Effectiveness and safety of different dressings therapy for pressure injuries: A protocol for systematic reviews and network meta-analysis

Effect evaluation of new dressing URGOTULRANGE in the treatment of pressure injury

BACKGROUND

Pressure injury (PI) is a local injury of the skin and/or soft tissue located at the bone caused by medical or other equipment and is common in long-term bedridden patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of Urgotul foam dressing in the treatment of stage 3 ∼ 4 PI and deep tissue PI.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients with stage 3 ∼ 4 PI and deep tissue PI admitted to Jinan Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (dressing change plus silver ion cream dressing) and an observation group (dressing change plus Urgotul Absorb non-border foam dressing), with 19 cases in each group. After 4 weeks of treatment, the pain intensity during dressing change and the treatment efficacy for PI wounds were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in gender (P= 0.740), age (P= 0.130), single wound area (P= 0.673), consultation department (P= 0.972), stage (P= 0.740), presence of undermining (P= 0.721), deep tissue PI (P= 0.721), and systemic antibiotic therapy (P= 1.000) between the two groups, which were comparable. The treatment effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P= 0.003), and the pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Urgotul Absorb non-border foam dressing has a good effect in the treatment of stage 3 ∼ 4 PI and deep tissue PI and can relieve patients' pain, and is thus worth promoting.

Moist dressings in the treatment of pressure injuries: A network meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this network meta-analysis is to analyze the difference in therapeutic effects between moist dressings and traditional dressings in the treatment of pressure injury (PI), explore the healing, healing time, direct cost, and number of dressing changes of different moist dressings for the management of pressure injuries.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pressure injury is high and the burden of disease is high, but there is no consensus on how to choose moist dressing treatment.

DESIGN

A systematic review with network meta-analysis was performed.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP database, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE.com, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and CINAHL to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of PI with moist dressings.

REVIEW METHODS

R studio software and Stata 16.0 software were used to compare different moist dressings and traditional dressings.

RESULTS

41 RCTs of moist dressings in the treatment of PI were included. A total of seven kinds of moist dressings, Vaseline gauze and traditional gauze dressing were involved. All RCTs were at a medium to high risk of bias. Overall, moist dressings had more advantages than traditional dressings in terms of various outcome indicators.

CONCLUSION

The effect of moist dressings in treating PI is more advantageous than traditional dressings. However, in terms of direct cost and the number of dressings changes, more research is needed to improve the credibility of the network meta-analysis. The results of the network meta-analysis show that the silver ion dressing and alginate dressing are the best choices in the treatment of PI.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study is a network meta-analysis, which does not require the participation of patients and the public.

Comparison of prognosis among patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases treated by surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation and HIFU: A protocol for network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a malignant tumor second only to lung and breast cancer in the West. The liver is the main target organ for colorectal cancer metastasis, affecting the prognosis and survival. Surgical treatment has made great progress in colorectal cancer liver metastasis , including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation.

OBJECT

Clinical treatments for colorectal cancer liver metastases are not the same. In order to clarify the impact of surgical resection, RFA and HIFU, we provided a decision-making basis for the clinical treatment of colon cancer liver metastasis through systematic reviews and network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We systematically searched the Chinese and English databases: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP, Wan Fang. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were carried out by two researchers, and finally, use Stata to carry out meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This study is ongoing and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202150044.