Symptomatic postoperative discal pseudocyst following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report and review of the literature

Contrast enhancing epidural fluid accumulation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report of recurrent disc herniation within pseudocyst secondary to irrigation fluid

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly being utilized to treat patients with lumbar disc herniation. PELD is unique in that it uses a single working port endoscope with constant irrigation of the surgical field to visualize pathology. The current report is of a case of postoperative epidural irrigation fluid accumulation presenting as peripherally enhancing epidural lesions, masking an underlying re-herniation.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A patient with a Lumbar 5-Sacral 1 level disc herniation presenting with radiculopathy was treated using PELD. Following the operation, the patient experienced recurrent pain, prompting a repeat MRI of the lumbar spine. Multiple ring-enhancing lesions within the epidural space were observed, creating diagnostic dilemmas. The differential diagnoses included epidural abscess, pseudomeningocele from unintended durotomy, epidural hematoma, or trapped epidural fluid collection presenting as a pseudocyst with or without recurrent disc herniation. A repeat endoscopic discectomy was performed to confirm the diagnosis of pseudocyst, revealing a recurrent disc herniation.

DISCUSSION

Pseudocysts are not an uncommon complication of PELD, typically believed to be due to an inflammatory response to disc fragments. However, in this case, the epidural fluid collection was likely the result of trapped irrigation fluid from continuous irrigation during the procedure, which masked an underlying re-herniation on imaging.

CONCLUSION

With the increasing utilization of PELD, it is important to acknowledge unique complications such as fluid accumulation from irrigation within the epidural space. Fluid accumulation can lead to contrast-enhancing pseudocyst formation, which can theoretically lead to mass effect or increased intracranial and intraspinal pressure and may mask additional underlying pathology.

Surgical treatment of recurrent postoperative discal pseudocyst: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative discal pseudocyst (PDP) is rare. Few studies have reported on the recurrence of PDPs, and there is a lack of understanding of their clinical features and treatment methods. This study discusses the clinical characteristics and treatment of recurrent PDPs.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 25-year-old man presented with radiating pain and numbness in the lateral left calf and dorsum of the foot.

DIAGNOSIS

Postoperative discal pseudocyst.

INTERVENTIONS

He underwent lumbar discectomy, which provided immediate postoperative relief. However, the symptoms recurred 45 days later. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a lesion compressing the dura and nerve roots at the site of the previous surgery. The lesion appeared hypointense on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging. The patient was treated conservatively for 1 month without significant relief. He then underwent lumbar discectomy and cyst removal, which immediately relieved his symptoms. However, 27 days later, the patient again developed the same symptoms. MRI examination showed recurrence of PDP. As 1 month of conservative treatment failed to relieve the patient's symptoms, we performed posterior instrumented lumbar fusion and cyst removal.

OUTCOMES

The patient's symptoms disappeared, and have not recurred for 1 year at the time of writing.

CONCLUSIONS

PDP is a rare complication of lumbar discectomy. Repeat lumbar discectomy can effectively treat PDP, but the cyst can recur. We, for the first time, used posterior instrumented lumbar fusion to successfully treat recurrent PDP.

Revision surgery for symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical characteristics and surgical strategies

BACKGROUND

A symptomatic postoperative pseudocyst (PP) is a cystic lesion that is formed in the operation area of the intervertebral disc, leading to worse symptoms. Some minority patients who developed PP experienced rapidly aggravating symptoms and could not be treated by any kind of conservative treatment. However, no clinical studies have evaluated the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of symptomatic PP requiring a revision surgery after full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of symptomatic PP requiring a revision surgery after FELD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received FELD revision surgeries due to symptomatic PP formation between January 2016 and December 2021. Common characteristics, time intervals of symptom recurrence and revision surgery, strategies for conservative treatment and revision surgery, operative time, imaging characteristics, numeric rating scale (NRS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and overall outcome rating based on modified MacNab criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (males = 10, females = 4), with a mean age of 24.4 years, were enrolled. The mean time intervals of symptom recurrence and revision surgery were 43.5 and 18.9 days respectively. While the patients were conservatively managed with analgesics and physical therapy, pain persisted or progressively worsened. In comparison to the initial herniated disc, the PP was larger in 11 cases, and up- or down-migrated in four cases. The PP location included the lateral recess (n = 12), foraminal (n = 1), and centrolateral (n = 1) zones. One of the two cases treated by percutaneous aspiration (PA) was eventually treated by FELD as pain was not relieved. Follow-ups revealed an improved mean NRS score from 7.1 to 1.4, mean ODI from 68.6 to 7.9% and promising overall surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The progressively severe pain experienced due to PP might be a result of its enlargement or migration to the lateral recess and foraminal zones. As complete removal of capsule is the goal, we recommend FELD instead of PA.