Y-configuration double-stent-retriever thrombectomy for refractory thrombus in middle cerebral artery bifurcation: A case report

Double Stent Retriever Technique for Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy using a double stent retriever technique has recently been described for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, but its efficacy and safety are not well-established.

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate reports of the use of a double stent retriever technique during the endovascular treatment of patients with ischemic stroke.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched to identify all studies (clinical trials, cohort series, and case reports) investigating the utility of a double stent retriever technique for the treatment of stroke. The study is reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023482691).

STUDY SELECTION

Seventeen studies involving a total of 128 patients with large-vessel occlusions predominantly in the anterior circulation (93.0%) were identified.

DATA ANALYSIS

Outcomes of interest were the prevalence of successful recanalization (modified TICI ≥2b) and a first-pass effect following the double stent retriever technique as well as complications such as iatrogenic dissections and SAH. Data were pooled using a random effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The double stent retriever technique was used as a rescue strategy in occlusions refractory to conventional endovascular treatment in 68.7% (88/128) of patients and as a first-line strategy in 31.3% (40/128) of patients. The double stent retriever technique achieved an overall final modified TICI ≥2b in 92.6% cases, with a first-pass effect of 76.6%. The complication rate remained low, with 0.37% dissection and 1.56% SAH.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of the study include the following: 1) a large number of case reports or small series, 2) a meta-analysis of proportions with no statistical comparison with a control group, and 3) the lack of access to patient-level data.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that double stent retriever thrombectomy may be safe and associated with good recanalization outcomes, but prospective comparative studies are needed to determine which patients may benefit from this endovascular procedure.

Dual-Stent retriever thrombectomy for extensive dural sinus thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

First line treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is systemic anticoagulation. In cases with symptoms of elevated ICP, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is pursued. We describe two cases in which dual stent-retrievers were used for EVT.

OBJECTIVES

The use of dual stent-retrievers has been described in arterial stroke when clot is present in the M1 artery and both M2 branches as a rescue therapy after 1 stent-retriever failed to remove the clot. We applied this same thinking to our EVT patients.

METHODS

A 17-year-old female with imaging demonstrating occlusion of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), dominant right transverse sinus (TS), right sigmoid sinus (SS), and upper right internal jugular vein (IJV). A 20-year-old female with a magnetic resonance venography (MRV) noting CVT in the dominant lateral left TS, SS, and upper left IJV.

RESULTS

Both were taken for EVT due to severity of symptoms. Two 6 × 40 mm stent-retrievers were deployed into the CVT and then remove with continuous aspiration with significant recanalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The average diameter of the dural sinuses is 8 mm compared to the average size of the middle cerebral artery 3-4 mm. The largest available SR in the United States is 6 mm, and the largest outer diameter of available aspiration catheters is 2-3 mm. Due to the larger size of the dural sinuses, using two SRs can result in more efficient recanalization and less radiation.

Double stent retriever technique for rescue recanalization in refractory large vessel occlusions

Acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) involving bifurcation usually have a difficult and high clot burden. By using conventional technique often resulting in a reduction in the possibility of successful recanalization. The double stent retriever technique can be considered for rescue recanalization. We reported a case of refractory terminal left internal carotid occlusion that was treated using double stent retriever technique. Two microcatheter were advanced across the occlusion were one to the superior branch of middle cerebral artery and another was on inferior branch. Both stent retrievers were pulled back together and complete recanalization was achieved. This technique were reported in some case series to be effective and based on our initial experience using this technique it seems the expansion improved after deployment of the second stent retriever and it traps the clot within its stent struts, to facilitate clot retrieval. Therefore, double stent retriever technique can be one of the choices for rescue recanalization in refractory clot occlusion and it may potentially help other clinicians in similar situations.

First Experience with the Nimbus Stentretriever

Purpose

To share our first experience with the Nimbus stentretriever, a multizone device designed to assist neurointerventionalists in handling fibrin-rich clots in endovascular stroke treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who were treated with the Nimbus stentretriever at our high-volume stroke center between May 2021 and May 2022. We evaluated the number of passes before Nimbus was used, the number of passes with nimbus, as well as the recanalization success before and after Nimbus according to the modified treatment in cerebral ischemia (mTICI) scale. Also, patient characteristics, procedural times and clinical outcomes were documented.

Results

A total of 21 consecutive patients were included in the study. An mTICI 2b/3 could be achieved in 76.2% and mTICI 2c/3 could be achieved in 57.1%. The mean number of passes was 3.4 before the use of Nimbus, 2.2 with Nimbus, and 5.4 for all passes with and without Nimbus and 4 occlusions (19.0%) were successfully recanalized with direct aspiration after the use of Nimbus. We observed seven subarachnoid hemorrhages (33.3%) and two cases of vasospasm.

Conclusion

In our series, the use of Nimbus resulted in successful recanalization in half of the patients after otherwise unsuccessful thrombectomy maneuvers; therefore, it should be considered as a rescue option if the maneuver with conventional stent retrievers was unsuccessful.