Effects of corticosteroids on new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy of preoperative single-dose dexamethasone in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative dexamethasone (DXM) in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

METHODS

Patients who underwent total MIE with two-field lymph node dissection from February 2018 to February 2023 were included in this study. Patients who were given either 5 mg or 10 mg DXM as preoperative prophylactic medication before induction of general anesthesia were assigned to the DXM group, while patients who did not receive DXM were assigned to the control group. Preoperative evaluations, intraoperative data, and occurrence of postoperative complications were analyzed. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs occurring by day 7 after surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 659 patients were included in the study; 453 patients received preoperative DXM, while 206 patients did not. Propensity score-matched analysis created a matched cohort of 366 patients, with 183 patients each in the DXM and control groups. A total of 24.6% of patients in the DXM group and 30.6% of patients in the control group had PPCs (P = 0.198). The incidence of respiratory failure was significantly lower in the DXM group than in the control group (1.1% vs 5.5%, P = 0.019). Fewer patients were re-intubated during their hospital stay in the DXM group than in the control group (1.1% vs 5.5%, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DXM before induction of anesthesia did not reduce overall PPC development after MIE. Nevertheless, the occurrence of early respiratory failure and the incidence of re-intubation during hospitalization were decreased.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2300071674; Date of registration, 22/05/2023).

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Literature and Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia to occur after cardiac surgery, with an incidence of 10% to 50%. It is associated with postoperative complications including increased risk of stroke, prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Despite new insights into the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, no specific etiologic factor has been identified as the sole perpetrator of the arrhythmia. Current evidence suggests that the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in general, as well as after cardiac surgery, is multifactorial. Studies have also shown that new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery is associated with a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that prophylactic medical therapy decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Of note, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation has not changed during the last decades despite the numerous preventive strategies and operative techniques proposed, although the perioperative and postoperative care of cardiac patients as such has improved.

The association between asthma and atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Respiratory disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequent coexist, but the risk of AF among asthma patients is less characterized. Growing evidence suggest that AF shares with asthma a systemic inflammation background and asthma treatments, such as beta agonists, have been associated with increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the risk of AF in patients with asthma in observational studies. We search for longitudinal studies reporting AF outcome in asthma and control patients through MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE. Pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. The risk of bias of individual studies was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO: CRD42020215707. Seven cohort/nested case-control studies with 1 405 508 individuals were included. The mean follow-up time was 9 years, ranging from 1 to 15 years. Asthma was associated with a higher risk of AF (OR 1.15. 95% CI 1.01-1.29). High heterogeneity (I2 = 81%) and overall "serious" risk of bias, lead to a very low confidence in in this result. Asthma was associated with an increased risk of AF. However, the high risk of bias and high heterogeneity reduces the robustness of these results, calling for further high-quality data.

Current Evidence on Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: Modifiable Risk Factors and the Effects of Risk Factor Intervention

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most encountered arrhythmias in clinical practice. It is also estimated that the absolute AF burden may increase by greater than 60% by 2050. It is inevitable that AF will become one of the largest epidemics in the world and may pose a major health problem for countries. Although AF rarely causes mortality in the acute period, it causes a significant increase in mortality and morbidity, including a fivefold increase in the risk of stroke, a twofold increase in dementia, and a twofold increase in myocardial infarction in the chronic period. Despite all the advances in the treatment of AF, it is better understood day by day that preventing AF may play a key role in reducing AF and its related complications. Modification of the main modifiable factors such as quitting smoking, abstaining from alcohol, changing eating habits, and exercise seems to be the first step in preventing AF. The strict adherence to the treatment process of secondary causes predisposing to AF such as DM, hypertension, obesity, and sleep apnea is another step in the prevention of AF. Both an individual approach and global public health campaigns can be highly beneficial to reduce the risk of AF. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current evidence on the relationship between modifiable risk factors and AF, and the impact of possible interventions on these factors in preventing or reducing the AF burden in the light of recently published guidelines and studies.

Incidence, Mortality, and Imaging Outcomes of Atrial Arrhythmias in COVID-19

Atrial arrhythmias (AAs) are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19; however, it remains uncertain if AAs are a poor prognostic factor in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2021, we report in-hospital mortality in patients with new-onset AA and history of AA. The incidence of new-onset congestive heart failure (CHF), hospital length of stay and readmission rate, intensive care unit admission, arterial and venous thromboembolism, and imaging outcomes were also analyzed. We further compared the clinical outcomes with a propensity-matched influenza cohort. Generalized linear regression was performed to identify the association of AA with mortality and other outcomes, relative to those without an AA diagnosis. Predictors of new-onset AA were also modeled. A total of 6,927 patients with COVID-19 were included (626 with new-onset AA, 779 with history of AA). We found that history of AA (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.38, confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.71, p = 0.003) and new-onset AA (aRR 2.02, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.43, p <0.001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The incidence of new-onset CHF was 6.3% in history of AA (odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.79, p <0.001) and 11.3% in new-onset AA (odds ratio 4.01, 95% CI 3.00 to 5.35, p <0.001). New-onset AA was shown to be associated with worse clinical outcomes within the propensity-matched COVID-19 and influenza cohorts. The risk of new-onset AA was higher in patients with COVID-19 than influenza (aRR 2.02, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.32, p <0.0001), but mortality associated with new-onset AA was higher in influenza (aRR 12.58, 95% CI 4.27 to 37.06, p <0.0001) than COVID-19 (aRR 1.86, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.22, p <0.0001). In a subset of the patients with COVID-19 for which echocardiographic data were captured, abnormalities were common, including valvular abnormalities (40.9%), right ventricular dilation (29.6%), and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (16.5%); although there was no evidence of a difference in incidence among the 3 groups. In conclusion, new-onset AAs are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Molecular Insights in Atrial Fibrillation Pathogenesis and Therapeutics: A Narrative Review

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is bound to increase globally in the following years, affecting the quality of life of millions of people, increasing mortality and morbidity, and beleaguering health care systems. Increasingly effective therapeutic options against AF are the constantly evolving electroanatomic substrate mapping systems of the left atrium (LA) and ablation catheter technologies. Yet, a prerequisite for better long-term success rates is the understanding of AF pathogenesis and maintenance. LA electrical and anatomical remodeling remains in the epicenter of current research for novel diagnostic and treatment modalities. On a molecular level, electrical remodeling lies on impaired calcium handling, enhanced inwardly rectifying potassium currents, and gap junction perturbations. In addition, a wide array of profibrotic stimuli activates fibroblast to an increased extracellular matrix turnover via various intermediaries. Concomitant dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system and the humoral function of increased epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) are established mediators in the pathophysiology of AF. Local atrial lymphomononuclear cells infiltrate and increased inflammasome activity accelerate and perpetuate arrhythmia substrate. Finally, impaired intracellular protein metabolism, excessive oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction deplete atrial cardiomyocyte ATP and promote arrhythmogenesis. These overlapping cellular and molecular alterations hinder us from distinguishing the cause from the effect in AF pathogenesis. Yet, a plethora of therapeutic modalities target these molecular perturbations and hold promise in combating the AF burden. Namely, atrial selective ion channel inhibitors, AF gene therapy, anti-fibrotic agents, AF drug repurposing, immunomodulators, and indirect cardiac neuromodulation are discussed here.