1
|
Yang LW, Bai XY, Jing GM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes: robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer patients with visceral obesity. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:238. [PMID: 38833096 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02002-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in treating gastric cancer among patients characterized by a high visceral fat area (VFA). In April 2024, we conducted a comprehensive literature review using major international databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We restricted our selection to articles written in English, excluding reviews, protocols without published data, conference abstracts, and irrelevant content. Our analysis focused on continuous data using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and standard mean differences (SMDs), while dichotomous data were assessed with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We set the threshold for statistical significance at P < 0.05. Data extraction included baseline characteristics, primary outcomes (such as operative time, major complications, lymph node yield, and anastomotic leakage), and secondary outcomes. The meta-analysis included three cohort studies totaling 970 patients. The robotic-assisted group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time compared to the laparoscopic group, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of - 55.76 min (95% CI - 74.03 to - 37.50; P < 0.00001). This group also showed a reduction in major complications, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.48 (95% CI 1.09-5.66; P = 0.03) and fewer occurrences of abdominal infections (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.41-7.14; P = 0.005), abdominal abscesses (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.53-9.57; P = 0.004), anastomotic leaks (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.73-9.65; P = 0.001), and pancreatic leaks (OR 8.93, 95% CI 2.33-34.13; P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups regarding length of hospital stay, overall complications, estimated blood loss, or lymph node yield. Based on our findings, robot-assisted gastric cancer surgery in obese patients with visceral fat appears to be correlated with fewer major complications compared to laparoscopic surgery, while maintaining similar outcomes in other surgical aspects. However, it is important to note that robot-assisted procedures do tend to have longer operative times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Wen Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xiang-Yu Bai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Guo-Min Jing
- Clinical Medicine Department of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kossenas K, Georgopoulos F. The Evolving Surgical Landscape: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer. Cureus 2023; 15:e49780. [PMID: 38161532 PMCID: PMC10757755 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Robotic gastrectomy has been gaining ground in the past 20 years. This study aims to (a) provide an updated and all-encompassing comprehensive review including post-operative outcomes, rate of complications, surgical efficiency and costs, pathology, overall survival, mortality and recurrence, and disease-free survival of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy, (b) report research gaps, and (c) identify ongoing or forthcoming clinical trials that could potentially shed light on underreported findings within the existing literature. Regarding the methodology, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between January 2012 and October 2023. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for related clinical trials currently underway or recruiting. Robotic gastrectomy, when compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy, for the treatment of gastric cancer, performs equally well or shows superiority in terms of the length of hospitalization, overall complications rates, rate of conversion to open surgery, surgical complications, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic complications, blood loss, mortality rates, time to first flatus, time to oral intake, distal and proximal resection margins, recurrence rate, reoperation rates, and overall survival. However, it is associated with higher costs and longer operative time. Parameters such as duodenal stump leakage, anastomosis stenosis, intestinal obstruction, ileus, delayed gastric emptying, wound complications, acute pancreatitis, pancreatic fistula, direct costs, time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and disease-free survival are currently underreported in the literature and necessitate for further research. Lastly, four clinical trials are currently underway or recruiting that could possibly bridge the research gap.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu X, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Feng Q. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1158804. [PMID: 37274257 PMCID: PMC10235683 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1158804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The number of overweight patients with gastric cancer (GC) is increasing, and no previous study has compared laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG) in obese patients with GC. To investigate the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of RG and LG in obese GC patients, we performed a meta-analysis of propensity matched scores and retrospective studies to compare the perioperative parameters, oncologic findings, and short-term postoperative outcomes between the two groups. Methods This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register to identify eligible propensity matched scores and retrospective studies conducted and published before December 2022. Data on perioperative and oncological outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. Results Overall, we identified 1 propensity score match study and 5 randomized control trials of RG and LG, enrolling a total of 718 patients (197 and 521 patients received RG and LG, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of complications, bleeding, or lymph node dissection. Of note, RG had a longer procedure time (P = 0.03), earlier oral intake (P = 0.0010), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.0002), and shorter time to defecation (P < 0.00001). Conclusions This meta-analysis concluded that patients in the RG group had shorter hospital stays, earlier postoperative feeding, and earlier postoperative ventilation; however, no differences were found in blood loss, number of lymph nodes removed, or overall complications. RG is an effective, safe, and promising treatment for obese patients with GC, compensating for the shortcomings of laparoscopy and allowing for less trauma and faster recovery. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022298967.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianzhe Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lingling Zhu
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qingbo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Affiliated Digestive Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Konishi S, Manaka D, Morioka M, Ikeda A, Kudo R, Saito Y, Ota T, Kanaya Y, Okamura Y, Takahashi R, Seo S. Laparoscopic-assisted robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer by Billroth II reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:179. [PMID: 37145178 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02895-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several reconstructions in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and there is no clear definition regarding the method selection. The optimal reconstruction is likely to vary according to the surgical setting, and the optimal reconstruction for robotic distal gastrectomy is urgently needed. In addition, as robotic gastrectomy is getting popular, cost and operative time are pressing issues of robotic gastrectomy. METHODS Gastrojejunostomy was planned with Billroth II reconstruction using a linear stapler arranged specifically for a robotic approach. After firing the stapler, the common insertion orifice of the stapler was closed using a 30 cm long non-absorbable barbed suture, and continuously, the afferent loop of the jejunum was lifted to the stomach with the same barbed suture. In addition, we introduced laparoscopic-assisted robotic gastrectomy, using extracorporeally inserted laparoscopic devices from the assistant port. Scissors, clips, and linear staplers were all laparoscopic tools inserted extracorporeally. RESULTS Twenty-one gastric cancer patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted robotic distal gastrectomy by Billroth II reconstruction with our modifications. There were no anastomosis-related complications such as leakage, stenosis, or bleeding. There were 2 cases of aspiration pneumonia (Clavien-Dindo grade 2), 1 case of pancreatic juice leakage (grade 3a), and 1 case of delayed gastric emptying (grade 1). CONCLUSION We successfully arranged Billroth II reconstruction for robotic distal gastrectomy with fewer operative and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic-assisted robotic gastrectomy using extracorporeally inserted devices, and continuous suturing using a barbed suture will reduce the time and cost of robotic gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayuri Konishi
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan.
| | - Dai Manaka
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Michina Morioka
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ikeda
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Ryo Kudo
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Saito
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Takano Ota
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Yuri Kanaya
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Yusuke Okamura
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Ryo Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, 17, Hirao-cho, Yamada, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sibio S, La Rovere F, Di Carlo S. Benefits of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:4227-4230. [PMID: 36157117 PMCID: PMC9403424 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We read with great interest the article that retrospectively analyzed 814 patients with primary gastric cancer, who underwent minimally invasive R0 gastrectomy between 2009 and 2014 by grouping them in laparoscopic vs robotic procedures. The results of the study highlighted that age, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, gastrectomy type and pathological T and N status were the main prognostic factors of minimally invasive gastrectomy and showed how the robotic approach may improve long-term outcomes of advanced gastric cancer. According to most of the current literature, robotic surgery is associated with a statistically longer operating time when compared to open and laparoscopic surgery; however, looking at the adequacy of resection, defined by negative surgical margins and number of lymph nodes removed, it seems that robotic surgery gives better results in terms of the 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The robotic approach to gastric cancer surgery aims to overcome the difficulties and technical limitations of laparoscopy in major surgery. The three-dimensional vision, articulation of the instruments and good ergonomics for the surgeon allow for accurate and precise movements which facilitate the complex steps of surgery such as lymph node dissection, esophagus-jejunal anastomosis packaging and reproducing the technical accuracy of open surgery. If the literature, as well as the analyzed study, offers us countless data regarding the short-term oncological results of robotic surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer, satisfactory data on long-term follow-up are lacking, so future studies are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Sibio
- Department of Surgery P. Valdoni, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Francesca La Rovere
- Department of Surgery P. Valdoni, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Sara Di Carlo
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome 00133, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zizzo M, Zanelli M, Sanguedolce F, Torricelli F, Morini A, Tumiati D, Mereu F, Zuliani AL, Palicelli A, Ascani S, Giunta A. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58060834. [PMID: 35744096 PMCID: PMC9231199 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment with curative intent for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Over the last three decades, surgeons have been increasingly adopting laparoscopic surgery for GC, due to its better short-term outcomes. In particular, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been routinely used for early gastric cancer (EGC) treatment. However, LG suffers from technical limitations and drawbacks, such as a two-dimensional surgical field of view, limited movement of laparoscopic tools, unavoidable physiological tremors and discomfort for operating surgeon. Therefore, robotic surgery has been developed to address such limitations. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines in order to investigate the benefits and harms of robotic gastrectomy (RG) compared to the LG. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL) and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) databases were used to search all related literature. Results: The 7 included meta-analyses covered an approximately 20 years-study period (2000-2020). Almost all studies included in the meta-analyses were retrospective ones and originated from Asian countries (China and Korea, in particular). Examined overall population ranged from 3176 to 17,712 patients. If compared to LG, RG showed both operative advantages (operative time, estimated blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes) and perioperative ones (time to first flatus, time to restart oral intake, length of hospitalization, overall complications, Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ III complications, pancreatic complications), in the absence of clear differences of oncological outcomes. However, costs of robotic approach appear significant. Conclusions: It is impossible to make strong recommendations, due to the statistical weakness of the included studies. Further randomized, possibly multicenter trials are strongly recommended, if we want to have our results confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Zizzo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0522-296372; Fax: +39-0522-295779
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Francesca Sanguedolce
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Federica Torricelli
- Laboratory of Translational Research, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Andrea Morini
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - David Tumiati
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - Federica Mereu
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - Antonia Lavinia Zuliani
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Stefano Ascani
- Hematology Unit, CREO, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy;
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giunta
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|