The predictive and prognostic effects of PD-L1 expression on TKI treatment and survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC: A meta-analysis

Impact of PD-L1 Expression on the Overall Survival of Caucasian Patients with Advanced EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Treated with Frontline Osimertinib

BACKGROUND

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an oncogenic epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) is currently based on osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). High Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% demonstrated to be a negative prognostic factor, mostly among Asian populations treated with 1st/2nd generation TKI.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the impact of PD-L1 expression on the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within a cohort of patients receiving osimertinib as first-line treatment.

METHODS

Our bi-centre French retrospective study included all newly diagnosed patients with an advanced EGFRm (common and uncommon) NSCLC, between May 2018 and November 2022, treated with osimertinib. The primary endpoint was OS according to tumor proportion score PD-L1 expression (low/intermediate < 50% vs high ≥ 50%). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox model for adjusted multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 96 patients, median age was 71 (IQR 62-76), 70 were women (72.9%), 81 had a performance status (PS) 0-1 (84.3%). Median follow-up was 22.6 months (95% CI 20.5-24.7). Twenty patients (20.8%) had high PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed based on PD-L1 status. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% had significant shorter PFS and OS than those with PD-L1 < 50%, respectively 9.3 vs 17.5 months (p = 0.044 months) and 14.3 vs 26.0 months (p = 0.025). Multivariable adjustment for baseline characteristics found that PS ≥ 2 (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.12-6.93, p = 0.027), PD-L1 ≥ 50% (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.22, p = 0.007) and uncommon EGFR mutation (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.95-10.80, p = <0.001) were associated with a shorter OS. Brain metastases at diagnosis and age ≥ 65 were not, respectively HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.90-3.06, p = 0.11) and HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.50-1.80, p=0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% was associated with a shorter OS in EGFRm NSCLC patients treated with first line osimertinib. Further research is warranted to understand the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms of this correlation.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

PDL1-status predicts primary resistance of metastatic, EGFR-mutated non small cell lung cancers to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the reference treatment for metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small-cell lung cancers (EGFRm NSCLCs). However, 16-20% of those tumors progress early (3-6 months) and factors predicting that resistance are unknown. This study was undertaken to examine PDL1 status as such a factor.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included metastatic, EGFRm-NSCLC patients who received first-line 1st-, 2nd- or 3rd-generation EGFR TKIs with PDL1 expression determined in pretreatment biopsies. Kaplan-Meier estimations of probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared with log-rank test, and logistic-regression analyses.

RESULTS

PDL1 status of the 145 included patients was ≥1% (47%), 1-49% (33%) or ≥50% (14%). For PDL1-positive vs PDL1-negative patients, respectively, median PFS lasted 8 (95% CI: 6-12) vs 12 (95% CI: 11-17) months (p = 0.008), with 18% vs. 8% (NS) of NSCLCs progressing at 3 months, and 47% vs. 18% (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.10-0.566], p<0.001) at 6 months. Multivariate analysis retained 1st- or 2nd-generation EGFR TKI, brain metastases and albuminemia <35 g/L at diagnosis as significantly associated with shorter PFS, but not PDL1 status, which was independently associated with progression at 6 months (HR 3.76 [1.23-12.63], p = 0.02). PDL1-negative and PDL1-positive patients' OS lasted 27 (95% CI 24-39) and 22 (95% CI 19-41) months, respectively (NS). Multivariate analysis retained only brain metastases or albuminemia <35 g/L at diagnosis as being independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

PDL1 expression ≥1% seems to be associated with early progression during the first 6 months of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment of metastatic EGFRm NSCLCs, without impacting OS.

Impact of RBM10 and PD-L1 expression on the prognosis of pathologic N1-N2 epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Impact of RNA-binding motif protein 10 (RBM10) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on the postoperative prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation (EGFR-Mt) lung adenocarcinoma with pathological lymph node metastasis is still unclear.

Methods

Patients who underwent curative surgery for pN1-N2 EGFR-Mt lung adenocarcinoma (n=129) harboring the EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation (Ex19) (n=66) or EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation (Ex21) (n=63) between January 2010 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The prognoses of patients with low/high cytoplasmic RBM10 expression and PD-L1 negativity/positivity based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) of resected specimens were compared using the log-rank test. The effects of RBM10 and PD-L1 expression on overall survival (OS) were examined via multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The effects of RBM10 and PD-L1 expression on progression-free survival (PFS) of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy among patients with recurrent pN1-N2 EGFR-Mt lung adenocarcinoma (n=67) were examined using log-rank tests.

Results

The RBM10 low expression group showed significantly better 5-year OS than the RBM10 high expression group (89.4% vs. 71.5%, P=0.020), and the PD-L1 negative group tended to have longer 5-year OS than the PD-L1 positive group (86.4% vs. 68.4%, P=0.050). Multivariable analysis showed that high RBM10 expression [hazard ratio (HR), 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-8.17; P=0.021] and PD-L1 positivity (HR, 3.80; 95% CI: 1.64-8.84; P=0.002) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS. PFS of patients with relapse and first-line EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly better in the PD-L1-negative group than in the PD-L1-positive group (34.5 vs. 12.1 months, P=0.045). PFS of patients with Ex21 relapse and first-line EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly better in the RBM10 low expression group than in the RBM10 high expression group (25.5 vs. 13.0 months, P=0.025).

Conclusions

High RBM10 expression and PD-L1 positivity are poor prognostic factors for OS in patients with pN1-N2 EGFR-Mt lung adenocarcinoma after curative surgery. In patients with recurrent pN1-N2 EGFR-Mt lung adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 and RBM10 expression may influence response to EGFR-TKIs.

The differential prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression in the outcomes of Filipinos with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

The tumor immune microenvironment influences tumor evolution in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, the prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC remains controversial. Additionally, prognostic studies in Filipinos with EGFR-mutant NSCLC remain unexplored to this day.

Methods

We prospectively studied the outcomes of EGFR-mutant NSCLC in Filipino cohort, and retrospectively verified the survival trend using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Kaplan-Meier method and generalized linear regression were used to assess survival. Expression and DNA methylation of cluster of differentiation 274 (CD274, gene that codes for PD-L1) were examined from TCGA tumor profiles. Pearson's correlation was used to correlate PD-L1 expression with outcomes associated with occurrence of EGFR mutations, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) types, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression. Proteome network analysis was used to examine the correlation between drug resistance and PD-L1.

Results

PD-L1 positivity was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; P=0.0096) but had a significantly contrasting influence in the overall survival (OS; P=0.0011). PD-L1 positivity (in both protein and RNA) was associated with longer median OS (mOS) in exon21 L858R, whereas, negativity was associated with longer mOS in exon19 deletion (exon19del). Stratification (high, low, negative) of PD-L1 expression lacked significant prognostic value (all P>0.05). PD-L1/CD274 expression (P<0.05) and DNA methylation (P<0.001) vary significantly among NSCLC subtypes and in different disease stages. Erlotinib treatment produced the longest median progression-free survival (mPFS; 874 days) relative to other EGFR-TKIs (137-311 days). PD-L1 lacked a significant correlation with EGFR-TKIs. Consistent with the immune-regulation activities of PD-1, higher expression leads to relatively shorter mOS. PD-1 correlated positively with PD-L1 expression and occurrence of exon21 L858R.

Conclusions

PD-L1 differentially influenced the outcomes of Filipinos with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. NSCLC subtypes, disease stage, and PD-1 expression may impact the collective outcomes associated with PD-L1 and EGFR-sensitizing mutations.

Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in treating patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the association between clinical characteristics and effectiveness. This retrospective study included 140 patients with NSCLC admitted to our hospital between July 2020 and July 2022. The patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the treatment that they received: a comparison group (67 patients) and a research group (73 patients). The comparison group received conventional chemotherapy, and the research group received conventional chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI-targeted therapy. The immune and tumor marker levels, clinical response, and relationship between clinical characteristics and response to therapy were compared between the 2 groups before and after treatment. After treatment, the levels of neuron-specific enolase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CD8+ count were significantly lower, and forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and CD4+ count were significantly higher in the research group than in the comparison group. After treatment, the clinical effectiveness in the 2 groups significantly improved, and the disease control rate in the research group was significantly higher than that in the comparison group (89% vs 69%, P = .014). The bivariate analysis revealed that smoking history, ECOG Performance Status score, and CEA level were significantly associated with clinical effectiveness. Conventional chemotherapy combined with EGFR-TKI-targeted therapy is effective in patients with NSCLC and has a clinically significant effect on improving patients' immune function and lung function.

Influence of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the influence of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is at variance.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the influence of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Clinical information was retrieved from electronic medical records. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to PD-L1 expression level: PD-L1 < 1% (negative), PD-L1 1%-49% and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The clinicopathological features, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and comutation information were collected and compared between the three subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were included. For PD-L1 < 1%, PD-L1 1%-49% and PD-L1 ≥ 50% group, there were 39 (33.3%), 51 (43.5%) and 27 (23.0%) patients respectively, and the ORR was 43.2%, 64.0%, and 51.9%, respectively (p = 0.162), and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 22.0 months (95% CI: 14.0-29.9 months), 15.4 months (95% CI: 8.9-21.8 months) and 13.0 months (95% CI: 10.6-15.3 months), respectively (log-rank, p = 0.01). The mPFS was negatively correlated with PD-L1 expression level (r = -0.264, p = 0.041) and PD-L1 expression was an independent risk factor for worse PFS of EGFR-TKIs in multivariate Cox regression. Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation had shorter PFS (p = 0.039) and the patients harboring both mutant TP53 and positive PD-L1 had the shortest PFS (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of EGFR-TKIs was influenced by the baseline PD-L1 expression. Higher PD-L1 expression was associated with shorter PFS. The combined indicators of TP53 and PD-L1 identified subgroups showing divergent benefits from EGFR-TKIs.

A retrospective study of the efficacy of combined EGFR‑TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy vs. EGFR‑TKI monotherapy for PD‑L1‑positive EGFR‑mutant non‑small cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group 2202

The present multicenter study was performed to compare the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy with that of combined EGFR-TKI plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC were collected from 12 institutes. Survival in patients treated with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib (third-generation EGFR-TKI), and combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy was analyzed by multiple regression analysis with adjustments for sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and the presence or absence of brain metastasis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Data from a total of 263 patients were analyzed, including 111 (42.2%) patients who had received monotherapy with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI, 132 (50.2%) patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy, and 20 (7.6%) patients who had received combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy (hereafter referred to as combined therapy). Multiple regression analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for progression-free survival was 0.73 (0.54-1.00) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.47 (0.25-0.90) in patients who had received combined therapy. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.98 (0.65-1.48) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.52 (0.21-1.31) in patients who had received combined therapy. In conclusion, combined therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of progression compared with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy, and therefore, may be promising for the treatment of patients of NSCLC.

Effect of CD274 (PD-L1) overexpression on survival outcomes in 10 specific cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The prognostic role of CD274 (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) overexpression has been examined in many studies. However, the results are controversial and conflicting. The present study aims to investigate the potential role of CD274 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical overexpression as a prognostic marker in malignant tumours.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to December 2021 to identify potentially eligible studies. The pooled HRs with 95% CIs were calculated to identify the association between CD274 (PD-L1) overexpression and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival in 10 lethal malignant tumours. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also analysed.

RESULTS

The study included 57 322 patients from 250 eligible studies (241 articles). The meta-analysis by tumour type using multivariate HR revealed worse OS in non-small cell lung cancer (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.68), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.74), pancreatic cancer (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.02), renal cell carcinoma (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.14) and colorectal cancer (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.88). Estimated HRs showed associations between CD274 (PD-L1) overexpression and worse prognosis across different types of tumours in various survival endpoints, but no inverse correlation was identified. The heterogeneity for most of the pooled results was high.

CONCLUSIONS

This large meta-analysis suggests that CD274 (PD-L1) overexpression is a potential biomarker for multiple types of cancers. However, further studies are needed to reduce high heterogeneity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022296801.

Study on Serum miR-204 Expression Levels in Patients with Severe Pneumonia and Patients with Primary Bronchial Lung Cancer and Its Diagnostic Value

Objective. To analyze the expression and clinical significance of miR-204 in the serum of patients with severe pneumonia (SP) and primary bronchial lung cancer (LC). Methods. 65 SP patients and 43 primary bronchial LC patients who were treated in the hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were randomly selected as the SP group and LC group. At the same time, healthy patients from the physical examination department of the hospital were selected. 65 cases were the control group. QRT-PCR detected serum miR-204 expression and compared the differences between groups. The pathological data of patients were collected, and the relationship between serum miR-204 and the patient’s pathological data was compared; the area under the ROC curve and Kaplan–Meier curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum miR-204 for the two conditions and to explore the relationship between serum miR-204 and prognosis. Results. The serum miR-204 of the SP group was (0.43 ± 0.09), the serum miR-204 of the LC group was (0.40 ± 0.10), the serum miR-204 of the control group was (1.00 ± 0.09), and the miR-204 level of was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( $P$  < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum miR-204 levels between the SP group and the LC group ( $P$  > 0.05). Serum miR-204 levels in SP patients with cumulative organs ≥3 were higher than those with cumulative organs <3, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P$  < 0.001). In the LC group, in patients with stage III to IV and low and undifferentiated patients, the level of miR-204 was higher than that of stage I∼II and high and moderately differentiated patients, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P$  < 0.001). The level of miR-204 in the two groups of patients (0.89 ± 0.10, 0.83 ± 0.13) who died of illness was significantly higher than that of the surviving patients (1.00 ± 0.11, 1.00 ± 0.10), and the difference was statistically significant ( $P$  < 0.05); the survival rate of patients with high expression of miR-204 was higher than that of patients with low expression. The AUC of serum miR-204 level to SP and LC was 0.766 and 0.818, respectively. Conclusion. The level of miR-204 in the serum of SP patients and patients with primary bronchial LC was significantly lower than that of healthy people, and patients who died were lower than those who survived; the miR-204 in serum has a good diagnostic value for SP and LC and is related to the survival and prognosis of patients.