Management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Samter triad by low-dose ASA desensitization or dupilumab

Current Goals of NSAID-ERD Management: Patient-Centered Approaches Involving NSAID Desensitization With and Without Biologics

The classic approach of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD) includes pharmaceutical and surgical treatments, as well as avoidance of cyclooxygenase 1-inhibitor NSAIDs. The introduction of biologics in the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps represents an alternative therapeutic approach to the classical aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) in some regions, and with convincing results. However, their use is limited due to approval and/or high-cost restrictions. NSAID-ERD is a mainly type 2 and highly eosinophilic disease, and mAbs targeting IgE or IL-5, IL-4, and IL-13 have been shown to be effective for both severe asthma and severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. So far, dupilumab demonstrated greater efficacy in patients with NSAID-ERD than in aspirin-tolerant patients with regard to several clinical outcomes. Patients with NSAID-ERD respond very rapidly to omalizumab also, with reduction in the release of prostaglandin D2 and cysteinyl leukotrienes. Patients favored biologic treatment over ATAD in multiple retrospective analyses, which must be acknowledged when choosing one or the other option. Although this review will summarize ATAD in general, it will more prominently focus on when ATAD should be considered, even when type 2 biologics are available. In addition, there are conflicting studies as to whether patients on a type 2 biologic become desensitized to NSAIDs, because omalizumab proved to restore tolerance to aspirin in only two-third of patients. This goal of NSAID tolerance should be considered as part of disease control future approaches, representing one of many aspects in a patient-centered care approach.

[Does aspirin therapy after desensitization still have a role in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis in the era of biologics?]

The prevalence of analgesic intolerance syndrome (AIS), internationally known as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), is reported to be 0.5-5.7% in the general population. The disease often begins with nasal symptoms, which are later joined by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory hypersensitivity reactions following use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the setting of chronic respiratory disease, the type 2 inflammatory endotype is predominant in approximately 80% of patients with CRSwNP, rendering biologics directed against interleukin (IL)-4, IL‑5, IL-13, and IgE of high clinical interest, particularly in patients with severe CRSwNP and NERD. NERD is often associated with CRSwNP and asthma. Patients with CRSwNP and NERD have been treated, among other therapies, with aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD). With the approval of monoclonal antibodies for CRSwNP and asthma, the question arises as to what extent ATAD, which is associated with undesirable side effects, is still useful in the treatment of CRSwNP. In this manuscript, the use of ATAD in CRSwNP patients is discussed from different medical and socioeconomic points of view, both alternatively to or in combination with monoclonal antibodies. Accordingly, both ATAD and biologics continue to play a supporting role in modern treatment of CRSwNP in NERD patients, and should be used judiciously to complement each other.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis : A retrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches in 463 patients]

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease, the treatment of which has undergone significant changes in recent years. In addition to surgical approaches, topical and systemic steroids, and adaptive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization, three specific antibodies have complemented the therapeutic portfolio since 2019.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of all patients who presented as outpatients for the first time due to CRSwNP in 2007 and 2008 (collective A) and 2017 and 2018 (collective B) was performed, up to and including June 2023.

RESULTS

The clinical courses of 463 patients (mean age 49.1 years, range 5-82 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. Conservative treatment with nasal corticosteroids started before initial presentation was more frequent in collective B (collective A 43.9% vs. collective B 72.2%). In 278 of the 463 patients (60%; A: 62%, B: 58%), at least one operation on the nasal sinuses had been performed after initial presentation; in 101 of these patients (36.3%) recurrent polyposis (within mean follow-up of 2.4 years) required further treatment. The indication for ASA provocation/desensitization was applied less frequently in collective B, also due to a high discontinuation rate (at least 38%) of the maintenance therapy. Of the total cohort, 16 patients (3.5%; A: n = 8, B: n = 8) were meanwhile switched to antibody therapy at recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A step-by-step guideline-orientated approach is recommended in the treatment of CRSwNP. Systemic antibodies as an add-on to nasal corticosteroids are a relatively new therapeutic option for treatment-refractory CRSwNP, which reduces the indication for ASA desensitization, which is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects and poor compliance.

[Importance of aspirin challenges in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease]

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is often characterized by a severe course of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), comorbid asthma, and NSAID hypersensitivity. The gold standard for N-ERD diagnosis is challenge with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). In expert recommendations, the diagnosis of N-ERD is established based on a plausible positive history of NSAID hypersensitivity and CRSwNP with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The following review describes the performance of ASA challenges and their sensitivity and specificity. It also examines the extent to which a positive history of NSAID hypersensitivity correlates with ASA challenge results in clinical trials and when ASA challenges should be performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

ASA challenges have high sensitivity and specificity. In clinical ASA challenge studies, there is a high concordance between a positive history of NSAID hypersensitivity obtained by rhinologists and the measured data of ASA challenge in patients with CRSwNP and comorbid asthma. Therefore, ASA challenge is primarily indicated in patients with an unclear history of NSAID hypersensitivity.

[Biologic therapy in patients with severe NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and previous aspirin desensitization : Results of a multicentric study]

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a type‑2 inflammatory disease of the upper airways, with severe impairment of quality of life. Persons affected by NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) usually present with highly dynamic recurrence of polyps and disease despite prior treatment with sinus surgeries, oral corticosteroids, and aspirin desensitization (ATAD). Biologic therapy has fundamentally changed the choice of therapeutic concept; however, limited data exist on subgroups such as NERD patients. The aim of the current article is to report on a multicenter retrospective study on add-on therapy with dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab in patients with NERD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients (NERD+, status after ATAD) in three reference centers in Germany (Munich, Mainz, Berlin). Subjective and objective parameters were collected at 4, 8, and 12 months after biologic therapy initiation in accordance with current EPOS/EUFOREA (European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps/European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases) guidelines. Biologic agents were chosen depending on availability and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Treatment was commenced in 122 patients meeting the criteria for CRSwNP and NERD. The endoscopic polyp score, SNOT-22 questionnaire score, visual analogue scoring of total symptoms/severity of disease, and sense of smell (psychophysical testing with Sniffin'Sticks/Brief Smell Identification Test, B‑SIT; Sensonics, Inc., Haddon Heights, NJ, USA) improved significantly after 4 and 12 months of add-on therapy (p < 0.0001). All three biologic agents significantly improved one or more disease parameter. Adverse events were not life threatening but led to change of biologic agent in 4 cases. Patients rated biologic therapy significantly better than ATAD, with improved long-term disease control.

CONCLUSION

Add-on biologic therapy is effective, safe, and widely accepted among CRSwNP + NERD patients. Future studies might allow for personalized algorithms with sequential surgery, ATAD, and/or biologic therapy.

Biologics Reduce Symptoms of Alcohol Intolerance Better than Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with N-ERD and Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and NSAID hypersensitivity. An overproduction of leukotrienes characterizes the pathomechanism of the disease. N-ERD patients often report breathing difficulties after consuming alcohol. These symptoms have been observed in patients receiving either aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD), therapy with the biologics dupilumab (anti-IL-4Ra antibody) and omalizumab (anti-IgE antibody), or intranasal corticosteroid treatment (INCS).

METHODS

This retrospective, real-world study assessed the severity of alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related respiratory symptoms in CRSwNP/N-ERD patients 3-6 months after ATAD, biologic (dupilumab or omalizumab), or INCS therapy. A total of 171 patients (98 women and 73 men) were enrolled in the study. All groups received standard INCS therapy. Sixty-three patients were treated with ATAD; 48 received biologics (dupilumab n = 31; omalizumab n = 17); and 60 received INCS only and served as a control group. Alcohol-dependent symptoms and typical CRS symptoms (alcohol-independent) were quantified using visual analog scales (VAS).

RESULTS

ATAD and biological therapy significantly reduced VAS scores for alcohol dependence and CRS symptoms. In the control group receiving INCS, only non-alcohol dependent CRS symptoms improved significantly (p < 0.05). The most significant differences in pre/post scores were observed in patients receiving dupilumab, with the most significant improvement in alcohol-dependent and CRS symptoms (dupilumab > omalizumab > ATAD).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study shows that alcohol-related respiratory symptoms are a relevant parameter in CRSwNP/N-ERD patients. Patients benefit more from biologic therapy than from ATAD in terms of their alcohol-related symptoms and other CRS symptoms. Future studies should include placebo-controlled oral alcohol challenge.

The effect of biologics in lung function and quality of life of patients with united airways disease: A systematic review

Background

Increasing evidence supports the united airway disease concept for the management of upper and lower respiratory tract diseases, particularly in patients with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, evidence for a combined approach in asthma and CRSwNP is scarce.

Objective

In this systematic review, we focused on the role of biologics in the lung function and quality of life in patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of 3 electronic databases using 2 search strategies to identify studies published from January 2010 to March 2022. Quality assessment was performed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.

Results

Of 1030 studies identified, 48 original studies reporting data of benralizumab (12), dupilumab (14), mepolizumab (10), omalizumab (13), and reslizumab (2) were analyzed. Primary diagnosis was mostly asthma or CRSwNP, with only 15 studies, mainly observational, performed in populations with united airway disease. In total, 18 studies reported data on quality of life (mostly 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score), 8 on lung function (mostly FEV1), and 22 on both outcomes. Significant FEV1 and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score improvements were consistently observed after 24-week treatment, and thereafter, mostly in real-world studies that included variable proportions of patients with asthma/CRSwNP.

Conclusions

The use of biologics in patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP was overall associated with significant improvements in lung function and quality of life. However, we observed a high heterogeneity of populations and outcome measurements across studies. Notwithstanding the need of larger studies, our results reinforce the joint management of asthma and CRSwNP as united airway disease in clinical practice.

Practical recommendations for managing severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the era of biologics

Objective

We conducted a national survey to understand how rhinology practice has changed with the advent of biologics and how this affected patients with uncontrolled, severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). We aimed to analyse the results of the survey and infer practical recommendations for clinical practice.

Methods

A group of ear, nose, and throat specialists (ENTs) experienced in the management of CRSwNP developed a 74-question survey. ENTs from rhinology centres authorised to prescribe biologics in the context of the national health system were invited to answer it between 01/05/2022 and 31/07/2022. The responses underwent descriptive analyses, and the authors discussed the results and derived practical recommendations for clinical practice.

Results

ENTs working in rhinology centres changed their practices coinciding with the advent of biologics. CRSwNP evaluations have become more complex because they involve diagnostic confirmation, determining the patients' immunologic profile, and other factors. We observed heterogenous behaviours in practice that may be conditioned by the novelty of the topic. The results of the survey were used to develop practical recommendations for ENTs and are summarised herein.

Conclusions

Clinical practice in rhinology outpatient clinics has changed profoundly in the era of biologics. Our practical recommendations for clinicians working in rhinology centres are expected to help standardise practice and improve care.

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Tolerance After Biological Therapy in Patients With NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: A Randomized Comparative Trial

BACKGROUND

There are no prospective studies comparing how biological therapies affect nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) tolerance in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease.

OBJECTIVE

To study the induction of NSAID tolerance after biological therapy in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease.

METHODS

A prospective pilot study in a real-world clinic setting was conducted among subjects with severe asthma and type 2 inflammation. A random allocation of therapy was carried out: benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, or omalizumab. NSAID intolerance was confirmed by an oral challenge test (OCT) using acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA-OCT). The principal outcome was NSAID tolerance according to OCT before and after 6 months of each biological therapy (intragroup comparisons). As exploratory outcomes, we compared NSAID tolerance between biological therapies (intergroup comparisons).

RESULTS

A total of 38 subjects were included; 9 received benralizumab, 10 dupilumab, 9 mepolizumab, and 10 omalizumab. There was an increase in the concentration needed to produce a reaction during ASA-OCT with omalizumab (P < .001) and dupilumab (P = .004) but not with mepolizumab and benralizumab. Omalizumab and dupilumab achieved the highest frequency of NSAID tolerance (omalizumab 60%, dupilumab 40%, mepolizumab 22%, and benralizumab 22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Biological therapies for asthma are useful for inducing NSAID tolerance; however, in patients with type 2 inflammation and high levels of total IgE, atopy, and eosinophils, anti-IgE or anti-IL4/13 seem to be more effective than antieosinophilic therapies. Omalizumab and dupilumab increased ASA tolerance, whereas mepolizumab and benralizumab did not. Future trials will be able to clarify this finding.

Dupilumab increases aspirin tolerance in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) comprises the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma and intolerance to NSAIDs. Dupilumab treatment, targeting the interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptor α, significantly reduces polyp burden as well as asthma symptoms. Here we aimed to investigate the effect of dupilumab on aspirin intolerance, burden of disease and nasal cytokine profiles in patients with N-ERD.

METHODS

In this open-label trial, adult patients with confirmed N-ERD were treated with dupilumab for 6 months. Clinical parameters (e.g. total polyp scores, quality of life questionnaires, smell test, spirometry), oral aspirin provocation testing and blood, nasal and urine sampling were monitored at regular intervals for up to 6 months after starting dupilumab therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients included in the study, 30 completed both aspirin provocation tests. After 6 months of treatment with dupilumab, 23% of patients (n=7 of 30) developed complete aspirin tolerance and an additional 33% of patients (n=10 of 30) tolerated higher doses. Polyp burden was significantly reduced (total polyp score: -2.68±1.84, p<0.001), while pulmonary symptoms (asthma control test: +2.34±3.67, p<0.001) and olfactory performance improved (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: +11.16±9.54, p<0.001) in all patients after therapy. Patients with increased aspirin tolerance showed a significant decrease in urinary leukotriene E4 levels and their improvement in clinical parameters was associated with a reduction of eotaxin-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 17, IL-5, IL-17A and IL-6.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 57% of N-ERD patients tolerated higher doses of aspirin under dupilumab therapy.

Vaskulitis mimics

Idiopathische Vaskulitiden sind seltene entzündliche Systemerkrankungen, die nach der Chapel-Hill Konsensus-Nomenklatur nach der Größe der prädominant betroffenen Gebiete von Blutgefäßen (große, mittelgroße, kleine Gefäße und Gefäße variabler Größe) eingeteilt werden. Vaskulitis mimics sind Syndrome, die ein ähnliches klinisches Bild hervorrufen oder leicht mit einer idiopathischen Vaskulitis verwechselt werden und teils sogar ein Krankheitsbild, das klinisch und histologisch einer Vaskulitis gleicht, auslösen können. Die Zahl der Vaskulitis mimics ist groß, je nach betroffenem Gefäßgebiet kommen hereditäre Erkrankungen des Bindegewebes, genetisch bedingte Immundefekt- und Autoinflammationssyndrome, infektiöse Erkrankungen, seltene entzündliche Systemerkrankungen, Tumorerkrankungen, medikamenteninduzierte Syndrome und zahlreiche weitere infrage. In diesem Review wird eine Auswahl klassischer Imitatoren von Vaskulitiden, orientiert an der Größe der betroffenen Blutgefäße präsentiert und Konstellationen, die typische „Fallstricke“ in der klinischen Abklärung darstellen können, diskutiert.

Subgroups in the treatment of nasal polyposis with dupilumab: A retrospective study

Dupilumab has been shown to be safe and effective in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis (CRSwNP). There is to this date no published data whether subgroups like patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), increased histologic eosinophilia or elevated blood eosinophil or IgE-levels benefit greater from dupilumab therapy. Moreover, there is no data comparing the efficacy of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with dupilumab therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients that were treated at a tertiary referral center for CRswNP with dupilumab. We also contacted the patients with a questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy of previous surgeries and dupilumab therapy by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the glasgow benefit inventory (GBI) as well as report on side effects. Overall, 75 patients were included in the study at hand that reported back 138 times. While dupilumab treatment was efficient, we found no systematic evidence of greater efficacy of dupilumab in patients with AERD, histologic eosinophilia or increased blood eosinophil or IgE-levels. All patients showed a considerable decrease in subjective burden of disease, objective smell tests and endoscopic findings. From the patients point of view, dupilumab therapy showed greater efficacy both in the VAS and the GBI overall and all subcategories but "social support." Dupilumab is efficient in treating CRSwNP; this effect is independent from disease characteristics like AERD, histologic eosinophilia, serum IgE-levels or eosinophil counts. There seems to be a group of patients that benefit greater from dupilumab therapy compared to FESS.