Simple prognostic markers for optimal treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

Pretherapeutic factors predicting conversion surgery in unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study

Recently, conversion surgery (CS) has been reported to improve the prognosis in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-PDAC) with a favorable response to intense chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, few pretherapeutic parameters predict the attainability of CS in patients with UR-PDAC. The present study aimed to explore the pretherapeutic predictors for the attainability of CS in patients with UR-PDAC. The present study retrospectively evaluated 130 patients with UR-PDAC treated at Gifu University Hospital (Gifu, Japan) from January 2015 to December 2021. Survival analysis was performed using the Simon and Makuch-modified Kaplan-Meier method. The hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a time-varying Cox regression model. The association between each predictor and CS was evaluated using the univariate analysis and age-adjusted Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model. The bootstrap bias-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting CS was used to assess the cut-off values for each predictor. The cumulative incidence rate was calculated with CS as the outcome when divided into two groups based on the cut-off value of each pretherapeutic predictor. Among the 130 patients included in the analysis, only 14 (11%) underwent CS. The median survival time was significantly longer in patients who underwent CS compared with patients without CS (56.3 vs. 14.1 months; P<0.001). The age-adjusted Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard regression showed that the total protein (TP) [HR 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-6.65; P=0.018], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90; P=0.020), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.53; P=0.006) were significantly associated with CS. Moreover, TP ≥6.8, NLR <2.84 and LMR ≥3.87 were associated with a higher cumulative incidence of CS. In conclusion, pretherapeutic TP, NLR and LMR are clinically feasible biomarkers for predicting the attainability of CS in patients with UR-PDAC.

Phase I/IIa Trial in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated with Cytotoxic Drug-Packaged, EGFR-Targeted Nanocells and Glycolipid-Packaged Nanocells

PURPOSE

We assessed the safety and efficacy of an EGFR-targeted, super-cytotoxic drug, PNU-159682-packaged nanocells with α-galactosyl ceramide-packaged nanocells (E-EDV-D682/GC) in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who had exhausted all treatment options.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ENG9 was a first-in-man, single-arm, open-label, phase I/IIa, dose-escalation clinical trial. Eligible patients had advanced PDAC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0 to 1, and failed all treatments. Primary endpoints were safety and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 25 enrolled patients, seven were withdrawn due to rapidly progressive disease and one patient withdrew consent. All 25 patients were assessed for toxicity, 24 patients were assessed for OS, which was also assessed for 17 patients completing one treatment cycle [evaluable subset (ES)]. Nineteen patients (76.0%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (graded 1 to 2) resolving within hours. There were no safety concerns, dose reductions, patient withdrawal, or treatment-related deaths.

Median OS (mOS) was 4.4 months; however, mOS of the 17 ES patients was 6.9 months [208 days; range, 83-591 days; 95.0% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-10.3 months] and mOS of seven patients who did not complete one cycle was 1.8 months (54 days; range, 21-72; 95.0% CI, 1.2-2.2 months). Of the ES, 47.1% achieved stable disease and one partial response. Ten subjects in the ES survived over 6 months, the longest 19.7 months. During treatments, 82.0% of the ES maintained stable weight.

CONCLUSIONS

E-EDV-D682/GC provided significant OS, minimal side effects, and weight stabilization in patients with advanced PDAC. Advanced PDAC can be safely treated with super-cytotoxic drugs via EnGeneIC Dream Vectors to overcome multidrug resistance.

Clinical and biological markers predictive of treatment response associated with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) offers limited benefits, but survival outcomes vary. Reliable predictive response biomarkers to guide patient management are lacking.

METHODS

Patient performance status, tumour burden (determined by the presence or absence of liver metastases), plasma protein biomarkers (CA19-9, albumin, C-reactive protein and neutrophils) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) were assessed in 146 patients with metastatic PDAC prior to starting either concomitant or sequential nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine chemotherapy in the SIEGE randomised prospective clinical trial, as well as during the first 8 weeks of treatment. Correlations were made with objective response, death within 1 year and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Initial poor patient performance status, presence of liver metastases and detectable mutKRAS ctDNA all correlated with worse OS after adjusting for the different biomarkers of interest. Objective response at 8 weeks also correlated with OS (P = 0.026). Plasma biomarkers measured during treatment and prior to the first response assessment identified ≥10% decrease in albumin at 4 weeks predicted for worse OS (HR 4.75, 95% CI 1.43-16.94, P = 0.012), while any association of longitudinal evaluation of mutKRAS ctDNA with OS was unclear (β = 0.024, P = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

Readily measurable patient variables can aid the prediction of outcomes from combination chemotherapy used to treat metastatic PDAC. The role of mutKRAS ctDNA as a tool to guide treatment warrants further exploration.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN71070888; ClinialTrials.gov (NCT03529175).

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluating response to pulsed-wave high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) parameters in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer could be used to assess response to treatment with pulsed-wave high intensity focused ultrasound (PW-HIFU).

METHODS

We prospectively recorded the pretreatment and posttreatment CEUS related parameters, CA19-9, pain scores of 30 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with PW-HIFU treatment. Correlation of clinical parameters, tumor characteristics, and PW-HIFU treatment energy with CEUS parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pain score decreased after treatment (from 4.80±2.14 to 3.28±1.93, p = 0.001). CA19-9 dropped in RT decreased group, 4 weeks after one session PW-HIFU, compared with prolonged group (p = 0.013). According to the display of blood vessels in the mass by CEUS, tumors were classified by vessel grade (VG), VG1: no vessel can be seen; VG 2: vessels diameter < 5 mm; VG 3: vessels diameter > 5 mm. VGs were different between increased and decreased relative rise intensity (rRI) groups (p = 0.008). VG1 group shown a decreased rRI after treatment, while VG3 group showed the opposite trend (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS can evaluating response to PW-HIFU in advanced pancreatic cancer. Quantitative analysis may help to assess the short-term efficacy of patients and help for individualized treatment.

Alternative Splicing Events in Immune Infiltration of Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND The exact mechanisms of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) etiology and pathogenesis remain unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this study, we evaluated alternative splicing (AS) events in LUAD. We separately analyzed LUAD data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and AS-related feature lists from SpliceSeq to develop risk models for AS events and further validated risk models for AS events. The association between immune-related features and the risk model of AS events was evaluated. RESULTS We found that exon skip (ES) and mutually exclusive exons (ME) exhibited the most and least AS events, respectively. The risk score and stage of LUAD patients were strongly associated with prognosis and were independent influences on the prognosis of LUAD. The pathological stage (stage, T, N) and risk model were incorporated to construct a column line graph with better predictive ability. Risk models were associated with tumor microenvironment, and higher risk score values were associated with higher M2 macrophage content and lower M0 macrophage and helper T lymphocyte content. The correlation between core genes and immunity was further assessed by analyzing differentially-expressed genes between risk models. These results suggest an association between the level of risk for AS events and the density of immune cell infiltration. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest a clear association between AS risk model and patient prognosis, and was performed to confirm the biological relationship between AS and immunity.