1
|
Zhu JW, Gong LZ, Wang QW. Serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4, carbohydrate antigen 24-2, ferritin) and gastric cancer prognosis correlation. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:2808-2814. [PMID: 39351575 PMCID: PMC11438793 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is a kind of malignant tumor which is prevalent all over the world. Although some progress has been made in the treatment of gastric cancer, its prognosis is still not optimistic, so it is of great significance to find reliable prognostic indicators to guide the treatment and management of patients with gastric cancer. AIM To explore the relationship between serum levels of five biomarkers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CA72-4, CA24-2, and ferritin] and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS This study included 200 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, and conducted an in-depth analysis of their baseline characteristics, relationship between tumor markers and staging, and prognosis. The study found that CA19-9 has a significant correlation with tumor stage, the average levels of CA24-2, CEA, CA72-4 and ferritin were slightly increased disregarding the stage of tumor. Survival analysis showed that increases in CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2, and ferritin were all associated with shortened overall survival of patients. Further multivariate analysis revealed that elevated serum CA72-4 levels were an independent adverse prognostic factor. RESULTS This study reveals that there is a significant correlation between the expression levels of serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, CA24-2 and ferritin in patients with gastric cancer and prognosis, and can be used as important indicators for prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer. In particular, markers that appear abnormally elevated initially may help identify gastric cancer patients with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION Serum CEA and CA19-9 play an important role in the prognosis assessment of gastric cancer, and are effective tools to guide clinical practice and optimize individualized treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Wen Zhu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Huangshi Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University), Hubei Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Huangshi Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Key Laboratory, Huangshi 435000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Ling-Zhen Gong
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Huangshi Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University), Hubei Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Huangshi Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Key Laboratory, Huangshi 435000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Qian-Wen Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Huangshi Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University), Hubei Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Intervention, Huangshi Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Key Laboratory, Huangshi 435000, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma X, Zhou X, Guo J, Feng X, Zhao M, Zhang P, Zhang C, Gong S, Wu N, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Ren Z, Zhang P. CA19‑9 is a significant prognostic factor in stage III gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. BMC Surg 2024; 24:31. [PMID: 38263014 PMCID: PMC10804529 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02324-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the great heterogeneity of gastric cancer (GC), the prognosis of patients within a stage is very different. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the high risk factors for postoperative recurrence and metastasis and take appropriate therapeutic strategies to improve the prognosis of patients. In this study, we aimed to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9) and carbohydrate antigen 72 - 4 (CA72-4) in patients with stage I, II and III GC who underwent radical gastrectomy. METHODS A total of 580 patients who underwent curative surgical resection and had not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. The relationship between clinicopathological features and recurrence was analysed. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier curve. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors in GC patients. RESULTS Among patients with stage III GC, the recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with CA19-9>35 U/mL were significantly lower than those with CA19-9 ≤ 35 U/mL; CA19-9 was always a significant independent marker. CEA and CA72-4 were sometime useful to predict RFS or OS alternatively in the pre- or postoperative period. The only other independent significant factors for prognosis in our study were lymph node metastases for RFS and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for OS. CONCLUSION Preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 values are independent risk factors for predicting prognosis in stage III GC after curative gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Xiaohua Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Gaochun People's Hospital, #53 Maoshan Road, Gaochun Economic Development Zone, JiangSu, Nanjing, 211300, China
| | - Jiaxuan Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Xinyu Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Mengmeng Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Chong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Shuai Gong
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Nai Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Xiuzhong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China
| | - Zeqiang Ren
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China.
| | - Pengbo Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, #99 Huaihai Xi Road, JiangSu, Xuzhou, 221002, China.
| |
Collapse
|