1
|
Caballero S, Domingo J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in gynecological cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:420-425. [PMID: 37551948 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gynecological cancer is a very important cause of comorbidity and mortality in women. The current delay in motherhood is increasing the incidence of women under 40 years of age that have not yet achieved their maternity goals when they are diagnosed and standard treatment negatively impacts the reproductive potential of cancer survivors. In this review, we update the information available about the safety of fertility-sparing treatments in young gynecological cancer patients, as well as the safety and efficacy of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in such group. We also evaluate the long-term gynecological cancer risk in women requiring ART. RECENT FINDINGS Although eligibility criteria continue to be very strict, there are more and more reports of fertility-sparing approaches outside of what traditionally has been considered safe. Molecular assessment is starting to be used in the selection of appropriate candidates. Data increasingly shows the long term safety and the efficacy of ART and pregnancy in these patients. SUMMARY Appropriate selection is key to safely preconize fertility-sparing alternatives. Because subfertility may be a result of these procedures, ART could be indicated in this setting. Neither ART nor pregnancy appear to increase recurrences or affect survival rates.
Collapse
|
2
|
Varlas VN, Borș RG, Crețoiu R, Bălescu I, Bacalbașa N, Cîrstoiu M. Fertility-sparing surgery: a hopeful strategy for young women with cancer. J Med Life 2023; 16:974-980. [PMID: 37900072 PMCID: PMC10600681 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation in cancer patients is currently based on either assisted reproductive technology or fertility-sparing surgery. Loss of fertility may be caused by excisional surgery associated with an adnexal or uterine pathology or secondary to gonadal insufficiency caused by chemotherapy or radiation. The counseling of these patients is very important, being carried out jointly by the oncologist, gynecologist, and reproductive medicine specialist. Reproductive surgery usually requires avoiding laparotomy to significantly reduce the formation of adhesions and trauma or tissue damage. This is done using standard laparoscopic surgery or robotic surgery (computer-assisted laparoscopy), a method increasingly used and accessible to all specialists who want to maintain the fertility of their patients with various oncological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Nicolae Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Faculty of Dentistry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Roxana Georgiana Borș
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Rebeca Crețoiu
- Department of Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Disorders, C.I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Bălescu
- Department of Surgery, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Bacalbașa
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Monica Cîrstoiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Terzic M, Makhadiyeva D, Bila J, Andjic M, Dotlic J, Aimagambetova G, Sarria-Santamera A, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, Vukovic I, Kocijancic Belovic D, Aksam S, Bapayeva G, Terzic S. Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072614. [PMID: 37048696 PMCID: PMC10095321 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women of reproductive age. The established fertility-sparing approaches for the management of early-stage cervical cancer for women who plan pregnancy are associated with a decline in fecundity and an increased risk of pregnancy complications. This article aims to offer an overview of fertility-sparing approaches and the management of potential subfertility and pregnancy complications after these treatments. An extensive search for the available data about infertility and cervical cancer, fertility-sparing techniques in patients with cervical cancer, fertility treatment, obstetrical complications, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cancer patients was completed. Fertility-preserving procedures such as loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), cold-knife conization, and trachelectomy in women diagnosed with cervical cancer can be considered as safe and effective treatments that preserve reproductive potential. Current fertility-preserving procedures, based on the balance of the oncological characteristics of patients as well as their desire for reproduction, allow one to obtain acceptable reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women treated for cervical cancer. Nevertheless, careful monitoring of pregnancies obtained after fertility-preserving procedures is recommended, since this cohort of patients should be considered at higher risk compared with a healthy population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Terzic
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund “University Medical Center”, Turan Ave. 32, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Dinara Makhadiyeva
- School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Jovan Bila
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mladen Andjic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jelena Dotlic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Correspondence:
| | - Antonio Sarria-Santamera
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Ivana Vukovic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dusica Kocijancic Belovic
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Slavica Aksam
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Dr Koste Todorovica 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Gauri Bapayeva
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund “University Medical Center”, Turan Ave. 32, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Sanja Terzic
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Zhanybek-Kerey Khans Street, 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Communications Is Time for Care: An Italian Monocentric Survey on Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Risk Information as Part of Cervical Cancer Screening. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091387. [PMID: 36143172 PMCID: PMC9505682 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection could be considered a social disease, both for its high incidence, especially in younger subjects, and for the risk of neoplastic evolution linked to viral infection. Therefore, the National Health System, in collaboration with the state, must help women to understand the oncological risk of HPV and suitable methods of prevention. We conducted an Italian monocentric survey on HPV risk information as part of cervical cancer screening. An anonymous questionnaire was administered to 200 women with high-risk positive HPV and low-grade cervical lesions during second-level cervical cancer screening at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit of the “San Paolo” Hospital. From this survey, the need to improve communication for patients has emerged, as currently it is not exhaustive. In response to this need, organizational changes have been implemented to centralize the moment of counseling in the second levels of screening and to improve the training of health workers in level I as well as family doctors. In addition, psychological support was also proposed to patients who requested it, as was the dissemination of material such as that produced by GISCI (Italian Cervico-Carcinoma Screening Group) and updated in May 2018, which provides 100 answers to questions on HPV in order to achieve effective and comprehensive communication. This investigation requires further development, and the expansion of this investigation to the multicenter level is already underway. Therefore, this survey will represent a cornerstone for further discussion on the topic considering the necessity of appropriate communication in the oncological context.
Collapse
|