Finite element analysis of femoral neck system in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture

Two-year outcomes of internal fixation with femoral neck system in patients with femoral neck fracture in an Asian population

Background

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most common fractures, with a projected increase in incidence with population growth and ageing. The Femoral Neck System (FNS) launched in 2019 was developed specifically for fixation of FNF with the purported advantages of providing both angular and rotational stability. We report our experience with the FNS and evaluate its effectiveness and associated complications.

Methods

A retrospective case series of 50 patients who underwent surgical fixation for FNF from August 2020 to October 2021 using the FNS in two Singapore tertiary institutions with at least 2 years follow-up were included. Clinical data (patients' demographics, fracture classification, intra-operative and post-operative complications) were reviewed. Radiological analysis assessed the pre- and immediate post-operative garden alignment index (GAI) and presence of femoral neck shortening at 3 months.

Results

The mean age was 63.5 years (SD 16.9, range 26-92). Five (10 %), 34 (68 %) and 11 (22 %) were ASA 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Twenty-four (48 %), 16 (32 %), 4 (8 %), and 6 (12 %) patients sustained Garden's 1, 2, 3 and 4 FNF respectively. The mean operative duration was 66.2 min (SD 20.5) and length of stay was 6.9 days (SD 4.6).The post-operative improvement in garden alignment index (GAI) was a mean of 9.1° (p < 0.001) on lateral view. The mean femoral neck shortening was 1.97 mm (SD 5.3) at 3 months. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operatively, 1 (2 %) patient required blood transfusion, 1 (2 %) patient had implant cut-out and non-union managed non-operatively, 2 (4 %) patients developed avascular necrosis and required revision to total hip replacements. There were two (4 %) cases of 1-year mortality.

Conclusion

The FNS achieved good outcomes with low rates of complications. The promising results justify its continued use and further evaluation in comparison to other devices.

The synthes femoral neck system (FNS): a technical tip and case series

The femoral neck system (FNS) was recently introduced for treatment of femoral neck fractures. A novel feature is an anti-rotation screw with a diverging design from the neck bolt to provide rotational stability. Using the 4 Nm torque limiting screwdriver might cause the incomplete insertion of the screw specifically in dense or sclerotic bone. A nontorque limiting manual screwdriver should be used to complete the insertion and locking of the screw to prevent this error. We present series of seven cases with incomplete insertion of the anti-rotation screw in patient with femoral neck fractures treated with the FNS.

Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture

OBJECTIVE

The current investigation sought to utilize finite element analysis to replicate the biomechanical effects of different fixation methods, with the objective of establishing a theoretical framework for the optimal choice of modalities in managing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

The Pauwels type III fracture configuration, characterized by angles of 70°, was simulated in conjunction with six distinct internal fixation methods, including cannulated compression screw (CCS), dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS with de-rotational screw (DS), CCS with medial buttress plate (MBP), proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), and femoral neck system (FNS). These models were developed and refined using Geomagic and SolidWorks software. Subsequently, finite element analysis was conducted utilizing Ansys software, incorporating axial loading, torsional loading, yield loading and cyclic loading.

RESULTS

Under axial loading conditions, the peak stress values for internal fixation and the femur were found to be highest for CCS (454.4; 215.4 MPa) and CCS + MBP (797.2; 284.2 MPa), respectively. The corresponding maximum and minimum displacements for internal fixation were recorded as 6.65 mm for CCS and 6.44 mm for CCS + MBP. When subjected to torsional loading, the peak stress values for internal fixation were highest for CCS + MBP (153.6 MPa) and DHS + DS (72.8 MPa), while for the femur, the maximum and minimum peak stress values were observed for CCS + MBP (119.3 MPa) and FNS (17.6 MPa), respectively. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum displacements for internal fixation were measured as 0.249 mm for CCS + MBP and 0.205 mm for PFNA. Additionally, all six internal fixation models showed excellent performance in terms of yield load and fatigue life.

CONCLUSION

CCS + MBP had the best initial mechanical stability in treatment for Pauwels type III fracture. However, the MBP was found to be more susceptible to shear stress, potentially increasing the risk of plate breakage. Furthermore, the DHS + DS exhibited superior biomechanical stability compared to CCS, DHS, and PFNA, thereby offering a more conducive environment for fracture healing. Additionally, it appeared that FNS represented a promising treatment strategy, warranting further validation in future studies.

Comparison of femoral neck shortening after femoral neck system and cannulated cancellous screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of femoral neck shortening between the femoral neck system (FNS) and the cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 225 patients aged 18-65 years with displaced femoral neck fracture were divided into two groups according to internal fixation: 135 patients in the FNS group and 90 patients in the CCS group. The length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, quality of reduction, extent of femoral neck shortening, incidence of femoral neck shortening, femoral neck shortening at each follow-up visit, Harris hip score (HHS), reoperation, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 28.2 (26.0, 31.2) months in the FNS group and 30.2 (26.3, 34.7) months in the CCS group. The follow-up time, age, sex distribution, body mass index (BMI), mechanism of injury, injured side, length of hospital stay, time from injury to surgery, and fracture classification were similar between the groups. Duration of surgery was longer in the FNS group (65.0 (55.0, 87.0) min versus 55.0 (50.0, 65.0) min, P<0.001); intraoperative blood loss was greater in the FNS group (50.0 (20.0, 60.0) ml versus 20.0 (10.0, 35.0) ml, P<0.001). Femoral neck shortening was 2.4 (1.0, 4.5) mm in the FNS group versus 0.6 (0.0, 2.6) mm in the CCS group at 1 month postoperatively (P<0.001); 3.7 (1.8, 6.4) mm in the FNS group versus 1.2 (0.6, 3.8) mm in the CCS group at 3 months (P<0.001); 4.1(2.4, 7.7) mm in the FNS group versus 2.3 (1.1, 4.4) mm in the CCS group at 6 months (P<0.001); 4.2 (2.6, 7.7) mm in the FNS group versus 2.6 (1.3, 4.6) mm in the CCS group at 12 months (P<0.001); and 4.5 (2.8, 8.0) mm in the FNS group versus 2.8 (1.5, 4.8) mm in the CCS group at 18 months (P<0.001). The two groups showed no significant differences in HHS, reoperation, and reduction quality.

CONCLUSION

Compared to CCS, FNS is deficient in preventing femoral neck shortening. Future research should focus on improving FNS in terms of preventing femoral neck shortening.

Bio-mechanical effects of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

As a novel internal fixation for femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has some advantages for young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures without clear biomechanical effects and mechanisms. Thus, the objection of the study is to realize the biomechanical effects and mechanism of FNS cannulated screws on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures compared to cannulated screws which are commonly used for femoral neck fractures by finite element analysis.

METHODS

Firstly, the model of young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, femoral neck system (FNS), and three cannulated screws (CS) arranged in an inverted triangle were established, and the internal fixations were set up to fix young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Under 2100 N load, the finite element was performed, and the deformation, peak von Mises stress (VMS), and contact at fracture segments were recorded to analyze the biomechanical effects and mechanism of FNS and three-CS fixing young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

RESULTS

Compared to three-CS, the deformation of the whole model, internal fixation, and fracture segments after FNS fixation were lower, and the peak VMS of the whole model and the internal fixation after FNS were higher with lower peak VMS of the distal femur and the fracture segments. With a sticking contact status, the contact pressure at fracture segments after FNS fixation was lower than that of three-CS.

CONCLUSIONS

FNS can provide better mechanical effects for young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, which may be the mechanical mechanism of the clinical effects of FNS on femoral neck fracture. Although there is high stress on FNS, it is still an effective and safe internal fixation for young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Proximal femoral bionic nail-a novel internal fixation system for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis

Introduction: Currently, cannulated screws (CSs) and dynamic hip screws (DHSs) are widely used for the treatment of femoral neck fractures, but the postoperative complications associated with these internal fixations remain high. In response to this challenge, our team proposes a new approach involving triangular-supported fixation and the development of the proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN). The primary objective of this study is to investigate the biomechanical differences among CSs, DHSs, and the PFBN in their capacity to stabilize femoral neck fractures. Methods: A normal proximal femur model was constructed according to the CT data of a normal healthy adult. A femoral neck fracture model was constructed and fixed with CSs, DHSs, and the PFBN to simulate the fracture fixation model. Abaqus 6.14 software was used to compare the biomechanical characters of the three fracture fixation models. Results: The maximum stresses and displacements of the normal proximal femur were 45.35 MPa and 2.83 mm, respectively. Under axial loading, the PFBN was more effective than DHSs and CSs in improving the stress concentration of the internal fixation and reducing the peak values of von Mises stress, maximum principal stress, and minimum principal stress. The PFBN fixation model exhibits superior overall and fracture section stability in comparison to both the DHS fixation model and the CS fixation model under axial loading. Notably, the maximum stress and peak displacement of the PFBN and bone were lower than those of the DHS and CS fixation models under bending and torsional loading. Conclusion: The PFBN shows considerable improvement in reducing stress concentration, propagating stress, and enhancing the overall stability in the femoral neck fracture fixation model compared to DHSs and CSs. These enhancements more closely correspond to the tissue structure and biomechanical characteristics of the proximal femur, demonstrating that the PFBN has great potential for therapeutic purposes in treating femoral neck fractures.

Clinical observation of Gofried positive buttress reduction in the treatment of young femoral neck fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures in young adults(<65 years), have always been a difficult problem, characterized by high rates of nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN). The clinical efficacy of anatomical reduction and non-anatomical reduction methods needs to be supported by clinical data. Therefore, we conduct a meta-analysis on the clinical efficacy of different reduction methods to better guide clinical practice.

METHODS

Relevant studies published using internal fixation to treat femoral neck fracture in several databases were searched. The outcomes sought included Harris score and the rate of AVN, nonunion and femoral neck shortening (<5 mm). Included studies were assessed for methodological bias and estimates of effect were calculated. Potential reasons for heterogeneity were explored.

RESULTS

The clinical results showed that compared with the anatomical reduction and positive buttress, there is no significant difference in the rate of AVN (OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.55-1.37, P = .55), nonunion (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.21-1.41, P = .21), femoral neck shortening (<5 mm) (OR = 1.03,95%CI: 0.57-1.86, P = .92), the Harris score (MD = -0.28, 95%CI: -1.36-0.80, P = .61) and the excellent and good rate of Harris score (OR = 1.73, 95%CI: 0.84-3.56, P = .61). However, compared with negative buttress, the rate of AVN (OR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.38-1.01, P = .05), nonunion (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12-1.00, P = .05) and femoral neck shortening (<5 mm) (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.16-0.45, P < .00001) were significantly lower, and the Harris score (MD = 6.53, 95%CI: 2.55 ~ 10.51, P = .001) was significantly better in positive buttress.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of difficult to achieve anatomical reduction, for young patients (< 65 years) with femoral neck fracture, reduction with positive buttress can be an excellent alternative and negative buttress should be avoided as much as possible.

Superior short-term outcomes of FNS in combination with a cannulated screw in treating femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the femoral neck system alone or in combination with a cannulated screw compared with other internal fixation methods for treating femoral neck fractures. We further investigated the predictive effects of tip-apex distance (TAD) on clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Data from 129 young adults with femoral neck fractures followed up at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2016 and June 2022 were retrospectively collected. The patients were categorized into four groups based on the different internal fixation methods. Analysis and comparisons of the four group were performed according to age, ASA score, operation time, blood loss, fracture classification, fracture healing time, Harris score, TAD value, presence of complications (osteonecrosis of the femoral head, screw failure, and femoral neck shortening), and changes in the neck-shaft angle.

RESULTS

All 129 patients were followed up for at least one year. The group who received treatment with the femoral neck system combined with a cannulated screw exhibited the shortest fracture healing time. Differences were observed in the change of neck-shaft angle among the four groups (P < 0.001), with the smallest change observed in the aforementioned group (0.76 ± 0.54°). The femoral neck shortening was also lower in groups with the femoral neck system or combined with a cannulated screw. At the last follow-up surgery, the combined treatment group achieved the highest HHS score. Subgroup analysis revealed that when the TAD was less than 25 and 49 mm for the femoral neck system and combined groups, respectively, there was less femoral neck shortening, less change in the neck-shaft angle, and a higher HHS score.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral neck system alone or combined with a cannulated screw demonstrated better short-term efficacy in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Furthermore, TAD may serve as a predictive indicator of the potential success of femoral neck fracture treatment.

Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review

Objective

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative safety and efficacy of cannulated compression screw (CCS) and femoral neck system (FNS) in treating patients with femoral neck fractures and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for FNS in treating femoral neck fractures.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to collect outcomes related to femoral neck fractures treated with FNS and CCS, including time to fracture healing, incidence of non-union, incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, incidence of failure of internal fixation, rate of femoral neck shortening, Harris hip score, Barthel index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and complications. A meta-analysis was performed using RevManv5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata v14.0 software.

Results

This analysis included 21 studies involving 1,347 patients. The results showed that FNS was superior to CCS in terms of fracture healing time [mean difference (MD) = -0.75, 95% CI = (-1.04, -0.46), P < 0.05], incidence of bone non-union [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head [OR = 0.49, 95% CI = (0.28, 0.86), P = 0.01], incidence of internal fixation failure [OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.52), P < 0.05], rate of femoral neck shortening [OR = 0.38, 95% CI = (0.27, 0.54), P > 0.05], Harris hip score [MD = 3.31, 95% CI = (1.99, 4.63), P < 0.001], Barthel index [MD =  4.31, 95% CI = (3.02, 5.61), P < 0.05], intraoperative bleeding [MD = 14.72, 95% CI = (8.52, 20.92), P < 0.05], fluoroscopy frequency [OR = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], and complications [OR = 0.31, 95% CI = (0.22, 0.45), P < 0.05]. The difference between FNS and CCS in operative time was not statistically significant [MD = -2.41, 95% CI = (-6.88, 2.05), P = 0.29].

Conclusion

FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture can shorten the fracture healing time; reduce the incidence and translucent rate of bone non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and internal fixation failure; reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications; and improve hip joint function and activity. We are confident in the findings that FNS, an effective and safe procedure for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, is superior to CCS.

Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck system and cannulated screws coupled with medial plate for treating Pauwels III femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

The femoral neck system (FNS) has been considered as a novel strategy for femoral neck fracture. The diversity of internal fixation creates difficulties in choosing an effective option for Pauwels III type femoral neck fractures. Therefore, it is significant to investigate the biomechanical effects of FNS versus conventional approaches on bones.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of FNS versus cannulated screws coupled with medial plate (CSS+MP) for the treatment of Pauwels III type femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

Through three-dimensional computer software (Minics, Geomagic - Warp), the proximal femur model was rebuilt. Based on the present clinical characteristics, models of internal fixation were reconstructed in SolidWorks, including cannulated screws (CSS), medial plate (MP) and FNS. After parameter setting and meshing, boundary conditions and loads were set up for the final mechanical calculation in Ansys Software. Under identical experimental conditions, such as the same Pauwels angle and force loading, the peak values of displacement, shear stress and equivalent (von Mises) stress were recorded.

RESULTS

This study showed that the displacement of the models was CSS, CSS+MP, and FNS in descending order of magnitude. The shear stress and equivalent stress of the models was CSS+MP, FNS, and CSS in descending order. The principal shear stress of CSS+MP was concentrated on the medial plate. The equivalent stress of FNS was more dispersed and distributed from the proximal main nail to the distal locking screw.

CONCLUSION

CSS+MP and FNS exhibited better initial stability compared to CSS. However, the MP was subjected to more shear stress, which could increase the risk of internal fixation failure. Due to its unique design, FNS may be a good choice for the treatment of Pauwels III type femoral neck fractures.

Survivability of the Femoral Neck System for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are common injuries in the elderly, with an incidence that continues to rise. The femoral neck system (FNS) recently emerged as a novel treatment option for femoral neck fractures, but long-term survivability of the implant remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate survivability of the FNS and assess risk factors for implant failure.

METHODS

One hundred five adult patients who received the FNS (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA) for femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA 31B) were included. Surgeries were performed within a regional hospital system comprising 18 facilities. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The primary outcome measures were cumulative incidence of implant failure and 1-year mortality, including risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve implants failed at a follow-up ranging from 17 days to 8 months, and 7 failed within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of implant failure was 2% at 30 days, 7% at 90 days, 12% at 6 months, and 13% at 1 year. Causes of implant failure included cut-out (n = 5), non-union (n = 4), peri-implant fracture (n = 2), and avascular necrosis (n = 1). Univariate Cox regression identified Pauwels type III fractures and an increasing AP Parker ratio as significant risk factors for failure. Pauwels type III fractures showed a 5.48 times higher risk compared to Pauwels types I & II. Every 10% increase in AP Parker ratio increased risk of failure by 2.39 times. The 1-year mortality rate was 21%, and univariate logistic regression identified age as the only risk factor (odds ratio = 3.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of implant failure and 1-year mortality rate in this study suggests that the FNS can provide reliable fixation compared to rates in the literature, but complications are not uncommon. Avoiding Pauwels type III fractures and optimizing implant placement appear crucial to preventing implant failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.