The investigation of levels of endothelial cell-specific molecule, progranuline, clusterin, and human epididymis protein 4 in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions

Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid human epididymis protein 4 for leptomeningeal metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

The diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) remains a clinical challenge. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) functions as a novel tumor biomarker for cancers. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HE4, and combined with CEACAM6, for LUAD LM.

Methods

The CSF HE4 protein level was measured in two independent cohorts by electrochemiluminescence. Test cohort included 58 LUAD LM patients, 22 LUAD patients without LM (Wiot-LM), and 68 normal controls. Validation cohort enrolled 50 LUAD LM patients and 40 normal controls, in parallel with Wiot-LM patients without brain metastases (19 Wiot-LM/BrM patients) or with BrM (26 BrM patients). The CSF level of CEA, CA125, CA153, CA199, CA724, NSE and ProGRP of these samples was measured by electrochemiluminescence, whereas the CSF CEACAM6 level was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, the serum level of these biomarkers was detected by same method as CSF.

Results

The level of HE4 or CEACAM6 in CSF samples from LUAD LM patients was significantly higher than those from normal controls and Wiot-LM patients. The HE4 or CEACAM6 level in CSF was higher than that in serum of LM patient. The CSF HE4 or CEACAM6 level for distinguished LM from Wiot-LM showed good performance by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. The better discriminative power for LM was achieved when HE4 was combined with CEACAM6. In addition, the CSF HE4 and CEACAM6 level showed little or no difference between Wiot-LM/BrM and BrM patients, the BrM would not significantly influence the HE4 or CEACAM6 level in CSF. The diagnostic power of CSF CA125, CA153, CA199, CA724, NSE and ProGRP for LUAD LM were not ideal.

Conclusion

The combination with HE4 and CEACAM6 has the promising application for the diagnosis of LUAD LM.

Value of human epididymis secretory protein 4 in differentiating malignant from benign pleural effusion: an analysis of two cohorts

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) is a useful diagnostic marker for lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid HE4 for MPE.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind diagnostic test accuracy study.

METHODS

Patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion were enrolled in two cohorts (Hohhot and Changshu). Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was used to detect pleural fluid HE4. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the net benefit of HE4 was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 66 MPEs and 86 benign pleural effusions (BPEs) were enrolled in the Hohhot cohort. In the Changshu cohort, 26 MPEs and 32 BPEs were enrolled. In both cohorts, MPEs had significantly higher pleural fluid HE4 than BPEs. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of HE4 was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.81) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67-0.91) in the Changshu cohort. At a threshold of 1300 pmol/L, HE4 had sensitivities of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33-0.56) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73) in the Changshu cohort. The corresponding specificities were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95) in the Hohhot cohort and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00) in the Changshu cohort. In subgroup analyses, HE4 had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.78 (0.71-0.85) in exudates and an AUC of 0.69 (0.57-0.81) in patients with negative effusion cytology. The DCA revealed that HE4 determination had a net benefit in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Pleural fluid HE4 has moderate diagnostic accuracy for MPE and has net benefit in pleural effusion patients with unknown etiology.