Multicenter randomized control study of the efficacy of SO clip in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). (SO clip study in colorectal ESD): Randomized controlled trial

Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in Treatment of Gastrointestinal Lesions-Single Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal (GI) tract lesions, originating from Japan, is becoming more frequently used in European countries. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ensure minimally invasive removal of benign, premalignant, and early neoplastic tumors of esophagus, stomach, and intestine in selected group of patients. Aim of this study was to determine the outcomes, radical resection rate (R0), and complication rate of ESD procedures performed in our department. Methods: The data from 100 ESD procedures of esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and colorectal lesions performed in out unit between 02.01.2020 and 30.06.2023 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results: A total of 42 male and 58 female patients in the median age of 64 years (range, 31-89 years) underwent ESD. Mean duration of the procedure was 66 minutes (ranging 25-185 minutes). Tumors were located in the esophagus in 8 cases (8%), stomach in 25 cases (25%), duodenum in 1 case (1%), and colon in 66 cases (66%). Radical resection was achieved in 98 cases (98%); 2 patients were qualified for surgical treatment. Average size of dissection lesions was 26 × 19 mm. The biggest one was 60 × 60 mm (sigmoid adenoma), and the smallest one was 5 × 5 mm (gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumors). Complication occurred in 10 patients (10%)-9 perforations of the wall of intestine (9%) and 1 hemorrhage, which required endoscopic intervention (1%). Conclusions: Implementation of ESD to clinical practice gives the opportunity for minimally invasive, radical treatment of benign, premalignant, and early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract in selected group of patients. Experienced endoscopists, following current guidelines and standardized process of qualification, are crucial to minimize the risk of severe complications.

How to implement adverse events as a quality indicator in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Quality improvement through the registration of endoscopy-related adverse events (AEs) has been recognized by major international endoscopy societies as an important quality indicator. The theory behind this is easier to approve than its implementation in daily practice. The results of many valuable attempts have been published in the literature, mainly highlighting the diverse hurdles trying to capture events related to endoscopy and the sedation used for endoscopic procedures. The current review discusses the difficulties encountered attempting to register AEs and incidents related to endoscopic procedures. Government-driven and financed health-care databases with automated coupling of specific data seem the only efficient way to implement endoscopy-related AEs and outcomes on a prospective and complete basis. This will not only allow continuous confidential feedback to endoscopists in relation to the pooled national benchmark data, but also follow-up in time through data-driven credentialing aiming to progressively optimize these benchmark data.

[Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by metal-clip pocket creation traction for colorectal tumors]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) assisted by metal-clip pocketcreation traction for treatment of colorectal tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 244 patients with colorectal tumors undergoing colorectal ESD treatment between January, 2019 and December, 2022, including 169 patients receiving ESD without metal-clip pocket-creation traction (N-ESD group) and 75 with traction-assisted ESD (M-ESD group). Propensity score matching was used to screen the patients using general clinical data as the covariates for matching. Operative time, surgical resection outcome indicators, incidence of adverse events, and histopathological diagnosis indicators were compared between the two groups of patients after matching.

RESULTS

The median operative time was significantly shorter in M-ESD group than in N-ESD group (20.0 [15.0, 30.0] vs 30 [20.0, 45.0] min, P=0.008). No significant difference was found in the en bloc resection rate (100% vs 98.6%), complete resection rate (97.3% vs 96%) and radical resection rate (97.3% vs 96%) between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse events was low in both groups and showed no significant difference between them (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with colorectal tumors, the use of metal-clip pocket-creation traction can shorten the operative time of ESD although it does not significantly reduce the surgical resection rate or incidence of adverse events.