1
|
Mosaddad SA, Talebi S, Keyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Darvishi M, Aghili SS, Tavahodi N, Namanloo RA, Heboyan A, Fathi A. Dental implant considerations in patients with systemic diseases: An updated comprehensive review. J Oral Rehabil 2024; 51:1250-1302. [PMID: 38570927 DOI: 10.1111/joor.13683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various medical conditions and the drugs used to treat them have been shown to impede or complicate dental implant surgery. It is crucial to carefully monitor the medical status and potential post-operative complications of patients with systemic diseases, particularly elderly patients, to minimize the risk of health complications that may arise. AIM The purpose of this study was to review the existing evidence on the viability of dental implants in patients with systemic diseases and to provide practical recommendations to achieve the best possible results in the corresponding patient population. METHODS The information for our study was compiled using data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases and searched separately for each systemic disease included in our work until October 2023. An additional manual search was also performed to increase the search sensitivity. Only English-language publications were included and assessed according to titles, abstracts and full texts. RESULTS In total, 6784 studies were found. After checking for duplicates and full-text availability, screening for the inclusion criteria and manually searching reference lists, 570 articles remained to be considered in this study. CONCLUSION In treating patients with systemic conditions, the cost-benefit analysis should consider the patient's quality of life and expected lifespan. The success of dental implants depends heavily on ensuring appropriate maintenance therapy, ideal oral hygiene standards, no smoking and avoiding other risk factors. Indications and contraindications for dental implants in cases of systemic diseases are yet to be more understood; broader and hardcore research needs to be done for a guideline foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Ali Mosaddad
- Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
- Department of Conservative Dentistry and Bucofacial Prosthesis, Faculty of Odontology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Maxillofacial Surgery & Implantology & Biomaterial Research Foundation, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sahar Talebi
- Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Seied Omid Keyhan
- Maxillofacial Surgery & Implantology & Biomaterial Research Foundation, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Iface Academy, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hamid Reza Fallahi
- Maxillofacial Surgery & Implantology & Biomaterial Research Foundation, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Iface Academy, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mohammad Darvishi
- Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Seyedeh Sara Aghili
- Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Narges Tavahodi
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| | | | - Artak Heboyan
- Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Fathi
- Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Materials Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lemos CAA, de Oliveira AS, Faé DS, Oliveira HFFE, Del Rei Daltro Rosa CD, Bento VAA, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Do dental implants placed in patients with osteoporosis have higher risks of failure and marginal bone loss compared to those in healthy patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2023:10.1007/s00784-023-05005-2. [PMID: 37043030 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05005-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the dental implant survival rate and marginal bone loss between patients with and without osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022356377). A systematic search was performed using five databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest for articles published up to July 2022. Additional searches in ClinicalTrials.gov and the reference lists of included studies were performed. The eligibility criteria comprised observational studies with a direct comparison between patients with and without osteoporosis, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and 10 implants placed in each group, which consider data analysis based on implant level, without restrictions on period or language of publication. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 program. Risk of bias analysis of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). RESULTS Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria, totaling 1132 patients with a mean age range from 54 to 76.6 years. Most of the included patients were women (73.6%). A total of 3505 implants were evaluated-983 in patients with osteoporosis and 2522 in patients without osteoporosis. The meta-analysis indicated no difference in implant survival rates between patients with and without osteoporosis (OR, 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-3.70; P = 0.12). However, significant bone loss was observed around dental implants placed in patients with osteoporosis (SMD, 0.71 mm; 95% CI, 0.06-0.87 mm). The NOS indicated a low risk of bias in the studies included. However, the certainty of the evidence was classified as very low and low for implant survival rates and bone loss, respectively. CONCLUSION According to the limitations of the present review, the data suggest that dental implants are a viable treatment option for the rehabilitation of patients with osteoporosis. However, clinical care by professionals is necessary to ensure the maintenance of peri-implant bone stability, as these patients may be susceptible to increased bone loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
- Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Avançado Governador Valadares, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Andreza Soares de Oliveira
- Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Avançado Governador Valadares, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Daniele Sorgatto Faé
- Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences (PPGCAS), Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Avançado Governador Valadares, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | - Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa
- Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil
| | - Victor Augusto Alves Bento
- Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil
| | - Fellippo Ramos Verri
- Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
- Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Causes of the progression of periodontitis such as an imbalance between the immune response by the host by the release of inflammatory mediators in the response of the oral pathogenic dysbiotic biofilm have been identified. New insights on specific cell signaling pathways that appear during periodontitis have attracted the attention of researchers in the study of new personalised approaches for the treatment of periodontitis. The gold standard of non-surgical therapy of periodontitis involves the removal of supra and subgingival biofilm through professional scaling and root planing (SRP) and oral hygiene instructions. In order to improve periodontal clinical outcomes and overcome the limitations of traditional SRP, additional adjuvants have been developed in recent decades, including local or systemic antibiotics, antiseptics, probiotics, anti-inflammatory and anti-resorptive drugs and host modulation therapies. This review is aimed to update the current and recent evolution of therapies of management of periodontitis based on the adjunctive and target therapies. Moreover, we discuss the advances in host modulation of periodontitis and the impact of targeting epigenetic mechanisms approaches for a personalised therapeutic success in the management of periodontitis. In conclusion, the future goal in periodontology will be to combine and personalise the periodontal treatments to the colonising microbial profile and to the specific response of the individual patient.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Noritomi PY, Kemmoku DT, Souza Batista VED, Cruz RS, de Luna Gomes JM, Pellizzer EP. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 125:137.e1-137.e10. [PMID: 33139058 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM A consensus regarding the biomechanical effects of vertical bone loss in normal and osteoporotic bone tissue according to different implant-abutment interfaces is lacking. PURPOSE The purpose of this finite element analysis study was to evaluate the effect of vertical bone loss (without bone loss; with 1.5-mm bone loss; with 3-mm bone loss; and with 4.5-mm bone loss) in normal and osteoporotic bone that received a Ø4×10-mm implant with different implant-abutment connections (external connection [external hexagon] and internal connection [Morse taper]) by using 3D finite element analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen 3D models were simulated. Axial and oblique forces of 200 N and 100 N, respectively, were applied on the occlusal surfaces of the prostheses. Maximum principal stress and microstrain were determined from the bone tissue of each model. von Mises stress analysis was used to evaluate the stress distribution in implants and prosthetic components (fixation screws, abutment, and crown). RESULTS The results showed higher stress concentrations in models with bone loss as increased vertical bone loss contributed to higher stress and microstrain in the bone tissue, regardless of the quality of bone and implant-abutment connection. Osteoporotic bone contributed to increase in microstrain in the trabecular bone. The internal connection showed lower stress than the external connection implants only in models without marginal bone loss. Furthermore, higher stress concentrations were observed in the implants and fixation screws in models with increased bone loss and external connection implants, mainly under oblique loading. Osteoporotic bone did not affect stress distribution in the implants and prosthetic components. CONCLUSIONS Progressive bone loss contributed to higher stress in the bone tissue, implants, and prosthetic components. The osteoporotic bone affects only the microstrain in the trabecular bone, but not the stress in the implants and prosthetic components. The internal connection implants showed lower stress in the cortical bone only in models without bone loss, while external connection implants exhibited higher stress in the implants and screws under oblique loading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF-GV), Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Fellippo Ramos Verri
- Associate Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Pedro Yoshito Noritomi
- Researcher, Tridimensional Technology Division, Renato Archer's Information Technology Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Takanori Kemmoku
- Researcher, Tridimensional Technology Division, Renato Archer's Information Technology Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista
- Professor, Department Prosthodontics, Presidente Prudente Dental School, University of the West of São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Ronaldo Silva Cruz
- PhD student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jessica Marcela de Luna Gomes
- PhD student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
- Titular Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palma LF, Tateno RY, Remondes CM, Marcucci M, Cortes ARG. Impact of radiotherapy on mandibular bone: A retrospective study of digital panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent 2020; 50:31-36. [PMID: 32206618 PMCID: PMC7078405 DOI: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of radiotherapy on mandibular bone tissue in head and neck cancer patients through an analysis of pixel intensity and fractal dimension values on digital panoramic radiographs. Materials and Methods Thirty patients with radiographic records from before and after 3-dimensional (3D) conformational radiotherapy were selected. A single examiner carried out digital analyses of pixel intensity values and fractal dimensions, with the areas of interest unilaterally located in the right angle medullary region of the mandible below the mandibular canal and posterior to the molar region. Results Statistically significant decreases were observed in the mean pixel intensity (P=0.0368) and fractal dimension (P=0.0495) values after radiotherapy. Conclusion The results suggest that 3D conformational radiotherapy for head and neck cancer negatively affected the trabecular microarchitecture and mandibular bone mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Felipe Palma
- Discipline of Descriptive and Topographic Anatomy, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,MSc Dentistry Program, Ibirapuera University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Cíntia Maria Remondes
- Stomatology and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Center, Heliópolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Marcucci
- Stomatology and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Center, Heliópolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes
- MSc Dentistry Program, Ibirapuera University, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hughes FJ, Bartold PM. Periodontal complications of prescription and recreational drugs. Periodontol 2000 2019; 78:47-58. [PMID: 30198137 DOI: 10.1111/prd.12230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Drug use for both therapeutic and recreational purposes is very widespread in most societies. The range of drugs used, the variations in response to these drugs and other health and behavioral confounders mean that drug use may be an important contributor to individualized periodontal diagnoses. In this narrative review, we review the main reported effects of drugs on the periodontal tissues and periodontal disease processes. Although some of the more common adverse drug reactions on periodontal tissues are well described, in many other cases the evidence for these drug effects is quite limited and based on small case series or isolated reports. Prescription drugs are responsible for a range of effects, including drug-induced gingival overgrowth and increased gingival bleeding, and influence periodontal inflammation and periodontal breakdown. The effects of recreational drugs on the periodontal tissues is less well researched, perhaps for the obvious reason that assembling large cohorts of recreational drug users presents particular challenges. Use of nearly all of these substances is associated with poorer periodontal and dental health, although there is almost certainly a large degree of behavioral confounding in these findings. Overall, further studies of adverse drug reactions on the periodontal tissues are required as this continues to be an important and increasing factor in periodontal health determination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P Mark Bartold
- Periodontology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dental implants in Sjögren's syndrome patients: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0189507. [PMID: 29240793 PMCID: PMC5730117 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects salivation and consequently the health of oral tissues. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL) and biological complications of dental implants in SS patients. Materials and methods Eligibility criteria included prospective and retrospective cohort studies, controlled clinical trials, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs). An electronic search without date or language restrictions was carried out in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and LILACS until June 2017. In addition, manual search and in the grey literature were also conducted. The search process, data analysis, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewing authors. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42016053277. Results The search and selection process yielded 6 studies, published between 1997 and 2016. An average of 93.7% survival in a mean period of 3.97 years of follow-up was observed. A low number of MBL and biological complications were reported by the studies. All the studies analyzed observed an improvement in life quality of subjects with SS and rehabilitated through dental implants. Conclusions With the limitations of this review and based on the available data, the dental implant therapy in SS patients seems to present high implant survival rate, low MBL and low biological complications. In addition, all included studies observed an increase in the quality of life of SS patients who were rehabilitated through dental implants.
Collapse
|