Risk factors for bleeding evaluated using the Forrest classification in Japanese patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm

Efficacy of local hemostatic agents after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Topical hemostatic agents have been used to reduce bleeding rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer. However, to date, no review has summarized evidence on their efficacy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing bleeding rates after ESD with and without local hemostatic agents.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included. The studies used polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets and fibrin glue, fibrin glue, oxidized regenerated cellulose, polysaccharide hemostatic powder, or polyethylene oxide adhesive. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of delayed bleeding with the use of PGA sheets & fibrin glue (six studies; RR: 0.35 95% CI: 0.20, 0.63 p = 0.0005). However, meta-analysis of two studies showed no difference in the risk of bleeding based on the use of fibrin glue (RR: 0.44 95% CI: 0.03, 7.17 p = 0.56). Scarce data were available for the remaining hemostatic agents.

CONCLUSION

A large number of different hemostatic agents have been used to reduce the risk of bleeding after ESD for gastric cancer. Observational studies indicate that the use of PGA with fibrin glue could reduce the risk of bleeding after ESD. However, evidence for other agents was too scarce to derive conclusions.

Wafer paper and ring-mounted polyglycolic acid sheet method for shielding artificial gastric floor

BACKGROUND

The management of postoperative bleeding, after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), has become particularly important because of the recent increase in antithrombotic use. Endoscopic shielding with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets has been shown to be effective. However, shrinkage and early displacement of the sheet remain challenges. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of our developed method, named wafer paper and ring-mounted PGA sheet (WaRP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with antithrombotic uptake who underwent the WaRP method following gastric ESD were retrospectively examined. This involved the delivery of a PGA sheet wrapped in wafer paper with ring-thread, and its fixation on the gastric floor using hemoclips. The primary outcome was the technical success rate of the WaRP, and several secondary outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The technical success rate of WaRP was 100%. The procedure lasted a mean of 10.5 min (SD 6.7 min). The prevalence of complete retention at follow-up endoscopy was 83.3% (20/24). There were no WaRP-associated complications, but post-ESD hemorrhage occurred in two patients undergoing hemodialysis (8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The WaRP method is a simple and reliable means of PGA sheet delivery and placement that reduces the incidence of post-ESD hemorrhage.

Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is generally used to treat gastric mucosal and submucosal lesions. Nevertheless, ESD is more difficult and complicated to perform than a traditional endoscopic mucosal resection, which can increase the incidence of various complications including hemorrhage, perforation and infection. Hemorrhage is a major post-ESD complication. Prevention and early diagnosis of post-ESD bleeding for gastric lesions are closely associated with the efficacy and safety of the operation. Many studies have reported the risks of and the preventative measures for hemorrhage after gastric ESD, but there remain some issues to be solved. We thus reviewed the risk factors, precautions and treatments for hemorrhage after ESD of gastric lesions.

Is the Reinitiation of Antiplatelet Agents Safe at 1 Week after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection? Assessment of Bleeding Risk Using the Forrest Classification

Background/Aims

Delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) commonly occurs within 3 days, but it may also occur after 1 week following ESD, especially in antiplatelet agent users. We evaluated the risk of delayed bleeding in post-ESD ulcers using the Forrest classification.

Methods

Registry data on the Forrest classification of post-ESD ulcers (n=371) at 1 week or 2 weeks after ESD were retrospectively evaluated. The Forrest classification was categorized into two groups: increased risk (Forrest Ia to IIc) or low risk (Forrest III). The odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 371 post-ESD ulcers, one ulcer (0.3%) was classified as Forrest Ib, two (0.5%) as Forrest IIa, 17 (4.6%) as Forrest IIb, 172 (46.4%) as Forrest IIc, and 179 (48.2%) as Forrest III. The proportion of increased-risk ulcers was 72.2% (140/194) at 1 week after ESD, which decreased to 29.4% (52/177) at 2 weeks after ESD (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a post-ESD ulcer at 1 week after ESD (OR, 7.54), younger age (OR, 2.17), and upper/middle ulcer location (OR, 2.05) were associated with increased-risk ulcers.

Conclusions

One week after ESD, ulcers still have an increased risk of bleeding when assessed using the Forrest classification. This risk should be considered when resuming antiplatelet therapy.

Efficacy of hemostatic powder in preventing bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The prevention of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) bleeding in high-risk patients is an important problem. This study evaluated the efficacy of polysaccharide hemostatic powder in preventing post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Patients at high risk for post-ESD bleeding were prospectively enrolled between December 2015 and July 2016. A high risk of post-ESD bleeding was considered if the patients were taking antithrombotic agents or had undergone a large resection (specimen size ≥ 40 mm). The endpoints were Forrest classification of the post-ESD ulcer on second-look endoscopy 2 days after the procedure and bleeding rates within 48 h and at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients underwent gastric ESD and treatment with hemostatic powder. Among them, 33 patients (70.5%) underwent large resection (≥ 40 mm) without antithrombotic therapy, and 13 patients (29.5%) received antithrombotic therapy. The mean resected specimen size was 55.3 ± 13.9 mm. The proportion of high-risk delayed bleeding lesions (Forrest IIa) at second-look endoscopy was 4.5% (2/44). The overall bleeding rate was 9.1% (4/44). There was no early bleeding event. The median (interquartile range) timing of bleeding after the procedure was 12.5 (interquartile range 10.3-15.5) days. The bleeding rate in the large resection (≥ 40 mm) group without antithrombotic therapy and the antithrombotic therapy group was 3.2% (1/33) and 23.1% (3/13), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemostatic powder may be a promising new simple and effective method to prevent early post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients, especially for those with larger resection. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02625792).

Role of second-look endoscopy and prophylactic hemostasis after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have shown that second-look endoscopy does not affect the incidence of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the potential roles of second-look endoscopy have not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the role of second-look endoscopy after ESD through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through March 2016 using the keywords "second-look," "prophylactic hemostasis," "prophylactic haemostasis," "prevention," "prophylaxis," and "endoscopic submucosal dissection." Studies were included if they evaluated the incidence of post-ESD bleeding according to second-look endoscopy or prophylactic hemostasis during second-look endoscopy.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials on post-ESD bleeding between second-look endoscopy and no second-look endoscopy and 12 non-randomized studies with a cohort design on post-ESD bleeding were included. On meta-analysis, second-look endoscopy did not affect delayed post-ESD bleeding (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.27 [0.80-2.00], I²  = 0%). During second-look endoscopy, patients who were considered as high-risk for post-ESD bleeding underwent prophylactic hemostasis. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was more common in patients who were treated with hemostasis during second-look endoscopy compared with those who were not (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 3.40 [1.87-6.18], I²  = 62%). In patients who underwent prophylactic hemostasis, the number needed to prolong a hospitalization period to avoid one additional post-ESD bleeding after discharge was 25.

CONCLUSION

Second-look endoscopy after ESD could not reduce the risk of delayed post-ESD bleeding. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was more common in patients who underwent prophylactic hemostasis than in those who did not.

Clinical risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a curative, standard therapy for colorectal neoplasms. Some studies have investigated the risk factors for perforation during colorectal ESD. However, few studies have assessed the risk factors for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. We studied patients undergoing ESD for colorectal epithelial neoplasms to identify the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 124 consecutive patients undergoing ESD for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. To identify risk factors for delayed bleeding post-ESD, recurrent bleeding post-ESD was compared with patient-related and tumor-related factors.

RESULTS

Delayed bleeding after ESD occurred in 10 (8.1%) lesions of 124 colorectal tumors, and the median time from the end of ESD to the onset of bleeding was 18.5 h. Delayed bleeding was significantly higher in tumors located in rectums than in colons (P=0.021), and the number of occurrences of arterial bleeding during ESD was significantly higher in the delayed bleeding group than in the nondelayed bleeding group (P=0.002). The procedure time was significantly longer in the delayed bleeding group than in the nondelayed bleeding group (P=0.012). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumor location (odds ratio, 10.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-87.03; P=0.035) and three or more occurrences of arterial bleeding during ESD (odds ratio, 6.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-41.5; P=0.036) were significant independent risk factors for delayed bleeding.

CONCLUSION

The presence of lesions in the rectum and three or more arterial bleeding occurrences during ESD were risk factors for post-ESD bleeding. Patients with these risk factors should be followed up carefully after ESD for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.