1
|
Lim C, Turco C, Goumard C, Jeune F, Perdigao F, Savier E, Rousseau G, Soubrane O, Scatton O. Perceptions of surgical difficulty in liver transplantation: A European survey and development of the Pitié-Salpêtrière classification. Surgery 2023; 174:979-993. [PMID: 37543467 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant variations exist regarding the definition of difficult liver transplantation. The study goals were to investigate how liver transplant surgeons evaluate the surgical difficulty of liver transplantation and to use the identified factors to classify liver transplantation difficulty. METHODS A Web-based online European survey was presented to liver transplant surgeons. The survey was divided into 3 parts: (1) participant demographics and practices; (2) various situations based on recipient, liver disease, tumor treatment, and technical factors; and (3) 8 real-life clinical vignettes with different levels of complexity. In part 3 of the survey, respondents were asked whether they would perform liver transplantation but were not aware that these patients eventually underwent liver transplantation. RESULTS A total of 143 invites were sent out, and 97 (67.8%) participants completed the survey. Most participants considered previous spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, previous supra-mesocolic surgery, hypertrophy of segment I, and obesity to be recipient factors for high-difficulty liver transplantation. Most participants considered liver transplantation to be challenging in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, Kasai surgery, polycystic liver disease, diffuse portal vein thrombosis, and a history of open hepatectomy. The proportion of participants indicating that liver transplantation was warranted varied across the 8 cases, from 69% to 100%. Our classification of the surgical difficulty of liver transplantation employed these recipient-related, surgical history-related, and liver disease-related variables and 3 difficulty groups were identified: low, intermediate, and high difficulty groups. CONCLUSION This survey provides an overview of the surgical difficulty of various situations in liver transplantation that could be useful for further benchmark and textbook outcome studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Célia Turco
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, INSERM, UMRS-938, Paris, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, INSERM, UMRS-938, Paris, France
| | - Florence Jeune
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Fabiano Perdigao
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eric Savier
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, INSERM, UMRS-938, Paris, France
| | - Géraldine Rousseau
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary, and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, INSERM, UMRS-938, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King JJ, Halliday N, Mantovani A, Gerussi A, Wey EQ, Tan J, Ryan J, Patch D, Tsochatzis E, Westbrook RH. Bacterascites confers poor patient prognosis beyond MELD prediction. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:356-364. [PMID: 36691984 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a well-recognized clinical entity with a poor prognosis. In comparison, the prevalence, microbiological flora, and prognostic significance of bacterascites (BA) (the presence of organism on culture but ascitic PMN <250 cells/mm³) is largely unknown. We, therefore, assessed the prognosis and predictors of outcome in patients with BA in comparison with those with SBP. Ascitic fluid cultures from consecutive patients with cirrhosis from 2008 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively, and patients with SBP and BA were identified. Baseline demographic, laboratory, and microbiological data were collated and analyzed as prognostic indicators, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patients were censored at the time of LT, death, or last follow-up. For this study 176 and 213 cases of SBP and BA, respectively, were identified and included. Patients with SBP had significantly higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ( p =<0.01), peripheral blood WCC ( p < 0.01), and higher rates of Enterobacteriaceae ( p < 0.01) and multi-drug resistant pathogens ( p < 0.01). Survival at 1 and 3 months was lower in patients with SBP ( p < 0.01) when compared with BA but at 6 months and beyond, no significant difference remained. After the exclusion of deaths within 30 days of presentation, survival between SBP and BA was equivocal at all time points. Mortality was substantially higher across all MELD groupings for both SBP and BA when compared with the predicted mortality calculated by the MELD score alone. BA has a negative impact on patient survival above that predicted by the MELD score. It has similar impact to SBP on patient survival beyond 1 month suggesting it should be seen as a poor prognostic marker and prompt consideration of LT where appropriate. Further studies evaluating the role of secondary prophylaxis in this group are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Jade King
- The Royal Free Hospital, Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Pond Street, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verna EC, Pereira MR. Transplanting patients with active bacterial infection. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2017; 9:81-85. [PMID: 30992965 PMCID: PMC6467147 DOI: 10.1002/cld.624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center622 West 168th Street New YorkNY, 10032
| | - Marcus R. Pereira
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center622 West 168th Street New YorkNY, 10032
| |
Collapse
|