The utility and yield of endoscopic ultrasonography for suspected choledocholithiasis in common gastroenterology practice

Do endosonographers agree on the presence of bile duct sludge and the subsequent need for intervention?

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a tool widely used to diagnose bile duct lithiasis. In approximately one out of five patients with positive findings at EUS, sludge is detected in the bile duct instead of stones. The objective of this study was to establish the agreement among endosonographers regarding: 1. presence of common bile duct (CBD) stones, microlithiasis and sludge; and 2. the need for subsequent treatment. Patients and methods  30 EUS videos of patients with an intermediate probability of CBD stones were evaluated by 41 endosonographers. Experience in EUS and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and the endosonographers' type of practices were recorded. Fleiss' kappa statistics were used to quantify the agreement. Associations between levels of experience and both EUS ratings and treatment decisions were investigated using mixed effects models. Results  A total of 1230 ratings and treatment decisions were evaluated. The overall agreement on EUS findings was fair (Fleiss' κ 0.32). The agreement on presence of stones was moderate (κ 0.46). For microlithiasis it was fair (κ 0.25) and for sludge it was slight (κ 0.16). In cases with CBD stones there was an almost perfect agreement for the decision to subsequently perform an ERC + ES. In case of presumed microlithiasis or sludge an ERC was opted for in 78 % and 51 % of cases, respectively. Differences in experience and types of practice appear unrelated to the agreement on both EUS findings and the decision for subsequent treatment. Conclusions  There is only slight agreement among endosonographers regarding the presence of bile duct sludge. Regarding the need for subsequent treatment of bile duct sludge there is no consensus.

Predictors of bile tree pathology in patients presenting with gallbladder disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with gallstone disease can present with elevated liver function tests (LFTs). It is often challenging to differentiate those with a common bile duct (CBD) stone from those without a CBD stone on the basis of the LFTs levels. In this study, we aim to evaluate the predictors of a CBD stones among patients presenting with symptomatic gallbladder disease and elevated LFTs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined all patients who had undergone a cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and increased LFTs were included. Patient characteristics, imaging findings, lab findings, endoscopic interventions, and operative report were recorded and evaluated. The diagnosis of CBD stones was made on the basis of ERCP and IOC findings.

RESULTS

We included 354 patients in the final analysis. Of these, 113 (32%) had confirmed choledocholithiasis. The prevalence of CBD stones among biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, and pancreatitis patients was 47, 25, and 26%, respectively. γ-Glutamyl transferase and direct bilirubin had the highest sensitivities for CBD stones among these patients (83 vs. 79%). In the setting of biliary colic, total bilirubin was highly predictive of CBD stones with a positive predictive value of 85%. In the setting of acute cholecystitis, elevated LFTs were even less significant in predicting stones, with a positive predictive value of less than 40% for most.

CONCLUSION

Although γ-glutamyl transferase and bilirubin levels showed a relatively higher sensitivity for CBDS compared with the other LFTs, these were not reliable enough because of high false-positive as well as false-negative values, especially in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.