1
|
Braat MN, Braat AJ, Lam MG. Toxicity comparison of yttrium-90 resin and glass microspheres radioembolization. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2024; 68:133-142. [PMID: 35762664 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.22.03452-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the clinical, hematological and biochemical toxicity differences between glass and resin yttrium-90 (90Y)-microspheres radioembolization treatment of primary and metastatic liver disease. METHODS Between May 2014 and November 2016 all consecutive glass and resin 90Y microspheres radioembolization treatments were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical, hematological and clinical data were collected at treatment day, two weeks, one month and three months follow-up. Post-treatment 90Y PET/CTs were assessed for the absorbed doses in non-tumorous liver volume (DNTLV) and tumor volume (DTV). Biochemical, hematological and clinical toxicity were compared between glass and resin using chi square tests and repeated ANOVA measures. Biochemical and clinical toxicity was correlated with DNTLV,total by means of Pearson correlation and independent t-tests. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were included (N.=44 glass, N.=41 resin). Clinical toxicity the day after treatment (i.e. abdominal pain [P=0.000], nausea [P=0.000] and vomiting [P=0.003]) was more prevalent for resin. Biochemical and hematological toxicities were similar for both microspheres. The DNTLV,total was significantly higher in patients with REILD grade ≥3 in the resin group (43.5 versus 33.3 Gy [P=0.050]). A similar non-significant trend was seen in the glass group: 95.0 versus 69.0 Gy [P=0.144]. CONCLUSIONS The clinical, hematological and biochemical toxicity of radioembolization treatment with glass and resin is comparable, however, post-embolization syndrome related complaints are more common for resin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon N Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands -
| | - Arthur J Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix G Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kappadath SC, Henry EC, Lopez BP, Mahvash A. Quantitative evaluation of 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT-based dosimetry following Yttrium-90 radioembolization. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38781554 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE), 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT imaging provide the means to calculate the voxelized absorbed dose distribution. Given the widespread use of the two imaging modalities and lack of well-established standardized dosimetry protocols for 90Y-RE, there is a clinical need to systematically investigate and evaluate differences in the performance of voxel-based dosimetry between 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT. PURPOSE To quantitatively analyze and compare 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT-based dosimetry following 90Y-RE. METHODS 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT imaging was acquired for 35 patients following 90Y-RE with TheraSphere for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Dosimetry was performed using the local deposition method with known activity and the mean dose (Dmean) was calculated for perfused liver volumes (PV), tumors (T), and perfused normal livers (NL). Additionally, the absorbed dose to x% of the volume (Dx, x ∈ $ \in $ [5%, 10%, …, 90%, 95%]) and the volume receiving y Gy (Vy, y ∈ $ \in $ [10 Gy, 20 Gy, …, 190 Gy, 200 Gy]) were calculated for T and NL, respectively. Dose metrics were compared using linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and statistical testing. RESULTS Both 90Y-SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/CT-based tumor Dmean were strongly correlated (R2 ≥ 0.90) with Dx, excluding metrics on the extrema. Intra-modality comparisons of various Dx and Vy metrics yielded statistically significant differences (ANOVA, p < 0.001) for both90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT. Based on statistical testing, only Dx metrics separated by greater than 20%-30% coverage, and only Vy metrics separated by greater than 40-70 Gy, reported significant differences. For PV, there was a strong correlation (R2 ≥ 0.99) between Dmean derived separately from 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT imaging. The strength of the correlation was slightly reduced for T and NL with R2 = 0.91 and R2 = 0.95, respectively. For PV, the mean bias ± standard error (SE) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between Dmean from the two modalities was effectively zero with -0.8 ± 0.4% (± 2.5%). For T and NL, the mean bias ± SE (± LOA) was -14.5 ± 3.7% (± 24%) and 9.4 ± 4.7% (± 27%), respectively. CONCLUSION The strong correlation between Dmean and Dx suggests information from multiple dose metrics (e.g., D70 and Dmean) is largely redundant when establishing dose-response relationships in 90Y-RE. Dmean is highly correlated between 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-SPECT/CT-based dosimetry, for all liver VOIs. Relative to 90Y-SPECT/CT, 90Y-PET/CT, on average, yielded higher Dmean to tumors (14%) and lower Dmean to perfused normal livers (9%). Absorbed dose differences for perfused liver volumes between 90Y-SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/CT were negligible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Courtney Henry
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Benjamin P Lopez
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Armeen Mahvash
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kwak DH, Lionberg A, Patel M, Nijhawan K, Martens S, Yu Q, Cao D, Youssef S, Ahmed O. Quantitative differences in volumetric calculations for radiation dosimetry in segmental Y90 treatment planning using hybrid angiography-CT compared with anatomic segmentation. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:353-362. [PMID: 38308040 PMCID: PMC11027260 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare treatment volumes reconstructed from hybrid Angio-CT catheter-directed infusion imaging and Couinaud anatomic model as well as the implied differences in Y-90 radiation dosimetry. METHODS Patients who underwent transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using Y-90 glass microspheres with pretreatment CT or MRI imaging as well as intraprocedural angiography-CT (Angio-CT) were analysed. Treatment volumes were delineated using both tumoural angiosomes (derived from Angio-CT) and Couinaud anatomic landmarks. Segmental and lobar treatment volumes were calculated via semi-automated contouring software. Volume and dose differences were compared by the two-tailed Student t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Factors affecting volume and dose differences were assessed via simple and/or multiple variable linear regression analysis. RESULTS From September 2018 to March 2021, 44 patients underwent 45 lobar treatments and 38 patients received 56 segmental treatments. All target liver lobes and all tumours were completely included within the field-of-view by Angio-CT. Tumour sizes ranged between 1.1 and 19.5 cm in diameter. Segmental volumes and treatment doses were significantly different between the Couinaud and Angio-CT volumetry methods (316 vs 404 mL, P < .0001 and 253 vs 212 Gy, P < .01, respectively). Watershed tumours were significantly correlated with underestimated volumes by the Couinaud anatomic model (P < .001). There was a significant linear relationship between tumour diameter and percent volume difference (R2 = 0.44, P < .0001). The Couinaud model overestimated volumes for large tumours that exhibited central hypovascularity/necrosis and for superselected peripheral tumours. CONCLUSIONS Angio-CT may confer advantages over the Couinaud anatomic model and enable more accurate, personalized dosimetry for TARE. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Angio-CT may confer advantages over traditional cross-sectional and cone-beam CT imaging for selective internal radiation therapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H Kwak
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Alex Lionberg
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Mikin Patel
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Karan Nijhawan
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Spencer Martens
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Qian Yu
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - David Cao
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Salma Youssef
- University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wagemans MEHM, Kunnen B, Stella M, van Rooij R, Smits M, Bruijnen R, Lam MGEH, de Jong HWAM, Braat AJAT. Comparison of 3 Different Therapeutic Particles in Radioembolization of Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:272-278. [PMID: 38176716 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to compare 3 different therapeutic particles used for radioembolization in locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: 90Y-glass, 90Y-resin, and 166Ho-labeled poly(l-lactic acid) microsphere prescribed activity was calculated as per manufacturer recommendations. Posttreatment quantitative 90Y PET/CT and quantitative 166Ho SPECT/CT were used to determine tumor-absorbed dose, whole-normal-liver-absorbed dose, treated-normal-liver-absorbed dose, tumor-to-nontumor ratio, lung-absorbed dose, and lung shunt fraction. Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 and the [18F]FDG PET-based change in total lesion glycolysis. Hepatotoxicity was assessed using the radioembolization-induced liver disease classification. Results: Six 90Y-glass, 8 90Y-resin, and 7 166Ho microsphere patients were included for analysis. The mean administered activity was 2.6 GBq for 90Y-glass, 1.5 GBq for 90Y-resin, and 7.0 GBq for 166Ho microspheres. Tumor-absorbed dose and treated-normal-liver-absorbed dose were significantly higher for 90Y-glass than for 90Y-resin and 166Ho microspheres (mean tumor-absorbed dose, 197 Gy for 90Y-glass vs. 73 Gy for 90Y-resin and 50 Gy for 166Ho; mean treated-normal-liver-absorbed dose, 79 Gy for 90Y-glass vs. 37 Gy for 90Y-resin and 31 Gy for 166Ho). The whole-normal-liver-absorbed dose and tumor-to-nontumor ratio did not significantly differ between the particles. All patients had a lung-absorbed dose under 30 Gy and a lung shunt fraction under 20%. The 3 groups showed similar toxicity and response according to RECIST 1.1 and [18F]FDG PET-based total lesion glycolysis changes. Conclusion: The therapeutic particles used for radioembolization differed from each other and showed significant differences in absorbed dose, whereas toxicity and response were similar for all groups. This finding emphasizes the need for separate dose constraints and dose targets for each particle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn E H M Wagemans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Britt Kunnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
- Image Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht and University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Stella
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Rob van Rooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Maarten Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Rutger Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Hugo W A M de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cicone F, Sjögreen Gleisner K, Sarnelli A, Indovina L, Gear J, Gnesin S, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Bischof Delaloye A, Valentini V, Cremonesi M. The contest between internal and external-beam dosimetry: The Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the tortoise. Phys Med 2024; 117:103188. [PMID: 38042710 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionuclide therapy, also called molecular radiotherapy (MRT), has come of age, with several novel radiopharmaceuticals being approved for clinical use or under development in the last decade. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a well-established treatment modality, with about half of all oncologic patients expected to receive at least one external radiation treatment over their disease course. The efficacy and the toxicity of both types of treatment rely on the interaction of radiation with biological tissues. Dosimetry played a fundamental role in the scientific and technological evolution of EBRT, and absorbed doses to the target and to the organs at risk are calculated on a routine basis. In contrast, in MRT the usefulness of internal dosimetry has long been questioned, and a structured path to include absorbed dose calculation is missing. However, following a similar route of development as EBRT, MRT treatments could probably be optimized in a significant proportion of patients, likely based on dosimetry and radiobiology. In the present paper we describe the differences and the similarities between internal and external-beam dosimetry in the context of radiation treatments, and we retrace the main stages of their development over the last decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Unit, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | | | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Luca Indovina
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Nantes Université, Université Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, Médecine Nucléaire, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Braat MNGJA, Ebbers SC, Alsultan AA, Neek AO, Bruijnen RCG, Smits MLJ, de Bruijne J, Lam MGEH, Braat AJAT. Prophylactic Medication during Radioembolization in Metastatic Liver Disease: Is It Really Necessary? A Retrospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3652. [PMID: 38132236 PMCID: PMC10742749 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13243652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Trans-arterial radioembolization is a well-studied tumoricidal treatment for liver malignancies; however, consensus and evidence regarding periprocedural prophylactic medication (PPM) are lacking. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis from 2014 to 2020 was performed in patients treated with 90Y-glass microspheres for neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. Inclusion criteria were the availability of at least 3 months of clinical, biochemical, and imaging follow-up and post-treatment 90Y-PET/CT imaging for the determination of the whole non-tumorous liver absorbed dose (Dh). Logistic regression models were used to investigate if variables (among which are P/UDCA and Dh) were associated with either clinical toxicity, biochemical toxicity, or hepatotoxicity. Additionally, a structured literature search was performed in November 2022 to identify all publications related to PPM use in radioembolization treatments. RESULTS Fifty-one patients received P/UDCA as post-treatment medication, while 19 did not. No correlation was found between toxicity and P/UDCA use. Dh was associated with biochemical toxicity (p = 0.05). A literature review resulted in eight relevant articles, including a total of 534 patients, in which no consistent advice regarding PPM was provided. CONCLUSION In this single-center, retrospective review, P/UDCA use did not reduce liver toxicity in patients with metastatic liver disease. The whole non-tumorous liver-absorbed dose was the only significant factor for hepatotoxicity. No standardized international guidelines or supporting evidence exist for PPM in radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon N. G. J. A. Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Sander C. Ebbers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Ahmed A. Alsultan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Atal O. Neek
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Rutger C. G. Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Maarten L. J. Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Joep de Bruijne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G. E. H. Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| | - Arthur J. A. T. Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands (M.G.E.H.L.); (A.J.A.T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jeschke M, Ludwig JM, Leyh C, Pabst KM, Weber M, Theysohn JM, Lange CM, Herrmann K, Schmidt HHJ, Jochheim LS. Bilobar Radioembolization Carries the Risk of Radioembolization-Induced Liver Disease in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Safety and Efficacy Comparison to Systemic Therapy with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4274. [PMID: 37686549 PMCID: PMC10486761 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recommended treatment options for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include systemic therapy (ST) and trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y90). Before the approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, a similar safety profile was reported for TARE and ST with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, whole-liver treatment and underlying cirrhosis were identified as risk factors for potentially lethal radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD). Therefore, the safety and efficacy of TARE and ST with atezolizumab/bevacizumab were compared in patients with advanced HCC involving at least both liver lobes in a retrospective real-world cohort. In total, 74 patients with new or recurrent advanced-stage HCC (BCLC stage B/C) were included if treated with either bilobar TARE (n = 33) or systemic combination therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 41). Most patients had compensated liver function (90.5% were classified as Child-Pugh Score A, 73% as ALBI Grade 1) at baseline. Although not significant, patients treated with ST showed a more prolonged overall survival than those treated with Y90 TARE (7.1 months vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.07). While a similar disease control rate could be achieved with bilobar TARE and atezolizumab/bevacizumab, in the TARE group, overall survival was curtailed by the occurrence of REILD. In patients with underlying liver cirrhosis, the liver function at baseline was a predictor for REILD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Jeschke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes M. Ludwig
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Catherine Leyh
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kim M. Pabst
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jens M. Theysohn
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christian M. Lange
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Hartmut H. -J. Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Leonie S. Jochheim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stella M, van Rooij R, Lam MGEH, de Jong HWAM, Braat AJAT. Automatic healthy liver segmentation for holmium-166 radioembolization dosimetry. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:68. [PMID: 37453996 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00996-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For safe and effective holmium-166 (166Ho) liver radioembolization, dosimetry is crucial and requires accurate healthy liver definition. The current clinical standard relies on manual segmentation and registration of a separately acquired contrast enhanced CT (CECT), a prone-to-error and time-consuming task. An alternative is offered by simultaneous imaging of 166Ho and technetium-99m stannous-phytate accumulating in healthy liver cells (166Ho-99mTc dual-isotope protocol). This study compares healthy liver segmentation performed with an automatic method using 99mTc images derived from a 166Ho-99mTc dual-isotope acquisition to the manual segmentation, focusing on healthy liver dosimetry and corresponding hepatotoxicity. Data from the prospective HEPAR PLuS study were used. Automatic healthy liver segmentation was obtained by thresholding the 99mTc image (no registration step required). Manual segmentation was performed on CECT and then manually registered to the SPECT/CT and subsequently to the corresponding 166Ho SPECT to compute absorbed dose in healthy liver. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (66 procedures) were assessed. Manual segmentation and registration took a median of 30 min per patient, while automatic segmentation was instantaneous. Mean ± standard deviation of healthy liver absorbed dose was 18 ± 7 Gy and 20 ± 8 Gy for manual and automatic segmentations, respectively. Mean difference ± coefficient of reproducibility between healthy liver absorbed doses using the automatic versus manual segmentation was 2 ± 6 Gy. No correlation was found between mean absorbed dose in the healthy liver and hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS 166Ho-99mTc dual-isotope protocol can automatically segment the healthy liver without hampering the 166Ho dosimetry assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02067988. Registered 20 February 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02067988.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Stella
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Rob van Rooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo W A M de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Podlasek A, Abdulla M, Broering D, Bzeizi K. Recent Advances in Locoregional Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3347. [PMID: 37444457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for 90% of primary hepatic cancer cases, and its incidence with associated morbidity and mortality is growing worldwide. In recent decades, there has been a revolution in HCC treatment. There are three main types of locoregional therapy: radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolisation, and transarterial radioembolisation. This article summarises recent advances in locoregional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Podlasek
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
- Precision Imaging Beacon, Radiological Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Maheeba Abdulla
- Salmaniya Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, Manama 323, Bahrain
| | - Dieter Broering
- Department of Liver Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Bzeizi
- Department of Liver Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Watanabe M, Grafe H, Theysohn J, Schaarschmidt B, Ludwig J, Jochheim L, Jeschke M, Schmidt H, Fendler WP, Moraitis A, Herrmann K, Pomykala KL, Weber M. Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Hepatotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.264996. [PMID: 37290792 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Personalized dosimetry holds promise to improve radioembolization treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. To this end, tolerance absorbed doses for nontumor liver tissue are assessed by calculating the mean absorbed dose to the whole nontumor liver tissue (AD-WNTLT), which may be limited by its neglect of nonuniform dose distribution. Thus, we analyzed whether voxel-based dosimetry could be more accurate in predicting hepatotoxicity in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization. Methods: In total, 176 HCC patients were available for this retrospective analysis; of these, 78 underwent partial- and 98 whole-liver treatment. Posttherapeutic changes in bilirubin were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. We performed voxel-based and multicompartment dosimetry using pretherapeutic 99mTc-labeled human serum albumin SPECT and contrast-enhanced CT/MRI and defined the following dosimetry parameters: AD-WNTLT; the nontumor liver tissue volume exposed to at least 20 Gy (V20), at least 30 Gy (V30), and at least 40 Gy (V40); and the threshold absorbed dose to the 20% (AD-20) and 30% (AD-30) of nontumor liver tissue with the lowest absorbed dose. Their impact on hepatotoxicity after 6 mo was analyzed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve; thresholds were identified using the Youden index. Results: The area under the curve for prediction of posttherapeutic grade 3+ increases in bilirubin was acceptable for V20 (0.77), V30 (0.78), and V40 (0.79), whereas it was low for AD-WNTLT (0.67). The predictive value could further be increased in the subanalysis of patients with whole-liver treatment, where a good discriminatory power was found for V20 (0.80), V30 (0.82), V40 (0.84), AD-20 (0.80), and AD-30 (0.82) and an acceptable discriminatory power was found for AD-WNTLT (0.63). The accuracies of V20 (P = 0.03), V30 (P = 0.009), V40 (P = 0.004), AD-20 (P = 0.04), and AD-30 (P = 0.02) were superior to that of AD-WNTLT but did not differ significantly from each other. The respective thresholds were 78% (V30), 72% (V40), and 43 Gy (AD-30). Statistical significance was not reached for partial-liver treatment. Conclusion: Voxel-based dosimetry may more accurately predict hepatotoxicity than multicompartment dosimetry in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization, which could enable dose escalation or deescalation with the intent to optimize treatment response. Our results indicate that a V40 of 72% may be particularly useful in whole-liver treatment. However, further research is warranted to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masao Watanabe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Hong Grafe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens Theysohn
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schaarschmidt
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ludwig
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Leonie Jochheim
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Matthias Jeschke
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Hartmut Schmidt
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexandros Moraitis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Kelsey L Pomykala
- Institute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany;
- University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Casáns-Tormo I, Guijarro-Rosaleny J, Lluch-García P, Rodríguez-Parra H, Roselló-Keränen S, Asensio-Valero L. Evaluation of results after 112 radioembolizations with 90Y-microspheres. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2023:S2253-8089(23)00053-8. [PMID: 37269983 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
AIM To determine the results of radioembolization transarterial (TARE), in the treatment of liver tumors, a retrospective evaluation was performed after 112 TARE with 90Y-microspheres administered in 82 patients in a single hospital, analyzing efficacy and safety, after a follow-up greater than or equal to 1 year post-TARE in all patients, and evaluating the possible relationship between treatment response and patient survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS We have administered 57 single TARE and 55 multiple TARE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (53), liver metastases (25) and cholangiocarcinoma (4), with prior multidisciplinary evaluation, clinical, angiographic and gammagraphic (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT with 99mTc-MAA), multicompartment model (MIRD equations), post-TARE screening (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT), clinical and radiological follow-up, tumor response evaluation (mRECIST criteria) and Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Therapeutic intention was palliative (82%) and as bridge to liver transplantation/surgical resection (17%). We obtained response (R), complete or partial, in 65.9% of cases. One year after TARE 34.7% of patients with R and 19.2% of non-R were progression-free (p: 0.003), with OS of 80% for R and 37.5% for non-R (p: 0.001). Survival analysis showed median OS of 18 months (95% CI 15.7-20.3) for R and 9 months (95% CI 6.1-11.8) for non-R (p: 0.03). We found mild (27.6%) and severe (5.3%) side effects, all of them resolved, without higher incidence after multiple TARE. CONCLUSION TARE with 90Y-microspheres, in appropriately selected patients with liver tumors, provides therapeutic efficacy and low rate of toxicity, with higher progression-free survival and OS in patients with TARE response compared to those who did not respond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Casáns-Tormo
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
| | - J Guijarro-Rosaleny
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - P Lluch-García
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - H Rodríguez-Parra
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Roselló-Keränen
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Asensio-Valero
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maleux G, Albrecht T, Arnold D, Bargellini I, Cianni R, Helmberger T, Kolligs F, Munneke G, Peynircioglu B, Sangro B, Schaefer N, Pereira H, Zeka B, de Jong N, Bilbao JI. Predictive Factors for Adverse Event Outcomes After Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres in Europe: Results from the Prospective Observational CIRT Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03391-4. [PMID: 36914788 PMCID: PMC10322946 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03391-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using data collected in the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy, the present study aimed at identifying predictors of adverse events (AEs) following transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres for liver tumours. METHODS We analysed 1027 patients enrolled between January 2015 and December 2017 and followed up for 24 months. Four hundred and twenty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 120 with intrahepatic carcinoma (ICC), 237 with colorectal liver metastases and 248 with liver metastases from other primaries were included. Prognostic factors were calculated with a univariable analysis by using the overall AEs burden score (AEBS). RESULTS All-cause AEs were reported in 401/1027 (39.1%) patients, with AEs associated with TARE, such as abdominal pain (16.6%), fatigue (17%), and nausea (11.7%) reported most frequently. Grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 92/1027 (9%) patients. Reports on grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal ulcerations (0.4%), gastritis (0.3%), radiation cholecystitis (0.2%) or radioembolization-induced liver disease (0.5%) were uncommon. Univariable analysis showed that in HCC, AEBS increased for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 (p = 0.0045), 1 tumour nodule (0.0081), > 1 TARE treatment (p = 0.0224), no prophylactic embolization (p = 0.0211), partition model dosimetry (p = 0.0007) and unilobar treatment target (0.0032). For ICC, > 1 TARE treatment was associated with an increase in AEBS (p = 0.0224), and for colorectal liver metastases, ECOG 0 (p = 0.0188), > 2 prior systemic treatments (p = 0.0127), and 1 tumour nodule (p = 0.0155) were associated with an increased AEBS. CONCLUSION Our study confirms that TARE is a safe treatment with low toxicity and a minimal impact on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert Maleux
- Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Albrecht
- Department for Radiology and Interventional Therapy, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Rudower Str. 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Oncology and Hematology, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 1, 22763, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Cianni
- Department of Interventional Radiology, S. Camillo Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 85, 00149, Rome, Italy
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Minimal-Invasive Therapy, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Kolligs
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Graham Munneke
- Interventional Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Bora Peynircioglu
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye Campus, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Avda. Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire et Imagerie Moléculaire, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Helena Pereira
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Paris, France.,Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1418 (CIC1418), INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Bleranda Zeka
- Clinical Research Department, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Neutorgasse 9, 1010, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niels de Jong
- Clinical Research Department, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Neutorgasse 9, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
| | - José I Bilbao
- Interventional Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII, No 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kolligs F, Arnold D, Golfieri R, Pech M, Peynircioglu B, Pfammatter T, Ronot M, Sangro B, Schaefer N, Maleux G, Munneke G, Pereira H, Zeka B, de Jong N, Helmberger T, Neukölln VK, D’Archambeau O, Balli T, Bilgic S, Bloom A, Cioni R, Fischbach R, Altona AK, Flamen P, Gerard L, Grözinger G, Katoh M, Koehler M, Kröger JR, Kuhl C, Orsi F, Özgün M, Reimer P, Ronot M, Schmid A, Vit A. Factors impacting survival after transarterial radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from the prospective CIRT study. JHEP Rep 2022; 5:100633. [PMID: 36593888 PMCID: PMC9804139 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres is an established treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, optimising treatment application and patient selection remains challenging. We report here on the effectiveness, safety and prognostic factors, including dosing methods, associated with TARE for HCC in the prospective observational CIRT study. Methods We analysed 422 patients with HCC enrolled between Jan 2015 and Dec 2017, with follow-up visits every 3 months for up to 24 months after first TARE. Patient characteristics and treatment-related data were collected at baseline; adverse events and time-to-event data (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and hepatic PFS) were collected at every 3-month follow-up visit. We used the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model and propensity score matching to identify independent prognostic factors for effectiveness outcomes. Results The median OS was 16.5 months, the median PFS was 6.1 months, and the median hepatic PFS was 6.7 months. Partition model dosimetry resulted in improved OS compared to body surface area calculations on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.46-0.92; p = 0.0144), which was confirmed in the exact matching propensity score analysis (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.35-0.89; p = 0.0136). Other independent prognostic factors for OS were ECOG-performance status >0 (p = 0.0018), presence of ascites (p = 0.0152), right-sided tumours (p = 0.0002), the presence of portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.0378) and main portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.0028), ALBI grade 2 (p = 0.0043) and 3 (p = 0.0014). Adverse events were recorded in 36.7% of patients, with 9.7% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events. Conclusions This large prospective observational dataset shows that TARE is an effective and safe treatment in patients with HCC. Using partition model dosimetry was associated with a significant improvement in survival outcomes. Impact and implications Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a form of localised radiation therapy and is a potential treatment option for primary liver cancer. We observed how TARE was used in real-life clinical practice in various European countries and if any factors predict how well the treatment performs. We found that when a more complex but personalised method to calculate the applied radiation activity was used, the patient responded better than when a more generic method was used. Furthermore, we identified that general patient health, ascites and liver function can predict outcomes after TARE. Clinical trial number NCT02305459.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALBI, albumin-bilirubin
- BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer
- BSA, body surface area
- CIRSE, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe
- CIRT, CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy
- ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HR, hazard ratio
- INR, international normalized ratio
- IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting
- OS, overall survival
- PFS, progression-free survival
- PVT, portal vein thrombosis
- REILD, radioembolization-induced liver disease
- SIRT
- TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
- TARE, transarterial radioembolization
- Y90, Yttrium-90
- dosimetry
- hPFS, hepatic progression-free survival
- liver
- mBSA, modified body surface area
- observational
- radioembolization
- registry
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Kolligs
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Oncology and Hematology, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bora Peynircioglu
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye Campus, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Thomas Pfammatter
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Université Paris Cité, Paris & Service de Radiologie, APHP Nord, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Service de médecine nucléaire et imagerie moléculaire, CHUV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Geert Maleux
- Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Graham Munneke
- Interventional Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helena Pereira
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Paris, France,INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1418 (CIC1418), Paris, France
| | - Bleranda Zeka
- Clinical Research Department, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niels de Jong
- Clinical Research Department, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Vienna, Austria,Corresponding author. Address: Clinical Research Department, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Neutorgasse 9, 1010, Vienna Austria; Tel.: +43 1904200347
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Minimal-Invasive Therapy, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu C, Tadros G, Smith Q, Martinez L, Jeffries J, Yu Z, Yu Q. Selective internal radiation therapy of metastatic breast cancer to the liver: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:887653. [PMID: 36505832 PMCID: PMC9729947 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.887653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in treating patients with breast cancer with hepatic metastasis. Method PubMed and The Cochrane Library were queried from establishment to January 2021. The following keywords were implemented: "breast", "yttrium", and "radioembolization". The following variables and outcomes were collected: publication year, region, sample size, study design, presence of extrahepatic disease, tumor burden, infused radioactivity, breast cancer subtype, previous treatment, median survival time (MST), length of follow-up, adverse events, and radiographical response such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). Results A total of 24 studies from 14 institutions were included in the present meta-analysis. On the basis of the data from 412 patients, post-embolization MST was 9.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.0-11.6] months. Patients with additional extrahepatic metastasis had a poorer survival rate compared with those with localized hepatic metastasis only (MST: 5.3 vs. 15 months, p < 0.0001). Patients with <25% liver tumor burden exhibited more promising survival than those with >25% (MST: 10.5 vs. 6.8 months, p < 0.0139). On the basis of RECIST, mRECIST, and PERCIST criteria, tumor response rate was 36% (95% CI: 26%-47%), 49% (95% CI: 34%-65%), and 47% (95% CI: 17%-78%), respectively, whereas tumor control rate was 85% (95% CI: 76%-93%), 73% (95% CI: 59%-85%), and 97% (95% CI: 91%-100%), respectively. Conclusion On the basis of the available published evidence, SIRT is feasible and effective in treating patients with breast cancer with liver metastasis. Patients with lower hepatic tumor burden and without extrahepatic metastasis demonstrated more survival benefit. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Liu
- School of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington DC, United States
| | - George Tadros
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States
| | - Quinn Smith
- Kansas City University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States
| | - Linda Martinez
- School of Medicine, Ross University, Miramar, FL, United States
| | - James Jeffries
- Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Zhiyong Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Qian Yu
- Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States,*Correspondence: Qian Yu,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Interventional Management of Portal Hypertension in Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1461-1475. [PMID: 35953600 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01319-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the classifications and clinical hallmarks of common cancer-related conditions that contribute to the high incidence of portal hypertension in this population and provide an update on currently available interventional radiology therapeutic approaches. RECENT FINDINGS In the last few decades, there have been significant advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of portal hypertension. This knowledge has led to the development of safer and more effective minimally invasive approaches. The main objective is to provide alternatives to prevent life-threatening complications from clinically significant portal hypertension and to allow the continuation of cancer treatment interventions that would otherwise be stopped. Clinicians involved in cancer care should be aware of risk factors, associated complications, and management of portal hypertension in cancer patients. Interventional radiology offers minimally invasive alternatives that play a central role in improving clinical outcomes and survival of these patients, allowing the continuation of cancer treatments.
Collapse
|
16
|
Transarterial Yttrium-90 Radioembolization in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients: Outcome Assessment Applying a Prognostic Score. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215324. [PMID: 36358743 PMCID: PMC9656639 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization (RE) is a viable therapy option in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study delineates a prognostic score regarding overall survival (OS) after RE using routine pre-therapeutic parameters. A retrospective analysis of 39 patients (median age, 61 [range, 32−82] years; 26 females, 13 males) with ICC and 42 RE procedures was conducted. Cox regression for OS included age, ECOG, hepatic and extrahepatic tumor burden, thrombosis of the portal vein, ascites, laboratory parameters and dose reduction due to hepatopulmonary shunt. Median OS after RE was 8.0 months. Using univariable Cox, ECOG ≥ 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8), AST/ALT quotient (HR, 1.86), high GGT (HR, 1.002), high CA19-9 (HR, 1.00) and dose reduction of 40% (HR, 3.8) predicted shorter OS (each p < 0.05). High albumin predicted longer OS (HR, 0.927; p = 0.045). Multivariable Cox confirmed GGT ≥ 750 [U/L] (HR, 7.84; p < 0.001), ECOG > 1 (HR, 3.76; p = 0.021), albumin ≤ 41.1 [g/L] (HR, 3.02; p = 0.006) as a three-point pre-therapeutic prognostic score. More specifically, median OS decreased from 15.3 months (0 risk factors) to 7.6 months (1 factor) or 1.8 months (≥2 factors; p < 0.001). The proposed score may aid in improved pre-therapeutic patient identification with (un-)favorable OS after RE and facilitate the balance between potential life prolongation and overaggressive patient selection.
Collapse
|
17
|
The Evolving Role of Radioembolization in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143415. [PMID: 35884479 PMCID: PMC9322914 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This review provides basic insights into radioembolization, also known as selective internal radiation therapy, in patients suffering from neuroendocrine liver metastases. Radioembolization is a treatment that uses radioactive beads that are implanted intra-arterially to locally irradiate liver tumors. The available literature on radioembolization in neuroendocrine liver metastases show promising results in terms of efficacy and toxicity and will be discussed in more detail. However, data in the field of NELM need clarification, and this review also discusses the caveats, challenges and new insights when considering radioembolization in neuroendocrine liver metastases. Abstract At diagnosis, 21–50% of neuroendocrine tumors already have distant metastases, of which the liver is most commonly affected. Unfortunately, the presence of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is the most incriminating factor for survival. At NELM diagnosis, 60–70% of patients suffer from bilobar multifocal disease, making them ineligible for surgical resection. With limited systemic options, a clinical need for liver-directed treatments exists. Trans-arterial (bland) embolization, chemoembolization and radioembolization have been increasingly used in the treatment of NELM. In recent years, radioembolization (also known as selective internal radiation therapy) has gained attention due to promising tumor reductive results, limited toxicities and increasing scientific evidence. This review provides basic insights into radioembolization as a technique, a summary of available literature on radioembolization in NELM, and discusses caveats, challenges and new insights when considering radioembolization in NELM.
Collapse
|
18
|
Maxwell AWP, Mendoza HG, Sellitti MJ, Camacho JC, Deipolyi AR, Ziv E, Sofocleous CT, Yarmohammadi H, Maybody M, Humm JL, Schwartz J, Juluru K, Dunphy MP, Boas FE. Optimizing 90Y Particle Density Improves Outcomes After Radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:958-969. [PMID: 35459960 PMCID: PMC10103908 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03139-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine how particle density affects dose distribution and outcomes after lobar radioembolization. METHODS Matched pairs of patients, treated with glass versus resin microspheres, were selected by propensity score matching (114 patients), in this single-institution retrospective study. For each patient, tumor and liver particle density (particles/cm3) and dose (Gy) were determined. Tumor-to-normal ratio was measured on both 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and post-90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT. Microdosimetry simulations were used to calculate first percentile dose, which is the dose in the cold spots between microspheres. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS As more particles were delivered, doses on 90Y SPECT/CT became more uniform throughout the treatment volume: tumor and liver doses became more similar (p = 0.04), and microscopic cold spots between particles disappeared. For hypervascular tumors (tumor-to-normal ratio ≥ 2.6 on MAA scan), delivering fewer particles (< 6000 particles/cm3 treatment volume) was associated with better LPFS (p = 0.03). For less vascular tumors (tumor-to-normal ratio < 2.6), delivering more particles (≥ 6000 particles/cm3) was associated with better LPFS (p = 0.02). In matched pairs of patients, using the optimal particle density resulted in improved overall survival (11.5 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.047), compared to using suboptimal particle density. Microdosimetry resulted in better predictions of LPFS (p = 0.03), and overall survival (p = 0.02), compared to conventional dosimetry. CONCLUSION The number of particles delivered can be chosen to maximize the tumor dose and minimize the liver dose, based on tumor vascularity. Optimizing the particle density resulted in improved LPFS and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron W P Maxwell
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Humberto G Mendoza
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew J Sellitti
- Radiology Informatics, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan C Camacho
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy R Deipolyi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Etay Ziv
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Majid Maybody
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John L Humm
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jazmin Schwartz
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Krishna Juluru
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark P Dunphy
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - F Edward Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Radiology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alnammi M, Wortman J, Therrien J, Afnan J. MRI features of treated hepatocellular carcinoma following locoregional therapy: a pictorial review. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:2299-2313. [PMID: 35524803 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03526-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and within the United States. Liver transplant or partial liver resection is the definitive treatment of choice for HCC; however, the majority of cases are detected in advanced stages due to its early-stage asymptomatic nature, often precluding surgical treatment. Locoregional therapy plays an essential role in HCC management, including curative intent, as a bridge to transplant, or in some cases palliative therapy. Radiologists play a critical role in assessing tumor response following treatment to guide further management that may potentially impact transplantation eligibility; therefore, it is important for radiologists to have an understanding of different locoregional therapies and the variations of imaging response to different therapies. In this review article, we outline the imaging response to ablative therapy (AT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We will also briefly discuss the basic concepts of these locoregional therapies. This review focuses on the imaging features following locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma following AT, TACE, SIRT, and SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohanned Alnammi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA
| | - Jeremy Wortman
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA
| | - Jaclyn Therrien
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA
| | - Jalil Afnan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reed DK, Stewart WH, Banta T, Lirette ST, Campbell GS, Patel A. Repeated Transarterial Radioembolization Adverse Event and Hepatotoxicity Profile in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience. Cureus 2022; 14:e23578. [PMID: 35494977 PMCID: PMC9045679 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to evaluate the adverse event (AE) and hepatotoxicity profile, including radioembolization induced liver disease (REILD), following repeat radioembolization (RE) to the same or overlapping vascular territories in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and limited functional hepatic reserve/cirrhosis. Methods Nine patients (seven male and two female; median age, 66 years) with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent repeat RE (cycle 1 and cycle 2) between January 2012 and August 2019 were included. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment history, and pertinent laboratory values were recorded at baseline and post-treatment time points over a period of four months. Post-RE AE/hepatotoxicity was assessed, organized by type and frequency, and graded by severity according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). To assess rudimentary comparisons for post-RE hepatotoxicity vs. factors of interest, Spearman's rank correlation/rho was calculated, and all relevant plots were constructed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed along with associated median survival time. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata v16.1. Results Following cycle 1, 22 objective AE were identified according to CTCAE v.5 (17 grade I, four grade II, and one grade III), with grade I, II, and III AE experienced by 78%, 33%, and 11% of patients, respectively. Following cycle 2, 19 objective AE were identified according to CTCAE v.5 (11 grade I, seven grade II, and one grade III), with grade I, II, and III AE experienced by 89%, 56%, and 11% of patients, respectively. A single patient developed REILD after cycle 1, which progressed to fatal REILD following cycle 2. Following cycle 2, an additional patient advanced from less severe hepatotoxicity to REILD. Following cycle 2, positive correlations between the higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD; rho=0.70) and Child-Pugh (rho=0.74) scores and degree of post-RE hepatotoxicity/REILD appear to emerge. Post-repeat RE median overall survival was 12.5 months. Conclusion Post-RE hepatotoxicity following repeat RE to the same or overlapping vascular territories in patients with limited functional hepatic reserve/cirrhosis is a common occurrence with variable severity ranging from transient laboratory derangement to fatal REILD. Lack of a consensus REILD definition and grading scale results in non-uniform reporting of incidence as well as clinical and laboratory features of the disease process. Strides aimed at improving clinical characterization, forming a more complete diagnostic definition, and establishing a uniform grading system with respect to REILD are of particular importance and would ultimately improve repeat RE patient selection and risk management.
Collapse
|
21
|
Nagel I, Herrmann K, Lahner H, Rischpler C, Weber F. Combined medical therapy, nuclear medicine therapy and other therapies in metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00156-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
22
|
Wagemans ME, Braat AJ, Smits ML, Bruijnen RC, Lam MG. Side effects of therapy with radiolabelled microspheres. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00179-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
23
|
Tong VJW, Shelat VG, Chao YK. Clinical application of advances and innovation in radiation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Transl Res 2021; 7:811-833. [PMID: 34988334 PMCID: PMC8715712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has evolved over the past two decades, with the development of newer treatment modalities. While various options are available, unmet needs are reflected through the mixed treatment outcome for intermediate-stage HCC. As HCC is radiosensitive, radiation therapies have a significant role in management. Radiation therapies offer local control for unresectable lesions and for patients who are not surgical candidates. Radiotherapy also provides palliation in metastatic disease, and acts as a bridge to resection and transplantation in selected patients. Advancements in radiotherapy modalities offer improved dose planning and targeted delivery, allowing for better tumor response and safer dose escalations while minimizing the risks of radiation-induced liver damage. Radiotherapy modalities are broadly classified into external beam radiation therapy and selective internal radiation therapy. With emerging modalities, radiotherapy plays a complementary role in the multidisciplinary care of HCC patients. Aim We aim to provide an overview of the role and clinical application of radiation therapies in HCC management. Relevance for Patients The continuous evolution of radiotherapy techniques allows for improved therapeutic outcomes while mitigating unwanted adverse effects, making it an attractive modality in HCC management. Rigorous clinical studies, quality research and comprehensive datasets will further its application in the present era of evidence-based practice in Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie J. W. Tong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vishal G. Shelat
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433, Singapore
| | - Yew Kuo Chao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dose-response relationship after yttrium-90-radioembolization with glass microspheres in patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:1700-1710. [PMID: 34873638 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05642-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In radioembolization, response is achieved through the irradiation and damaging of tumor DNA. For hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors, a dose-response relationship has not been established yet. This study assesses whether increasing tumor-absorbed doses lead to increased response rates. METHODS We included all patients who underwent yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres radioembolization in our center if both pre- and post-treatment contrast-enhanced CT and post-injection PET/CT were available. Up to five hepatic tumors and the healthy hepatic tissue were delineated, and absorbed dose was quantified using post-injection PET/CT. Response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 on patient and tumor level. Linear mixed models were used to study the relationship between absorbed dose and response on tumor level. Logistic regression analysis was used on patient level to study dose-response and hepatic dose-toxicity relationships. RESULTS A total of 128 tumors in 26 patients (31 procedures) were included in the response analysis. While correcting for confounding by tumor volume, a significant effect of response on dose was found (p = 0.0465). Geometric mean of absorbed dose for responding tumors was 170 Gy, for stable disease 101 Gy, and for progressive disease 67 Gy. No significant dose-toxicity relationship could be identified. CONCLUSION In patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases, treated with 90Y-radioembolization, a clear dose-response relationship was found. We propose to perform 90Y-radioembolization with an absolute minimum planned tumor-absorbed dose of 150 Gy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ricke J, Schinner R, Seidensticker M, Gasbarrini A, van Delden OM, Amthauer H, Peynircioglu B, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, De Toni EN, Malfertheiner P, Pech M, Sangro B. Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2021; 75:1387-1396. [PMID: 34454995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS SORAMIC is a previously published randomised controlled trial assessing survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received sorafenib with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Based on the per-protocol (PP) population, we assessed whether the outcome of patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone was affected by adverse effects of SIRT on liver function. METHODS The PP population consisted of 109 (SIRT+sorafenib) vs. 173 patients (sorafenib alone). Comparisons were made between subgroups who achieved a significant survival benefit or trend towards improved survival with SIRT and the inverse group without a survival benefit: <65 years-old vs. ≥65 years-old, Child-Pugh 5 vs. 6, no transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) vs. prior TACE, no cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis, non-alcohol- vs. alcohol-related aetiology. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was used to monitor liver function over time during follow-up. RESULTS ALBI scores increased in all patient groups during follow-up. In the PP population, ALBI score increases were higher in the SIRT+sorafenib than the sorafenib arm (p = 0.0021 month 4, p <0.0001 from month 6). SIRT+sorafenib conferred a survival benefit compared to sorafenib alone in patients aged <65 years-old, those without cirrhosis, those with Child-Pugh 5, and those who had not received TACE. A higher increase in ALBI score was observed in the inverse subgroups in whom survival was not improved by adding SIRT (age ≥65 years-old, p <0.05; cirrhosis, p = 0.07; Child-Pugh 6, p <0.05; prior TACE, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION SIRT frequently has a negative, often subclinical, effect on liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which may impair prognosis after treatment. Careful patient selection for SIRT as well as prevention of clinical and subclinical liver damage by selective treatments, high tumour uptake ratio, and medical prophylaxis could translate into better efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645 LAY SUMMARY: This study of treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has an adverse effect on liver function that may affect patient outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected before they undergo SIRT and the treatment technique should be optimised for maximum protection of non-target liver parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany.
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Medicina interna e gastroenterologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Radiology and Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rizzo A, Annunziata S, Salvatori M. Side effects of theragnostic agents currently employed in clinical practice. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2021; 65:315-326. [PMID: 34881848 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03411-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Nuclear medicine plays an increasingly important role in several neoplasms management through a theragnostic approach by which targeted molecular imaging and radiotherapy are obtained with the use of radionuclide pairs with similar characteristics. In some cases, nuclear theragnostic use a pair of agents with identical chemical and biological characteristics while in others are employed theragnostic molecules which are not chemically or biologically identical but show similar biodistribution (so-called "twins in spirit" radiopharmaceuticals). This strategy was developed for the first time over 75 years ago, when iodine-131 was used for diagnostic imaging, confirmation of target expression and radionuclide therapy of thyroid cancer. Other theragnostic approaches were subsequently introduced with significant clinical results and some of them are currently considered standard treatment for different cancers. However, as any other therapy, also nuclear theragnostic treatment carries the potential risk of early deterministic and late stochastic off-target adverse effects, generally minimal and easily managed. This article reviews the reported side effects and risks of the main radiopharmaceuticals used for nuclear theragnostic in oncology for the treatment of thyroid cancer, neuroendocrine neoplasms, adrenergic tumors, metastatic prostate cancer, and liver tumors. Selecting appropriate patients using a multidisciplinary approach, meticulous pretreatment planning and knowledge of methods permit to decrease the incidence of these potential side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Rizzo
- Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy -
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, TracerGLab, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Salvatori
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Liver Decompensation as Late Complication in HCC Patients with Long-Term Response following Selective Internal Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215427. [PMID: 34771591 PMCID: PMC8582376 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest forms of cancer. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is one of the therapeutic options for treatment of advanced HCC. Studies show that SIRT has a high objective response rate, but lack of survival benefit when compared to different treatment modalities. We hypothesized that this is due to potential damage in healthy liver parenchyma as a side-effect of SIRT, resulting in functional changes to the liver. This can ultimately result in liver decompensation and potentially death. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess long-term liver-related complications after SIRT in patients with HCC. We analyzed patients who underwent SIRT and found that liver decompensation occurred more often after SIRT when compared to sorafenib. However, careful patient selection may result in a survival benefit after SIRT when compared to other treatments. The ABLI score may be a valuable prognostic score for selecting patients. Abstract Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is used as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to assess long-term liver-related complications of SIRT in patients who had not developed radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients without REILD that developed Child-Pugh (CP) ≥ B7 liver decompensation after SIRT. The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and tumor response. These data were compared with a matched cohort of patients treated with sorafenib. Eighty-five patients were included, of whom 16 developed REILD. Of the remaining 69 patients, 38 developed liver decompensation CP ≥ B7. The median OS was 18 months. In patients without REILD, the median OS in patients with CP ≥ B7 was significantly shorter compared to those without CP ≥ B7; 16 vs. 31 months. In the case-matched analysis, the median OS was significantly longer in SIRT-treated patients; 16 vs. 8 months in sorafenib. Liver decompensation CP ≥ B7 occurred significantly more in SIRT when compared to sorafenib; 62% vs. 27%. The ALBI score was an independent predictor of liver decompensation (OR 0.07) and OS (HR 2.83). After SIRT, liver decompensation CP ≥ B7 often developed as a late complication in HCC patients and was associated with a shorter OS. The ALBI score was predictive of CP ≥ B7 liver decompensation and the OS, and this may be a valuable marker for patient selection for SIRT.
Collapse
|
28
|
Prognostic value of baseline imaging and clinical features in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2021; 126:211-218. [PMID: 34686780 PMCID: PMC8770679 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01577-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To investigate the prognostic value of baseline imaging features for overall survival (OS) and liver decompensation (LD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Design Patients with advanced HCC from the SORAMIC trial were evaluated in this post hoc analysis. Several radiological imaging features were collected from baseline computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, besides clinical values. The prognostic value of these features for OS and LD (grade 2 bilirubin increase) was quantified with univariate Cox proportional hazard models and multivariate Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Results Three hundred and seventy-six patients were included in this study. The treatment arm was not correlated with OS. LASSO showed satellite lesions, atypical HCC, peritumoral arterial enhancement, larger tumour size, higher albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score, liver–spleen ratio <1.5, ascites, pleural effusion and higher bilirubin values were predictors of worse OS, and higher relative liver enhancement, smooth margin and capsule were associated with better OS. LASSO analysis for LD showed satellite lesions, peritumoral hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase, high ALBI score, higher bilirubin values and ascites were predictors of LD, while randomisation to sorafenib arm was associated with lower LD. Conclusions Imaging features showing aggressive tumour biology and poor liver function, in addition to clinical parameters, can serve as imaging biomarkers for OS and LD in patients receiving sorafenib and selective internal radiation therapy for HCC.
Collapse
|
29
|
Manchec B, Kokabi N, Narayanan G, Niekamp A, Peña C, Powell A, Schiro B, Gandhi R. Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:445-452. [PMID: 34629712 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Cancer has become the leading cause of mortality in America, and the majority of patients eventually develop hepatic metastasis. As liver metastases are frequently unresectable, the value of liver-directed therapies, such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE), has become increasingly recognized as an integral component of patient management. Outcomes after radioembolization of hepatic malignancies vary not only by location of primary malignancy but also by tumor histopathology. This article reviews the outcomes of TARE for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic breast cancer, and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, as well as special considerations when treating metastatic disease with TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Manchec
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Govindarajan Narayanan
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Andrew Niekamp
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Constantino Peña
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Alex Powell
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Brian Schiro
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Ripal Gandhi
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bi-Centric Independent Validation of Outcome Prediction after Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancer. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163668. [PMID: 34441964 PMCID: PMC8396945 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Yttrium-90 radioembolization (RE) plays an important role in the treatment of liver malignancies. Optimal patient selection is crucial for an effective and safe treatment. In this study, we aim to validate the prognostic performance of a previously established random survival forest (RSF) with an external validation cohort from a different national center. Furthermore, we compare outcome prediction models with different established metrics. METHODS A previously established RSF model, trained on a consecutive cohort of 366 patients who had received RE due to primary or secondary liver tumor at a national center (center 1), was used to predict the outcome of an independent consecutive cohort of 202 patients from a different national center (center 2) and vice versa. Prognostic performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and the integrated Brier score (IBS). The prognostic importance of designated baseline parameters was measured with the minimal depth concept, and the influence on the predicted outcome was analyzed with accumulated local effects plots. RSF values were compared to conventional cox proportional hazards models in terms of C-index and IBS. RESULTS The established RSF model achieved a C-index of 0.67 for center 2, comparable to the results obtained for center 1, which it was trained on (0.66). The RSF model trained on center 2 achieved a C-index of 0.68 on center 2 data and 0.66 on center 1 data. CPH models showed comparable results on both cohorts, with C-index ranging from 0.68 to 0.72. IBS validation showed more differentiated results depending on which cohort was trained on and which cohort was predicted (range: 0.08 to 0.20). Baseline cholinesterase was the most important variable for survival prediction. CONCLUSION The previously developed predictive RSF model was successfully validated with an independent external cohort. C-index and IBS are suitable metrics to compare outcome prediction models, with IBS showing more differentiated results. The findings corroborate that survival after RE is critically determined by functional hepatic reserve and thus baseline liver function should play a key role in patient selection.
Collapse
|
31
|
Schatka I, Tschernig M, Rogasch JMM, Bluemel S, Graef J, Furth C, Sehouli J, Blohmer JU, Gebauer B, Fehrenbach U, Amthauer H. Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Outcome Assessment Applying a Prognostic Score. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153777. [PMID: 34359677 PMCID: PMC8345060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a therapy option in patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM). This analysis aimed at identifying a prognostic score regarding overall survival (OS) after SIRT using routine pretherapeutic parameters. Retrospective analysis of 38 patients (age, 59 (39-84) years) with BCLM and 42 SIRT procedures. Cox regression for OS included clinical factors (age, ECOG and prior treatments), laboratory parameters, hepatic tumor load and dose reduction due to hepatopulmonary shunt. Elevated baseline ALT and/or AST was present if CTCAE grade ≥ 2 was fulfilled (>3 times the upper limit of normal). Median OS after SIRT was 6.4 months. In univariable Cox, ECOG ≥ 1 (hazard ratio (HR), 3.8), presence of elevated baseline ALT/AST (HR, 3.8), prior liver surgery (HR, 10.2), and dose reduction of 40% (HR, 8.1) predicted shorter OS (each p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox confirmed ECOG ≥ 1 (HR, 2.34; p = 0.012) and elevated baseline ALT/AST (HR, 4.16; p < 0.001). Combining both factors, median OS decreased from 19.2 months (0 risk factors; n = 14 procedures) to 5.9 months (1 factor; n = 20) or 2.2 months (2 factors; n = 8; p < 0.001). The proposed score may facilitate pretherapeutic identification of patients with unfavorable OS after SIRT. This may help to balance potential life prolongation with the hazards of invasive treatment and hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)30-450-627-045
| | - Monique Tschernig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Josefine Graef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (J.-U.B.)
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (J.-U.B.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.G.); (U.F.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.G.); (U.F.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Predictors of Successful Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Bridging or Downstaging in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 2021:9926704. [PMID: 34336728 PMCID: PMC8324378 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9926704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to identify clinical and imaging prognosticators associated with the successful bridging or downstaging to liver transplantation (LT) in patients undergoing Yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y90-RE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Retrospectively, patients with Y90-RE naïve HCC who were candidates or potential candidates for LT and underwent Y90-RE were included. Patients were then divided into favorable (maintained or achieved Milan criteria (MC) eligibility) or unfavorable (lost eligibility or unchanged MC ineligibility) cohorts based on changes to their MC eligibility after Y90-RE. Penalized logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant baseline prognosticators. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2018, 135 patients underwent Y90-RE treatment. Among the 59 (42%) patients within MC, LT eligibility was maintained in 49 (83%) and lost in 10 (17%) patients. Within the 76 (56%) patients outside MC, eligibility was achieved in 32 (42%) and unchanged in 44 (58%). Among the 81 (60%) patients with a favorable response, 16 (20%) went on to receive LT. Analysis of the baseline characteristics revealed that lower Albumin-Bilirubin score, lower Child-Pugh class, lower Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, HCC diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging on CT or MRI, normal/higher albumin levels, decreased severity of tumor burden, left lobe HCC disease, and absence of HBV-associated cirrhosis, baseline abdominal pain, or fatigue were all associated with a higher likelihood of bridging or downstaging to LT eligibility (p's < 0.05). CONCLUSION Certain baseline clinical and tumor characteristics are associated with the successful bridging or downstaging of potential LT candidates with HCC undergoing Y90-RE.
Collapse
|
33
|
Proietti I, Skroza N, Filippi L, Bernardini N, Mambrin A, Tolino E, Rossi G, Marchesiello A, Marraffa F, Volpe S, Bagni O, Potenza C. Long-Term Maintained Response to Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in an Oligometastatic Uveal Melanoma Patient Treated with Concomitant Anti-PD-1 Therapy. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:692. [PMID: 34357064 PMCID: PMC8307638 DOI: 10.3390/life11070692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a primary neoplasm of the eye arising from the melanocytes residing in the iris, ciliary body or choroid. It is the most frequent intraocular malignancy and often determines metastases at distant sites, with a peculiar tropism for the liver. Metastatic UM has a poor prognosis, as any treatment affects the natural course of this fatal disease. Herein, we report a case of a UM metastatic to the liver in a 54 year-old female patient, initially treated with nivolumab without success. The patient was then scheduled for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) while continuing immunotherapy. This combination led to a complete and durable response and the patient is currently free of disease, two years after the diagnosis of the hepatic metastases. The association between SIRT and immunotherapy (IT) has very promising perspectives for metastatic UM, especially considering the disappointing or contradictory results of classic chemotherapies, IT alone and targeted therapies. Furthermore, this combination has been shown to have a good security profile. However, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of associating SIRT and IT and to clarify some unsolved problems, such as the timing of administration of these two therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Proietti
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Nevena Skroza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Luca Filippi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy; (L.F.); (O.B.)
| | - Nicoletta Bernardini
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Alessandra Mambrin
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Ersilia Tolino
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Giovanni Rossi
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Anna Marchesiello
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Federica Marraffa
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Salvatore Volpe
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Oreste Bagni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy; (L.F.); (O.B.)
| | - Concetta Potenza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sang R, Stratton B, Engel A, Deng W. Liposome technologies towards colorectal cancer therapeutics. Acta Biomater 2021; 127:24-40. [PMID: 33812076 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the fourth most common deadly cancer worldwide. After treatment with curative intent recurrence rates vary with staging 0-13% in Stage 1, 11-61% in S2 and 28-73% in Stage 3. The toxicity to healthy tissues from chemotherapy and radiotherapy and drug resistance severely affect the quality of life and cancer specific outcomes of CRC patients. To overcome some of these limitations, many efforts have been made to develop nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems. Among these nanocarriers, liposomes represented one of the most successful candidates in delivering targeted oncological treatment, improving safety profile and therapeutic efficacy of encapsulated drugs. In this review we will discuss liposome design with a particular focus on the targeting feature and triggering functions. We will also summarise the recent advances in liposomal delivery system for CRC treatment in both the preclinical and clinical studies. We will finally provide our perspectives on the liposome technology development for the future clinical translation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Conventional treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) severely affect the therapeutic effects for advanced patients. With the development of nanomedicines, liposomal delivery system appears to be one of the most promising nanocarriers for CRC treatment. In last three years several reviews in this area have been published focusing on the preclinical research and drug delivery function, which is a fairly narrow focus in the field of liposome technology for CRC therapy. Our review presented the most recent advances of the liposome technology (both clinical and preclinical applications) for CRC with strong potential for further clinical translation. We believe it will attract lots of attention from various audiences, including researchers, clinicians and the industry.
Collapse
|
35
|
Seidensticker M, Fabritius MP, Beller J, Seidensticker R, Todica A, Ilhan H, Pech M, Heinze C, Powerski M, Damm R, Weiss A, Rueckel J, Omari J, Amthauer H, Ricke J. Impact of Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis on Radiation-Induced Liver Disease Following Radioembolization. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13091992. [PMID: 33919073 PMCID: PMC8122451 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13091992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radioembolization has failed to prove survival benefit in randomized trials, and, depending on various factors including tumor biology, response rates may vary considerably. Studies showed positive correlations between survival and absorbed tumor dose. Therefore, increasing currently prescribed tumor doses may be favorable for improving patient outcomes. The dominant limiting factor for increasing RE dose prescriptions is the relatively low tolerance of liver parenchyma to radiation with the possible consequence of a radiation-induced liver disease. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients. The results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization. Abstract Background: Radioembolization (RE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres yields heterogeneous response rates in with primary or secondary liver cancer. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is a potentially life-threatening complication with higher prevalence in cirrhotics or patients exposed to previous chemotherapies. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients; Methods: Ninety-three patients with liver metastases of breast cancer received RE between 2007 and 2016. All Patients received RILD prophylaxis for 8 weeks post-RE. From January 2014, RILD prophylaxis was changed from ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and prednisolone (standard prophylaxis [SP]; n = 59) to pentoxifylline (PTX), UDCA and low-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (modified prophylaxis (MP); n = 34). The primary endpoint was toxicity including symptoms of RILD; Results: Dose exposure of normal liver parenchyma was higher in the modified vs. standard prophylaxis group (47.2 Gy (17.8–86.8) vs. 40.2 Gy (12.5–83.5), p = 0.017). All grade RILD events (mild: bilirubin ≥ 21 µmol/L (but <30 μmol/L); severe: (bilirubin ≥ 30 µmol/L and ascites)) were observed more frequently in the SP group than in the MP group, albeit without significance (7/59 vs. 1/34; p = 0.140). Severe RILD occurred in the SP group only (n = 2; p > 0.1). ALBI grade increased in 16.7% patients in the MP and in 27.1% patients in the SP group, respectively (group difference not significant); Conclusions: At established dose levels, mild or severe RILD events proved rare in our cohort. RILD prophylaxis with PTX, UDCA and LMWH appears to have an independent positive impact on OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer and may reduce the frequency and severity of RILD. Results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis presumably targeting combinations of anticoagulation (MP) and antiinflammation (SP) to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Matthias Philipp Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Jannik Beller
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.T.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.T.); (H.I.)
| | - Maciej Pech
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Constanze Heinze
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Robert Damm
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Alexander Weiss
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Johannes Rueckel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| | - Jazan Omari
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Badar W, Van Ha T, Zangan S, Navuluri R, Pillai A, Baker T, Dalag L, Han R, Ahmed O. Safety and efficacy of repeat Y90 radioembolization to the same hepatic arterial territory. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200752. [PMID: 33411569 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the efficacy and safety of repeat transarterial radioembolization (TARE) to similar hepatic arterial territories. METHODS Between 3/2011 and 4/2019, 26 patients (25 males and 1 Female, Mean Age: 65 yo, SD: 11.7 yo, Range: 18-83.0 yo) received TARE with Y90 glass microspheres to treat recurrent or residual primary disease in similar hepatic arterial lobe or segments. Tumor response was evaluated by imaging using the modified-RECIST criteria. Incidence of RILD and adverse events were categorized by a standardized scale using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. RESULTS Mean cumulative activity after the first treatment was 2.50 GBq (SD:1.04 GBq, Range:0.61-4.93 GBq) and second treatment was 2.27 GBq (SD:1.01 GBq, Range:0.92-5.46 GBq). Mean interval time between initial and repeat treatments was 9.6 months (Range: 1-53 months). Tumor responses were complete, partial, or progression in 73% (n = 19/26), 23% (n = 6/26), and 4% (n = 1/26) in repeat treatment patients, respectively. The incidence of RILD was 0%. Toxicity after first and second treatment was seen in 19% (n = 5/26) & 23% (n = 6/26) patients, respectively, and were all of CTCAE Grade 2. No significant predictors of treatment toxicity for repeat treatment were identified except increased MELD score (p = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with repeat treatment showed a median survival of 15.0 months (95% CI 8.8-21.1 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI 8.1-29.9 months) in patients who only received one treatment with a p value of 0.485. CONCLUSION Repeat TARE with glass microspheres was an effective and safe treatment strategy for disease management in patients with residual or recurrent disease to the similar hepatic arterial territories without any major treatment related toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Although safety and efficacy of repeat radioembolism has been studied, no study has focused on repeat treatment to similar hepatic arterial territories. The current study shows that repeat treatment to the same hepatic arterial territory is as safe as single treatment to the same territory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wali Badar
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Steven Zangan
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rakesh Navuluri
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Talia Baker
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard Dalag
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ross Han
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alsultan AA, Braat AJAT, Smits MLJ, Barentsz MW, Bastiaannet R, Bruijnen RCG, de Keizer B, de Jong HWAM, Lam MGEH, Maccauro M, Chiesa C. Current Status and Future Direction of Hepatic Radioembolisation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:106-116. [PMID: 33358630 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Radioembolisation is a locoregional treatment modality for hepatic malignancies. It consists of several stages that are vital to its success, which include a pre-treatment angiographic simulation followed by nuclear medicine imaging, treatment activity choice, treatment procedure and post-treatment imaging. All these stages have seen much advancement over the past decade. Here we aim to provide an overview of the practice of radioembolisation, discuss the limitations of currently applied methods and explore promising developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Alsultan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - A J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M W Barentsz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R Bastiaannet
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B de Keizer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H W A M de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Maccauro
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - C Chiesa
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chronic Hepatotoxicity in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Transarterial Radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:1627-1635. [PMID: 33004146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the manifestations of chronic liver injury following transarterial chemoembolization with those of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study consisted of an Institutional Review Board-approved single-institution retrospective analysis of NET patients who received transarterial chemoembolization from 2006 to 2016 and TARE from 2005 to 2014 and survived at least 1 year from the initial treatment. Patients receiving only transarterial chemoembolization (n = 63) or TARE (n = 28) were evaluated for the presence or absence of durable hepatic toxicities occurring at least 6 months after initial treatment. The definitions and grades of liver injury were adapted from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and were characterized by the presence of laboratory or clinical toxicities of Grade 3 or above. RESULTS Chronic hepatic toxicity occurred in 14 of 63 transarterial chemoembolization patients (22%) with a total of 26 Grade 3-4 events, in whom elevation of bilirubin was the most common toxicity, compared to 8 of 28 TARE patients (29%) with a total of 16 Grade 3-4 and 2 Grade 5 events, in whom ascites were the most frequent toxicity. There were more laboratory toxicities in the transarterial chemoembolization group (65% vs 38%, P = .11) and fewer Grade 4-5 injuries (6% vs 27% of patients, P = .06). There was also a significantly higher number of patients who experienced intrahepatic progression of disease in the transarterial chemoembolization cohort than in the TARE patients (75% vs 43%, respectively; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS Delayed hepatotoxicity from transarterial chemoembolization and TARE occurred in 22% and 29% of patients, respectively, from 6 months to several years following treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization-related toxicities on average were less severe and manifested primarily as laboratory derangements, compared to TARE toxicities which consisted of clinical hepatic decompensation.
Collapse
|
39
|
The Role of Interventional Radiology for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumor: An Updated Review. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9072302. [PMID: 32698459 PMCID: PMC7408651 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional radiology plays an important role in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NELM). Transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are intra-arterial therapies available for these patients in order to improve symptoms and overall survival. These treatment options are proposed in patients with NELM not responding to systemic therapies and without extrahepatic progression. Currently, available data suggest that TAE should be preferred to TACE in patients with NELM from extrapancreatic origin because of similar efficacy and better patient tolerance. TACE is more effective in patients with pancreatic NELM and SIRT has shown promising results along with good tolerance. However, large randomized controlled trials are still lacking in this setting. Available literature mainly consists in small sample size and retrospective studies with important technical heterogeneity. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated overview of the currently reported endovascular interventional radiology procedures that are used for the treatment of NELM.
Collapse
|
40
|
The utility of 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT/CT for selective internal radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 41:740-749. [PMID: 32649575 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies assessing the impact of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) on the regional liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are sparse. This study assessed the changes in total and regional liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and investigated the utility of HBS to predict post-SIRT liver dysfunction. METHODS Patients treated with SIRT for HCC between 2011 and 2019, underwent Tc-mebrofenin HBS with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) before and 6 weeks after SIRT. The corrected mebrofenin uptake rate (cMUR) and corresponding volume was measured in the total liver, and in treated and nontreated liver regions. Patients with and without post-SIRT liver dysfunction were compared. RESULTS A total of 29 patients, all Child-Pugh-A and mostly intermediate (72%) stage HCC were included in this study. Due to SIRT, the cMURtotal declined from 5.8 to 4.5%/min/m (P < 0.001). Twenty-two patients underwent a lobar SIRT, which induced a decline in cMUR (2.9-1.7%/min/m, P < 0.001) and volume (1228-1101, P = 0.002) of the treated liver region, without a change in cMUR (2.4-2.0%/min/m, P = 0.808) or volume (632-644 mL, P = 0.661) of the contralateral nontreated lobe. There were no significant pre-SIRT differences in total or regional cMUR or volume between patients with and without post-SIRT liver dysfunction. CONCLUSION In patients treated with SIRT for HCC, HBS accurately identified changes in total and regional liver function and may have a complementary role to personalize lobar or selective SIRT. In this pilot study, there were no pre-SIRT differences in cMUR or volume to aid in predicting post-SIRT liver dysfunction.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bösch F, Ilhan H, Pfahler V, Thomas M, Knösel T, Eibl V, Pratschke S, Bartenstein P, Seidensticker M, Auernhammer CJ, Spitzweg C, Guba MO, Werner J, Angele MK. Radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases is safe and effective prior to major hepatic resection. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020; 9:312-321. [PMID: 32509817 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Radioembolization (RE) is well established in the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. However surgery is rarely performed after RE, although liver resection is the gold standard in the treatment of localized neuroendocrine liver metastases. Therefore, aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of liver resection after RE in a homogenous cohort. Methods From a prospective surgical (n=494) and nuclear medical (n=138) database patients with NELM who underwent liver resection and/or RE were evaluated. Between September 2011 and December 2017 eight patients could be identified who underwent liver resection after RE (mean therapeutic activity of 1,746 Mbq). Overall and progression free survival were evaluated as well as epidemiological and perioperative factors. The surgical specimens were analyzed for necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis. Results The mean hepatic tumor load of patients, who had liver surgery after RE, was 31.4% with a mean Ki-67 proliferation index of 5.9%. The majority of these patients (7/8) received whole liver RE prior to liver resection, which did not increase morbidity and mortality compared to a surgical collective. Indications for RE were oncological (6/8) or carcinoid syndrome associated reasons (2/8). Mean overall survival was 25.1 months after RE and subsequent surgery. Tumor necrosis in radioembolized lesions was 29.4% without evidence of fibrosis and inflammation in hepatic tissue. Conclusions This is the first study analyzing the multimodal therapeutic approach of liver resection following whole liver RE. This treatment algorithm is safe, does not lead to an increased morbidity and is associated with a favorable oncological outcome. Nonetheless, patient selection remains a key issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Bösch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vanessa Pfahler
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Knösel
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Valentin Eibl
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Pratschke
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J Auernhammer
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 4, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 4, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus O Guba
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin K Angele
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yttrium-90 Radioembolization in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:1035-1043.e2. [PMID: 32473757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcomes of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review was performed of 115 patients at 6 tertiary care centers; 92 were treated with resin microspheres (80%), 22 were treated with glass microspheres (19%), and 1 was treated with both. Postintervention outcomes were compared between groups with χ2 tests. Survival after diagnosis and after treatment was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Grade 3 laboratory toxicity was observed in 4 patients (4%); no difference in toxicity profile between resin and glass microspheres was observed (P = .350). Clinical toxicity per Society of Interventional Radiology criteria was noted in 29 patients (25%). Partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 was noted in 25% of patients who underwent embolization with glass microspheres and 3% of patients who were treated with resin microspheres (P = .008). Median overall survival (OS) from first diagnosis was 29 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-37 mo) for all patients, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. Median OS after treatment was 11 months (95% CI, 8-13 mo), and 1- and 3-year OS rates were 44% and 4%, respectively. These estimates were not significantly different between resin and glass microspheres (P = .730 and P = .475, respectively). Five patients were able to undergo curative-intent resection after 90Y radioembolization (4%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides observational data of treatment outcomes after 90Y radioembolization in patients with unresectable ICC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Mikell JK, Dewaraja YK, Owen D. Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Metastases: Clinical Aspects and Dosimetry Models. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:68-76. [PMID: 31727302 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres is a liver-directed therapy for primary and metastatic disease. This manuscript provides a review of the clinical literature on TARE indications and efficacy with overviews of patient-selection and toxicity. Current dosimetry models used in practice are safe, relatively simple, and easy for clinicians to use. Planning currently relies on the imperfect surrogate, 99mTc macroaggregated albumin. Post-therapy quantitative imaging (90Y SPECT/CT or 90Y PET/CT) of microspheres can be used to calculate the macroscopic in vivo absorbed dose distribution. Similar to the evolution of other brachytherapy dose calculations, TARE is moving toward more patient-specific dosimetry that includes calculating and reporting nonuniform dose distributions throughout tumors and normal uninvolved liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin K Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Yuni K Dewaraja
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Radioembolization of hepatocarcinoma with 90Y glass microspheres: treatment optimization using the dose-toxicity relationship. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:3018-3032. [PMID: 32451604 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04845-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is, by all standards, a radiation therapy. As such, according to Euratom Directive 2013/59, it should be optimized by a thorough treatment plan based on the distinct evaluation of absorbed dose to the lesions and to the non-tumoural liver (two-compartment dosimetry). Since the dosimetric prediction with 99mTc albumin macro-aggregates (MAA) of non-tumoural liver is much more accurate than the same prediction on lesions, treatment planning should focus on non-tumoural liver rather than on lesion dosimetry. The aim of this study was to determine a safety limit through the analysis of pre-treatment dosimetry with 99mTc-MAA single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT), in order to deliver the maximum tolerable absorbed dose to non-tumoural liver. METHODS Data from intermediate/advanced hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with 90Y glass microspheres were collected in this single-arm retrospective study. Injection was always lobar, even in case of bilobar disease, to avoid treating the whole liver in a single session. A three-level definition of liver decompensation (LD) was introduced, considering toxicity only in cases of liver decompensation requiring medical action (LD type C, LDC). We report LDC rates, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis between LDC and NO LDC absorbed dose distributions, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) curves and uni- and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with toxicity. RESULTS A 6-month timeline was defined as necessary to capture all treatment-related toxicity events. Previous transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), presence or extension of portal vein tumoural thrombosis (PVTT) and tumour pattern (nodular versus infiltrative) were not associated with tolerance to TARE. On the contrary, at the multivariate analysis, the absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver (including the non-injected lobe) was a prognostic indicator correlated with liver decompensation (odds ratio = 4.24). Basal bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dL was a second even more significant risk factor (odds ratio = 6.35). NTCP analysis stratified with this bilirubin cut-off determined a 15% liver decompensation risk at 50 Gy/90 Gy for bilirubin >/< 1.1 mg/dL. These results are valid for a 90Y glass microsphere administration 4 days after the reference time. CONCLUSION Given the low predictive accuracy of 99mTc-MAA on lesion absorbed dose reported by several authors, an optimized TARE with 90Y glass microspheres with lobar injection 4 days after reference time should aim at an absorbed dose averaged over the whole non-tumoural liver of 50 Gy/90 Gy for basal bilirubin higher/lower than 1.1 mg/dL, respectively.
Collapse
|
45
|
Herchuelz M, Marin G, Derijckere ID, Vouche M, Delatte P, Donckier V, Liberale G, Hendlisz A, Artigas C, Bourgeois P, Flamen P. Personalized selective internal radiation therapy in liver metastasis of thyroid cancer with impaired liver function: A case report. Radiol Case Rep 2020; 15:548-551. [PMID: 32190167 PMCID: PMC7068060 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) is a less common form of differentiated thyroid cancer. Liver metastasis of differentiated thyroid cancer frequently occurs in the late onset of the metastatic disease, are often unrescetable and noniodine avid, leading to a poor prognosis. A 69-year-old man with a 14-year history of multi-metastatic follicular thyroid cancer was treated iteratively with 131-Iodine allowing to maintain a stable disease. Upon a recent exponential increase of the thyroglobulin, a peritoneal mass and a voluminous hepatic metastasis were discovered, comorbidities and an insufficient future remnant liver function excluded liver surgical resection. The tumour board proposed a resection of the peritoneal mass followed by selective internal radiation therapy of the liver mass. Due to the already impaired liver function, personalized dosimetry allowed a safe treatment delivering low activity to the nontumoral liver followed by a clinical and imaging response of the liver mass at 3 months. At our knowledge, this is the first case of thyroid liver metastasis treated by selective internal radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Tiwari A, Saraf S, Jain A, Panda PK, Verma A, Jain SK. Basics to advances in nanotherapy of colorectal cancer. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2020; 10:319-338. [PMID: 31701486 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-019-00680-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer existing across the globe. It begins with the formation of polyps leading to the development of metastasis, especially in advanced stage patients, who necessitate intensive chemotherapy that usually results in a poor response and high morbidity owing to multidrug resistance and severe untoward effects to the non-cancerous cells. Advancements in the targeted drug delivery permit the targeting of tumor cells without affecting the non-tumor cells. Various nanocarriers such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, micelles, and nanogels, etc. are being developed and explored for effective delivery of cytotoxic drugs to the target site thereby enhancing the drug distribution and bioavailability, simultaneously subduing the side effects. Moreover, immunotherapy for CRC is being explored for last few decades. Few clinical trials have even potentially benefited patients suffering from CRC, still immunotherapy persists merely an experimental alternative. Assessment of the ongoing and completed trials is to be warranted for effective treatment of CRC. Scientists are paying efforts to develop novel carrier systems that may enhance the targeting potential of low therapeutic index chemo- and immune-therapeutics. Several preclinical studies have revealed the superior efficacy of nanotherapy in CRC as compared to conventional approaches. Clinical trials are being recruited to ascertain the safety and efficacy of CRC therapies. The present review discourses in a nutshell the molecular interventions including the genetics, signaling pathways involved in CRC, and advances in various strategies explored for the treatment of CRC with a special emphasis on nanocarriers based drug targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Tiwari
- Pharmaceutics Research Projects Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, 470 003 (M.P.), India
| | - Shivani Saraf
- Pharmaceutics Research Projects Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, 470 003 (M.P.), India
| | - Ankit Jain
- Pharmaceutics Research Projects Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, 470 003 (M.P.), India
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, NH-2, Mathura-Delhi Road, Mathura, 281 406 (U.P.), India
| | - Pritish K Panda
- Pharmaceutics Research Projects Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, 470 003 (M.P.), India
| | - Amit Verma
- Pharmaceutics Research Projects Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, 470 003 (M.P.), India
| | - Sanjay K Jain
- Pharmaceutics Research Projects Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, 470 003 (M.P.), India.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Incidence of Radioembolization-Induced Liver Disease and Liver Toxicity Following Repeat 90Y-Radioembolization: Outcomes at a Large Tertiary Care Center. Clin Nucl Med 2020; 45:100-104. [PMID: 31876805 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The complication profile following repeat Y-radioembolization (RE) is not well understood, and repeat RE is sometimes avoided because of concerns for RE-induced liver disease (REILD) and liver toxicity. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of REILD and liver toxicity following repeat Y-RE and to identify potential risk factors. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing repeat RE to the same hepatic lobe between 2013 and 2018 was performed. Baseline factors were evaluated as predictors of liver toxicity, mortality, and REILD, which was defined as the presence symptomatic ascites or jaundice in the absence of biliary obstruction within 8 weeks following RE. Post-RE complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. RESULTS A total of 39 patients underwent repeat RE with 14 (35.9%) experiencing Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity of grade 2 or greater, 3 (10.3%) grade 3, and no grade 4 or greater. A Model for End Stage Liver Disease score of 8 or greater was associated with grade 2 toxicity or greater (26.7% vs 75%; P = 0.013). Only 3 patients (7.7%) experienced REILD due to symptomatic ascites without jaundice. Greater than 2 REs were associated with a greater rate of 6-month mortality (12% vs 58.3%, P = 0.003), 12-month mortality (28% vs 75%, P = 0.007), and REILD (0% vs 21.4%, P = 0.016). Age, sex, microsphere type, cirrhosis, Child-Pugh, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status were not significantly associated with complications, REILD, or survival. CONCLUSIONS Repeat Y-RE appears to be well tolerated with a low rate of high-grade adverse events and REILD.
Collapse
|
48
|
Braat AJAT, Bruijnen RCG, van Rooij R, Braat MNGJA, Wessels FJ, van Leeuwaarde RS, van Treijen MJC, de Herder WW, Hofland J, Tesselaar MET, de Jong HWAM, Lam MGEH. Additional holmium-166 radioembolisation after lutetium-177-dotatate in patients with neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (HEPAR PLuS): a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:561-570. [PMID: 32112737 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30027-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, the liver is the most commonly affected organ and a crucial factor for prognosis and survival. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy can prolong progression-free survival in these patients. Additional treatment of liver disease might further improve outcomes. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of additional holmium-166 (166Ho) radioembolisation after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with metastatic liver neuroendocrine neoplasms. METHODS The Holmium Embolization Particles for Arterial Radiotherapy Plus 177Lu-Dotatate in Salvage Neuroendocrine Tumour Patients (HEPAR PLuS) study was a single-centre, phase 2 study done at the University Medical Center Utrecht (Utrecht, Netherlands). Patients, aged at least 18 years, with histologically proven grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine neoplasms of all origins, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and three or more measurable liver metastases according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria received 166Ho-radioembolisation within 20 weeks after four cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (lutetium-177-dotatate [177Lu-dotatate]). The primary endpoint was objective liver tumour response in the treated liver volume, defined as complete response (disappearance of all lesions) or partial response (≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions, compared with baseline measurements), according to RECIST 1.1, analysed per protocol at 3 months. Safety was assessed in all patients who received treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02067988. Recruitment is completed and long-term follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS From Oct 15, 2014, to Sept 12, 2018, 34 patients were assessed for eligibility. 31 patients received treatment and 30 (97%) patients were available for primary endpoint assessment and completed 6 months of follow-up. Three (9%) patients were excluded at screening and one (3%) patient was treated and died before the primary endpoint and was replaced. According to the per-protocol analysis 13 (43%; 95% CI 26-63) of 30 patients achieved an objective response in the treated volume. The most frequently reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3-4 clinical and laboratory toxicities within 6 months included abdominal pain (three [10%] of 31 patients), increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (16 [54%]), and lymphocytopenia (seven [23%]). One (3%) fatal treatment-related serious adverse event occurred (radioembolisation-induced liver disease). Two (6%) patients had serious adverse events deemed to be unrelated to treatment (gastric ulcer and perforated cholecystitis). INTERPRETATION 166Ho-radioembolisation, as an adjunct to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm liver metastases, is safe and efficacious. Radioembolisation can be considered in patients with bulky liver disease, including after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. A future randomised, controlled study should investigate the added benefit of this treatment on progression-free survival. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Rutger C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rob van Rooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Manon N G J A Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Mark J C van Treijen
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hugo W A M de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Birgin E, Rasbach E, Seyfried S, Rathmann N, Diehl SJ, Schoenberg SO, Reissfelder C, Rahbari NN. Contralateral Liver Hypertrophy and Oncological Outcome Following Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12020294. [PMID: 32012709 PMCID: PMC7072354 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization with 90Y-microspheres has been reported to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy with simultaneous ipsilateral control of tumor growth. The aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the evidence of contralateral liver hypertrophy and oncological outcome following unilateral treatment with radioembolization. A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries for studies published between 2008 and 2020 was performed. A total of 16 studies, comprising 602 patients, were included. The median kinetic growth rate per week of the contralateral liver lobe was 0.7% and declined slightly over time. The local tumor control was 84%. Surgical resection after radioembolization was carried out in 109 out of 362 patients (30%). Although the available data suggest that radioembolization prior to major hepatectomy is safe with a promising oncological outcome, the definitive role of radioembolization requires assessment within controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Erik Rasbach
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Nils Rathmann
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Steffen J. Diehl
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Stefan O. Schoenberg
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-621-383-3591
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
van Roekel C, Braat AJAT, Smits MLJ, Bruijnen RCG, de Keizer B, Lam MGEH. Radioembolization. Clin Nucl Med 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39457-8_36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|