The outcome of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in obese patients

The obesity paradox in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Obesity is widely regarded as an established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, recent studies have shown that lower mortality and better cancer-specific survival were observed in CRC patients with elevated body mass index (BMI), an example of the obesity paradox, which is the inverse correlation between obesity and mortality in some populations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association between BMI and CRC outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles published from inception to December 31, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies comparing the prognosis of CRC patients with obesity or overweight with that of normal-weight CRC patients were eligible.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by 2 reviewers independently; differences were resolved by a third reviewer. BMI was classified according to WHO categories.

DATA ANALYSIS

To assess the prognostic effects of different BMI categories in CRC patients, hazard ratios and 95%CIs of overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were extracted from included articles.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies (55 391 patients in total) were included. Higher BMI was significantly associated with more favorable CRC outcomes. Compared with normal-weight patients, underweight patients had worse overall survival (HR = 1.26; 95%CI, 1.15-1.37) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.19; 95%CI, 1.11-1.27, while patients with overweight had better overall survival (HR = 0.92; 95%CI, 0.86-0.99), disease-free survival (HR = 0.96; 95%CI, 0.93-1.00), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.76-0.98). Patients with morbid obesity had worse overall survival (HR = 1.12; 95%CI, 1.02-1.22) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.15; 95%CI, 1.07-1.24) than normal-weight patients. There was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival between patients with obesity (HR = 0.94; 95%CI, 0.76-1.16) and patients with normal weight, nor between patients with underweight and patients with normal weight (HR = 1.14; 95%CI, 0.82-1.58).

CONCLUSIONS

CRC patients with a higher BMI appear to have reduced mortality compared with normal-weight CRC patients, even though higher BMI/obesity is an established determinant for the development of CRC.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020202320.

Is obesity a factor of surgical difficulty in transanal endoscopic surgery?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) in obese patients.

METHODS

Observational descriptive study evaluating the feasibility of TES in obese rectal tumors between June 2004 and January 2019. Patients were assigned to two groups: body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m² and BMI ≥30 kg/m², the latter defined as obese.

RESULTS

From 775 patients, 681 were enrolled in the study, 145 (21.3%) of them obese. No statistically significant differences between groups were found with respect to overall morbidity (27, 18.6%).The obese patients presented trends towards shorter mean surgical time (65 min, IQR 48 min), less perforation in the peritoneal cavity (eight, 5.5%), and 133 (91.7%) presented a lower rate of lesion fragmentation.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes in obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m²). TES in those obese patients does not represent a factor of surgical difficulty.

Use of rectal mucosal grafts in substitution urethroplasty: an early series

Background

To evaluate the feasibility of use of rectal mucosal grafts for augmentation urethroplasty.

Methods

A series of five patients who underwent rectal mucosal graft urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease were identified. Descriptive statistics were used to describe these patients. Primary endpoints were recurrence of stricture and perioperative morbidity.

Results

Five patients underwent rectal mucosal graft augmentation urethroplasty. Four had a history of prior buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty and one had a history of head and neck cancer. Rectal mucosa was noted to be thinner and required more tailoring than buccal mucosa. All patients had patent urethras at time of postoperative retrograde urethrogram. A small diverticulum was noted in one patient with no further sequelae. No complications from rectal mucosal graft harvest were noted. All patients with prior buccal grafting subjectively preferred the rectal graft due to fewer side effects. Subjectively, patients with prior buccal grafts preferred the post-operative recovery following rectal mucosal graft urethroplasty.

Conclusions

Rectal mucosal graft augmentation urethroplasty is a safe alternative in patients with contraindications to buccal grafting with limited morbidity.