β-Blocker use is associated with a higher relapse risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a Dutch retrospective case-control study

A ganglionic intestinointestinal reflex activated by acute noxious challenge

To investigate noxious stimulation-responsive neural circuits that could influence the gut, we recorded from intestinally directed (efferent) nerve filaments dissected from mesenteric nerves close to the small intestine in anesthetized rats. These exhibited baseline multiunit activity that was almost unaffected by vagotomy (VagX) and reduced only slightly by cutting the splanchnic nerves. The activity was halved by hexamethonium (Hex) treatment. When an adjacent gut segment received an intraluminal stimulus 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonate (TNBS) in 30% ethanol, mesenteric efferent nerve activity increased for more than 1 h. The increased activity was almost unaffected by bilateral vagotomy or splanchnic nerve section, indicating a lack of central nervous involvement, but it was 60% reduced by hexamethonium. Spike sorting discriminated efferent single and predominantly single-unit spike trains that responded to TNBS, were unaffected by splachnectomy but were silenced by hexamethonium. After noxious stimulation of one segment, the adjacent segment showed no evidence of suppression of gut motility or vasoconstriction. We conclude that luminal application of a noxious stimulus to the small intestine activates an entirely peripheral, intestinointestinal reflex pathway. This pathway involves enteric intestinofugal neurons that excite postganglionic sympathetic neurons via a nicotinic synapse. We suggest that the final sympathetic efferent neurons that respond to a tissue damaging stimulus are distinct from vasoconstrictor, secretomotor, and motility inhibiting neurons.NEW & NOTEWORTHY An intraluminal noxious chemical stimulus applied to one segment of small intestine increased mesenteric efferent nerve activity to an adjacent segment. This was identified as a peripheral ganglionic reflex that did not require vagal or spinal connections. Hexamethonium blocked most, but not all, ongoing and reflex mesenteric efferent activity. The prevertebral sympathetic efferent neurons that are activated likely affect inflammatory and immune functions of other gut segments.

β-adrenergic signaling triggers enteric glial reactivity and acute enteric gliosis during surgery

BACKGROUND

Enteric glia contribute to the pathophysiology of various intestinal immune-driven diseases, such as postoperative ileus (POI), a motility disorder and common complication after abdominal surgery. Enteric gliosis of the intestinal muscularis externa (ME) has been identified as part of POI development. However, the glia-restricted responses and activation mechanisms are poorly understood. The sympathetic nervous system becomes rapidly activated by abdominal surgery. It modulates intestinal immunity, innervates all intestinal layers, and directly interfaces with enteric glia. We hypothesized that sympathetic innervation controls enteric glia reactivity in response to surgical trauma.

METHODS

Sox10iCreERT2/Rpl22HA/+ mice were subjected to a mouse model of laparotomy or intestinal manipulation to induce POI. Histological, protein, and transcriptomic analyses were performed to analyze glia-specific responses. Interactions between the sympathetic nervous system and enteric glia were studied in mice chemically depleted of TH+ sympathetic neurons and glial-restricted Sox10iCreERT2/JellyOPfl/+/Rpl22HA/+ mice, allowing optogenetic stimulation of β-adrenergic downstream signaling and glial-specific transcriptome analyses. A laparotomy model was used to study the effect of sympathetic signaling on enteric glia in the absence of intestinal manipulation. Mechanistic studies included adrenergic receptor expression profiling in vivo and in vitro and adrenergic agonism treatments of primary enteric glial cell cultures to elucidate the role of sympathetic signaling in acute enteric gliosis and POI.

RESULTS

With ~ 4000 differentially expressed genes, the most substantial enteric glia response occurs early after intestinal manipulation. During POI, enteric glia switch into a reactive state and continuously shape their microenvironment by releasing inflammatory and migratory factors. Sympathetic denervation reduced the inflammatory response of enteric glia in the early postoperative phase. Optogenetic and pharmacological stimulation of β-adrenergic downstream signaling triggered enteric glial reactivity. Finally, distinct adrenergic agonists revealed β-1/2 adrenoceptors as the molecular targets of sympathetic-driven enteric glial reactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric glia act as early responders during post-traumatic intestinal injury and inflammation. Intact sympathetic innervation and active β-adrenergic receptor signaling in enteric glia is a trigger of the immediate glial postoperative inflammatory response. With immune-activating cues originating from the sympathetic nervous system as early as the initial surgical incision, adrenergic signaling in enteric glia presents a promising target for preventing POI development.

Sympathetic activity regulates epithelial proliferation and wound healing via adrenergic receptor α2A

Innervation of the intestinal mucosa by the sympathetic nervous system is well described but the effects of adrenergic receptor stimulation on the intestinal epithelium remain equivocal. We therefore investigated the effect of sympathetic neuronal activation on intestinal cells in mouse models and organoid cultures, to identify the molecular routes involved. Using publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets we show that the α2A isoform is the most abundant adrenergic receptor in small intestinal epithelial cells. Stimulation of this receptor with norepinephrine or a synthetic specific α2A receptor agonist promotes epithelial proliferation and stem cell function, while reducing differentiation in vivo and in intestinal organoids. In an anastomotic healing mouse model, adrenergic receptor α2A stimulation resulted in improved anastomotic healing, while surgical sympathectomy augmented anastomotic leak. Furthermore, stimulation of this receptor led to profound changes in the microbial composition, likely because of altered epithelial antimicrobial peptide secretion. Thus, we established that adrenergic receptor α2A is the molecular delegate of intestinal epithelial sympathetic activity controlling epithelial proliferation, differentiation, and host defense. Therefore, this receptor could serve as a newly identified molecular target to improve mucosal healing in intestinal inflammation and wounding.

Chronic Effects of the Sympathetic Nervous System in Inflammatory Models

The immune system is embedded in a network of regulatory systems to keep homeostasis in case of an immunologic challenge. Neuroendocrine immunologic research has revealed several aspects of these interactions over the past decades, e.g., between the autonomic nervous system and the immune system. This review will focus on evidence revealing the role of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in chronic inflammation, like colitis, multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis, lupus erythematodes, and arthritis with a focus on animal models supported by human data. A theory of the contribution of the SNS in chronic inflammation will be presented that spans these disease entities. One major finding is the biphasic nature of the sympathetic contribution to inflammation, with proinflammatory effects until the point of disease outbreak and mainly anti-inflammatory influence thereafter. Since sympathetic nerve fibers are lost from sites of inflammation during inflammation, local cells and immune cells achieve the capability to endogenously produce catecholamines to fine-tune the inflammatory response independent of brain control. On a systemic level, it has been shown across models that the SNS is activated in inflammation as opposed to the parasympathetic nervous system. Permanent overactivity of the SNS contributes to many of the known disease sequelae. One goal of neuroendocrine immune research is defining new therapeutic targets. In this respect, it will be discussed that at least in arthritis, it might be beneficial to support β-adrenergic and inhibit α-adrenergic activity besides restoring autonomic balance. Overall, in the clinical setting, we now need controlled interventional studies to successfully translate the theoretical knowledge into benefits for patients.

Immunological Tolerance in Liver Transplant Recipients: Putative Involvement of Neuroendocrine-Immune Interactions

The transplantation world changed significantly following the introduction of immunosuppressants, with millions of people saved. Several physicians have noted that liver recipients that do not take their medication for different reasons became tolerant regarding kidney, heart, and lung transplantations at higher frequencies. Most studies have attempted to explain this phenomenon through unique immunological mechanisms and the fact that the hepatic environment is continuously exposed to high levels of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or non-pathogenic microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) from commensal flora. These components are highly inflammatory in the periphery but tolerated in the liver as part of the normal components that arrive via the hepatic portal vein. These immunological mechanisms are discussed herein based on current evidence, although we hypothesize the participation of neuroendocrine-immune pathways, which have played a relevant role in autoimmune diseases. Cells found in the liver present receptors for several cytokines, hormones, peptides, and neurotransmitters that would allow for system crosstalk. Furthermore, the liver is innervated by the autonomic system and may, thus, be influenced by the parasympathetic and sympathetic systems. This review therefore seeks to discuss classical immunological hepatic tolerance mechanisms and hypothesizes the possible participation of the neuroendocrine-immune system based on the current literature.

Neuronal regulation of the gut immune system and neuromodulation for treating inflammatory bowel disease

The gut immune system in the healthy intestine is anti-inflammatory, but can move to a pro-inflammatory state when the gut is challenged by pathogens or in disease. The nervous system influences the level of inflammation through enteric neurons and extrinsic neural connections, particularly vagal and sympathetic innervation of the gastrointestinal tract, each of which exerts anti-inflammatory effects. Within the enteric nervous system (ENS), three neuron types that influence gut immune cells have been identified, intrinsic primary afferent neurons (IPANs), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) neurons that project to the mucosa, and cholinergic neurons that influence macrophages in the external muscle layers. The enteric neuropeptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), tachykinins, and neuromedin U (NMU), which are contained in IPANs, and VIP produced by the mucosa innervating neurons, all influence immune cells, notably innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). ILC2 are stimulated by VIP to release IL-22, which promotes microbial defense and tissue repair. Enteric neurons are innervated by the vagus, and, in the large intestine, by the pelvic nerves. Vagal nerve stimulation reduces gut inflammation, which may be both by stimulation of efferent (motor) pathways to the ENS, and stimulation of afferent pathways that connect to integrating centers in the CNS. Efferent pathways from the CNS have their anti-inflammatory effects through either or both vagal efferent neurons and sympathetic pathways. The final neurons in sympathetic pathways reduce gut inflammation by the action of noradrenaline on β2 adrenergic receptors expressed by immune cells. Activation of neural anti-inflammatory pathways is an attractive option to treat inflammatory bowel disease that is refractory to other treatments. Further investigation of the ways in which enteric reflexes, vagal pathways and sympathetic pathways integrate their effects to modulate the gut immune system and gut inflammation is needed to optimize neuromodulation therapy.

Renin-angiotensin system in intestinal inflammation-Angiotensin inhibitors to treat inflammatory bowel diseases?

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, which manifest in recurring gastrointestinal inflammation. The current treatment options of IBD are not curative and are lacking in aspects like prevention of fibrosis. New treatment options are needed to fulfil the unmet needs and provide alternatives to drugs with resistances and side effects. Drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), besides being antihypertensive, also possess anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties and could offer an inexpensive alternative to control inflammation and fibrosis in the gut. RAS inhibitors have been effective in preventing and alleviating colitis in preclinical studies, but available human data are still sparse. This review outlines the pathophysiological functions of RAS in the gut and summarizes preclinical studies utilizing pharmacological RAS inhibitors in the treatment of experimental colitis. We discuss the alterations in intestinal RAS and the available evidence of the benefits of RAS inhibitors for IBD patients. Retrospective studies comparing IBD patients using ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers have provided optimistic results regarding a milder disease course and fewer hospitalizations and corticosteroid use in patients using RAS inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these promising medications in the treatment of IBD.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Impact of Medications on Cardiovascular Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

There is increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Studies have shown association between cardiovascular disease (eg, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke) and inflammatory bowel disease. Medications such as infliximab and adalimumab (monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor α) may help decrease the inflammatory burden and cardiovascular risk; however, there have been reports of hypertriglyceridemia and worsening of moderate to severe heart failure with these medications. Janus kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, have been associated with hyperlipidemia and thromboembolism. We aim to discuss clinical and imaging modalities to assess cardiovascular risk in inflammatory bowel disease patients and review the role of various medications with respect to cardiovascular disease in this population.

Bioelectronics in the brain-gut axis: focus on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Accumulating evidence shows that intestinal homeostasis is mediated by cross-talk between the nervous system, enteric neurons and immune cells, together forming specialized neuroimmune units at distinct anatomical locations within the gut. In this review, we will particularly discuss how the intrinsic and extrinsic neuronal circuitry regulates macrophage function and phenotype in the gut during homeostasis and aberrant inflammation, such as observed in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Furthermore, we will provide an overview of basic and translational IBD research using these neuronal circuits as a novel therapeutic tool. Finally, we will highlight the different challenges ahead to make bioelectronic neuromodulation a standard treatment for intestinal immune-mediated diseases.

Is there any role of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in modulating inflammatory bowel disease outcome?

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have been associated with improved outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to investigate any possible effect of antihypertensive medications on inflammatory bowel disease course.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty inflammatory bowel disease patients with hypertension were compared using a 1:1 ratio with age- and gender-matched control patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The class of antihypertensive medication, traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease characteristics, and history (surgery, hospitalizations, and treatment) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 150 (44.7% Crohn's disease) patients with hypertension, 46.7% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, 30.6% on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 40% on β-blockers, and 40.7% on calcium channel blockers. Univariate analysis revealed significantly higher rates of traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis among antihypertensive users. When analyzing by class of antihypertensive medication, angiotensin receptor blockers were significantly associated with milder course as indicated by less frequent immunomodulator (P = 0.039) and steroid use (P = 0.041). Rates of lifetime steroids were statistically significantly lower among angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (odds ratio = 1.191, 95% confidence interval, 1.005-1.411). After adjustment with confounding factors, only angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with milder inflammatory bowel disease course (P = 0.037) and lower rates of immunomodulator use (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a possible protective effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on overall inflammatory bowel disease course by targeting the renin-angiotensin system. Their effect on inflammatory bowel disease needs to be studied in larger cohorts.

Roles of G protein-coupled receptors in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex disease with multiple pathogenic factors. Although the pathogenesis of IBD is still unclear, a current hypothesis suggests that genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, a dysfunctional immune system, the microbiome, and the interactions of these factors substantially contribute to the occurrence and development of IBD. Although existing and emerging drugs have been proven to be effective in treating IBD, none can cure IBD permanently. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical signaling molecules implicated in the immune response, cell proliferation, inflammation regulation and intestinal barrier maintenance. Breakthroughs in the understanding of the structures and functions of GPCRs have provided a driving force for exploring the roles of GPCRs in the pathogenesis of diseases, thereby leading to the development of GPCR-targeted medication. To date, a number of GPCRs have been shown to be associated with IBD, significantly advancing the drug discovery process for IBD. The associations between GPCRs and disease activity, disease severity, and disease phenotypes have also paved new avenues for the precise management of patients with IBD. In this review, we mainly focus on the roles of the most studied proton-sensing GPCRs, cannabinoid receptors, and estrogen-related GPCRs in the pathogenesis of IBD and their potential clinical values in IBD and some other diseases.

Neuro-Immune Circuits Regulate Immune Responses in Tissues and Organ Homeostasis

The dense innervation of the gastro-intestinal tract with neuronal networks, which are in close proximity to immune cells, implies a pivotal role of neurons in modulating immune functions. Neurons have the ability to directly sense danger signals, adapt immune effector functions and integrate these signals to maintain tissue integrity and host defense strategies. The expression pattern of a large set of immune cells in the intestine characterized by receptors for neurotransmitters and neuropeptides suggest a tight neuronal hierarchical control of immune functions in order to systemically control immune reactions. Compelling evidence implies that targeting neuro-immune interactions is a promising strategy to dampen immune responses in autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases or rheumatoid arthritis. In fact, electric stimulation of vagal fibers has been shown to be an extremely effective treatment strategy against overwhelming immune reactions, even after exhausted conventional treatment strategies. Such findings argue that the nervous system is underestimated coordinator of immune reactions and underline the importance of neuro-immune crosstalk for body homeostasis. Herein, we review neuro-immune interactions with a special focus on disease pathogenesis throughout the gastro-intestinal tract.

Neuroimmune Interactions in the Gut and Their Significance for Intestinal Immunity

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have a complex, multifactorial pathophysiology with an unmet need for effective treatment. This calls for novel strategies to improve disease outcome and quality of life for patients. Increasing evidence suggests that autonomic nerves and neurotransmitters, as well as neuropeptides, modulate the intestinal immune system, and thereby regulate the intestinal inflammatory processes. Although the autonomic nervous system is classically divided in a sympathetic and parasympathetic branch, both play a pivotal role in the crosstalk with the immune system, with the enteric nervous system acting as a potential interface. Pilot clinical trials that employ vagus nerve stimulation to reduce inflammation are met with promising results. In this paper, we review current knowledge on the innervation of the gut, the potential of cholinergic and adrenergic systems to modulate intestinal immunity, and comment on ongoing developments in clinical trials.

Bioelectric neuromodulation for gastrointestinal disorders: effectiveness and mechanisms

The gastrointestinal tract has extensive, surgically accessible nerve connections with the central nervous system. This provides the opportunity to exploit rapidly advancing methods of nerve stimulation to treat gastrointestinal disorders. Bioelectric neuromodulation technology has considerably advanced in the past decade, but sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence currently remains the only neuromodulation protocol in general use for a gastrointestinal disorder. Treatment of other conditions, such as IBD, obesity, nausea and gastroparesis, has had variable success. That nerves modulate inflammation in the intestine is well established, but the anti-inflammatory effects of vagal nerve stimulation have only recently been discovered, and positive effects of this approach were seen in only some patients with Crohn's disease in a single trial. Pulses of high-frequency current applied to the vagus nerve have been used to block signalling from the stomach to the brain to reduce appetite with variable outcomes. Bioelectric neuromodulation has also been investigated for postoperative ileus, gastroparesis symptoms and constipation in animal models and some clinical trials. The clinical success of this bioelectric neuromodulation therapy might be enhanced through better knowledge of the targeted nerve pathways and their physiological and pathophysiological roles, optimizing stimulation protocols and determining which patients benefit most from this therapy.

Stress burden and neuroendocrine regulation of cytokine production in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission

Stress demonstrably contributes to disease course in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we investigated if neuroendocrine regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production by peripheral blood immune cells is altered in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission (UCR). Using a whole blood stimulation assay, we measured the sensitivity of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α and IL-10 production to the glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone (DEX), the β₂-adrenergic receptor agonist terbutaline (TERB), and the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist 3-[2,4-dimethoxy-benzylidene]-anabaseine (GTS-21) in UCR patients (N = 26) and in healthy controls (HC, N = 25). Additionally, we assessed anxiety and depression symptoms as well as chronic perceived stress and disease-specific quality of life. Results showed that UCR patients exhibited greater anxiety, depression and chronic stress levels than HC, and reduced disease-specific quality of life. Plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) were significantly higher, while LPS-induced IL-10 production was substantially lower in UCR compared to HC. Independent of group, DEX and GTS-21 dose-dependently inhibited TNF-α and IL-10 production, whereas TERB inhibited TNF-α and upregulated IL-10 production. However, at higher TERB doses (i.e., stress levels), upregulation of IL-10 production was significantly diminished in UCR compared to HC. Together, these findings demonstrate that downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production in peripheral blood immune cells through glucocorticoid, adrenergic, and cholinergic mechanisms is essentially normal in UC in clinical remission and as efficient as in healthy individuals. However, UCR patients exhibited signs of systemic low-grade inflammation and dysregulation of anti-inflammatory IL-10 production. Impaired adrenergic upregulation of IL-10 production during remission could be one mechanism how stress facilitates relapse and conversion to symptomatic disease in these patients.