Are third-generation cephalosporins still the empirical antibiotic treatment of community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antimicrobial approach of abdominal post-surgical infections

Abdominal surgical site infections (SSIs) are infections that occur after abdominal surgery. They can be superficial, involving the skin tissue only, or more profound, involving deeper skin tissues including organs and implanted materials. Currently, SSIs are large global health problem with an incidence that varies significantly depending on the United Nations' Human Development Index. The purpose of this review is to provide a practical update on the latest available literature on SSIs, focusing on causative pathogens and treatment with an overview of the ongoing studies of new therapeutic strategies.

Antibiotic treatment in cirrhotic patients

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Liakina V: "Antibiotic resistance in patients with liver cirrhosis: Prevalence and current approach to tackle" (World J Clin Cases 2023, 11: 7530-7542). In this excellent review, Liakina presents current data on bacterial complications in patients with cirrhosis. Bacterial infections are the most common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. We focus specifically on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) which is the most representative infectious complication. Liakina V suggested starting empirically, in all patients with suspected SBP, third-generation cephalosporins when the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) in ascites is greater than 250/mm3. This statement creates some doubts in our clinical practice so we discuss on the unsolved pitfalls of diagnosis and treatment that are often encountered in patients with ascitic fluid infections, especially on bacterascites that is defined as ascitic bacterial growth with PMNs below 250/mm3. The severity of liver disease and overall prognosis are highly comparable for patients with bacterascites and SBP in some recent well-conducted studies. Furthermore, we present a brief analysis of the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant isolates with an introduction of currently approved antibiotic drug options to treat ascitic fluid infections avoiding antibiotic resistance. In light of the most recent epidemiological data, third-generation cephalosporins should not be considered as an empirical antibiotic treatment of choice for ascitic fluid infections.

Emergency medicine updates: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and is associated with significant risk of mortality. Therefore, it is important for emergency medicine clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this condition.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning SBP for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

SBP is commonly due to Gram-negative bacteria, but infections due to Gram-positive bacteria and multidrug resistant bacteria are increasing. The typical presentation of SBP includes abdominal pain, worsening ascites, fever, or altered mental status in a patient with known liver disease; however, some patients may be asymptomatic or present with only mild symptoms. Paracentesis is the diagnostic modality of choice and should be performed in any patient with ascites and concern for SBP or upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or in those being admitted for a complication of cirrhosis. Ultrasound should be used to optimize the procedure. An ascites absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 250 cells/mm³ is diagnostic of SBP. Ascitic fluid should be placed in blood culture bottles to improve the culture yield. Leukocyte esterase reagent strips can be used for rapid diagnosis if available. While many patients will demonstrate coagulation panel abnormalities, routine transfusion is not recommended. Management traditionally includes a third-generation cephalosporin, but specific patient populations may require more broad-spectrum coverage with a carbapenem or piperacillin-tazobactam. Albumin infusion is associated with reduced risk of renal impairment and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates can improve the care of patients with suspected SBP.

Guidelines for the Management of Adult Acute and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in the ICU: Neurology, Peri-Transplant Medicine, Infectious Disease, and Gastroenterology Considerations

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for adults with acute liver failure (ALF) or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) in the ICU.

DESIGN

The guideline panel comprised 27 members with expertise in aspects of care of the critically ill patient with liver failure or methodology. We adhered to the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures manual and conflict-of-interest policy. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the panel, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development.

INTERVENTIONS

In part 2 of this guideline, the panel was divided into four subgroups: neurology, peri-transplant, infectious diseases, and gastrointestinal groups. We developed and selected Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions according to importance to patients and practicing clinicians. For each PICO question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis where applicable. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence to decision framework to facilitate recommendations formulation as strong or conditional. We followed strict criteria to formulate best practice statements.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We report 28 recommendations (from 31 PICO questions) on the management ALF and ACLF in the ICU. Overall, five were strong recommendations, 21 were conditional recommendations, two were best-practice statements, and we were unable to issue a recommendation for five questions due to insufficient evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary, international experts formulated evidence-based recommendations for the management ALF and ACLF patients in the ICU, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on low quality and indirect evidence.

Clinical Characteristics and Early Diagnosis of Spontaneous Fungal Peritonitis/Fungiascites in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients with Ascites: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous fungal peritonitis (SFP) and fungiascites is less well-recognized and described in patients with liver cirrhosis. The aims of this study were to determine the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and risk factors of cirrhotic patients with SFP/fungiascites and to improve early differential diagnosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of 54 cases of spontaneous peritonitis in cirrhotic patients (52 SFP and 2 fungiascites) with fungus-positive ascitic culture. Fifty-four SBP cirrhotic patients with bacteria-positive ascitic culture were randomly enrolled as a control group. A nomogram was developed for the early differential diagnosis of SFP and fungiascites.

RESULTS

Hospital-acquired infection was the main cause of SFP/fungiascites. Of the 54 SFP/fungiascites patients, 31 (57.41%) patients carried on with the antifungal treatment, which seemed to improve short-term (30-days) mortality but not long-term mortality. Septic shock and HCC were independent predictors of high 30-day mortality in SFP/fungiascites patients. We constructed a predictive nomogram model that included AKI/HRS, fever, (1,3)-β-D-glucan, and hospital-acquired infection markers for early differential diagnosis of SFP/fungiascites in cirrhotic patients with ascites from SBP, and the diagnostic performance was favorable, with an AUC of 0.930 (95% CI: 0.874-0.985).

CONCLUSIONS

SFP/fungiascites was associated with high mortality. The nomogram established in this article is a useful tool for identifying SFP/fungiascites in SBP patients early. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed SFP/fungiascites, timely antifungal therapy should be administered.

Response-Guided Therapy With Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, or Ciprofloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial: A Validation Study of 2021 AASLD Practice Guidance for SBP

INTRODUCTION

For the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin were used as first-line agents. However, considering the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance, it is unclear which of these drugs can be initially recommended. This study aimed to compare the current efficacy of the 3 antibiotics, namely cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, for the treatment of SBP in patients with cirrhosis with ascites, when guided by therapeutic responses.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The inclusion criteria were 16- to 75-year-old patients with liver cirrhosis with ascites, having polymorphonuclear cell count of >250/mm 3 . We performed a follow-up paracentesis at 48 hours to decide continuing or changing the assigned antibiotics and then assessed the resolution rates at 120 and 168 hours of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients with cirrhosis who developed SBP were enrolled. Most of the patients were diagnosed as those with SBP within 48 hours of admission. The resolution rates at 120 hours, which is the primary endpoint, were 67.8%, 77.0%, and 73.6% in the cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin groups, respectively ( P = 0.388), by intension-to-treat analysis. The 1-month mortality was similar among the groups ( P = 0.770). The model for end-stage liver disease score and the SBP resolution were significant factors for survival.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of empirical antibiotics, such as cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, against SBP was not significantly different. In addition, these antibiotics administered based on response-guided therapy were still efficacious as initial treatment for SBP, especially in those with community-acquired infections.

Korean Guidelines for Use of Antibiotics for Intra-abdominal Infections in Adults

The guidelines are intended to provide practical information for the correct use of antibiotics for intra-abdominal infections in Korea. With the aim of realizing evidence-based treatment, these guidelines for the use of antibiotics were written to help clinicians find answers to key clinical questions that arise in the course of patient care, using the latest research results based on systematic literature review. The guidelines were prepared in consideration of the data on the causative pathogens of intra-abdominal infections in Korea, the antibiotic susceptibility of the causative pathogens, and the antibiotics available in Korea.

Efficacy predictors of third-generation cephalosporins in treating spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

OBJECTIVE

Third-generation cephalosporins (3rd GCs) have recently become controversial as the first-line strategy for empirical spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) treatment. This study aimed to identify SBP treatment efficacy predictors of 3rd GCs.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 279 cirrhosis patients with SBP who received 3rd GC monotherapy for initial empirical treatment from 2013 to 2019 were included. Nonresponse was defined as a decreased ascites polymorphonuclear (PMN) count < 25% from baseline after 48 hours of antibacterial treatment. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify efficacy predictors of 3rd GCs in treating SBP. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival data.

RESULTS

The nonresponder group included 120 patients with no response, and the responder group included 159 patients with responses. The response rate to 3rd GCs was 57.0% among all patients. The common pathogens were Escherichia coli (40.6%), Staphylococcus (15.6%), Klebsiella pneumonia (12.5%), and Streptococcus (12.5%) in 32 ascites culture isolates. Nosocomial SBP (NSBP) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.371, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.323-4.249, P = .004), pneumonia (OR: 11.561, 95% CI: 1.876-71.257, P = .008), recurrent SBP (OR: 3.386, 95% CI: 1.804-6.357, P < .001), platelet count (≥113.5 × 109/L) (OR: 3.515, 95% CI: 1.973-6.263, P < .001), and ascites PMN count (≤0.760 × 109/L) (OR: 4.967, 95% CI: 2.553-9.663, P < .001) were independent predictors of nonresponse to 3rd GCs against SBP. Survival plot analysis at 30 days showed worse survival for the nonresponders (P = .003).

CONCLUSION

NSBP, pneumonia, recurrent SBP, increased platelet count, and lower ascites PMN count were independent predictors of nonresponse to 3rd GC in treating SBP. Nonresponse to initial antibiotic treatment was associated with worse survival.

Prevalence and Therapeutic Management of Infections by Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Narrative Review

Bacterial infections are common events that significantly impact the clinical course of patients with cirrhosis. As in the general population, infections caused by multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are progressively increasing in cirrhotic patients, accounting for up to 30-35% of all infections. Nosocomial acquisition and prior exposure to antimicrobial treatment or invasive procedures are well-known risk factors for MDRO infections. Several studies have demonstrated that infections due to MDROs have a poorer prognosis and higher rates of treatment failure, septic shock, and hospital mortality. Due to the increasing rate of antimicrobial resistance, the approach to empirical treatment in cirrhotic patients with life-threatening infections has become significantly more challenging. In order to ensure a prompt administration of effective antibiotic therapy while avoiding unnecessary antibiotic exposure at the same time, it is of utmost importance to choose the correct antimicrobial therapy and administration schedule based on individual clinical characteristics and risk factors and rapidly adopt de-escalation strategies as soon as microbiological data are available. In the present paper, we aimed to provide an overview of the most frequent infections diagnosed in cirrhotic patients, the prevalence and impact of antimicrobial resistance, and potential therapeutic options in this population.

Empirical Treatment With Carbapenem vs Third-generation Cephalosporin for Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Third-generation cephalosporins (TGCs) are recommended as first-line antibiotics for treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). However, antibiotics against multidrug-resistant organisms (such as carbapenems) might be necessary. We aimed to evaluate whether carbapenems are superior to TGC for treatment of SBP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 865 consecutive patients with a first presentation of SBP (275 culture positive; 103 with TGC-resistant bacterial infections) treated at 7 referral centers in Korea, from September 2013 through January 2018. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We made all comparisons using data from patients whose baseline characteristics were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Of patients who initially received empirical treatment with antibiotics, 95 (11.0%) received carbapenems and 655 (75.7%) received TGCs. Among the entire study cohort, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the carbapenem (25.8%) and TGC (25.3%) groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.11; P = .66). In the subgroup of patients with high chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) scores (score of 7 or greater, n = 314), carbapenem treatment was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (23.1%) than in the TGC group (38.8%) (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94; P=.002). In contrast, among patients with lower CLIF-SOFA scores (n = 436), in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the carbapenem group (24.7%) and the TGC group (16.0%) (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.32; P = .58).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with a first presentation of SBP, empirical treatment with carbapenem does not reduce in-hospital mortality compared to treatment with TGCs. However, among critically ill patients (CLIF-SOFA scores ≥7), empirical carbapenem treatment was significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality than TGCs.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Etiology and antibiotic treatment

Carbapenem antibiotics were first introduced in the 1980s and have long been considered the most active agents for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as organisms causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Infections caused by CRE have shown a higher mortality rate than those caused by bacteria sensitive to carbapenem antibiotics. Current antibiotic guidelines for the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are insufficient, and rapid de-escalation of empiric antibiotic treatment is not widely recognized. This review summarizes the molecular characteristics, epidemiology and possible treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by CRE.

A retrospective analysis of cases of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in cirrhosis patients

Background & aims

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) is an infection in patients with cirrhosis and carries significant mortality. The management of SBP is evolving with the rise of multidrug resistant organisms. Our aim was to perform a retrospective analysis to determine if identification of bacteria in culture could aid in prognosis and provide information regarding optimal treatment.

Methods

We analyzed our 10-year experience of SBP in a single academic center (Northwestern Memorial Hospital). We obtained information regarding SBP prophylaxis, culture data and resistance patterns of bacteria, choice/duration of inpatient antibiotics, and key laboratory measurements and determined outcomes including mortality, hospital duration, and ICU stay.

Results

Patients with SBP had a 17.8% mortality and had culture positive SBP 34.4% of the time. Antimicrobial resistance was seen in 21.3% of cases and trended towards worsening mortality, with worsened mortality associated with first line use of piperacillin-tazobactam (p = 0.0001). Patients on SBP prophylaxis who developed SBP had improved mortality (p<0.0001) unless there was a positive culture, in which case patients had worsened mortality (p = 0.019). Patient with a higher PMN counts after repeat paracentesis had higher mortality (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Our results show that SBP continues to be a morbid and deadly condition and identification of an organism is key in treatment. The standard initial antibiotic for SBP may need to be modified to reflect emerging resistant pathogens and gram-positive organisms. Further, antibiotic prophylaxis should be utilized only in select cases to prevent development of resistance.

Current Status and Prospects of Spontaneous Peritonitis in Patients with Cirrhosis

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common cirrhotic ascites complication which exacerbates the patient's condition. SBP is caused by gram-negative bacilli and, to a lesser extent, gram-positive cocci. Hospital-acquired infections show higher levels of drug-resistant bacteria. Geographical location influences pathogenic bacteria distribution; therefore, different hospitals in the same country record different bacteria strains. Intestinal changes and a weak immune system in patients with liver cirrhosis lead to bacterial translocation thus causing SBP. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are important in SBP management. When the treatment effect is not effective, other rare pathogens should be explored.

Microbiological profile of pathogens in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis secondary to liver cirrhosis: a retrospective study

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an acute bacterial infection of ascitic fluid without an obvious source. The prevalence of SBP in patients with cirrhosis is in the range of 10%–30%. With increasing use of antibiotics, there is a gradual shift in the causative flora of SBP from Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive and, more importantly, to drug-resistant bacteria. The aim of this retrospective study on 721 cases was to identify the prevalence of various organisms causing SBP along with their drug sensitivity and resistance patterns. A prevalence of 38.2% culture positivity was observed in our South Indian population. Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen isolated. Third-generation cephalosporins showed high rates of resistance, but a susceptibility of 74.5% to amikacin was found. Nonetheless, 42% of culture-positive isolates exhibited multidrug resistance, the highest rates being seen with Enterococcus faecium (64.2%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (71.4%).

Novel strategies for the management of bacterial and fungal infections in patients with liver cirrhosis: focus on new antimicrobials

Introduction: Liver cirrhosis is a frequent condition caused by different etiologies. Bacterial and fungal infections are common complications, representing an independent prognostic stage in patients with cirrhosis, dramatically worsening their clinical outcomes.Areas covered: The present review article addresses manifold points and to this purpose an inductive literature search of MEDLINE database through PubMed was performed. First, it provides an overview on the mechanisms underlying immune disfunctions in patients with cirrhosis, who are prone to develop infections being at higher risk than the general population. Second, commonest types of bacterial and fungal infections in patients with advanced liver disease are described, focusing on their deleterious impact as decompensating events. Third, the rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and fungi as causative agents of infection in cirrhotic subjects is illustrated. Eventually, the most promising novel therapeutic options against MDR pathogens and fungi are reviewed.Expert opinion: The management of bacterial and fungal infections in patients with cirrhosis is difficult, due to the frequent co-existence of renal impairment, low platelet count and other conditions that limit the antimicrobial choice. New antibacterial and antifungal compounds may overcome this issue by providing a better tolerability profile, along with equal or superior efficacy compared with older drugs.

Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 2.5% of all hospitalisations in people with cirrhosis are for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Antibiotics, in addition to supportive treatment (fluid and electrolyte balance, treatment of shock), form the mainstay treatments of SBP. Various antibiotics are available for the treatment of SBP, but there is uncertainty regarding the best antibiotic for SBP.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different antibiotic treatments for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until November 2018 to identify randomised clinical trials on people with cirrhosis and SBP.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adults with cirrhosis and SBP. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previously undergone liver transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified eligible trials and collected data. The outcomes for this review included mortality, serious adverse events, any adverse events, resolution of SBP, liver transplantation, and other decompensation events. We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) based on an available-case analysis, according to the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 12 trials (1278 participants; 13 antibiotics) in the review. Ten trials (893 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The trials that provided the information included patients having cirrhosis with or without other features of decompensation of varied aetiologies. The follow-up in the trials ranged from one week to three months. All the trials were at high risk of bias. Only one trial was included under each comparison for most of the outcomes. Because of these reasons, there is very low certainty in all the results. The majority of the randomised clinical trials used third-generation cephalosporins, such as intravenous ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ciprofloxacin as one of the interventions.Overall, approximately 75% of trial participants recovered from SBP and 25% of people died within three months. There was no evidence of difference in any of the outcomes for which network meta-analysis was possible: mortality (9 trials; 653 participants), proportion of people with any adverse events (5 trials; 297 participants), resolution of SBP (as per standard definition, 9 trials; 873 participants), or other features of decompensation (6 trials; 535 participants). The effect estimates in the direct comparisons (when available) were very similar to those of network meta-analysis. For the comparisons where network meta-analysis was not possible, there was no evidence of difference in any of the outcomes (proportion of participants with serious adverse events, number of adverse events, and proportion of participants requiring liver transplantation). Due to the wide CrIs and the very low-certainty evidence for all the outcomes, significant benefits or harms of antibiotics are possible.None of the trials reported health-related quality of life, number of serious adverse events, or symptomatic recovery from SBP.

FUNDING

the source of funding for two trials were industrial organisations who would benefit from the results of the trial; the source of funding for the remaining 10 trials was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Short-term mortality after SBP is about 25%. There is significant uncertainty about which antibiotic therapy is better in people with SBP.We need adequately powered randomised clinical trials, with adequate blinding, avoiding post-randomisation dropouts (or performing intention-to-treat analysis), and using clinically important outcomes, such as mortality, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.

Evidence of Significant Ceftriaxone and Quinolone Resistance in Cirrhotics with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

OBJECTIVES

There are few studies addressing the impact of cephalosporin and quinolone resistance on hospital length of stay and mortality in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). We aim to describe the shifting epidemiology of SBP at our institution and its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of all cases of SBP from 2005 to 2015 at a transplant center. Cases were identified using hospital billing data. Patient data were confirmed using the electronic medical record. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors that were associated with prolonged hospital length of stay and reduced survival. Culture-positive cases (N = 56) were compared to culture-negative cases (N = 104). Subpopulation analysis of the culture-positive cases compared ceftriaxone-resistant (N = 25) to ceftriaxone-susceptible (N = 31) cases.

RESULTS

We identified 160 cases of SBP (56 culture positive and 104 culture negative; 21 nosocomial, 79 hospital associated, and 60 community acquired). Forty-five percent (N = 25 total, 13 hospital associated and 6 nosocomial) of bacterial isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone, with 37.5% (N = 21) being gram positive, including 8 methicillin-resistant staphylococcus and 6 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus. Multivariate analysis identified hospital-associated SBP, age, alcoholic cirrhosis, and MELD-Na score as variables associated with worse survival (P < 0.05), with a trend toward worse survival in culture-positive cases (P = 0.123). Only MELD-Na was associated with prolonged length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of resistant pathogens causing SBP is significant, notably in hospital-associated SBP. Culture-positive SBP may represent a higher risk group compared to culture-negative SBP.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria: an update of epidemiology and antimicrobial treatments

Introduction: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a main infectious complication in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients. The increasing trend of bacterial resistance in ESLD patients with SBP has been associated with low treatment efficacy of traditional therapy. Cephalosporin use has been restricted to community-acquired infections and in areas/health care settings with low rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. To date, several changes are necessary with regard to empiric therapy recommendations in areas/health care settings with high rates of MDR bacteria. Areas covered: An overview of the epidemiology and antimicrobial treatments of SBP caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Expert opinion: Broad-spectrum antibiotics have been recommended as empiric therapy for suspected SBP in areas/health care settings with high rates of MDR bacteria and secondary treatment, with newer antibiotics, for SBP caused by MDR-Gram-negative bacteria (i.e. new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and eravacycline) either alone or in combination.

Causative agents and outcome of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: community-acquired versus nosocomial infections

Background

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication and common cause of death in patients with liver cirrhosis. This study was conducted to compare the microbiological characteristics, drug resistance, and treatment outcomes for nosocomial SBP and community-acquired SBP.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 334 patients with culture-positive SBP at Beijing Youan Hospital, China, between January 2012 and December 2016. The medical records for these patients were reviewed, and their clinical and laboratory data were analyzed.

Results

A total of 155 (46.4%) patients with nosocomial SBP and 179 (53.6%) with community-acquired SBP were included in this study. From the patients’ ascitic fluids, 334 pathogenic strains, including 178 Gram-negative bacterial strains, 138 Gram-positive bacterial strains and 18 other microbial strains were isolated. E. coli was the major pathogen (24.3%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.0%) and Enterococcus faecium (10.5%). The proportion of Enterococcus was significantly higher in the patients with nosocomial SBP (6.1% vs. 27.7%, P < 0.001) than in the patients with community-acquired SBP. The main pathogens isolated from the nosocomial infections were significantly more resistant to the first-line recommended drug. Compared with community-acquired SBP, nosocomial SBP had a poorer outcome (36.8% vs. 24.6%; P = 0.016). The independent predictors for 30-day mortality included nosocomial infection, Child-Pugh classification, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal failure and hepatic encephalopathy.

Conclusion

Gram-negative bacteria were the major pathogens involved in SBP in the cirrhotic patients. The strains isolated from the patients with nosocomial SBP displayed higher drug resistance than those isolated from patients with community-acquired SBP. Compared with community-acquired SBP, nosocomial SBP had a poorer outcome. When choosing drug treatments, the acquisition site of infection and the local epidemiological situation should be taken into account.

High Prevalence of Multidrug Resistant Bacteria in Cirrhotic Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: Is It Time to Change the Standard Antimicrobial Approach?

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) has a deleterious clinical impact in end-stage liver disease, and multidrug resistance has increased, raising concern about effectiveness of traditional antibiotic regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of ascitic fluid infections in cirrhotic patients.

RESULTS

We analyzed medical records related to 2129 culture-positive ascitic fluid and found 183 samples from cirrhotic patients. There were 113 monobacterial SBP cases from 97 cirrhotic patients; 57% of patients were male; hepatitis C and alcohol were the main etiologies for cirrhosis. Multidrug resistant bacteria were isolated in 46.9% of SBP samples, and third-generation cephalosporin and quinolone resistant reached 38.9% and 25.7% of SBP cases.

CONCLUSION

SBP due to multidrug resistant bacteria is a growing problem, and one should consider reported resistance profiles for the decision-making process of empirical first-line treatment prescription.

New antimicrobial options for the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Optimal management of cIAI requires early source control in combination with adequate antimicrobial treatment and aggressive fluid resuscitation. cIAIs are mainly caused by Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes. Broad-spectrum single-agent or combination drug regimens against these microorganisms are the mainstay of therapy. However, development of antimicrobial resistance has become an increasingly large concern: multidrug-resistant organisms are associated with a higher rate of inadequate antimicrobial therapy, which in turn is associated with higher mortality rate, longer hospital stay, and increased cost compared to adequate antimicrobial therapy. In this mini-review, we discuss the effectiveness of several new antimicrobial agents, recently approved or in advanced phases of clinical development, for the treatment of cIAIs, including the new beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, aztreonam/avibactam), siderophore cephalosporins (cefiderocol), aminoglycosides (plazomicin), and tetracyclines (eravacycline).

Unsolved Issues in the Treatment of Spontaneous Peritonitis in Patients with Cirrhosis: Nosocomial Versus Community-acquired Infections and the Role of Fungi

INTRODUCTION

Historically, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) has represented one of the most frequent and relevant infectious complications of advanced liver disease, and this is still valid today. Nevertheless, in recent years the role of fungi as causative pathogens of primary peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis has become not negligible. Another issue is linked with the traditional distinction, instrumental in therapeutic choice, between community-acquired and nosocomial forms, according to the onset. Between these two categories, another one has been introduced: the so-called "healthcare-associated infections".

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the most controversial aspects in the management of SBP nowadays in the light of best available evidence.

METHODS

A review of recent literature through MEDLINE was performed.

RESULTS

The difference between community-acquired and nosocomial infections is crucial to guide empiric antibiotic therapy, since the site of acquisition impact on the likelihood of multidrug-resistant bacteria as causative agents. Therefore, third-generation cephalosporins cannot be considered the mainstay of treatment in each episode. Furthermore, the distinction between healthcare-associated and nosocomial form seems very subtle, especially in areas wherein antimicrobial resistance is widespread, warranting broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens for both. Finally, spontaneous fungal peritonitis is a not common but actually underestimated entity, linked to high mortality. Especially in patients with septic shock and/or failure of an aggressive antibiotic regimen, the empiric addition of an antifungal agent might be considered.

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is one of the most important complications in patients with cirrhosis. A proper empiric therapy is crucial to have a positive outcome. In this respect, a careful assessment of risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens is crucial. Likewise important, mostly in nosocomial cases, is not to overlook the probability of a fungal ascitic infection, namely a spontaneous fungal peritonitis.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for the treatment of bacterial peritonitis

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the quintessential model of bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients. In these particularly frail subjects, infections clearly worsen prognosis increasing substantially mortality. Furthermore, treatment of SBP has become more challenging because of the growing impact of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the reasons behind the change in therapeutic recommendations for SBP that have occurred in the past few years, by focusing on the following aspects: the importance of an early appropriate empirical treatment, the difference between nosocomial and non-nosocomial forms and the overall microbiological shift (rise of Gram-positive bacteria and MDR strains) that have affected SBP.

EXPERT OPINION

Until recently, third-generation cephalosporins have represented the cornerstone of SBP treatment, a safe choice covering the most important causative agents, namely Enterobacteriaceae. Unfortunately, massive exposure to health systems makes cirrhotic patients prone to MDR infections, which poses significant challenges, all the while not forgetting to strike a balance between effective antimicrobial activity and the risk of toxicity in these fragile subjects. Moreover, there is sparse information about new antibiotics in cirrhotic patients and about drugs levels in ascitic fluid. Therefore, further research is needed to optimize the treatment of SBP.