Graft-versus-host disease after living donor liver transplantation: an unpredictable troublesome complication for liver transplant centers

The Consequences of HLA Screening in the Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

AIMS

To study the effects of routine HLA screening and the policy of avoiding donor-dominant one-way HLA match to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of potential living liver donors and recipients who attended our center between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 149 patients who underwent LDLT and survived longer than 3 months, two developed GVHD despite our strict policy. The first patient presented with grade II GVHD limited to the skin. She was treated successfully by briefly discontinuing immunosuppression and switching to everolimus. In the second case, the policy had been relaxed due to the availability of a single donor for ABO-incompatible transplantation without any intervention to decrease anti-A antibody levels (special case: A2 to O). Nevertheless, the patient presented with grade I GVHD limited to skin and was treated successfully by adding oral methylprednisolone to tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. To the best of our information, this is the second reported case who recovered from GVHD after LDLT from a donor, homozygous at HLA A, B and DR and a recipient, heterozygous for all. Sixteen potential donors (1.2% of all candidates) of 14 recipients were disqualified solely on the basis of the HLA results; five of these patients died due to unavailability of another donor.

CONCLUSION

The results support the policy of avoiding HLA combinations that preclude immune recognition of graft lymphocytes as foreign to decrease the risk of GVHD after LDLT.

Liver Graft-to-Spleen Volume Ratio as a Useful Predictive Factor of the Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study

Background

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0. 8% is an important index for predicted portal hypertension, which may induce the graft small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Recently, the value of graft-to-spleen volume ratio (GSVR) on predicted portal hypertension had been reported, whether without splenectomy prevent portal hypertension in transplantation remains disputed, we aimed to identify GSVR contributing to portal venous pressure (PVP) and outcomes without simultaneous splenectomy in LDLT.

Methods

A retrospective study had been designed. Excluded patients with splenectomy, 246 recipients with LDLT between 2016 and 2020 were categorized into a low GSVR group and a normal GSVR group. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected, then we explored different GSVR values contributing to portal hypertension after reperfusion.

Results

According to the first quartile of the distributed data, two groups were divided: low GSVR (<1.03 g/mL) and normal GSVR (>1.03 g/mL). For the donors, there were significant differences in donor age, graft type, liver size, GRWR, and GSVR (P < 0.05). Following the surgical factors, there were significant differences in blood loss and CRBC transfusion (P < 0.05). The low GSVR has demonstrated had a significant relationship with ascites drainage and portal venous flow after LDLT (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, low GSVR heralds worse results which covered platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), and portal venous velocity. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups, while the low GSVR group demonstrated worse recipients survival compared with the normal GSVR group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Without splenectomy, low GSVR was an important predictor of portal hypertension and impaired graft function after LDLT.

Diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation: Report of six cases

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following liver transplantation (LT) is an unpredictable complication with poor outcome. However, consensus regarding the diagnosis and therapeutic regimen for the disease is yet lacking. The present study summarized the clinical experience on the diagnosis and treatment of acute GVHD (aGVHD) following LT and reviewed the pertinent literature.

CASE SUMMARY

Between January 1^st, 2000 and December 31^st, 2020, a total of 1053 LT were performed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Six recipients developed aGVHD with clinical symptoms of fever, rash, diarrhea, and pancytopenia. The incidence of aGVHD was 0.57%. The median time from LT to the clinical presentation of aGVHD was 22.17 d. The median time from the beginning of the clinical symptom to histopathological diagnosis was 7.5 d. All six cases underwent treatment of immunosuppressant adjustment, corticosteroids, human normal immunoglobulin, and antithymocyte globulin/IL-2 antagonists. Despite intensive treatment strategies, 4 patients were deceased due to sepsis, multiple organ failure, and cerebral hemorrhage. The remaining two cases were discharged as treatment successfully. However, one died because of tuberculosis infection on the 6th month of follow-up, the other one was alive healthy during 30 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The rapid diagnosis of aGVHD is mainly based on the time from the first symptom, histopathological features, and the donor T-lymphocyte chimerism. Our cases report highlights massive corticosteroid therapy and age difference between donors and recipients could accelerate to aGVHD. Moreover, gut microbial interventions and donor-targeted serotherapy may provide novel therapeutics.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization-based confirmation of acute graft-vs-host disease diagnosis following liver transplantation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Although acute graft-vs-host disease (aGvHD) is a rare complication of liver transplantation, it is poorly understood and has an extremely high mortality rate. No standardized diagnostic criteria or treatment regimens currently exist.

CASE SUMMARY

The present study investigated the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of aGvHD following liver transplantation. Presentation, diagnosis, disease course, histology, and treatment of an aGvHD case are reported, and associated literature is reviewed. A 64-year-old female required LTx due to primary biliary cirrhosis. The donor was a 12-year-old male. Three weeks following liver transplantation, the recipient developed pyrexia, diarrhea, rashes, and antibiotic-unresponsive pancytopenia. Clinical symptoms together with laboratory investigations suggested a diagnosis of aGvHD, which was confirmed via peripheral blood fluorescent in situ hybridization. Donor XY chromosome fluorescent in situ hybridization indicating early chimerism achieved 93% sensitivity in the detection of GvHD. Existing immunosuppressants were discontinued, and high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone was initiated along with antibiotics. While diarrhea resolved, the patient’s general condition continued to deteriorate until demise due to multi-system organ failure at 37 d post-liver transplantation. This case illustrates the life-threatening nature of aGvHD.

CONCLUSION

Herein, we have summarized a post-LTx aGvHD case and reviewed associated literature in order to increase awareness and provide potentially risk-mitigating recommendations.

Dermatologic manifestations in pediatric patients after liver and HSCT: A 20-year retrospective cohort study

LT and HSCT are now potentially curative treatments for many medical conditions. Dermatologic manifestations are one of the sequelae after transplantation. To study the prevalence and associated risk factors of dermatologic manifestations after pediatric LT and HSCT. A 20-year retrospective cohort study was conducted in children, aged ≤15 years, who received LT or HSCT from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2017. Medical records were reviewed for data collection until December 31, 2018. A total of 70 LT and 51 HSCT recipients were included. The percentages of overall dermatologic manifestations after LT and HSCT were 64.3% and 64.7%, respectively. Viral infection was the most common manifestation in both groups, with mucocutaneous HSV infection as the most prevalent. One HSCT recipient developed leukemia cutis. GVHD was revealed in 27.5% of HSCT recipients. Impetigo and xerosis were significantly observed in patients using azathioprine and prednisolone. Approximately two-thirds of pediatric LT and HSCT recipients experienced dermatologic manifestations, potentially associated with immunosuppressive agents. Thus, regular skin examination and optimized immunosuppression would be beneficial in these recipients.