Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in preventing metachronous gastric cancer and preneoplastic lesions. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Development and application of an artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy system for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The early diagnosis and treatment of Heliobacter pylori (H.pylori) gastrointestinal infection provide significant benefits to patients. We constructed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model based on an endoscopic system to diagnose H. pylori infection, and then examined the potential benefit of this model to endoscopists in their diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A CNN neural network system for endoscopic diagnosis of H.pylori infection was established by collecting 7377 endoscopic images from 639 patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined. Then, a randomized controlled study was used to compare the accuracy of diagnosis of H. pylori infection by endoscopists who were assisted or unassisted by this CNN model.

RESULTS

The deep CNN model for diagnosis of H. pylori infection had an accuracy of 89.6%, a sensitivity of 90.9%, and a specificity of 88.9%. Relative to the group of endoscopists unassisted by AI, the AI-assisted group had better accuracy (92.8% [194/209; 95%CI: 89.3%, 96.4%] vs. 75.6% [158/209; 95%CI: 69.7%, 81.5%]), sensitivity (91.8% [67/73; 95%CI: 85.3%, 98.2%] vs. 78.6% [44/56; 95%CI: 67.5%, 89.7%]), and specificity (93.4% [127/136; 95%CI: 89.2%, 97.6%] vs. 74.5% [114/153; 95%CI: 67.5%, 81.5%]). All of these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our AI-assisted system for diagnosis of H. pylori infection has significant ability for diagnostic, and can improve the accuracy of endoscopists in gastroscopic diagnosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Daping Hospital (10/07/2020) (No.89,2020) and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center (02/09/2020)   ( www.chictr.org.cn ; registration number: ChiCTR2000037801).

Characteristic endoscopic findings in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori is a major risk factor for gastric cancer. In addition to eradication therapy, early-phase detection of gastric cancer through screening programs using high-vision endoscopy is also widely known to reduce mortality. Although European and US guidelines recommend evaluation of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia by high-vision endoscopy and pathological findings, the guideline used in Japan - the Kyoto classification of gastritis - is based on endoscopic evaluation, and recommends the grading of risk factors. This system requires classification into three endoscopic groups: H. pylori-negative, previous H. pylori infection (inactive gastritis), and current H. pylori infection (active gastritis). Major endoscopic findings in active gastritis are diffuse redness, enlarged folds, nodularity, mucosal swelling, and sticky mucus, while those in H pylori-related gastritis - irrespective of active or inactive status - are atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and xanthoma.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the endoscopic characteristics of current H. pylori infection, and how characteristic endoscopic findings should be evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Although the correct evaluation of endoscopic findings related to H. pylori remains necessary, if findings of possible infection are observed, it is important to diagnose infection by detection methods with high sensitivity and specificity, including the stool antigen test and urea breath test.

RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative-updating the updates

At the end of the last century, a far-sighted 'working party' held in Sydney, Australia addressed the clinicopathological issues related to gastric inflammatory diseases. A few years later, an international conference held in Houston, Texas, USA critically updated the seminal Sydney classification. In line with these initiatives, Kyoto Global Consensus Report, flanked by the Maastricht-Florence conferences, added new clinical evidence to the gastritis clinicopathological puzzle.The most relevant topics related to the gastric inflammatory diseases have been addressed by the Real-world Gastritis Initiative (RE.GA.IN.), from disease definitions to the clinical diagnosis and prognosis. This paper reports the conclusions of the RE.GA.IN. consensus process, which culminated in Venice in November 2022 after more than 8 months of intense global scientific deliberations. A forum of gastritis scholars from five continents participated in the multidisciplinary RE.GA.IN. consensus. After lively debates on the most controversial aspects of the gastritis spectrum, the RE.GA.IN. Faculty amalgamated complementary knowledge to distil patient-centred, evidence-based statements to assist health professionals in their real-world clinical practice. The sections of this report focus on: the epidemiology of gastritis; Helicobacter pylori as dominant aetiology of environmental gastritis and as the most important determinant of the gastric oncogenetic field; the evolving knowledge on gastric autoimmunity; the clinicopathological relevance of gastric microbiota; the new diagnostic horizons of endoscopy; and the clinical priority of histologically reporting gastritis in terms of staging. The ultimate goal of RE.GA.IN. was and remains the promotion of further improvement in the clinical management of patients with gastritis.

Evolving Concepts in Helicobacter pylori Management

Helicobacter pylori is the most common chronic bacterial infection worldwide and the most significant risk factor for gastric cancer, which remains a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. H pylori and gastric cancer continue to disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority and immigrant groups in the United States. The approach to H pylori case-finding thus far has relied on opportunistic testing based on symptoms or high-risk indicators, such as racial or ethnic background and family history. However, this approach misses a substantial proportion of individuals infected with H pylori who remain at risk for gastric cancer because most infections remain clinically silent. Moreover, individuals with chronic H pylori infection are at risk for gastric preneoplastic lesions, which are also asymptomatic and only reliably diagnosed using endoscopy and biopsy. Thus, to make a significant impact in gastric cancer prevention, a systematic approach is needed to better identify individuals at highest risk of both H pylori infection and its complications, including gastric preneoplasia and cancer. The approach to H pylori eradication must also be optimized given sharply decreasing rates of successful eradication with commonly used therapies and increasing antimicrobial resistance. With growing acceptance that H pylori should be managed as an infectious disease and the increasing availability of susceptibility testing, we now have the momentum to abandon empirical therapies demonstrated to have inadequate eradication rates. Molecular-based susceptibility profiling facilitates selection of a personalized eradication regimen without necessitating an invasive procedure. An improved approach to H pylori eradication coupled with population-level programs for screening and treatment could be an effective and efficient strategy to prevent gastric cancer, especially in minority and potentially marginalized populations that bear the heaviest burden of H pylori infection and its complications.

Curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of gastric cancer

Endoscopic treatment, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection, has become the primary treatment for early gastric cancer. A comprehensive optical assessment, including white light endoscopy, image-enhanced endoscopy, and magnification, are the cornerstones for clinical staging and determining the resectability of lesions. This paper discusses factors that influence the indication for endoscopic resection and the likelihood of achieving a curative resection. Our review stresses the critical need for interpreting the histopathological report in accordance with clinical guidelines and the imperative of tailoring decisions based on the patients' and lesions' characteristics and preferences. Moreover, we offer guidance on managing complex scenarios, such as those involving non-curative resection. Finally, we identify future research avenues, including the role of artificial intelligence in estimating the depth of invasion and the urgent need to refine predictive scores for lymph node metastasis and metachronous lesions.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Treatment in Older Patients

Helicobacter pylori is the main etiopathogenetic factor of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. The world's population is shifting towards older people, who have the highest prevalence of H. pylori. Aging-related peculiarities could have an impact on the treatment of H. pylori and there is still a lack of research data in the older population. The aim of this review was to summarize the findings of the most recent information, publications and studies on the issues relating to H. pylori infection in older patients. H. pylori eradication offers gastrointestinal and extra gastrointestinal benefits in older patients. Based on the main guidelines, H. pylori should be eradicated independent of the patient's age, only reconsidering cases with terminal illness and low life expectancy. Proton pump inhibitors are generally safe and well tolerated. Some antibiotics require dose adjustment only in advanced renal insufficiency and the risk of hepatotoxicity is very low. Special precautions should be taken in patients with polypharmacy and those taking aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In older patients, H. pylori eradication treatment frequently causes only mild and short-term adverse events; however, treatment compliance is usually still very good. H. pylori treatment in older patients does not increase the risk of Clostridium difficile infection. Optimal eradication effectiveness (> 90%) is mostly achieved with bismuth- and non-bismuth-based quadruple therapies. Susceptibility-guided treatment of H. pylori can contribute to increasing the effectiveness of eradication regimens in older adults. To achieve optimal H. pylori eradication effectiveness in older patients, the same guidelines, which are applied to adults, also apply to this population: avoiding repetitive treatment prescriptions, choosing quadruple therapies, prescribing longer treatment duration and administering high-dose proton pump inhibitors twice daily.

Do atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia reverse after Helicobacter pylori eradication?

BACKGROUND

It's still controversial whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication can reverse atrophic gastritis (AG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the effect of H. pylori eradication on AG and IM.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE datasets through April 2023 for epidemiological studies, which provided mean glandular atrophy (GA) or IM score before and after H. pylori eradication, or provided ORs, RRs or HRs and 95% CIs for the association of AG or IM with H. pylori eradication. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and pooled ORs and 95%CIs were used to estimate the effect of H. pylori eradication on AG and IM.

RESULTS

Twenty articles with a total of 5242 participants were included in this meta-analysis. H. pylori eradication significantly decreased GA score in the antrum (WMD -0.36; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.19, p < 0.01), GA score in the corpus (WMD -0.35; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.19, p < 0.01), IM score in the antrum (WMD -0.16; 95% CI: -0.26, -0.07, p < 0.01) and IM score in the corpus (WMD -0.20; 95% CI: -0.37, -0.04, p = 0.01). H. pylori eradication significantly improved AG (pooled OR 2.96; 95% CI: 1.70, 5.14, p < 0.01) and IM (pooled OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.24, 4.70, p < 0.01). The association remained significant in the subgroup analyses by study design, sites of lesions, regions and follow-up time. Although Publication bias was observed for AG, the association remained significant after trim-and-fill adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication could significantly improve AG and IM at early stage.

Genome-wide association studies identify miRNA-194 as a prognostic biomarker for gastrointestinal cancer by targeting ATP6V1F, PPP1R14B, BTF3L4 and SLC7A5

Background

The dysregulated genes and miRNAs in tumor progression can be used as biomarkers for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. However, the biomarkers for predicting the clinical outcome of gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) are still scarce.

Methods

Genome-wide association studies were performed to screen optimal prognostic miRNA biomarkers. RNA-seq, Ago-HITS-CLIP-seq, western blotting and qRT-PCR assays were conducted to identify target genes of miR-194. Genome-wide CRISPR-cas9 proliferation screening analysis were conducted to distinguish passenger gene and driver gene.

Results

A total of 9 prognostic miRNAs for GIC were identified by global microRNA expression analysis. Among them, miR-194 was the only one miRNA that significantly associated with overall survival, disease-specific survival and progress-free interval in both gastric, colorectal and liver cancers, indicating miR-194 was an optimal prognostic biomarker for GIC. RNA-seq analysis confirmed 18 conservative target genes of miR-194. Four of them, including ATP6V1F, PPP1R14B, BTF3L4 and SLC7A5, were directly targeted by miR-194 and required for cell proliferation. Cell proliferation assay validated that miR-194 inhibits cell proliferation by targeting ATP6V1F, PPP1R14B, BTF3L4 and SLC7A5 in GIC.

Conclusion

In summary, miR-194 is an optimal biomarker for predicting the outcome of GIC. Our finding highlights that miR-194 exerts a tumor-suppressive role in digestive system cancers by targeting ATP6V1F, PPP1R14B, BTF3L4 and SLC7A5.

[Efficacy of butyric acid inclusion in eradication regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis of controlled trials]

AIM

Systematization of data on the efficacy and safety of butyric acid inclusion in eradication therapy (ET) regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Research searches were carried out in the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) until November 2020. All controlled studies comparing the efficacy and/or safety of including butyric acid in ET regimens for H. pylori infection were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 6 controlled studies (1 Italy, 5 Russia) involving 736 patients (381 in the ET groups with butyric acid; 355 in the comparison groups). The pooled eradication efficiency in the butyric acid groups was 90.23% (95% confidence interval CI 86.73493.069), while in the comparison groups it was 65.69% (95% CI 60.44170.669). Meta-analysis showed that the addition of butyric acid to ET regimens significantly increased the eradication efficiency (odds ratio OR 5.355, 95% CI 3.5048.184; p0.001). There was no significant heterogeneity between results (p=0.1408; I2=42.1%). The addition of butyric acid to ET regimens significantly reduces the risk of diarrhea (OR 0.225, 95% CI 0.09230.549; p=0.001; I2=34.21%) and abdominal distention (OR 0.357, 95% CI 0.1550.818; p=0.015; I2=80.13%) by the end of the 1st week of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the inclusion of butyric acid in ET regimens for H. pylori infection significantly increases the effectiveness of treatment and reduce the incidence of side effects. Apparently, the increase in the effectiveness of eradication is due to an increase in patient compliance with treatment due to an improvement in the safety profile of therapy.