Extrapancreatic infections are common in acute pancreatitis and they are related to organ failure: a population-based study

Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Sepsis complicates acute pancreatitis (AP), increasing mortality risk. Few studies have examined how sepsis and its onset timing affect mortality in AP. This study evaluates the association between sepsis occurrence and all-cause mortality in AP, focusing specifically on the impact of sepsis onset timing.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 494 ICU-admitted AP patients from the MIMIC-IV database and 91 from our center. Patients were grouped by sepsis occurrence and onset timing. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day all-cause mortality. Machine learning identified key variables associated with mortality. Multivariable regression analyzed the impact of sepsis and its onset timing on mortality. To reduce baseline differences, propensity score matching (PSM) based on time to sepsis was conducted. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses incorporated data from our center for validation. Restricted cubic spline analysis examined any nonlinear relationship between sepsis onset timing and mortality.

RESULTS

Patients with sepsis had significantly higher in-hospital and 90-day mortality rates than those without sepsis (p < 0.05). Sepsis was identified as a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality and remained significantly associated after adjusting for key variables (p < 0.05). However, sepsis onset timing did not significantly impact in-hospital or 90-day mortality. These findings were validated after PSM and with our center's data. No nonlinear relationship between sepsis onset timing and mortality was found.

CONCLUSION

Sepsis significantly increases all-cause mortality in AP patients, but the timing of its onset has limited impact. Continuous monitoring and intervention for sepsis during hospitalization are recommended to improve prognosis.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Differentiates Infections from Sterile Inflammation in First Week of Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Differentiating infections from sterile inflammation is crucial in early AP management.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the capability of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and procalcitonin to differentiate between sterile inflammation and infections in the first week of AP and to analyze the source, microbiological profile, and impact of infections in AP.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting within 5 days of symptom onset were included. Microbiological profiles and serious adverse events (SAEs: in-hospital mortality or discharge in critical state) were analyzed. Blood count obtained at fever onset was used for calculating the NLR. The ability of NLR and procalcitonin to differentiate infections from sterile inflammation in the first week was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 505 AP patients, 150 developed fevers. 48 (32%) had sterile inflammation, while 102 (68%) had infections. Most patients (n = 98, 65.3%) developed fever during the first week of illness (sterile inflammation (n = 43) and infections (n = 55)). NLR demonstrated good accuracy in differentiating infections from sterile inflammation in the first week (AUROC 0.70, p = 0.001), outperforming procalcitonin (AUROC 0.54, p = 0.58). Within infections (n = 102), 44 (43.1%) had infected pancreatic necrosis, 68 (66.7%) had extra-pancreatic infections, and 10 (9.8%) had both. Lower respiratory tract infection was the most common extra-pancreatic infection. Of 54 patients with culture-positive infections, 36 (66.7%) had grown multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. Fungal isolates were identified in 5 patients. Patients with infections had higher SAE incidence (21.6% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.007) than those with inflammation. The SAE incidence was higher with MDR infections than those without MDR (37.5% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Infections in AP occur early in the course of illness. NLR could serve as a reliable biomarker to distinguish infections from sterile inflammation in the early course of AP, aiding timely management. Patients with MDR infections have higher serious adverse outcomes.

Impact of invasive infections on clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: early predictive factors and implications for prophylactic anti-infective therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of antibiotic therapy in acute pancreatitis remains controversial and is currently recommended only for confirmed infections of peripancreatic necrosis. However, reliable early predictors of septic complications and unfavorable outcomes are substantially lacking.

METHODS

Patients with acute pancreatitis were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups: one with a septic course defined by pathogen detection [GERM(+)] and one without [GERM(-)]. After propensity score matching, both groups were compared regarding clinical outcomes. Early predictors of pathogen detection were evaluated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

424 patients with acute pancreatitis were included. After propensity score matching 123 GERM(-) patients were compared to 74 GERM(+) patients. GERM(+) patients demonstrated significantly worse clinical outcomes with higher rate of intensive care treatment (59.5% vs. 35.0%; p = 0.0011) and consecutive longer stay in intensive care unit (11.5 ± 25.2d vs. 3.0 ± 7.9d; p = 0.0007), longer in-hospital stay (26.8 ± 22.0d vs. 14.7 ± 15.0d; p = 0.0003) as well as worse results in the composite outcome length of in-hospital stay > 15d or death (67.6% vs. 31.7%; p < 0.0001). Prescence of ascites and elevated white blood cell count at the onset of acute pancreatitis were identified as significant predictive factors in the early disease associated with invasive infection and pathogen detection. The most frequently detected pathogens were commensals of the gastrointestinal tract, observed in 70.7% of the examined body fluids and 50.7% of the examined blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of pathogens is associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis. The presence of ascites and elevated white blood cell count at onset of acute pancreatitis are significant predictive factors indicating the risk of invasive infection with relevant bacterial load. Thus, an aggressive, early anti-infective strategy against pathogens of intestinal origin should be considered in these cases and may improve patient outcomes.

The Ongoing Debate on the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis-Is There a Conclusion? A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common but often self-limiting disease in the majority of patients. However, in the minority, who may progress to moderately severe or severe AP, high mortality risk has been reported. Infected pancreatitis necrosis (IPN) in necrotising pancreatitis has been shown to result in more than twice the mortality rate compared with in sterile pancreatic necrosis. This raises the question on whether prophylactic antibiotics (PABs) should be given in subgroups of AP to prevent superimposed infection to improve survival outcomes. Despite numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and guidelines on the management of AP, there is a lack of strong evidence to suggest the use of PABs in AP. Additionally, use of PABs is associated with antimicrobial resistance. Considerable heterogeneity exists and limits the interpretation of results-subgroup of AP benefitting from PAB use, choice/class of PAB, and timing of administration from symptom onset and duration of PAB use. Only a minority of existing meta-analyses suggest mortality benefits and reduction in IPN. The majority of existing guidelines do not recommend the use of PABs in AP. More research is required to make more definitive conclusions. Currently, PAB should only be administered after multidisciplinary discussions led by pancreatology experts.

Unraveling the immunological landscape in acute pancreatitis progression to sepsis: insights from a Mendelian randomization study on immune cell traits

Background

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a severe digestive system disorder with a significant risk of progressing to sepsis, a major cause of mortality. Unraveling the immunological pathways in AP is essential for developing effective treatments, particularly understanding the role of specific immune cell traits in this progression.

Methods

Employing a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach, this study first examined the causal relationship between AP and 731 immune cell traits to identify those significantly associated with AP. Subsequently, we explored the causal associations between 731 immune cell traits and sepsis. The analysis utilized extensive genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary datasets, with a focus on identifying common immune cell traits with statistically significant causal associations between AP and sepsis.

Results

Our investigation identified 44 immune cell traits unidirectionally associated with AP and 36 traits unidirectionally associated with sepsis. Among these, CD127 on CD28+ CD45RA- CD8+ T cells emerged as a common mediator, accounting for 5.296% of the increased risk of sepsis in AP patients. This finding highlights the significant role of specific memory CD8+ T cells in the pathophysiology of AP and its progression to sepsis.

Conclusion

This study elucidates the critical role of specific immune cell traits, particularly CD127hi memory CD8+ T cells, in the progression of AP to sepsis. Our findings provide a foundation for future research into targeted immune-modulatory therapies, potentially improving patient outcomes in AP-related sepsis and offering new insights into the complex immunological dynamics of this condition.

The Effect of Prophylactic Carbapenem Use on Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

This study aimed to determine the effect of prophylactic use of carbapenems for acute pancreatitis on clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

It was conducted according to the preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by using the keywords "Pancrea * AND carbapenem OR imipenem OR ertapenem OR meropenem OR doripenem." Primer outcomes were mortality, surgical intervention, and pancreatic and non-pancreatic infection. Subgroup analyses were also performed to reduce the risk of bias.

Results

Ten studies with 4038 patients were included in the meta-analyses. While eight of ten were randomized controlled trials, two were observational studies. The prophylactic use of carbapenems had no statistically significant effect on mortality (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.65-1.04, I²=0%) and surgical intervention. (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.57-1.17, I²=0%). However, the real impact of prophylaxis on reducing the incidence of mortality and surgical intervention was uncertain due to the insufficient sample size. The prophylactic use of carbapenems was significantly associated with a lower risk of peripancreatic (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.25-0.55, I²=61%) and non-pancreatic infection risk (OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.46-0.78, I²=65%). The definitions of infection in the articles were not clear, and the diagnostic approach to infection was based on subjective criteria. In addition, there was inadequate collateral damage and safety assessments. In high-quality studies with a low risk of bias, prophylactic carbapenems had no effect on peripancreatic infection (RR=1.54, 95% CI=0.65-3.47, I²=0%) and non-pancreatic infection (RR=0.72, 95% CI=0.48-1.07, I²=0%).

Conclusion

Although there is a reduction in the infection risk, routine carbapenem use in acute pancreatitis cases should not be recommended based on current evidence. Cooperation with Infectious Disease specialists and developing diagnostic algorithms are required instead of routine prophylaxis to prevent infection, especially non-pancreatic infection.

Characteristics and risk factors for extrapancreatic infection in patients with moderate or severe acute pancreatitis

Background

How to detect acute pancreatitis (AP) complicated with infection early and how to arrange the treatment time are still the main problems in the world. There are few reports on the potential relationship between extrapancreatic infections and AP. The purpose of this article was to investigate the characteristics, influencing factors and prognosis of extrapancreatic infection in AP patients with modified Marshall score ≥2 on admission.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed AP admitted to emergency intensive care unit of Ruijin hospital within 72 h of onset from September 2019 to December 2021. In addition to the patients' baseline data, sites of infection and microorganisms outside the pancreas were collected. Microbial cultures were used to identify infections of the respiratory tract, blood, abdominal cavity, biliary tract, urinary tract and clostridium difficile in feces.

Results

144 patients with AP were included, of which extrapancreatic infection accounted for 40.28%. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, oxygenation index, modified Marshall score, BISAP score and APACHE II score were significantly increased in the extrapancreatic infection group. The risk factors of extrapancreatic infection included blood urea nitrogen, Modified Marshall score and duration of mechanical ventilation. The positive rates of pathogenic bacteria in sputum culture, blood culture, ascites culture and bile culture were significantly higher than those in the 1-3 days after admission. The infection begins to worsen as early as 4-7 days after the onset of symptoms. Extrapancreatic infection is associated with pancreatic necrosis, the rate of laparotomy, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Our research has confirmed the need to prevent and monitor extrapancreatic infection in the early stage.

Columnar graphical model of poor prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis complicated by carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection

BACKGROUND

At present, there have been research reports on severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) complicated with carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in China, but few studies have focused on factors affecting the prognosis of patients with SAP complicated with CRE. It is of important significance to identify adverse prognostic risk factors for SAP complicated with CRE to improve the prognosis.

AIM

To develop a line graph model of poor prognosis of CRE hospital infection with SAP.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with SAP complicated by CRE hospital infection at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2020 and counted the distribution of pathogenic bacteria. The patients were divided into a poor prognosis group (n = 42) and a good prognosis group (n = 158) according to the prognosis to compare the difference in clinical data between the two groups. The factors responsible for poor prognosis of patients with SAP complicated by CRE infection were identified using logistic regression equation, and a columnar graphical model was then developed based on the influencing factors identified.

RESULTS

The source of specimens in 200 patients with SAP complicated by CRE was mainly abdominal drainage fluid (42.50%), and the pathogenic bacteria were mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae (45.00%) and Escherichia coli (27.50%). Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, white blood cell count (WBC), homocysteine (Hcy), C-reactive protein (CRP), number of affected organs, invasive operations, and mechanical ventilation differed significantly between the two groups (P < 0.05). APACHE II score, number of affected organs, mechanical ventilation, Hcy, and WBC were identified to be the influencing factors of poor prognosis in patients with SAP complicated by CRE hospital infection (P < 0.05). A line graph model of poor prognosis was developed based on the five influencing factors, and the initial C-index was 0.985.

CONCLUSION

The individualized column line graph model developed based on the factors influencing the poor prognosis of SAP complicated by CRE has good predictive value and is beneficial to the selection of clinical treatment plans.

Systematic Review with Trial Sequential Analysis of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Prophylactic antibiotics (PAB) are being still widely used for treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) despite trials showing no firm evidence of efficacy. We aimed to evaluate effects of PAB for AP in a meta-analysis and the need for further research by trial sequential analysis (TSA).

METHODS

Medline, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials. Primary outcomes were all infections and mortality. Secondary outcomes comprised infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), specific infections, organ failure, surgical interventions, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-one trials with 1383 pts were included. PAB were received by 703 pts, while 680 were controls. Mortality was similar with RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.66-1.10). Infections were significantly reduced (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.49-0.74), mainly due to decreased risk of sepsis (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.25-0.73) and urinary tract infections (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.86). No significant reduction for IPN was shown (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.63-1.04). Length of hospital stay was diminished by MD -6.65 (95% CI -8.86 to -4.43) days. TSA for all infections showed that the cumulative Z score crossed both conventional and monitoring boundaries at 526 pts from a heterogeneity-corrected required information size of 1113 pts based on a 40% incidence of infections in the control group, RRR of 30%, alpha 5%, beta 20%, and heterogeneity 56%.

CONCLUSIONS

PABs decrease the rate of infections in AP, mainly due to RRR of extra-pancreatic infections, requiring no further research. No significant effect is shown on IPN and mortality, although firmer evidence is needed.

Impact of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections on acute pancreatitis patients

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections present great challenges in clinical practices with high mortality. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of CRAB infections on acute pancreatitis (AP).

METHODS

A case-control study was performed via collecting data from March 1st, 2016 to August 1st, 2020 in two comprehensive teaching hospital. Clinical data of the CRAB-positive AP patients were analyzed and compared to a matched control group (case-control ratio of 1:1). Comparisons were preformed between with/without CRAB infections and multiple organ failure (MOF), respectively. Independent risk factors of overall mortality were determined via univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

CRAB infections were associated with higher mortality (49.2% vs. 23.0%, P < 0.01). CRAB combined with MOF increased a mortality up to 90% (P < 0.01). MOF (Odds ratio (OR) = 21.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.26-87.80, P < 0.01), CRAB infections (OR = 3.58, 95%CI = 1.24-10.37, P = 0.02) and hemorrhage (OR = 3.70, 95%CI = 1.21-11.28, P = 0.02) were independent risk factors of overall mortality. Lung was the most common site of strains (37 of 82). CRAB strains were highly resistant (>60%) to ten of eleven common antibiotics, except for tigecycline (28%).

CONCLUSION

High mortality rate in AP patients was associated with CRAB infections and further increased when CRAB infections combined with MOF.

Assessment of Prophylactic Carbapenem Antibiotics Administration for Severe Acute Pancreatitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains a debatable issue. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics in SAP.

METHODS

This meta-analysis of prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics for SAP was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to February 2021. The related bibliographies were manually searched. The primary outcomes involved infected pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis, mortality, complications, infections, and organ failure.

RESULTS

Seven articles comprised 5 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective observational studies, including 3,864 SAP participants. Prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics in SAP were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of infections (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27; p = 0.03) and complications (OR: 0.48; p = 0.009). Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the incidence of infected pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis (OR: 0.74; p = 0.24), mortality (OR: 0.69; p = 0.17), extrapancreatic infection (OR: 0.64, p = 0.54), pulmonary infection (OR: 1.23; p = 0.69), blood infection (OR: 0.60; p = 0.35), urinary tract infection (OR: 0.97; p = 0.97), pancreatic pseudocyst (OR: 0.59; p = 0.28), fluid collection (OR: 0.91; p = 0.76), organ failure (OR: 0.63; p = 0.19), acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR: 0.80; p = 0.61), surgical intervention (OR: 0.97; p = 0.93), dialysis (OR: 2.34; p = 0.57), use of respirator or ventilator (OR: 1.90; p = 0.40), intensive care unit treatment (OR: 2.97; p = 0.18), and additional antibiotics (OR: 0.59; p = 0.28) between the experimental and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not recommended to administer routine prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics in SAP.