1
|
Ferreira MF, Marques M, Morais R, Lemmers A, Macedo G, Santos-Antunes J. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Is Safe and Effective for Lesions Located at the Anorectal Junction: Analysis from Two Referral European Centers. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2024; 31:41-47. [PMID: 38476304 PMCID: PMC10928857 DOI: 10.1159/000528107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established resection technique for colorectal superficial tumors, but its role in the treatment of anorectal junction (ARJ) lesions still remains to be determined. With this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ESD for the resection of ARJ lesions, in comparison to more proximal rectal lesions. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data concerning all consecutive rectal ESD procedures performed in two European centers, from 2015 to 2021. Results A total of two hundred and fifty-two rectal lesions were included. Sixty (24%) were ARJ lesions, and the remaining 192 (76%) were located proximally. Technical success was achieved in 248 procedures (98%), and its rate was similar in both locations (p = 0.246). Most of the lesions presented high-grade dysplasia/Tis adenocarcinoma (54%); 36 (15%) had submucosal adenocarcinoma, including 20 superficial (sm1) and 16 deeply invasive (>SM1) T1 cancers. We found no differences between ARJ and rectal lesions in regard to en bloc resection rate (100% vs. 96%, p = 0.204), R0 resection rate (76% vs. 75%, p = 0.531), curative resection rate (70% vs. 70%, p = 0.920), procedures' median duration (120 min vs. 90 min, p = 0.072), ESD velocity (14 vs. 12 mm2/min, p = 0.415), histopathology result (p = 0.053), and the need for surgery due to a non-curative ESD (5% vs. 3%, p = 0.739). Also, there was no statistically significant difference that concerns delayed bleeding (7% vs. 8%, p = 0.709), perforation (0% vs. 5%, p = 0.075), or the need for readmission (2% vs. 2%, p = 0.939). Nevertheless, anorectal stenosis (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) and anorectal pain (9% vs. 1%, p = 0.002) were significantly more frequent in ARJ lesions. Conclusion ESD is a safe and efficient resection technique for the treatment of rectal lesions located in the ARJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Margarida Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Santos-Antunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morais R, Libanio D, Dinis Ribeiro M, Ferreira A, Barreiro P, Bourke MJ, Gupta S, Amaro P, Küttner Magalhães R, Cecinato P, Boal Carvalho P, Pinho R, Rodríguez de Santiago E, Sferrazza S, Lemmers A, Figueiredo M, Pioche M, Gallego F, Albéniz E, Ramos Zabala F, Uchima H, Berr F, Wagner A, Marques M, Pimentel-Nunes P, Gonçalves M, Mascarenhas A, Soares EG, Xavier S, Faria-Ramos I, Sousa-Pinto B, Gullo I, Carneiro F, Macedo G, Santos-Antunes J. Predicting residual neoplasia after a non-curative gastric ESD: validation and modification of the eCura system in the Western setting: the W-eCura score. Gut 2023; 73:105-117. [PMID: 37666656 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) after a non-curative (NC) gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to validate and eventually refine the eCura scoring system in the Western setting. Also, to assess the rate and risk factors for parietal residual disease. DESIGN Retrospective multicentre multinational study of prospectively collected registries from 19 Western centres. Patients who had been submitted to surgery or had at least one follow-up endoscopy were included. The eCura system was applied to assess its accuracy in the Western setting, and a modified version was created according to the results (W-eCura score). The discriminative capacities of the eCura and W-eCura scores to predict LNM were assessed and compared. RESULTS A total of 314 NC gastric ESDs were analysed (72% high-risk resection (HRR); 28% local-risk resection). Among HRR patients submitted to surgery, 25% had parietal disease and 15% had LNM in the surgical specimen. The risk of LNM was significantly different across the eCura groups (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.900 (95% CI 0.852 to 0.949)). The AUC-ROC of the W-eCura for LNM (0.916, 95% CI 0.870 to 0.961; p=0.012) was significantly higher compared with the original eCura. Positive vertical margin, lymphatic invasion and younger age were associated with a higher risk of parietal residual lesion in the surgical specimen. CONCLUSION The eCura scoring system may be applied in Western countries to stratify the risk of LNM after a gastric HRR. A new score is proposed that may further decrease the number of unnecessary surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Morais
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Diogo Libanio
- Department of Gastroenterology, IPO Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mario Dinis Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, IPO Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Aníbal Ferreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Braga, Braga, Portugal
| | - Pedro Barreiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental EPE Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pedro Amaro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pedro Boal Carvalho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Rolando Pinho
- Department of Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Gaia, Portugal
| | - Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), CIBEREHD, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariana Figueiredo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marhieu Pioche
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed Research Institute, Public University of Navarra, IdiSNA, Navarra, Spain
| | - Felipe Ramos Zabala
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Clínicas, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Servicio de Endoscopia Digestiva Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Frieder Berr
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andrej Wagner
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Margarida Marques
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Gastroenterology, IPO Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - André Mascarenhas
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental EPE Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Elisa Gravito Soares
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sofia Xavier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Isabel Faria-Ramos
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS@RISE-Health Research Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Irene Gullo
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fatima Carneiro
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Santos-Antunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pimingstorfer P, Biebl M, Gregus M, Kurz F, Schoefl R, Shamiyeh A, Spaun GO, Ziachehabi A, Fuegger R. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract and the Need for Rescue Surgery-A Multicenter Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6940. [PMID: 37959405 PMCID: PMC10647895 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for early malignant lesions in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Its clinical results have been reported to be as good as surgery. The outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD have been reported to be as good as first-line surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of ESD in the upper GI tract and the outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD performed in Linz, Austria, between 2009 and January 2023. A total of 193 ESDs were included and divided into 104 esophageal ESD and 89 gastric ESD procedures. The criteria for curative ESD were in line with established guidelines' recommendations. For esophageal lesions, the mean lesion size was 40.3 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 56.7%. In the non-curative ESD, the rate of technical failure as the reason for non-curative ESD was 13.3% and the oncological failure rate was 86.7%. Only 48.7% of indicated rescue surgeries were performed. The main reason for not performing surgery was interdisciplinary consensus due to comorbidity. Perioperative complications Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3 occurred in 22.2% of cases with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0. In gastric lesions, the mean size was 39 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 69.7%. The rate of technical failure as a reason for non-curative ESD was 25.9% and the oncological failure rate was 74.1% for non-curative ESD. Rescue surgery was performed in 48.2% of indicated cases. The perioperative rate for major complications was 0. The outcome of ESD in the upper GI tract is in line with the published literature, and non-curative ESD does not worsen surgical outcomes. The available follow-up data are in line with the international published literature, showing a low rate of residual malignancy in surgical resection specimens. Therefore, the indication of rescue surgery for oncological failure remains challenging. Furthermore, the learning curve of ESD has shown a trend towards improving outcomes over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Matus Gregus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria (R.S.)
| | - Franz Kurz
- Kepler Universitätsklinikum, 4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Rainer Schoefl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria (R.S.)
| | | | - Georg O. Spaun
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | | | - Reinhold Fuegger
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Su J, Wei S, Li W, Chen H, Li L, Xu L, Zhao P, Zhang G, Yan J. Clinicopathological characteristics of synchronous multiple primary early esophageal cancer and risk factors for multiple lesions. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1219451. [PMID: 37664067 PMCID: PMC10471681 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1219451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the development of endoscopic technology, the detection rate of synchronous multiple primary early esophageal cancer (SMPEEC) is increasing; however, the risk factors remain unclear. We aimed to assess the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with SMPEEC and investigate the risk factors contributing to the development of multiple lesions. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 911 consecutive patients who underwent Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for primary esophageal neoplasms from January 2013 to June 2021. The patients were divided into the SMPEEC group and the solitary early esophageal cancer (SEEC) group. We compared the differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups and investigated the risk factors linked to multiple lesions. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the main and accessory lesions. Results A total of 87 SMPEEC patients were included in this study, and the frequency of synchronous multiple lesions was 9.55% in patients with early esophageal cancer. The lesions in the SMPEEC group were mainly located in the lower segment of the esophagus (46[52.9%]), whereas those in the SEEC group were in the middle segment (412[50.0%]). The pathology type, tumor location, and circumferential rate of lesions were independent risk factors(P<0.05) for SMPEEC by logistic regression analysis. Significant positive correlations were observed between the main and accessory lesions in terms of morphologic type (r=0.632, P=0.000), tumor location(r=0.325, P=0.037), pathologic type (r=0.299, P=0.003), and depth of invasion (r=0.562, P=0.000). Conclusion Pathology type, tumor location, and circumferential rate of lesions were identified as independent risk factors for SMEPPC. Understanding these risk factors and the correlation between the main and accessory lesions could significantly improve the detection rate of SMPEEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Su
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shuchun Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wenjie Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Han Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lurong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lijuan Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Guoxin Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jin Yan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Santos-Antunes J, Pioche M, Ramos-Zabala F, Cecinato P, Gallego F, Barreiro P, Mascarenhas A, Sferrazza S, Berr F, Wagner A, Lemmers A, Ferreira MF, Albéniz E, Uchima H, Küttner-Magalhães R, Fernandes C, Morais R, Gupta S, Martinho-Dias D, Faria-Ramos I, Marques M, Bourke MJ, Macedo G. Risk of Residual Neoplasia after a Local-Risk Resection of Colorectal Lesions by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multinational Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5356. [PMID: 37629398 PMCID: PMC10455482 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in colorectal lesions is demanding, and a significant rate of non-curative procedures is expected. We aimed to assess the rate of residual lesion after a piecemeal ESD resection, or after an en bloc resection but with positive horizontal margins (local-risk resection-LocRR), for colorectal benign neoplasia. A retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive colorectal ESDs was performed. Patients with LocRR ESDs for the treatment of benign colorectal lesions with at least one follow-up endoscopy were included. A cohort of en bloc resected lesions, with negative margins, was used as the control. A total of 2255 colorectal ESDs were reviewed; 352 of the ESDs were "non-curative". Among them, 209 were LocRR: 133 high-grade dysplasia and 76 low-grade dysplasia. Ten cases were excluded due to missing data. A total of 146 consecutive curative resections were retrieved for comparison. Compared to the "curative group", LocRRs were observed in lengthier procedures, with larger lesions, and in non-granular LSTs. Recurrence was higher in the LocRR group (16/199, 8% vs. 1/146, 0.7%; p = 0.002). However, statistical significance was lost when considering only en bloc resections with positive horizontal margins (p = 0.068). In conclusion, a higher rate of residual lesion was found after a piecemeal ESD resection, but not after an en bloc resection with positive horizontal margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Santos-Antunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Felipe Ramos-Zabala
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Clínicas, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, HM Hospitales, 28660 Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL—IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francisco Gallego
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de Poniente, 04700 Almería, Spain
| | - Pedro Barreiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental EPE, 1169-050 Lisbon, Portugal
- Lisbon Advanced Endoscopic Center, Hospital Lusíadas, 2724-002 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - André Mascarenhas
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental EPE, 1169-050 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38123 Trento, Italy
| | - Frieder Berr
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andrej Wagner
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed Research Institute, Public University of Navarra, IdiSNA, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Servicio de Endoscopia Digestiva Centro Médico Teknon, 08022 Barcelona, Spain
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricardo Küttner-Magalhães
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - Carlos Fernandes
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, 4400-129 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia
| | - Daniel Martinho-Dias
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | - Isabel Faria-Ramos
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Santos-Antunes J, Pioche M, Ramos-Zabala F, Cecinato P, Gallego Rojo FJ, Barreiro P, Félix C, Sferrazza S, Berr F, Wagner A, Lemmers A, Figueiredo Ferreira M, Albéniz E, Uchima H, Küttner-Magalhães R, Fernandes C, Morais R, Gupta S, Martinho-Dias D, Rios E, Faria-Ramos I, Marques M, Bourke MJ, Macedo G. Risk of residual neoplasia after a noncurative colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for malignant lesions: a multinational study. Endoscopy 2023; 55:235-244. [PMID: 35863354 DOI: 10.1055/a-1906-8000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in colorectal lesions is technically demanding and a significant rate of noncurative procedures is expected. We aimed to assess the rate of residual lesions after a noncurative ESD for colorectal cancer (CRC) and to establish predictive scores to be applied in the clinical setting. METHODS : Retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive colorectal ESDs. Patients with noncurative ESDs performed for the treatment of CRC lesions submitted to complementary surgery or with at least one follow-up endoscopy were included. RESULTS : From 2255 colorectal ESDs, 381 (17 %) were noncurative, and 135 of these were performed in CRC lesions. A residual lesion was observed in 24 patients (18 %). Surgery was performed in 96 patients and 76 (79 %) had no residual lesion in the colorectal wall or in the lymph nodes. The residual lesion rate for sm1 cancers was 0 %, and for > sm1 cancers was also 0 % if no other risk factors were present. Independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis were poor differentiation and lymphatic permeation (NC-Lymph score). Risk factors for the presence of a residual lesion in the wall were piecemeal resection, poor differentiation, and positive/indeterminate vertical margin (NC-Wall score). CONCLUSIONS : Lymphatic permeation or poor differentiation warrant surgery owing to their high risk of lymph node metastasis, mainly in > sm1 cancers. In the remaining cases, en bloc and R0 resections resulted in a low risk of residual lesions in the wall. Our scores can be a useful tool for the management of patients who undergo noncurative colorectal ESDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Santos-Antunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Felipe Ramos-Zabala
- Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, HM Hospitales, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Pedro Barreiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- Lisbon Advanced Endoscopic Center, Hospital Lusíadas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Félix
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Frieder Berr
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andrej Wagner
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Navarrabiomed Research Institute, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Public University of Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricardo Küttner-Magalhães
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carlos Fernandes
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel Martinho-Dias
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Elisabete Rios
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Isabel Faria-Ramos
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Santos-Antunes J, Marques M, Morais R, Carneiro F, Macedo G. Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 28:319-327. [PMID: 34604463 DOI: 10.1159/000514797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. Results Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (n = 24) and rectum (n = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). Conclusion Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Santos-Antunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.,Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.,Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|