Multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of Barrett's esophagus: feasibility study with matched historical controls

Preinjection With Ligation-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Barrett's Dysplasia and Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Characteristic Histological Features of the Depth of Resection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an established technique for the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's esophagus. Submucosal preinjection is not universally used or generally recommended when performing routine ligation-assisted EMR. Prior studies, however, have demonstrated evidence of at least superficial muscle injury on ligation-assisted EMR without submucosal injection. There are limited published data supporting any potential benefit of submucosal preinjection. Our aim was to review this technique and determine the rate of any degree of muscle injury in patients with Barrett's HGD and EAC treated with submucosal preinjection before ligation-assisted EMR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing submucosal preinjection before ligation-assisted EMR for Barrett's esophagus at a single institution between 2012 and 2016 were identified. Data were collected regarding patient demographics and medical history, endoscopy and histopathology findings, adverse events, and subsequent outcomes. All EMR specimens were reviewed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty consecutive EMR procedures were performed on 70 patients. Of 70 patients, 85.7% of patients were men, with a median age of 68 years. EAC was identified in 75 specimens (50%) and HGD in 44 specimens (29.3%). Deep resection margins were clear of adenocarcinoma in all specimens. Muscularis propria was not identified in any of the 150 specimens. There were no cases of post-EMR perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preinjection before ligation-assisted EMR achieved complete excision with histologically clear margins, without histological evidence of any inadvertent muscularis propria.

Lymph Node Metastasis for pN+ Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze lymph node metastasis (LNM) distribution in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its impact factors on survival.

METHODS

We reviewed 241 pT1N+ ESCC cases between February 2012 and April 2022 from 10 Chinese hospitals with a high volume of esophageal cancer (EC). We analyzed clinicopathological data to identify overall survival (OS) risk factors and LNM distribution in relation to tumor invasion depth.

RESULTS

Of the 241 patients, 26 (10.8%) had pT1a cancer and 215 (89.2%) had pT1b cancer. We showed that N3 stage, ≤ 28 lymphadenectomies, and nerve infiltration (NI) were negative factors for OS in superficial pN+ ESCC, whereas the OS was not definitively affected by the tumor depth and the choice of adjuvant therapy. In general, the LNM rates of the 193 pT1N+ ESCC cases can be ranked in the following order: station 106recR > station 106recL > station 1 > station 7 > station 2. With deeper tumor invasion, the higher LNM rate was observed near the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN), but there was no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

In superficial ESCC, LNM was frequently observed along the 106recR (35.8%) and 106recL (25.6%) stations. Advanced N-staging (N3) was a major negative impact factor in prognosis, and adequate lymph nodes dissected (LND) (N > 28) improved OS of pT1N+ ESCC. However, in superficial ESCC, tumor infiltration depth did not affect patients' OS or the distribution of positive LNs. The optimal adjuvant treatment that favors survival for these patients required further investigation.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett's-associated neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Barrett esophagus-associated neoplasia (BEN) has been evolving. We examined the efficacy and safety of ESD and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for BEN.

METHODS

A database search was performed for studies reporting efficacy and safety outcomes of ESD and EMR for BEN. Pooled proportional and comparative meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

47 studies (23 ESD, 19 EMR, 5 comparative) were included. The mean lesion sizes for ESD and EMR were 22.5 mm and 15.8 mm, respectively; most lesions were Paris type IIa. For ESD, pooled analysis showed rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resection, and local recurrence of 98%, 78%, 65%, and 2%, respectively. Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were achieved in 94% and 59% of cases, respectively. Pooled rates of perforation, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and stricture were 1%, 1%, 2%, and 10%, respectively. For EMR, pooled analysis showed rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resection, and local recurrence of 37%, 67%, 62%, and 6%, respectively. Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were achieved in 94% and 75% of cases. Pooled rates of perforation, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and stricture were 0.1%, 1%, 0.4%, and 8%, respectively. The mean procedure times for ESD and EMR were 113 and 22 minutes, respectively. Comparative analysis showed higher en bloc and R0 resection rates with ESD compared with EMR, with comparable adverse events.

CONCLUSION

ESD and EMR can both be employed to treat BEN depending on lesion type and size, and center expertise.

Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Endoscopic Treatments for Early Esophageal Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRC), ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRL), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and multiband mucosectomy (MBM) are used for treating early esophageal cancer patients. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of four different endoscopic treatments.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to include relevant studies published from database inception until February 15, 2021. There were no date or language restrictions. Data related to study such as characteristics, methods, outcomes, and risks of bias were extracted by two reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles with 1880 patients were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that ESD was a better choice considering the efficacy of en bloc resection rate (surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) = ESD: 99.5%, EMRC: 26.5%, MBM: 24.1%) and local recurrence rate (SUCRA = EMRC: 95.6%, MBM: 42.9%, ESD: 11.6%). MBM had a lower rate of side effects compared to the other treatments: perforation rate (SUCRA = ESD: 100%, EMRC: 48.1%, MBM: 1.9%), stricture rate (SUCRA = ESD: 99.8%, MBM: 40.8%, EMRC: 9.4%), and bleeding rate (SUCRA = EMRC: 69.4%, ESD: 62.2%, EMRL: 61.6%, MBM: 6.8%). MBM also had the shortest operation time and smallest diameter of the specimens.

CONCLUSION

The MBM endoscopic treatment was recommended for early esophageal cancer patients, but considering the increase in lesion size, ESD would be better.

Clinical Adverse Events and Device Failures Reported for the Captivator and Duette Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) Systems: A MAUDE Database Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a widely used technique for the removal of precancerous or select cancerous mucosal-based lesions. Two systems used for EMR of upper gastrointestinal lesions are the Duette EMR kit and the Captivator EMR kit. The aim of this study is to analyze the reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for patient-related adverse events and device failures associated with these EMR kits.

METHODS

We analyzed postmarketing data from the FDA MAUDE from August 2004 to August 2021.

RESULTS

Eighty-four MAUDE reports were found in the study period from August 2004 to August 2021. In total, device issues comprised 36.9% of the reports (n=31) and patient adverse events comprised 63.09% of the reports (n=53). Device issues that were reported included, but were not limited to, band placement/deployment failure (8.1%), suture breakage (7.31%), and snare breakage (4.94%). Patient adverse events that were reported included, but were not limited to, bleeding (25.9%), perforation (7.31%), and snare breakage (4.94%).

CONCLUSION

Captivator EMR and Duette EMR have similar patterns of technical failure and clinical adverse events. More MAUDE reports exist for Duette EMR, possibly due to its longer duration of commercial availability.

Early Esophageal Cancer: What the Gastroenterologist Needs to Know

Endoscopic findings in early esophageal cancer are often subtle and require careful inspection and meticulous endoscopic examination. When dysplasia is suspected, we recommend performing 1 or 2 targeted biopsies of the abnormal area and review with a pathologist specialized in evaluating gastrointestinal diseases. In the case of adenocarcinoma, after resection of any visible cancer, residual Barrett's can be treated by ablation. Endoscopic resection can offer the opportunity for patients to avoid surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal management of circumferential and near-circumferential lesions as well as tools and techniques to facilitate the performance of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus

The management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) has evolved as newer technologies and novel methods are developed. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are the initial interventions of choice for nodular BE, with ESD reserved for endoscopists highly trained in the technique and for larger lesions that would warrant en bloc resection. Resection should then be followed by ablative therapy, which remains first line in the treatment of BE with dysplasia. Although there is a myriad of ablation techniques available to the endoscopist, this review has found that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) continues to have the most robust safety and efficacy data to support its use despite a relatively high rate of recurrence. Cryotherapy and Hybrid-APC appear to be safe and effective as RFA alternatives, but further trials are still needed to directly compare their outcomes to RFA and ultimately guide changes in treatment decisions.

Current Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Gastrointestinal Lesions: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Submucosal Dissection, and Full-Thickness Resection

Background

Endoscopic resection of dysplastic lesions in early stages of cancer reduces mortality rates and is recommended by many national guidelines throughout the world. Snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are established techniques of polyp removal. The advantages of these methods are their relatively short procedure times and acceptable complication rates. The latter include delayed bleeding in 0.9% and a perforation risk of 0.4-1.3%, depending on the size and location of the resected lesion. EMR is a recent modification of endoscopic resection. A limited number of studies suggest that larger lesions can be removed en bloc with low complication rates and short procedure times. Novel techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are used to enhance en bloc resection rates for larger, flat, or sessile lesions. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is employed for non-lifting lesions or those not easily amenable to resection. Procedures such as ESD or EFTR are emerging standards for lesions inaccessible to EMR techniques.

Summary

Endoscopic treatment is now regarded as first-line therapy for benign lesions.

Key Message

Endoscopic resection of dysplastic lesions or early stages of cancer is recommended. A plethora of different techniques can be used dependent on the lesions.

Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy for Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review with pooled analysis

Background

According to guidelines, all visible lesions in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) should be endoscopically resected. Available methods of endoscopic resection include the cap-assisted technique and, more recently, multiband mucosectomy (MBM). Data on the efficacy and safety of MBM have yet to be systematically reviewed. We performed the first systematic review with pooled analysis to evaluate the outcomes of MBM in patients with BE.

Methods

Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to August 2019. Studies including patients with BE who underwent MBM were eligible. The primary outcome was the adverse events rate. Secondary outcomes were the proportions of complete resections and R0 resections. Outcomes were assessed by pooling data using a random or fixed-effect model, according to the degree of heterogeneity, to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval.

Results

Fourteen studies were eligible (1334 procedures, 986 patients). The adverse event rate was 5.3%. Immediate and post-procedural bleeding, perforations and strictures occurred in 0.2%, 0.7%, 0.3% and 3.9% of procedures, respectively. Focal lesions were resected at a complete rate of 97.6% with an R0 resection rate of 94.1%.

Conclusion

MBM is a safe and effective technique for treating visible lesions in BE.

Risk factors for serious adverse events associated with multiband mucosectomy in Barrett's esophagus: an international multicenter analysis of 3827 endoscopic resection procedures

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is a widely used technique for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, large multicenter studies enabling a generalizable estimation of the risk of serious adverse events, such as perforation and postprocedural bleeding, are lacking. The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of, and risk factors for, serious adverse events associated with MBM.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, consecutive patients who underwent MBM for treatment of BE in 14 tertiary referral centers in Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia were included. Primary outcomes were perforation and postprocedural bleeding rate. Potential risk factors were identified by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2016, a total of 3827 MBM procedures were performed in 2447 patients (84% male, mean age 66 years, median BE length C2M4). Perforation occurred in 17 procedures (0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.7), of which 15 could be treated endoscopically or conservatively. Female gender was an independent risk factor for perforation (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.02-7.57; P = .05). Postprocedural bleeding occurred after 35 procedures (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.6-1.3). The number of resections (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25; P < .001) was significantly associated with postprocedural bleeding.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that MBM for BE is safe with a low risk of serious adverse events. In addition, most of the adverse events could be managed endoscopically or conservatively. The number of resections was an independent risk factor for postprocedural bleeding.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer

The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines. These guidelines present recommendations in response to 18 clinical questions concerning the preoperative diagnosis, indications, resection methods, curability assessment, and surveillance of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal cancers based on a systematic review of the scientific literature.

Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus: ready for primetime

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the condition where intestinal metaplastic changes are found in the normal stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus predisposing an individual to dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). It tends to affect males and is often the result of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The current standard of therapy for diagnosing Barrett's is white light endoscopy (WLE) with biopsies obtained using the Seattle protocol. Multiple newer advanced modalities have been developed to improve diagnostic abilities, including volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE). This technique utilizes second generation optical coherence tomography (OCT) to provide an enhanced circumferential image to a depth of 3 mm with the potential for improved diagnostic yield for dysplasia, particularly submucosal lesions or lesions not seen by WLE. It has also been evaluated in guiding mapping of endotherapy as well as post therapy surveillance for recurrence. Although the results have been promising when used with current diagnostic standards, overall data are limited to support the routine use of VLE.

Endoscopic management of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) generally consists of squamous cell carcinoma (which arise from squamous epithelium) and adenocarcinoma (which arise from columnar epithelium). Due to the increased recognition of risk factors associated with EC and the development of screening programs, there has been an increase in the diagnosis of early EC. Early EC is amenable to curative therapy by endoscopy, which can be performed by either endoscopic resection or endoscopic ablation. Endoscopic resection consists of either endoscopic mucosal resection (preferred in cases of adenocarcinoma) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (preferred in cases of squamous cell carcinoma). Endoscopic ablation can be performed by either radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, argon plasma coagulation or photodynamic therapy, amongst others. Endoscopy can also assist in the management of complications post-esophageal surgery, such as anastomotic leaks and perforations. Finally, there is a growing role for endoscopy to manage end-of-life palliative symptoms, especially dysphagia. The growing use of esophageal stents, debulking therapy and dilation can assist in improving a patient’s quality of life. In this review, we examine the multiple roles of endoscopy in the management of patients with EC.

Multi-band mucosectomy for neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus: in vivo comparison between two different devices

BACKGROUND

Multi-band mucosectomy (MBM) is effective and safe for Barrett's neoplasia. No studies have yet compared the efficacy and safety of the MBM devices commercially available: Duette™ (CookMedical) and Captivator™ (BostonScientific). Our aim is to compare the two devices.

METHODS

This is a dual-center retrospective case-control study (Rozzano, Portsmouth) comparing efficacy, safety, and histology of resected specimens between Duette™ (DUE) and Captivator™ (CAPT). Efficacy was assessed by R0 and local recurrence (LR) rate. Bleedings, perforations, and strictures were recorded as safety outcomes. Moreover, the specimens were re-examined by two pathologists, blinded about the study group, to assess the maximum thickness of both the whole specimens and the resected submucosal layer.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (38 per group) were included. The two groups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics. R0 resection was achieved in 96.7% versus 96.3% (p = ns) and LR were recorded in 4/38 (10.5%) versus 3/38 (7.9%) in DUE and CAPT group, respectively (p = ns). Considering Duette™ versus Captivator™, 2 versus 3 patients developed a symptomatic stricture. Only one post-procedural bleeding occurred (Captivator™). Maximum medium thicknesses of specimens and of resected submucosa did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MBM is safe and effective for resecting visible lesions using either of the two available devices.

Efficacy and Safety of Multiband Mucosectomy Versus Cap-assisted Endoscopic Resection For Early Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of multiband mucosectomy (MBM) for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions is still in uncertainty. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure and to compare it with cap-assisted endoscopic resection (EMR-cap).

METHODS

A systematic search of both English and Chinese databases was performed from inception to April 30, 2019. Complete resection rate, local recurrence rate, and procedure time were considered the primary outcome measures. Prevalence of complications was considered the secondary outcome measure. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager Software.

RESULTS

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 non-RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis. When compared with the EMR-cap technique, MBM had a similar complete resection rate [odds ratio (OR)=2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-5.60, P=0.14], a similar local recurrence rate (OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.09-2.67, P=0.42), a shorter resection time (mean difference: -9.08, 95% CI: -13.86 to -4.30, P=0.0002), a shorter procedure time (mean difference: -13.36, 95% CI: -17.85 to -8.86, P<0.00001), a lower bleeding rate (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.83, P=0.01), a similar perforation rate (OR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.15-2.06, P=0.37), and a similar stricture rate (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.10-5.84, P=0.80). The results of non-RCTs were consistent with those of RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

MBM is similar to EMR-cap in terms of efficacy and safety for endoscopic resection of early cancer and precancerous lesions of the esophagus. However, MBM is less time-consuming.

Comparison of two multiband mucosectomy devices for endoscopic resection of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia

Background

Esophageal adenocarcinoma carries a poor prognosis and therefore treatment of early neoplasia arising in the precursor condition Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is desirable. Visible lesions arising in BE need endoscopic mucosal resection for accurate staging and removal. Resection modalities include a cap-based system with snare and custom-made multiband mucosectomy (MBM) devices (Duette, Cook Medical Ltd). A new MBM device has recently become available (Captivator, Boston Scientific Ltd).

Objectives

A retrospective pilot study to compare the efficacy, safety, specimen size and histology of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens resected with two MBM devices (Cook Duette and Boston Captivator) in treatment naive patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for BE neoplasia.

Methods

Consecutive EMR procedures carried out by a single experienced endoscopist were analysed. All visible lesions were marked and resected using one of the two MBM devices. All resected specimens were analysed by the same two experienced pathologists. The resected specimens in both groups were analysed for maximum diameter, minimum diameter, surface area and depth.

Results

Twenty consecutive patients were analysed (18M + 2F; mean age 74) in the Duette group and 20 (17M + 3F; mean age 72) in the Captivator group. A total of 58 specimens were resected in the Duette and 63 in the Captivator group. Min diameter, max diameter, surface area and depth of the ER specimens resected by the Captivator device were significantly larger than that by the Duette device [min diameter 9.89 mm vs 9.07 mm (p = 0.019); max diameter: 13.54 mm vs 12.38 mm (p = 0.024); surface area: 135.40 mm² vs 113.89 mm² (p = 0.005); depth 3.71 mm vs 2.89 (p = 0.001)].

Conclusions

These two MBM devices showed equivalent efficacy and safety outcomes, but the EMR Captivator device resected specimens with a larger area in the esophagus when compared with the Duette device. A possible advantage of this is in situations where en bloc resections with fewer EMRs are desirable for larger lesions.

Results of a two-phased clinical study evaluating a new multiband mucosectomy device for early Barrett's neoplasia: a randomized pre-esophagectomy trial and a pilot therapeutic pilot study

Background

Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is the preferred technique for piecemeal resection of early neoplastic lesions in Barrett’s esophagus (BE). The currently most widely used device for MBM is the Duette device. Recently, the Captivator EMR device has come available which might have practical advantages over the Duette device.

Methods

Phase I was a randomized pre-esophagectomy trial with a non-inferiority design aiming to compare EMR specimens obtained with the Captivator and the Duette device. Primary outcome: max diameter of the EMR specimens, secondary outcomes: min diameter, max thickness of the EMR specimens and resected submucosal stroma. Phase II were clinical pilot cases aiming to evaluate the feasibility of EMR using the Captivator device. Primary outcome was the successful EMR rate and secondary outcomes included procedure time and adverse events.

Results

Phase I: 24 EMR specimens (12 pairs) were obtained from six patients. The median max diameter of EMR specimens obtained with the Captivator device was 16 mm [IQR 12–21] versus 18 mm [IQR 13–23] for the Duette device. Non-inferiority of the max diameter of the Captivator specimens could not be demonstrated (median difference 1 mm, 95% CI − 3.26 to + 5.26). However, when using paired analysis, no significant difference was found (p 0.573). In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in the min diameter, max thickness of EMR specimens, and max thickness of resected submucosal stroma. Phase II: 5 BE patients with early neoplastic lesions were included. Successful EMR was achieved in 100%. Median procedure time was 33 min (IQR 25–39). One patient developed transient dysphagia, without signs of stenosis on endoscopy.

Conclusions

EMR of early Barrett’s neoplasia using the Captivator device is comparable to Duette EMR when looking at size of resected specimens. In the first patients, EMR using the Captivator was feasible, resulting in successful resection without acute adverse events.

A prospective multicenter study using a new multiband mucosectomy device for endoscopic resection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) can be effectively and safely removed by endoscopic resection (ER) using multiband mucosectomy (MBM). This study aimed to document performance of a novel MBM device designed for improved visualization, easier passage of accessories, and better suction power compared with other marketed MBM devices.

METHODS

This international, single-arm, prospective registry in 14 referral centers (Europe, 10; United States, 3; Canada, 1) included patients with early BE neoplasia scheduled for ER. The primary endpoint was successful ER defined as complete resection of the delineated area in 1 procedure. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and procedure time.

RESULTS

A total of 332 lesions was included in 291 patients (248 men; mean age, 67 years [standard deviation, 9.6]). ER indication was high-grade dysplasia in 64%, early adenocarcinoma in 19%, lesion with low-grade dysplasia in 11%, and a lesion without definite histology in 6%. Successful ER was reached in 322 of 332 lesions (97%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.6%-98.4%). A perforation occurred in 3 of 332 procedures (.9%; 95% CI, .31%-2.62%), all were managed endoscopically, and patients were admitted with intravenous antibiotics during days 2, 3, and 9. Postprocedural bleeding requiring an intervention occurred in 5 of 332 resections (1.5%; 95% CI, .65%-3.48%). Dysphagia requiring dilatation occurred in 11 patients (3.8%; 95% CI, 2.1%-6.6%). Median procedure time was 16 minutes (interquartile range, 12.0-26.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In expert hands, the novel MBM device proved to be effective for resection of early neoplastic lesions in BE, with successful ER in 97% of procedures. Severe adverse events were rare and were effectively managed endoscopically or conservatively. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02482701.).

Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer

Incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has increased exponentially in the West over the past few decades. Following detection of advanced cancers, 5-year survival rates remain bleak, making identification of early neoplasia, which has a better outcome, important. Detection of subtle oesophageal lesions during endoscopy can be challenging, and advanced imaging techniques might improve their detection. High-definition endoscopy has become a standard in most endoscopy centres, and this technology probably provides better delineation of mucosal features than standard-definition endoscopy. Various image enhancement techniques are now available with the development of new electronics and software systems. Image enhancement with chromoendoscopy using dyes has been a cost-effective option for many years, yet these techniques have been replaced in some contexts by electronic chromoendoscopy, which can be used with the press of a button. However, Lugol's chromoendoscopy remains the gold standard to identify squamous dysplasia. Identification and characterization of subtle neoplastic lesions could help to target biopsies and perform endoscopic resection for better local staging and definitive therapy. In vivo histology with techniques such as confocal endomicroscopy could make endotherapy feasible within a shorter timescale than when relying on histology on tissue samples. Once early neoplasia is identified, treatments include endoscopic resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or various ablative techniques. Endotherapy has the advantage of being a less invasive technique than oesophagectomy, and is associated with lower mortality and morbidity. Endoscopic ablation therapies have evolved over the past few years, with radiofrequency ablation showing the best results in terms of success rates and complications in Barrett dysplasia.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic multiband mucosectomy for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia: a retrospective, single-center study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic multiband mucosectomy (EMBM) has been used to treat early Barrett's esophagus and esophagogastric junction neoplasia, yet it is seldom reported for the treatment of early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia. Here we retrospectively evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EMBM for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients were included in the study. Lesions were delineated using electrocoagulation and resected using the EMBM technique. The primary outcomes were local recurrence and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were histology of the endoscopic resection specimens, specimen area, and speed of resection. All patients were followed up endoscopically.

RESULTS

There were 135 esophageal lesions, of which 40 were pathologically diagnosed as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 57 as high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 34 as early esophageal cancer, and 4 as squamous epithelium without neoplasia. No severe adverse events were observed, except for 1 perforation, which was treated by application of clips. The median follow-up was 27.75 months. Three patients had local recurrence and were endoscopically treated again. Local recurrence rate was 2.4% (3/125). No deaths occurred during the follow-up. All specimens were visible with a dividing rule, and the mean specimen area was 4.63 cm². Mean operation time was 31.2 ± 17.4 minutes. Mean speed of resection was 6.74 min/cm².

CONCLUSIONS

EMBM seems to be effective and safe for patients with early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia. The long-term recurrence rate is low.

Thoracolaparoscopic dissection of esophageal lymph nodes without esophagectomy is feasible in human cadavers and safe in a porcine survival study

High-risk early esophageal adenocarcinoma (i.e. submucosal invasion >500 nm, poor differentiation, and/or presence of lymphovascular invasion) is currently treated with esophagectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection given the high rates of LN metastases. However, esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic radical resection followed by thoracolaparoscopic LN dissection without concomitant esophagectomy could be an alternative. The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of thoracolaparoscopic dissection of esophageal LNs in a preclinical setting. (i) In human cadavers, thoracolaparoscopic dissection of LNs involved in drainage of the esophagus was performed. Subsequently, esophagectomy was performed to be able to detect retained LNs. Outcome parameters included the number of dissected LNs, the number of retained LNs in the esophagectomy specimen (ES), and technical success. (ii) In swine, thoracolaparoscopic LN dissection was also performed. After the procedure, the swine survived for 28 days. Thereafter, the swine were sacrificed and esophagectomy was performed. Outcome parameters included the presence of ischemia and/or stenosis in the ES and other complications. (i) In five human cadavers, a median of 26 LNs (interquartile range 22-46) were dissected. In two ES, one retained LN was found: one high paraesophageal, one low paraesophageal. Technical success rate was 100%. (ii) None of the seven porcine ES showed signs of ischemia or stenosis. One swine died because of ventricular fibrillation during surgery; during follow up no complications were observed. Thoracolaparoscopic dissection of LNs involved in the drainage of the esophagus is feasible in human cadavers and swine. The porcine survival study suggests that the esophageal vascularity is not severely compromised by the procedure. As anatomy differs between swine and humans, safety of the procedure will have to be investigated thoroughly before applying this new technique as the treatment of choice.

Endoscopic Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Esophageal Neoplasia

In the last few decades, endoscopic treatment of early neoplastic lesions in the esophagus has established itself as a valid and less invasive alternative to surgical resection. Endoscopic resection (ER) is the cornerstone of endoscopic therapy. Next to the curative potential of ER, by removing neoplastic lesions, ER may also serve as a diagnostic tool. The relatively large tissue specimens obtained with ER enable accurate histological staging of a lesion, allowing for optimal decision-making for further patient management. ER was pioneered in Japan, mainly for the resection of gastric lesions and squamous esophageal neoplasia, and also Western countries have been increasingly implementing ER in the treatment of early gastroesophageal neoplasia, mostly associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE). In BE, however, there is still a risk of metachronous lesions in the remainder of the Barrett's after focal ER. Additional treatment of all Barrett's mucosa is therefore advised. Currently, the most effective method for this is by using radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This review will provide an overview of indications for ER and RFA. Key Messages and Conclusions: Endoscopic management of early esophageal neoplasia is a safe and valid alternative to surgery and is nowadays the treatment of choice. ER is the mainstay of endoscopic management of early esophageal neoplasia since it allows for removal of neoplastic lesions and provides a large tissue specimen for histological evaluation. In case of early neoplasia in BE, focal ER should be complemented by eradication of the remaining Barrett's mucosa. RFA has proven to be a safe and effective modality to achieve complete eradication of Barrett's mucosa.

A randomized trial comparing multiband mucosectomy and cap-assisted endoscopic resection for endoscopic piecemeal resection of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Piecemeal endoscopic resection for esophageal high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or early squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is usually performed by cap-assisted endoscopic resection. This requires submucosal lifting and multiple snares. Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) uses a modified variceal band ligator without submucosal lifting. In high-risk areas where ESCC is common and endoscopic expertise is limited, MBM may be a better technique. We aimed to compare MBM to the cap-assisted technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection of esophageal ESCCs.

METHODS

Patients with mucosal HGIN/ESCC (2 - 6 cm, maximum two-thirds of esophageal circumference) were included. Lesions, delineated by 1.25 % Lugol staining, were randomized to MBM or cap-assisted piecemeal resection. Endpoints were procedure time and costs, complete endoscopic resection, adverse events, and absence of HGIN/ESCC at 3-month and 12-month follow-up. 

RESULTS

Endoscopic resection was performed in 84 patients (59 men, mean age 60) using MBM (n = 42) or the endoscopic resection cap (n = 42). There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Endoscopic complete resection was achieved in all lesions. Procedure time was significantly shorter with MBM (11 vs. 22 minutes, P < 0.0001). One perforation, seen after using the endoscopic resection cap, was treated conservatively. Total costs of disposables were lower for MBM (€200 vs. €251, P = 0.04). At 3-month and 12-month follow-ups none of the patients had HGIN/ESCC at the resection site.

CONCLUSION

Piecemeal endoscopic resection of esophageal ESCC with MBM is faster and cheaper than with the endoscopic resection cap. Both techniques are highly effective and safe. MBM may have significant advantages over the endoscopic resection cap technique, especially in countries where ESCC is extremely common but limited endoscopic expertise and resources exist. (Netherlands trial register: NTR 3246.).

Endoscopic mucosal resection of early oesophageal neoplasia in patients requiring anticoagulation: is it safe?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has become the standard treatment for early oesophageal neoplasia. The mucosal defect caused by EMR usually takes several weeks to heal. Despite guidelines on high-risk endoscopic procedures in patients on anticoagulation, evidence is lacking whether EMR is safe in such patients. We investigated the immediate and delayed bleeding risk in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic oesophageal EMR comparing patients requiring warfarin anticoagulation with a control group.

METHODS

Warfarin was stopped 5 days before the planned EMR and restarted on the evening following the procedure. Patients with high-risk conditions, such as recent pulmonary thromboemboli, received bridging with low molecular weight heparin. All EMRs were performed when the INR was <1.5. Bleeding events on the day of the EMR and within 3 months post-procedure were documented.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen consecutive patients with early oesophageal neoplasia were included. Sixty-eight EMRs were performed in 15 patients requiring anticoagulation. One patient on warfarin was readmitted 10 days after EMR with haematemesis and melaena. Out of 400 EMRs in 102 controls, 26 immediate bleeding events occurred requiring endoscopic intervention. One delayed bleeding event (melaena) occurred in the control group. The number of bleeding events did not differ between groups [p = 0.99; odds ratio 1.01 (0.30-3.44)], neither for acute (p = 0.76) nor delayed bleeding (p = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

EMR of early oesophageal neoplasia can be safely performed in patients requiring anticoagulation when warfarin is discontinued 5 days before the endoscopic intervention and reinstituted on the evening of the procedure day.

In vitro assessment of the performance of a new multiband mucosectomy device for endoscopic resection of early upper gastrointestinal neoplasia

Background and study aims

Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is widely used for the endoscopic resection of early neoplasia in the upper gastrointestinal tract. A new MBM-device may have advantages over the current MBM-device with improved visualization, easier passage of accessories, and higher suction power due to different trip wire and cap.

Methods

Rubber bands were released one by one for both MBM-devices while endoscopic images were collected. First, free endoscopic view was assessed by computer-assisted measurements (quantitative) and by ranking the images by a panel of 11 endoscopists (qualitative). Second, using a visual analog scale, three ‘blinded’ endoscopists assessed introduction and advancement of three types of endoscopic devices through the working channel of a diagnostic endoscope with the MBM-devices assembled. Third, suction power was evaluated by a manometer attached to the cap of the assembled MBM-devices in four endoscopes. Negative pressures were measured after 5 and 10 s of suction and repeated five times. The passage and suction experiments were performed with dry trip wires and repeated after soaking with bloody, mucous fluids.

Results

With all bands present, endoscopic views were 90 and 40 % in the new and current MBM-device, respectively. With the release of more bands, differences slowly disappeared. The panel scored a better endoscopic view in the new MBM-device (p = 0.03). Passage of all accessories was considered significantly easier in the new MBM-device. With the associated snare in the working channel, suction power was significantly better with the new MBM-device.

Conclusion

Compared to the currently available MBM-device, the new MBM-device provides improved endoscopic visibility, smoother passage of accessories, and higher suction power.

Multiband mucosectomy for advanced dysplastic lesions in the upper digestive tract

Endoscopic resection (ER) is at present an accepted treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. ER provides similar efficacy to surgery; however, it is minimally invasive and less expensive. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is superior to biopsy for diagnosing advanced dysplasia and can change the diagnostic grade and the management. Several EMR techniques have been described that are alternatively used dependent upon the endoscopist personal experience, the anatomic conditions and the endoscopic appearance of the lesion to be resected. The literature suggests that EMR offers comparable outcomes to surgery for selected indications. EMR techniques using a cap fitted endoscope and EMR using a ligation device [multiband mucosectomy (MBM)] are the most frequently use. MBM technique does not require submucosal injection as with the endoscopic resection-cap technique, multiple resections can be performed with the same snare, pre-looping the endoscopic resection-snare in the ridge of the cap is not necessary, MBM does not require withdrawal of the endoscope between resections and up to six consecutive resections can be performed. This reduces the time and cost required for the procedure, while also reducing patient discomfort. Despite the increasing popularity of MBM, data on the safety and efficacy of this technique in upper gastrointestinal lesions with advanced dysplasia, defined as those lesions that have high-grade dysplasia or early cancer, is limited.

Comparison of the clinical value of multi-band mucosectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of patients with early-stage esophageal cancer

The present study aimed to compare the clinical value of multi-band mucosectomy (MBM) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for the treatment of patients with early-stage esophageal cancer. Between January 2011 and December 2012, 68 patients with early-stage esophageal cancer who underwent MBM and EMR were enrolled into the present study. The curative resection rate, duration of surgery, complications and follow-up records were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 68 patients included, 33 were treated with MBM and 35 with EMR. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete resection between the MBM and EMR groups (P>0.05). The mean duration of surgery in the MBM group was statistically lower than that in the EMR group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the intraoperative and post-operative complications between the MBM and EMR groups (P>0.05). Esophageal cancer reoccurred in 2 patients treated with MBM and 1 patient treated with EMR during the follow-up period (range, 3-24 months). Overall, MBM can be considered a better surgical option for the management of patients with early-stage esophageal cancer, as it offers higher histological curative resection rates and improved safety. However, further studies and a larger follow-up period are required to confirm the long-term curative effect.

Diagnosis and staging of superficial esophageal precursor based on pre-endoscopic resection system comparable to endoscopic resection

Background

Endoscopic treatments for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the esophageal neoplasm are two types: endoscopic resection (ER) and ablation. Resection enables evaluation of the lesion in the ER specimens, while ablation cannot. We sought to establish a pre-ER evaluated system with a diagnostic and staging accuracy similar to ER for the development of ablation therapy.

Methods

In our study, we collected data pertaining to early esophageal cancer and esophageal neoplasm treated with ER, analyzed the pre- and post-ER data of the lesions and evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of pre-ER system compared with the gold standard.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy rate was 91% based on the pre-ER system compared with the gold standard, and 93% based on the ER diagnosis. The AUC of the pre-ER system was 0.964, while the ER examination was 0.971.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the accuracy of pre-ER system was comparable to ER. The pre-ER system enables prediction of histological diagnosis and stage of the lesions, and the choice of treatment for superficial esophageal neoplasm.

EMR is not inferior to ESD for early Barrett's and EGJ neoplasia: An extensive review on outcome, recurrence and complication rates

Background and study aims In recent years, it has been reported that early Barrett's and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) neoplasia can be effectively and safely treated using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) appears to be the safest EMR method. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the safety and efficacy of MBM compared with ESD for the treatment of early neoplasia in Barrett's or at the EGJ. Methods A literature review of studies published up to May 2013 on EMR and ESD for early Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia and adenocarcinoma at the EGJ was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Results on outcome parameters such as number of curative resections, complications and procedure times are compared and reported. Results A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis in this study. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates when comparing EMR (10/380, 2.6 %) to ESD (1/333, 0.7 %) (OR 8.55; 95 %CI, 0.91 - 80.0, P = 0.06). All recurrences after EMR were treated with additional endoscopic resection. The risks of delayed bleeding, perforation and stricture rates in both groups were similar. The procedure was considerably less time-consuming in the EMR group (mean time 36.7 min, 95 %CI, 34.5 - 38.9) than in the ESD group (mean time 83.3 min, 95 %CI, 57.4 - 109.2). Conclusions The MBM technique for EMR is as effective as ESD when comparing outcomes related to recurrence and complication rates for the treatment of early Barrett's or EGJ neoplasia. The MBM technique is considerably less time-consuming.

The risk of endoscopic mucosal resection in the setting of clopidogrel use

Objective. Guidelines on antiplatelet medication use during endoscopy are based on limited evidence. We investigate the risk of bleeding and ischemic events in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of esophageal lesions in the setting of scheduled cessation and prompt resumption of clopidogrel. Design. Single centre retrospective review. Patients. Patients undergoing EMR of esophageal lesions. Interventions. Use of clopidogrel before EMR and resumption after EMR. Patients cease antiplatelets and anticoagulants 7 days before EMR and resume clopidogrel 2 days after EMR in average risk patients. Main Outcomes. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and ischemic events (IE) within 30 days of EMR. Results. 798 patients underwent 1716 EMR. 776 EMR were performed on patients on at least 1 antiplatelet/anticoagulant (APAC). 17 EMR were performed following clopidogrel cessation. There were 14 GIB and 2 IE. GIB risk in the setting of recent clopidogrel alone (0%) was comparable to those not on APAC (1.1%) (P = 1.0). IE risk on clopidogrel (6.3%) was higher than those not on APAC (0.1%) (P = 0.03). Limitations. Retrospective study. Conclusions. Temporary cessation of clopidogrel before EMR and prompt resumption is not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding but may be associated with increased ischemic events.

One-step circumferential endoscopic mucosal cap resection of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Focal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of visible intraepithelial lesions arising within Barrett's esophagus (BE) may miss synchronous lesions that are not endoscopically apparent. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection would obviate this concern by removing all BE; however, it requires repeated endoscopy which may increase the risk of complications, particularly for patients with circumferential BE. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of one-step complete circumferential resection of BE by cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) among patients with circumferential BE and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2003 and March 2010, 47 patients with circumferential BE and biopsy-proven high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer underwent EMR-C. We evaluated: (1) complete eradication of neoplasia, (2) complete eradication of metaplasia, and (3) complications including bleeding and esophageal stricture.

RESULTS

Complete eradication of neoplasia and complete eradication of metaplasia were achieved after a median follow-up of 18.4 months in 91% (43/47) of patients. After EMR-C, two patients (one IMC, one invasive cancer) underwent esophagectomy. Histology of the resected specimens showed no residual disease and a T1bN0 lesion, respectively. Two patients had progression of neoplasia. A stenosis occurred in 18 out of 45 patients (40%). All stenoses were treated with dilations and two required temporary placement of a covered stent.

CONCLUSION

One-step complete EMR-C is a safe and effective technique which can be considered in patients with early neoplastic lesions. Although 40% of patients developed dysphagia, this could well be managed endoscopically.

Barrett's esophagus: review of diagnosis and treatment

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an acquired condition characterized by replacement of stratified squamous epithelium by a cancer predisposing metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopy with systemic biopsy protocols plays a vital role in diagnosis. Technological advancements in dysplasia detection improves outcomes in surveillance and treatment of patients with BE and dysplasia. These advances in endoscopic technology radically changed the treatment for dysplastic BE and early cancer from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. A multimodal treatment approach combining endoscopic resection of visible and/or raised lesions with ablation techniques for flat BE mucosa, followed by long-term surveillance improves the outcomes of BE. Safe and effective endoscopic treatment can be either tissue acquiring as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection or tissue ablative as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy. Debatable issues such as durability of response, recognition and management of sub-squamous BE and optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and non-dysplastic BE need to be studied further. Development of safer wide field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all BE and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is another research goal. Shared decision making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in BE.

Clinical value of multiband mucosectomy for the treatment of squamous intraepithelial neoplasia of the esophagus

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To evaluate the clinical value of multiband mucosectomy (MBM) for the treatment of squamous intraepithelial neoplasia of the esophagus.

METHODS

A total of 51 lesions located at esophagus from 43 patients were treated with MBM, among which 11 were diagnosed as middle-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 25 as high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and 15 as early esophageal cancer pathologically. Primary end-points were the rate of complete endoscopic resection and the mean operation time; the second end-points were the postoperative local recurrence rate and acute plus early complications. The histopathological results were compared between pre-MBM biopsy and MBM specimens. All patients were followed up endoscopically.

RESULTS

A total of 52 MBM procedures with 180 resections were performed in 43 patients. The complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.8-96.9%). The sizes of the lesions ranged from 10 × 8 mm to 25 × 23 mm. The mean operation time is 37 ± 5 min. The operative acute bleeding complication was 7.6% (95% CI 3-18.1%); no perforations occurred. Early complications consisted of delayed bleeding (one patient 1.9%; 95% CI 0.3-10.1%) and slight esophageal stenosis (one patient). The histopathological diagnosis of 26 cases (51%) was consistent between biopsy and MBM samples, while 20 lesions exhibited higher grade dysplasia. The local recurrence rate was 6.9% (3/43) at 1 year, 9.3% (4/43) at 2 years, and 9.3% at 2.5 years. No death occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

MBM is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.

Endoscopic resection (endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection) for superficial Barrett's esophageal cancer

Recently developed endoscopic resection (endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]/ endoscopic mucosal resection) has dramatically changed the therapeutic approach for Barrett's esophageal cancer. The rationale for endoscopic resection is that lesions confined to the mucosal layer have negligible risk for developing lymph node metastasis and can be successfully eradicated by endoscopic treatment as a curative treatment with minimal invasiveness. According to some reports that analyzed the rate of lymph-node involvement relative to the depth of mucosal or submucosal tumor infiltration, endoscopic resection is clearly indicated for intramucosal carcinoma and might be extended to lesions with invasion into the submucosa (<200 μm, sm1) because of the low risk for lymph node metastasis. Most Japanese experts recommend ESD for Barrett's esophageal cancer after accurate diagnosis of the margin of cancer using narrow band imaging with magnifying endoscopy because of its high curative rate. However, few studies have evaluated the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for Barrett's esophageal cancer in Japan. Further investigations should be conducted to establish endoscopic resection for Barrett's esophageal cancer.

Parameters predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Endoscopic resection is a less invasive treatment than esophagectomy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but patients with lymph node metastasis need additional treatment after endoscopic resection. The purpose of this study was to establish a set of indicators to identify superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients at a high risk of metastasis. In all, 271 superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma esophagectomy cases were reviewed retrospectively. The relationships between clinicopathological parameters and immunohistochemical findings (p53, cyclin D1, EGFR and VEGF) on tissue microarrays, on the one hand, and lymph node metastasis were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Patients with intraluminal masses and ulcerated masses had a high risk of lymph node metastasis. Patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (1) thinner than 1200 μm; (2) confined to the mucosa; (3) with submucosal invasion <250 μm; (4) with submucosal invasion ≥250 μm but with negative VEGF expression and well/moderately differentiated or basaloid histology; or (5) with submucosal invasion ≥250 μm but with weak VEGF expression and well-differentiated histology had almost no risk of lymph node metastasis. We recommend endoscopic resection for all erosive, papillary and plaque-like superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas where endoscopic resection is clinically feasible, and esophagectomy for all other erosive, papillary and plaque-like cases and all intraluminal masses and ulcerated tumors. No additional treatment is needed for endoscopic resection cases with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (1) thinner than 1200 μm; (2) confined to the mucosa; (3) with submucosal invasion <250 μm; (4) with submucosal invasion ≥250 μm but with negative VEGF expression and well/moderately differentiated or basaloid histology; or (5) with submucosal invasion ≥250 μm but with weak VEGF expression and well-differentiated histology. These clinical and pathological criteria should enable more accurate selection of patients for these procedures.

Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's-associated dysplasia: a new paradigm for a new decade

The emergence of endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated dysplasia has significantly altered the management of this complex disease. Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift from that of pure surveillance to a more therapeutic approach in eradicating dysplastic BE. This strategy includes less invasive options than esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and early eradication of confirmed low-grade dysplasia. Although multiple modalities exist for endoscopic therapy, endoscopic mucosal resection coupled with radiofrequency ablation appears to be the most effective therapy, with minimal complications. Recent advances in endoscopic eradication therapies for dysplastic BE have fueled excitement for a significant weapon against the rising incidence of esophageal cancer.

Safety of prior endoscopic mucosal resection in patients receiving radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is safe and effective treatment for flat dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, there are limited data on the safety of RFA in patients who had prior endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which might increase the risk of complications. We compared complications and histologic outcomes between patients who had EMR before RFA and those who received only RFA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from patients treated for BE, associated with dysplasia or intramucosal cancer, at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from 1998-2009. Patients were divided into groups that had RFA after EMR (group 1, n = 44) or only RFA (group 2, n = 46). We compared the incidence of complications (strictures, bleeding, and esophageal perforation) and histologic features (complete resolution of dysplasia and complete resolution of intestinal metaplasia [CR-IM]) between groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of stricture formation.

RESULTS

Stricture rates were 14% in group 1 and 9% in group 2 (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-9.74). The rates of CR-IM were 43% in group 1 and 74% in group 2 (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.78). The rates of complete resolution of dysplasia were 76% in group 1 and 71% in group 2 (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.39-4.17). The adjusted odds ratio for CR-IM in group 1 (adjusting for age, segment length, and grade of dysplasia) was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.15-1.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Stricture rates among patients who receive only RFA are comparable to those of patients who had prior EMR. EMR appears safe to perform prior to RFA.

Outcomes of T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is usually recommended for patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1b EAC) because of the potential for lymph node metastasis (LNM). Endoscopic management often differs based on the risk of metastasis. There is limited information on the difference in outcomes for T1b-EAC with and without esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate (1) the outcomes of T1b EAC treatments with and without esophagectomy and (2) the percentage of LNM at esophagectomy for T1b-EAC.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

A tertiary Barrett's esophagus unit.

PATIENTS

Sixty-eight T1b EAC patients based on EMR histology.

INTERVENTIONS

Esophagectomy and endoscopic therapies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Survival duration and mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients had T1b EAC; cumulative mortality rate was 30.9% and median survival duration was 39.5 months. Thirty-nine underwent esophagectomy and 29 did not. Among patients who underwent esophagectomy, 13 (33.3%) had LNM, and the mortality rate was 50.0% and 11.1% for those with and without LNM, respectively (P < .01). For those with and without esophagectomy, the cumulative mortality rates were 25.6% and 37.9%, and median survival duration was 48.9 and 34.8 months, respectively. There was no statistical difference in Charlson comorbidity index, number of EMRs, mortality rate, or survival duration. In Cox proportional hazard model analysis, the hazard ratio for esophagectomy was 0.5 (P = .21).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, nonrandomized small sample size cohort.

CONCLUSION

Among the patients with T1b EAC found in EMR specimens who underwent esophagectomy, one third had regional LNM. In our small series, patients who underwent esophagectomy did not have a significantly different survival duration from that of those who did not, indicating that these patients may have similar outcomes [corrected].

Efficacy and safety of EMR to completely remove Barrett's esophagus: experience in 41 patients

BACKGROUND

EMR is typically used to remove focal abnormalities of the esophageal mucosa. However, larger areas of Barrett's esophagus (BE) can be resected through side-by-side resections.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of EMR to completely remove BE.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center study.

SETTING

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.

PATIENTS

Between January 2006 and December 2010, 46 patients underwent EMR for complete removal of BE. Three were lost to follow-up, one died of unrelated causes before completion, and one was still undergoing EMR treatment at the conclusion of the study. The remaining 41 patients were included for analysis. The worst histologic grade was low-grade dysplasia in 4 patients, high-grade dysplasia without cancer in 26 patients, and high-grade dysplasia with superficial adenocarcinoma in 11 patients. BE was circumferential in 65.9% of cases, and the mean (± SD) length was 3.3 ± 2.3 cm.

INTERVENTION

EMR was performed by using a cap (n = 4), a multiband ligator device (n = 31), or both (n = 6), with a mean (± SD) of 2.4 ± 1.2 sessions per patient.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Remission rates and complications.

RESULTS

Remission of high-grade dysplasia and cancer, all dysplasia, and all BE was achieved in 94.6%, 85.4%, and 78.0%, respectively. Complications included minor bleeding (31.7%), perforations (4.9%), and strictures (43.9%). All complications were managed conservatively.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Complete removal of BE with EMR is effective but associated with a high complication rate, which is mainly related to stricture formation. This needs to be considered when choosing between available treatment modalities.

Endoscopic resection techniques and ablative therapies for Barrett’s neoplasia

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the most rapidly increasing cancer in western countries. High-grade dysplasia (HGD) arising from Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the most important risk factor for its development, and when it is present the reported incidence is up to 10% per patient-year. Adenocarcinoma in the setting of BE develops through a well known histological sequence, from non-dysplastic Barrett’s to low grade dysplasia and then HGD and cancer. Endoscopic surveillance programs have been established to detect the presence of neoplasia at a potentially curative stage. Newly developed endoscopic treatments have dramatically changed the therapeutic approach of BE. When neoplasia is confined to the mucosal layer the risk for developing lymph node metastasis is negligible and can be successfully eradicated by an endoscopic approach, offering a curative intention treatment with minimal invasiveness. Endoscopic therapies include resection techniques, also known as tissue-acquiring modalities, and ablation therapies or non-tissue acquiring modalities. The aim of endoscopic treatment is to eradicate the whole Barrett’s segment, since the risk of developing synchronous and metachronous lesions due to the persistence of molecular aberrations in the residual epithelium is well established.

Endoscopic management of Barrett esophagus

Endoscopy has a vital role in the diagnosis, screening, surveillance and treatment of Barrett esophagus. Over the past few decades, tremendous advances have been made in endoscopic technology, and the management of dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett esophagus has changed radically from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. Proper endoscopic techniques and systematic biopsy protocols improve dysplasia detection, and endoscopic surveillance improves outcomes in patients with Barrett esophagus and dysplasia. Endoscopic treatment can be tissue acquiring (as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection) or ablative (as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy). Treatment is usually multimodal, combining endoscopic resection of visible lesions with one or more mucosal ablation techniques, followed by long-term surveillance. Such treatment is safe and effective. Shared decision-making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in Barrett esophagus. Issues such as durability of response, importance of subsquamous Barrett epithelium and the optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and nondysplastic Barrett esophagus need to be studied further. Development of safer wide-field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all Barrett esophagus and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is needed.

Randomized trial on endoscopic resection-cap versus multiband mucosectomy for piecemeal endoscopic resection of early Barrett's neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an important treatment for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus. ER-cap requires submucosal lifting and positioning of a snare in the cap, making it technically demanding and laborious. Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) uses a modified variceal band ligator and requires no submucosal lifting or positioning of a snare.

OBJECTIVE

To compare ER-cap and MBM for piecemeal ER of early Barrett's neoplasia.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary-care and community-care centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved 84 patients (64 men; median age 70 years) undergoing piecemeal ER of Barrett's neoplasia.

INTERVENTION

Piecemeal ER was performed by using ER-cap (n = 42) or MBM (n = 42).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Safety, efficacy, procedure time, costs.

RESULTS

Procedure time (34 vs 50 minutes; P = .02) and costs (€240 vs €322; P < .01) were significantly less with MBM compared with ER-cap. MBM resulted in smaller resection specimens than ER-cap (18 ×13 mm vs 20 × 15 mm; P < .01). Maximum thicknesses of specimens and resected submucosa were not significantly different. There were no clinically relevant bleeding episodes. Four perforations occurred, 3 with ER-cap, 1 with MBM (P = not significant).

LIMITATIONS

Potential bias because of different levels of experience among participating endoscopists.

CONCLUSION

Piecemeal ER with MBM is faster and cheaper than with ER-cap. Despite the lack of submucosal lifting, MBM appears not to be associated with more perforations. Although MBM results in slightly smaller specimens, the clinical relevance of this may be limited because depth of resections does not differ between both techniques. MBM may thus be preferred for piecemeal ER of early Barrett's neoplasia. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR1435.).

State of the art in the endoscopic imaging and ablation of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is the result of long-term acid reflux and is a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surgical resection of the esophagus has been the mainstay of treatment for high grade dysplasia and early cancer. However, recent advances in the endoscopic imaging and ablation technologies have made esophagectomy avoidable in patients with dysplasia and superficial neoplasia. In this article, we review the most relevant endoscopic imaging technologies, such as chromoendoscopy, narrow band and autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy. We also review the various endoscopic ablation technologies, such as endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy. Finally, we focus on the studies that evaluate the efficacy of these imaging and ablation technologies in finding and eradicating neoplastic Barrett's esophagus.

[Endoscopic treatments for Barrett oesophagus]

High grade dysplasia and superficial carcinomas (with no extension under muscularis mucosae) can be indications for endoscopic treatments of Barrett oesophagus. When an endoscopic treatment is considered, a gastroscopy with use of acetic acid and planimetry and the confirmation of high-grade dysplasia by a new examination after PPI treatment and a pathologic second confirmation is needed. For high-grade dysplasia in focalised and visible lesions, an endoscopic resection by EMR or ESD should be proposed: it allows a more accurate pathologic examination and can be an effective curative treatment. After endoscopic resection of visible high grade dysplasia lesions, a complete eradication of Barrett oesophagus may be proposed to prevent dysplasia recurrence. In case of extensive high-grade dysplasia or to eradicate Barrett oesophagus residual lesions, radiofrequency ablation is the preferred endoscopic technique. Photodynamic therapy may also be proposed for more invasive lesions or after other endoscopic techniques with mucosal scars. Surgical oesophagus resection is still recommended for diffuse high-grade dysplasia in young patients or in case of pathologic pejorative criteria in endoscopic resection specimen. In case of Low-grade dysplasia, either endoscopic surveillance should be performed every six or 12 months or radiofrequency ablation could be proposed in the yield of prospective studies.

Endoscopic resection

Endoscopic resection (ER) has become the most important endoscopic treatment method of early cancers of the upper GI tract. ER serves as a therapeutic but also as a diagnostic tool by providing a specimen for histologic assessment. In expert hands ER is easy to performe and has a very low complication rate. Long-term results in early esophageal and gastric cancer are excellent.

Greater interobserver agreement by endoscopic mucosal resection than biopsy samples in Barrett's dysplasia

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an important diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic tool for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated neoplasia. We analyzed the histopathologic characteristics of specimens collected during EMR compared with biopsy specimens from patients with BE and assessed interobserver variability in pathologists' assessment of EMR and biopsy specimens.

METHODS

We evaluated EMR (n = 251) and biopsy (n = 269) specimens collected from patients with BE at 2 tertiary referral centers. A detailed histologic analysis was performed for each EMR and biopsy specimen to determine the grade of dysplasia, depth of the specimen, proportion of specimen with dysplasia, and quality of samples. Interobserver agreement for both biopsy and EMR specimens (among 4 experienced pathologists) was calculated by using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Histologic analysis showed that submucosa was present in the majority of EMRs, compared with biopsy specimens (88% vs 1%, P < .0001). Almost all biopsy specimens (99%) included lamina propria. However, the muscularis mucosa was observed in only 58% of biopsy specimens. For both EMR and biopsy specimens, the highest grade of dysplasia comprised < or =25% of the total area in >50% of the specimens. Interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of dysplasia was significantly greater for EMR specimens than biopsy specimens (low-grade dysplasia, 0.33 vs 0.22, P < .001; high-grade dysplasia, 0.43 vs 0.35, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

Submucosa can be examined in most samples collected from EMR; the distribution of neoplasia is focal within biopsy and EMR specimens. There is more interobserver agreement among pathologists in the analysis of EMR samples than biopsy specimens for the diagnosis of dysplasia.

Optimal endoluminal treatment of Barrett's esophagus: integrating novel strategies into clinical practice

Endoluminal therapy has become the first-choice treatment over the last 5 years for early Barrett's neoplasia limited to the mucosa. Long-term follow-up data on endoscopic resection have demonstrated the oncological safety of endoscopic resection in comparison to surgery. However, there is a high rate of recurrent disease, which can be avoided using additional ablation of the remaining Barrett. Radiofrequency ablation was recently introduced as an efficacious means to ablate Barrett's epithelium with a better safety profile than older ablation techniques. Recent studies show that endoscopic resection can be safely combined with radiofrequency ablation for treating dysplastic Barrett's after removal of visible lesions. This constitutes a completely new treatment paradigm that will be integrated in routine clinical practice in the forthcoming years.

History, molecular mechanisms, and endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus

This report is an adjunct to the American Gastroenterological Association Institute's medical position statement and technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus, which will be published in the near future. Those documents will consider a number of broad questions on the diagnosis, clinical features, and management of patients with Barrett's esophagus, and the reader is referred to the technical review for an in-depth discussion of those topics. In this report, we review historical, molecular, and endoscopic therapeutic aspects of Barrett's esophagus that are of interest to clinicians and researchers.