Is endoscopic sphincterotomy avoidable in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction?

Biliary Dyskinesia and Hyperkinesis

Biliary dyskinesia refers to a group of functional and motility disorders of the biliary system in patients presenting with typical biliary pain, but without any visible structural abnormalities on standard imaging. The Rome IV Criteria establishes diagnostic criteria for functional gallbladder disorder (gallbladder dyskinesia and biliary hyperkinesia), functional biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder (biliary dyskinesia), and pancreatic sphincter of Oddi disorder. Many diagnostic adjuncts such as hepatobiliary scintigraphy and sphincter of Oddi manometry exist, although these results are supportive and not necessarily diagnostic for biliary dyskinesia. Surgical intervention is most successful when selecting for patients with typical biliary pain.

Role of Inflammation and Motility Disorders in the Development, Course and Consequences of Functional Gastrointestinal and Biliary Tract Diseases (Literature Review and Expert Panel Resolution)

   Aim: to present the results of the Expert Panel with a discussion of modern concepts of the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal diseases and the possibilities of multitarget therapy with trimebutine.

   Key points. Low-grade inflammation can be considered as a morphological substrate of functional diseases with an increase in activated mastocytes and eosinophils, T-helpers 2 and T-helpers 17 in the gastrointestinal mucosa. In the development in the content of visceral hypersensitivity, the functional connection between mastocytes and TRPV1-positive sensory endings of the vagus nerve is of great importance. Proinflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases can enter the systemic circulation, provoking the development of systemic manifestations. Increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines are supported by altered intestinal permeability and microbiota. Functional diseases are believed to modify the symptoms and course of concomitant organic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (for example, functional diseases of the biliary tract may contribute to the development of cholelithiasis, pancreatitis). The peripheral μ-, κ- and δ-receptor agonist trimebutine (Trimedat®) regulates the production of enterohormones, modulates motility throughout the gastrointestinal tract and normalizes visceral sensitivity. The effectiveness of trimebutine in the treatment of functional disorders has been shown in various studies. Trimebutine helps reduce the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6.

   Conclusion. In the treatment of functional diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, trimebutine can be considered as a multitarget agent, since the drug helps to normalize motility, reduces the degree of visceral hypersensitivity, exhibits anti-inflammatory and neuroregenerative effects, and can also increase the effectiveness of treatment of concomitant diseases.

Current treatment of biliary Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction

The sphincter of Oddi is a delicate neuromuscular structure located at the junction of the biliary-pancreatic system and the duodenum. Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) can result in various clinical manifestations, including biliary-type pain and recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis. The management of SOD has been challenging. With the publication of the landmark Evaluating Predictors and Interventions in Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (EPISOD) trial and the Rome IV consensus, our clinical practice in the treatment of SOD has changed significantly in recent years. Currently, the management of type II SOD remains controversial and there is a lack of non-invasive therapy options, particularly for patients not responding to endoscopic treatment. In this mini review, we aimed to discuss the current knowledge on the treatment of biliary SOD.

Current situation and problems in diagnosis and treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a clinical syndrome referring to the loss of normal physiological function of the sphincter of Oddi with upper abdominal pain from the gallbladder and pancreas, postprandial abdominal bloating, elevation of liver or pancreatic enzymes, common bile duct dilation, pancreatitis and so on. SOD is more common in patients after cholecystectomy. Although the established criteria for diagnosing and treating SOD have been applied in clinical practice, its diagnosis and treatment have long been a controversial topic since the best diagnostic and treatment methods are still unconfirmed, partly because of its natural course, disease treatment process, and long-term follow-up outcomes that have not been determined in large controlled studies. This article briefly reviews the latest research of SOD and comprehensively analyzes the current status and existing problems in the diagnosis and treatment of SOD, with an aim to provide appropriate advice for clinicians to diagnose and treat this disease.

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: past, present and future

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and the concept of a causal relationship to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, despite the controversy, has presented a clinically relevant conflict for decades. Historically surgeons, and now gastroenterologists have expended tremendous efforts towards trying to better understand the dilemma that is confounded by unique patient phenotypes. Areas covered: This review encompasses the literature from a century of experience on the topic of post-cholecystectomy syndrome. Relevant historical and anecdotal experiences are examined in the setting of insights from evaluation of recently available controlled data. Expert commentary: Historical observations and recent data suggest that patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome can be categorized as follows. Patients with sphincter of Oddi stenosis will most often benefit from treatment with sphincterotomy. Patients with classic biliary pain and some objective evidence of biliary obstruction may have a sphincter of Oddi disorder and should be considered for endoscopic evaluation and therapy. Patients with atypical post-cholecystectomy pain, without any evidence consistent with biliary obstruction, and/or with evidence for another diagnosis or dysfunction should not undergo ERCP.

Rome IV. Gallbladder and Sphincter of Oddi Disorders

The concept that motor disorders of the gallbladder, cystic duct and sphincter of Oddi can cause painful syndromes is attractive and popular, at least in the USA. However, the results of commonly performed ablative treatments (cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy) are not uniformly good. The predictive value of tests that are often used to diagnose dysfunction (dynamic gallbladder scintigraphy and sphincter manometry) is controversial. Evaluation and management of these patients is made difficult by the fluctuating symptoms and the placebo effect of invasive interventions. A recent stringent study has shown that sphincterotomy is no better than sham treatment in patients with post-cholecystectomy pain and little or no objective abnormalities on investigation, so that the old concept of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) type III is discarded. ERCP approaches are no longer appropriate in that context. There is a pressing need for similar prospective studies to provide better guidance for clinicians dealing with these patients. We need to clarify the indications for cholecystectomy in patients with Functional Gallbladder Disorder (FGBD) and the relevance of sphincter dysfunction in patients with some evidence for biliary obstruction (previously SOD type II, now called "Functional Biliary Sphincter Disorder - FBSD") and with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis.

Symptomatic cholelithiasis and functional disorders of the biliary tract

Symptomatic cholelithiasis and functional disorders of the biliary tract present with similar signs and symptoms. The functional disorders of the biliary tract include functional gallbladder disorder, dyskinesia, and the sphincter of Oddi disorders. Although the diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis are relatively straightforward, the diagnosis and treatment of functional disorders can be much more challenging. Many aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of functional disorders are in need of further study. This article discusses uncomplicated gallstone disease and the functional disorders of the biliary tract to emphasize and update the essential components of diagnosis and management.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: an evidence-based review

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a painful syndrome that presents as recurrent episodes of right upper quadrant biliary pain, or recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis. It is a disease process that has been a subject of controversy, in part because its natural history, disease course and treatment outcomes have not been clearly defined in large controlled studies with long-term follow-up. This review is aimed at clarifying the state-of-the-art with an evidence-based summary of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and modalities for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Endoscopic approach to the patient with motility disorders of the bile duct and sphincter of Oddi

Since its original description by Oddi in 1887, the sphincter of Oddi has been the subject of much study. Furthermore, the clinical syndrome of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) and its therapy are controversial areas. Nevertheless, SOD is commonly diagnosed and treated by physicians. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of SOD.

The diagnosis and management of Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a benign pathological syndrome. The clinical manifestations may be a consequence of an anatomical stenosis or sphincter dysmotility. Manometry is invasive and has an associated morbidity. Non-invasive investigations have been evaluated to ameliorate risk but have unknown efficacy. The review aims to critically appraise current evidence for the diagnosis and management of SOD.

METHODS

A systematic review of articles containing relevant search terms was performed.

RESULTS

Manometry is the current gold standard in selecting which patients are likely to benefit from endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). It can, however, be misleading. Several non-invasive investigations were identified. These have poor sensitivities and specificities compared to manometry. There is a paucity of data examining the investigation's specific ability to select patients for ES. Outcomes of ES for Type I SOD are favourable irrespective of manometry. Types II and III SOD may respond to an initial trial of medical therapy. Manometry may predict response to ES in Type II SOD, but not in Type III.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive investigations currently lack sufficient sensitivities and specificities for routine use in diagnosing SOD. Type I SOD should be treated with ES without manometry. Manometry may be useful for Type II SOD. However, whilst data is lacking a therapeutic trial of Botox(TM) or trial stenting may bean alternative. Careful and thorough patient counselling is essential. Type III SOD is associated with high complications from manometry and poor outcomes from ES. Alternative diagnoses should be thoroughly sought and its management should be medical.

Medical treatment for sphincter of oddi dysfunction: Can it replace endoscopic sphincterotomy?

AIM: To report the results of a medical management of sphincter of oddi dysfunction (SOD) after an intermediate follow-up period.

METHODS: A total of 59 patients with SOD (2 men and 57 women, mean age 51 years old) were included in this prospective study. After medical treatment for one year, the patients were clinically re-evaluated after an average period of 30 mo.

RESULTS: The distribution of the patients according to the Milwaukee’s classification was the following: 11 patients were type 1, 34 were type 2 and 14 were type 3. Fourteen patients underwent an endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) after one year of medical treatment. The median intermediate follow-up period was 29.8 ± 3 mo (3-72 mo). The initial effectiveness of the medical treatment was complete, partial and poor among 50.8%, 13.5% and 35%, respectively, of the patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 37 patients (62.7%) showed more than 50% improvement. The rate of improvement in patients who required ES was not significantly different compared with the patients treated conservatively (64.2% vs 62.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that conservative medical treatment could be an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy because, after an intermediate follow-up period, the two treatments show the same success rates.

Management of patients with biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder without sphincter of Oddi manometry

Background

The paucity of controlled data for the treatment of most biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder (SOD) types and the incomplete response to therapy seen in clinical practice and several trials has generated controversy as to the best course of management of these patients. In this observational study we aimed to assess the outcome of patients with biliary SOD managed without sphincter of Oddi manometry.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with biliary SOD (14% type I, 51% type II, 35% type III) were prospectively enrolled. All patients with a dilated common bile duct were offered endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy whereas all others were offered medical treatment alone. Patients were followed up for a median of 15 months and were assessed clinically for response to treatment.

Results

At follow-up 15.3% of patients reported complete symptom resolution, 59.3% improvement, 22% unchanged symptoms, and 3.4% deterioration. Fifty-one percent experienced symptom resolution/improvement on medical treatment only, 12% after sphincterotomy, and 10% after both medical treatment/sphincterotomy. Twenty percent experienced at least one recurrence of symptoms after initial response to medical and/or endoscopic treatment. Fifty ERCP procedures were performed in 24 patients with an 18% complication rate (16% post-ERCP pancreatitis). The majority of complications occurred in the first ERCP these patients had. Most complications were mild and treated conservatively. Age, gender, comorbidity, SOD type, dilated common bile duct, presence of intact gallbladder, or opiate use were not related to the effect of treatment at the end of follow-up (p > 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Patients with biliary SOD may be managed with a combination of endoscopic sphincterotomy (performed in those with dilated common bile duct) and medical therapy without manometry. The results of this approach with regards to symptomatic relief and ERCP complication rate are comparable to those previously published in the literature in cohorts of patients assessed by manometry.