Long-term treatment reduction and steroids withdrawal in children with autoimmune hepatitis: a single centre experience on 55 children

Long-term outcomes of patients with type 1 or 2 autoimmune hepatitis presenting in childhood

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In children with autoimmune hepatitis, uncertainties include outcomes associated with type 2 hepatitis, the possibility of and criteria for attempting withdrawal of treatment, and long-term outcomes. We report our experience on these issues.

METHODS

From 1973 to 2002, 117 children with type 1 (n = 65) or type 2 (n = 52) hepatitis, excluding fulminant hepatitis, were treated, primarily with prednisone and azathioprine. Median follow-up was 20 years in survivors.

RESULTS

Normalisation of aminotransferases and prothrombin ratio were observed in 93% and 84% of children, respectively; sustained remission after treatment withdrawal was recorded in 24% of the entire population, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Sustained treatment-free remission was obtained in 11 of 24 children with follow-ups of 4-22 years based on durable normalisation of aminotransferases (without histological assessment). Gastrointestinal bleeding from varices and the emergence of extrahepatic autoimmune disorders occurred in 10 and 22 patients, respectively. Liver transplantation was performed in 23 patients at a median age of 21 years. The 30-year probabilities of overall and native liver survival were 81% and 61%, respectively. No differences were observed between type 1 and 2 hepatitis for any of the component parts of outcome. In the multivariate analysis, a persistent abnormal prothrombin ratio was associated with worse probabilities of overall and native liver survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of liver outcome, type 2 hepatitis is not different from type 1. Withdrawal of treatment is possible without prior liver histology. A persistent abnormal prothrombin ratio identifies patients who will require liver transplantation in adolescence or early adulthood.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

In children with autoimmune hepatitis, there are conflicting reports on the differences in outcome between type 1 and type 2 hepatitis, and on the possibility of treatment withdrawal, before which liver histology is required; data concerning >10-year overall and native liver survival rates are limited. In this study, we found no differences in outcomes between type 1 and 2 hepatitis; a durable treatment-free state was achieved in 19% of all patients throughout childhood and early adulthood, and in 45% of children for whom treatment withdrawal was attempted without prior liver histology; prothrombin was found to be predictive of 30-year overall and native liver survival. The results allow for a less-strict approach to treatment withdrawal in children, avoiding the risks of a liver biopsy, and they provide a tool to help anticipate the need for liver transplantation before complications occur.

A reasoned approach to the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages, characterised by elevated transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on histology and good response to immunosuppressive treatment. If untreated, it has a poor prognosis. The aim of this review is to analyse AIH therapeutic interventions with reference to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AIH. Standard treatment, based on steroids and azathioprine, leads to disease remission in 80-90% of patients. Alternative first-line treatment with budesonide is effective in adults, but less so in the juvenile form of AIH; first-line treatment with ciclosporin does not provide convincing advantages compared to standard treatment. Second-line treatments are needed for patients not responding or intolerant to first-line standard management. Mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line drug, and has good efficacy particularly for patients intolerant to azathioprine, but is teratogenic. Only few and heterogeneous data on calcineurin inhibitors and m-TOR inhibitors are available. Biologicals, including anti-tumour necrosis factor- α and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, have given ambivalent results and may have severe side-effects. Clinical trials with new therapeutic options aiming at targeting B lymphocytes and proinflammatory cytokines, or expanding regulatory T cells to restore tolerance are ongoing.

Steroid Free Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Selected Children

Current guidelines recommend steroids for induction of remission in all children diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis regardless of the clinical presentation. In this report, we describe our experience in treating selected asymptomatic children with autoimmune hepatitis using a steroid-free regimen; this treatment strategy was safe and effective in inducing remission.

Autoimmune hepatitis: Standard treatment and systematic review of alternative treatments

Autoimmune hepatitis is a rare chronic inflammatory liver disease, affecting all ages, characterised by elevated transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive autoantibodies, interface hepatitis at liver histology and good response to immunosuppressive treatment. If untreated, it has a poor prognosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence for standard treatment and to provide a systematic review on alternative treatments for adults and children. Standard treatment is based on steroids and azathioprine, and leads to disease remission in 80%-90% of patients. Alternative first line treatment has been attempted with budesonide or cyclosporine, but their superiority compared to standard treatment remains to be demonstrated. Second-line treatments are needed for patients not responding or intolerant to standard treatment. No randomized controlled trials have been performed for second-line options. Mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line drug, and has good efficacy particularly for patients intolerant to azathioprine, but has the major disadvantage of being teratogenic. Only few and heterogeneous data on cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus and sirolimus are available. More recently, experience with the anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha infliximab and the anti-CD20 rituximab has been published, with ambivalent results; these agents may have severe side-effects and their use should be restricted to specialized centres. Clinical trials with new therapeutic options are ongoing.

Incidence and Characteristics of Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive inflammatory liver disease of unknown etiology, with limited population-based estimates of pediatric incidence. We reported the incidence of pediatric AIH in Canada and described its clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged <18 years diagnosed with AIH between 2000-2009 at all pediatric centers in Canada.

RESULTS

A total of 159 children with AIH (60.3% female, 13.2% type 2 AIH) were identified. Annual incidence was 0.23 per 100000 children. Median age at presentation for type 1 was 12 years (interquartile range: 11-14) versus 10 years for type 2 (interquartile range: 4.5-13) (P = .03). Fatigue (58%), jaundice (54%), and abdominal pain (49%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Serum albumin (33 vs 38 g/L; P = .03) and platelet count (187 000 vs 249 000; P <.001) were significantly lower and the international normalized ratio (1.4 vs 1.2; P <.001) was higher in cirrhotic versus noncirrhotic patients. Initial treatment included corticosteroids (80%), azathioprine (32%), and/or cyclosporine (13%). Response to treatment at 1 year was complete in 90%, and partial in 3%. 3% of patients had no response, and 3% responded and later relapsed. Nine patients underwent liver transplantation, and 4 patients died at a mean follow-up of 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

AIH is uncommon in children and adolescents in Canada. Type 1 AIH was diagnosed 5.5 times more frequently than type 2 AIH. Most patients respond well to conventional therapy, diminishing the need for liver transplantation.

Budesonide versus prednisone with azathioprine for the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of budesonide vs prednisone therapy both in combination with azathioprine in pediatric patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-six patients with AIH (11 males and 35 females) aged 9-17 years were enrolled in a 6-month, prospective, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter phase IIb study evaluating budesonide (n = 19; 3 mg twice or 3 times daily) vs prednisone (n = 27; 40 mg/day tapered to 10 mg/day), both with azathioprine (1-2 mg/kg/day), followed by a further 6 months of open-label budesonide therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete biochemical remission (normal serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels) without predefined steroid-specific side effects.

RESULTS

We observed no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients who met the primary endpoint between the budesonide (3 of 19; 16%) and prednisone groups (4 of 27; 15%) after 6 months, nor in the percentage of patients who experienced biochemical remission (budesonide, 6 of 19 [32%]; prednisone, 9 of 27 [33%]), lack of steroid-specific side effects (budesonide, 10 of 19 [53%]; prednisone, 10 of 27 [37%]). The mean weight gain was 1.2 ± 3.5 kg in the budesonide group and 5.1 ± 4.9 kg in the prednisone group (P = .006). A total of 42 patients received open-label budesonide treatment for another 6 months. After 12 months, 46% of these patients achieved complete remission.

CONCLUSION

Oral budesonide with azathioprine can induce and maintain remission in pediatric patients with AIH and may be considered an alternative therapy to prednisone. The treatment causes fewer side effects and does not lead to weight gain; however, it may be less effective than prednisone in inducing remission.

Autoimmune hepatitis in children: an overview of the disease focusing on current therapies

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated necroinflammatory disease of the liver characterized by elevation of IgG, presence of characteristic autoantibodies, and histological features of interface hepatitis. Two types of juvenile AIH have been recognized according to seropositivity for smooth muscle and/or antinuclear antibody (AIH type 1) or liver kidney microsomal antibody (AIH type 2). The exact pathogenesis of AIH is still unclear, but it is known that unidentified environmental factors, and occasionally drugs, might trigger disease in genetically susceptible individuals. The clinical spectrum of this disease is very wide, ranging from asymptomatic individuals with abnormal liver function to those with fulminant liver failure. The diagnosis is based on a combination of biochemical and histological parameters and on exclusion of other liver diseases. It is a relatively rare but devastating disease, which progresses rapidly unless immunosuppressive treatment is started promptly. Standard therapy consists of a combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine, which is efficacious in 80% of patients. Alternative therapies are increasingly being explored in patients who do not respond to standard treatment and/or have intolerable side-effects. The purpose of this paper is to review our current knowledge about AIH in children, evaluating mainly the therapeutic options for its treatment, considering also the newer immunosuppressant agents used in difficult-to-treat cases.

Pharmacological management of autoimmune hepatitis

INTRODUCTION

Without prompt immunosuppressive treatment, autoimmune hepatitis is a devastating, albeit rare, liver disease. It affects both adults and children, being particularly aggressive in the latter. Eighty per cent of patients respond satisfactorily to treatment; the other 20% progress to end-stage liver disease and require transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

This review emphasizes the importance of a timely diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis and provides a practical guide for its treatment. The authors summarize the treatment options available for autoimmune hepatitis and stress that most patients respond successfully to standard treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine, two well-tried and inexpensive drugs. The authors also review the options for difficult-to-treat patients (non-responders and frequent relapsers), for whom newer immunosuppressive agents--usually employed as anti-rejection drugs--have been tried with variable success.

EXPERT OPINION

Autoimmune hepatitis is exquisitely responsive to immunosuppression but treatment must be started as soon as possible to achieve full remission and halt progression of liver disease. New strategies aiming at treating the unresponsive patients and at specifically curbing the liver autoimmune attack, without provoking unwanted systemic side effects, are being investigated and may be available within the next 5 years.