A slow caloric satiety drinking test in patients with temporary and permanent gastric electrical stimulation

Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis and Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting

OPINION STATEMENT

Gastroparesis is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Some patients have debilitating vomiting, weight loss, and dehydration, while others have effortless regurgitation of undigested foods or postprandial distress suggestive of functional dyspepsia. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been proposed as an effective treatment option for patients with gastroparesis refractory to medical therapy. Evidence suggests that the clinically available device, a low-energy high-frequency GES, activates the vagal afferent pathways to influence the central control mechanisms for nausea and vomiting. Myoelectrical effects of the stomach are also involved. The results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for adults with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are conflicting. There are no RCTs in adults with chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) with normal gastric emptying or in children with gastroparesis. However, there is increasing evidence from large unblinded studies showing the long-term efficacy in selected adults with gastroparesis. Selection criteria should be based on three categories: (a) underlying etiology, (b) clinical presentation and predominant symptoms, and (c) potential risk for complication. Significant abdominal pain, daily opiate use, and idiopathic gastroparesis are identified as negative predictors of success. Temporary GES has been utilized to identify patients who may benefit from surgical GES, but this strategy has yet to be proven in controlled studies. Objectives for this review are to highlight the mechanisms of action for GES, to look at the evidence for clinical efficacy, and to select patients who are likely to benefit.

Impact of electrical stimulation of the stomach on gastric distension-induced emesis in the musk shrew

BACKGROUND

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is implicated as a potential therapy for difficult-to-treat nausea and vomiting; however, there is a lack of insight into the mechanisms responsible for these effects. This study tested the relationship between acute GES and emesis in musk shrews, an established emetic model system.

METHODS

Urethane-anesthetized shrews were used to record emetic responses (monitoring intra-tracheal pressure and esophageal contractions), respiration rate, heart rate variability, blood pressure, and gastrointestinal electromyograms. We investigated the effects of acute GES pulse duration (0.3, 1, 5, and 10 ms), current amplitude (0.5, 1, and 2 mA), pulse frequency (8, 15, 30, and 60 Hz), and electrode placement (antrum, body, and fundus) on emesis induced by gastric stretch, using a balloon.

KEY RESULTS

There were four outcomes: (i) GES did not modify the effects of gastric stretch-induced emesis; (ii) GES produced emesis, depending on the stimulation parameters, but was less effective than gastric stretch; (iii) other physiological changes were closely associated with emesis and could be related to a sub-threshold activation of the emetic system, including suppression of breathing and rise in blood pressure; and (iv) a control experiment showed that 8-OH-DPAT, a reported 5-HT1A receptor agonist that acts centrally as an antiemetic, blocked gastric stretch-induced emesis.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

These results do not support an antiemetic effect of acute GES on gastric distension-induced emesis within the range of conditions tested, but further evaluation should focus on a broader range of emetic stimuli and GES stimulation parameters.

Improvement of quality of life and symptoms after gastric electrical stimulation in children with functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to evaluate the effect of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) on symptoms and quality of life for pediatric patients with functional dyspepsia (FD).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (16 female, median 15 years) were treated with GES for FD after a median of 24 months of symptoms (3 months-14 years). At baseline, 46% required tube feeds and 25% parenteral nutrition. Sixty percent had gastroparesis. The PedsQL GI Module (PedsQL) was completed for 18/24 both pre-/post-GES after a median of 8 months. Patients also completed the Symptom Monitor Worksheet (SMW) pre-/post-GES after a median of 6 months. Pre-/post-GES global health was also assessed.

KEY RESULTS

Significant improvements were seen in multiple areas of the PedsQL, including stomach pain/upset, food/drink limits, heartburn/reflux, gas/bloating, patient worry, medication tolerance, and constipation (P < 0.05). A decrease was found in combined symptom severity/frequency based on SMW (P < 0.01). Improvements were made in all categories, including vomiting, nausea, early satiety, bloating, fullness, epigastric pain, and burning (P < 0.01). Improvements in PedsQL/SMW scores remained when analysis was limited to normal or delayed gastric emptying (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). Thirteen percent needed tube feeds and 13% parenteral nutrition after GES. Sixty-five percent reported that their health was much improved after GES vs 15% the same or worse. Five patients experienced complications, primarily mild abdominal discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In the largest series to date of pediatric patients who have undergone GES for FD, we found significant improvements in upper gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and perception of global health. Patients were less dependent on tube feeding or parenteral nutrition.

Gastroduodenal motility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abnormalities of gastroduodenal motility are considered key players in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in disorders such as functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Abnormalities of sensory control are considered another important factor that contributes to symptom generation. This review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of gastroduodenal motility and sensitivity in health and in disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although gastric and small intestinal motility remain an important focus of research, including the application of the SmartPill (SmartPill Corp., Buffalo, New York, USA) wireless motility monitoring capsule, duodenal sensitivity and low-grade duodenal inflammation are new areas of interest in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. A number of genetic polymorphisms associated with functional dyspepsia are being investigated, but large-scale studies are still lacking. Central processing of visceral stimuli, and its role in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia, is another important emerging topic. Therapeutic studies have reported on novel pharmacological approaches in functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis, as well as gastric electrical stimulation in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis.

SUMMARY

There is gradual progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal symptoms. Areas of recent advances including the recognition of low-grade duodenal inflammation, the role of central nervous system processing in visceral hypersensitivity and the exploration of novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches.