Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macronodular cirrhosis

Novel Prognostic Nomograms for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Microvascular Invasion: Experience from a Single Center

Background/Aims

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is an established risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, prediction models that specifically focus on the individual prognoses of HCC patients with MVI is lacking.

Methods

A total of 385 HCC patients with MVI were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts in a 2:1 ratio. The outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic nomograms were established based on the results of multivariate analyses. The concordance index (C-index), calibration plots and Kaplan-Meier curves were employed to evaluate the accuracy, calibration and discriminatory ability of the models.

Results

The independent risk factors for both DFS and OS included age, tumor size, tumor number, the presence of gross vascular invasion, and the presence of Glisson’s capsule invasion. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was another risk factor for OS. On the basis of these predictors, two nomograms for DFS and OS were constructed. The C-index values of the nomograms for DFS and OS were 0.712 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.679 to 0.745; p<0.001) and 0.698 (95% CI, 0.657 to 0.739; p<0.001), respectively, in the training cohort and 0.704 (95% CI, 0.650 to 0.708; p<0.001) and 0.673 (95% CI, 0.607 to 0.739; p<0.001), respectively, in the validation cohort. The calibration curves showed optimal agreement between the predicted and observed survival rates. The Kaplan-Meier curves suggested that these two nomograms had satisfactory discriminatory abilities.

Conclusions

These novel predictive models have satisfactory accuracy and discriminatory abilities in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients with MVI after hepatectomy.

Evaluating the role of RAD52 and its interactors as novel potential molecular targets for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Radiation sensitive 52 (RAD52) is an important protein that mediates DNA repair in tumors. However, little is known about the impact of RAD52 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated the expression of RAD52 and its values in HCC. Some proteins that might be coordinated with RAD52 in HCC were also analyzed.

Methods

Global RAD52 mRNA levels in HCC were assessed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. RAD52 expression was analyzed in 70 HCC tissues and adjacent tissues by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. The effect of over-expressed RAD52 in Huh7 HCC cells was investigated. The String database was then used to perform enrichment and functional analysis of RAD52 and its interactome. Cytoscape software was used to create a protein–protein interaction network. Molecular interaction studies with RAD52 and its interactome were performed using the molecular docking tools in Hex8.0.0. Finally, these DNA repair proteins, which interact with RAD52, were also analyzed using the TCGA dataset and were detected by qRT-PCR. Based on the TCGA database, algorithms combining ROC between RAD52 and RAD52 interactors were used to diagnose HCC by binary logistic regression.

Results

In TCGA, upregulated RAD52 related to gender was obtained in HCC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RAD52 was 0.704. The results of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) indicated no difference in the prognosis between patients with high and low RAD52 gene expression. We validated that RAD52 expression was increased at the mRNA and protein levels in Chinese HCC tissues compared with adjacent tissues. Higher RAD52 was associated with older age, without correlation with other clinicopathological factors. In vitro, over-expressed RAD52 significantly promoted the proliferation and migration of Huh7 cells. Furthermore, RAD52 interactors (radiation sensitive 51, RAD51; X-ray repair cross complementing 6, XRCC6; Cofilin, CFL1) were also increased in HCC and participated in some biological processes with RAD52. Protein structure analysis showed that RAD52–RAD51 had the firmest binding structure with the lowest E-total energy (− 1120.5 kcal/mol) among the RAD52–RAD51, RAD52–CFL1, and RAD52–XRCC6 complexes. An algorithm combining ROC between RAD52 and its interactome indicated a greater specificity and sensitivity for HCC screening.

Conclusions

Overall, our study suggested that RAD52 plays a vital role in HCC pathogenesis and serves as a potential molecular target for HCC diagnosis and treatment. This study’s findings regarding the multigene prediction and diagnosis of HCC are valuable.

Resection vs Ablation for Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinomas meeting the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer A Classification: A Propensity Score Matching Study

With development of surgical technology, we aimed to investigate whether resection could challenge the standard treatment, ablation, in treating multifocal hepatocellular carcinomas meeting the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer A stage. From January 2005 to January 2017, the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing resection (n = 72) or ablation (n = 63) were retrospectively analysed using propensity score matching. At baseline, patients in the ablation group had more tri-focal lesions (30.2% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.001) and smaller tumours (2.00 cm vs. 2.50 cm, P = 0.002) than resection group. After matching, the baseline was well-balanced between treatments (n = 46 pairs); resection provided comparable 5-year overall survival (77.0% vs. 83.6, P = 0.790) and superior 5-year recurrence-free survival (40.4% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.022) to ablation. The multivariate Cox model confirmed that ablation was not associated with worse overall survival (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.33 - 2.42, P = 0.819), but identified ablation as an unfavourable predictor of recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.27 - 3.57, P <0.001). For subgroup patients with multifocal tumours located in different segments, both treatments offered similar 5-year overall survival (74.3% vs. 95.5%, P = 0.190) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (42.9 vs. 25.9%, P = 0.170). Additionally, ablation resulted in less major complications than resection (3.2% vs 13.9%, P = 0.035). Compared with ablation, resection achieved comparable overall survival and even superior recurrence-free survival for patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinomas meeting the BCLC A stage.

HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study

Long term outcome of ablation-assisted hepatic resection is unclear for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study was scheduled to compare the outcome of Habib 4X ablation assisted resection (Habib group) with clamp-crush resection (CC group) for HCC. In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 81 patients from the Habib group and 103 patients from the CC group. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. Compared with the CC group, the Habib group had higher levels of γ-glutamyltransferase (P=0.044) and albumin (P=0.001), larger tumor sizes (P=0.007), shorter operation times (P=0.001), less blood loss (P=0.005), and less blood transfusions (P=0.038). There were no significant differences in complications (P=0.310), recurrence-free survival rates (RFS, P=0.112), or overall survival rates (OS, P=0.203) between the two groups. For the 67 patient pairs selected from the PSM analysis, the Habib group had better RFS and OS (P=0.033 and P=0.014, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that Habib-assisted resection was an independent factor for RFS and OS (P=0.008 and P=0.016, respectively). Furthermore, for the 42 patients with central and large tumors, the Habib group had better RFS and OS than the CC group (P=0.035 and P=0.038, respectively). However, the differences of RFS and OS (P=0.117 and P=0.126, respectively) were not significant among 92 patients with peripheral or small tumors. Hence, Habib^TM 4X-assisted resection is safe and provides better survival for HCC patients, particularly those with central and large tumors.

High Levels of Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase and Indocyanine Green Retention Rate at 15 min as Preoperative Predictors of Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study investigated the preoperative independent risk factors associated with survival and recurrence for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatic resection. In total, 384 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for single primary HCC were studied. Predictive factors associated with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using a univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) > 100 U/L was identified as a preoperative independent risk factor affecting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival whereas GGT > 50 U/L and indocyanine green retention 15 min (ICG-R15) > 10% were identified as preoperative independent risk factors affecting 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS. The 384 patients studied had a 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rate of 72.8%, 43.3%, and 27%, respectively. Patients with GGT > 50 U/L had a 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rate of 64.5%, 36.0%, and 21.7%. These patients had lower survival rates than did patients with GGT ≤ 50 U/L (P < 0.05). Patients with GGT > 50 U/L and ICG-R15 > 10% had a 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rate of 62.4%, 29.5%, and 14.1%, respectively. These patients had lower survival rates than did patients in the other 2 groups with different levels of GGT and ICG (P < 0.05, respectively). The same was also true for patients with a tumor < 5 cm in size. Combined information in the form of high levels of GGT and ICG-R15 is a preoperative predictor that warrants full attention when evaluating tumor recurrence postoperatively.

Significant impact of patient age on outcome after liver resection for HCC in cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. The majority of patients with HCC have cirrhosis. Beside liver transplantation the resection is an established curative treatment option for patients with HCC in cirrhosis. However, the long term success is limited by a high tumor recurrence rate. Furthermore, by many patients surgical resection is restricted by poor liver function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of patient age on long term outcome after liver resection in patients with HCC in cirrhotic liver. Further purpose was to define the potential prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The outcome of 141 patients with liver cirrhosis after curative resection was analyzed using a prospective database. Only patients with postoperative histological assurance of HCC were included in the database. Patients with fibrolamellar HCC were excluded.

RESULTS

By patients below 70 years of age the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 78.5%, 56.5% and 47.1%. By patients over 70 years the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 59.9%, 40.3% and 6.7%. Cumulative survival of the total collective was significant influenced by patient age, Clavien grade, positive lymph vessels, mechanical ventilation and BMI. The overall postoperative morbidity was 44.7%. No intraoperative deaths were observed, but 11 patients (8 older than 70 and 3 younger than 70 years) died during the hospital stay. Clavien grade correlated with preoperative increased GGT, need for intraoperative blood and fresh frozen plasma transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age and postoperative complications are more relevant for the outcome than many tumor factors, especially by patients over 70 years of age. In contrast, the prognosis of patients below 70 years of age is significantly better and a 5 year survival rate above 50% could be shown in our patients. However, by carefully selected elderly patients with HCC in cirrhosis an acceptable long term survival is reachable.