Cost-utility Analysis: Thiopurines Plus Endoscopy-guided Biological Step-up Therapy is the Optimal Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease

Preventing Recurrence of Crohn's Disease Post-Ileocaecal Surgery in Paediatric Patients: A Therapy Guide Based on Systematic Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ileocaecal resection (ICR) is frequent in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease (pCD). Despite rates of reoperation being low, the risk of clinical or endoscopic post-operative recurrence (POR) is high; effective medical strategies to prevent POR are thus needed. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to identify and evaluate the published literature on post-operative medical prevention of POR in pCD to draft a possible therapy guide for pCD patients undergoing ICR.

METHODS

We performed an SR according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and registered it in the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42024533855). The population, intervention, control, outcome (PICO) model was focussed on post-surgical medical prevention of POR in pCD with clearly expressed definition of recurrence (endoscopically using a standardized scoring system (e.g. Rutgeerts score) or by laboratory markers, for example, faecal calprotectin (F-CPT), C-reactive protein (CRP) or by histological findings or by clinical activity indexes [e.g. weighted paediatric Crohn's disease activity index - (w)PCDAI]. From inception until 29 February 2024, the following databases were searched: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus/Embase, Web of Sciences, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (including Cochrane), Cochrane Central Registrar of controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT. Retrieved articles were evaluated for eligibility and finally selected publications for risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Out of 811 publications identified by the search, only 5 fulfilled inclusion criteria of the SR. None of the studies fully answered our PICO question. The studies were overall of poor quality and the heterogeneity of the data did not allow us to perform meta-analysis, detailed statistical analysis or formal synthesis of data. Adverse events of post-operative medication were not described in any of the included studies. Existing guidelines of European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN), North American Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) were reviewed and paediatric therapy guide for pCD undergoing ICR was drafted with respect to recent SRs and meta-analyses in adult population and including scarce paediatric data identified by our SR. As pCD patients undergoing ICR are a high-risk population, they should not be left untreated post-operatively. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs should be considered as first-line therapy in the majority of patients. Non-anti-TNF biologics should be considered in case of anti-TNF failure. Regular endoscopic monitoring starting at 6 months after the surgery and supported by regular F-CPT evaluation should be used to identify early endoscopic recurrence and to escalate the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our SR revealed that there is wide variability in treatment strategies in children, and high-quality data are generally lacking. At the moment, paediatric prophylaxis of POR should be guided by available adult evidence with respect to the high-risk nature of pCD. Extensive research in pCD should be encouraged.

Azathioprine Plus Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Versus Azathioprine Monotherapy for the Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence in Patients with Crohn's Disease: An Open-Label, Single-Centre, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine [AZA] effectively prevents postoperative endoscopic recurrence [ER] in Crohn's disease [CD]. However, the efficacy of AZA emerges after 3 months. Exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] can maintain remission in CD. The present trial investigates whether AZA plus postoperative 3-month EEN is superior to AZA alone in preventing ER of CD.

METHODS

In total, 84 high-risk CD patients undergoing intestinal resection received AZA alone or AZA plus 3 months of EEN [AZA + EEN] postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the rate of ER at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included the rate of ER at 3 months, clinical recurrence [CR], CD activity index [CDAI] scores, faecal calprotectin [FC], and C-reactive protein [CRP]. Quality of life was assessed using Short Form-36 [SF-36] and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ].

RESULTS

Patients in the AZA + EEN group exhibited significantly lower rates of ER compared to the AZA group at both 12 months (33.3% [13/39] vs 63.2% [24/38], P = 0.009) and 3 months (8.6% [3/35] vs 28.1% [9/32], P = 0.037) post-surgery. The rates of CR between the two groups at 3 and 12 months were similar. CDAI scores, FC, albumin level, and CRP were all comparable between the two groups. Quality of life was significantly higher in the AZA group than in the AZA + EEN group at 3 months but became comparable from 5 to 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk CD patients, combining AZA with postoperative 3-month EEN reduces 1-year ER but may temporarily impact quality of life. Further large-scale, long-term studies are warranted.

TRIAL NUMBER

NCT05214430.

Anti-TNF Agents and New Biological Agents (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) in the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence After Surgery in Crohn's Disease

Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative, as postoperative recurrence (POR) after ileocolonic resection is the rule in the absence of prophylactic treatment. In the present article, we critically review available data on the role of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and new biologics (including vedolizumab and ustekinumab) in the prevention and treatment of POR after surgery in CD. Several studies (summarised in various meta-analyses) have confirmed the efficacy of anti-TNFs in the prevention of POR. We identified 37 studies, including 1863 CD patients, with mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 29%. Only few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared thiopurines and anti-TNFs, with controversial results, although the superiority of the latter is supported by several meta-analyses. Infliximab and adalimumab seem equally effective. The combination of anti-TNFs and immunosuppressives should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNFs. Several studies have shown that anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. In fact, the use of the same anti-TNF before and after surgery might be effective for the prevention of POR. Prophylactic anti-TNF treatment, once started, should be continued long term. Anti-TNFs are also effective for the treatment of established POR. Retreatment with anti-TNFs for POR is a valid strategy even after their preoperative failure. In six studies (including 156 patients) evaluating vedolizumab, mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months was 41%. The non-randomised comparison of anti-TNFs and vedolizumab has provided controversial results. One placebo-controlled RCT confirmed that vedolizumab is quite effective in preventing POR in CD patients with increased risk of recurrence. Seven studies (including 162 patients) evaluated ustekinumab, with a mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 41%. The comparative efficacy of ustekinumab and anti-TNFs is still unclear. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab seem to be equally effective, although the experience is very limited. In conclusion, to date, anti-TNFs are the most effective agents in preventing and treating POR in CD. Anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. Vedolizumab seems to be quite effective in the prevention of POR in patients with increased risk of recurrence. Ustekinumab is probably also effective in the postoperative setting, although the comparative efficacy with anti-TNFs or vedolizumab is still unclear.

Infliximab Pricing in International Economic Evaluations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease to Inform Biologic and Biosimilar Access Policies: A Systematic Review

Background. Policies mandating the use of lower cost biosimilars in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have created concerns for patients who prefer their original biologic. Purpose. To inform the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar infliximab treatment in IBD by systematically reviewing the effect of infliximab price variation on cost-effectiveness for jurisdictional decision making. Data Sources. MEDLINE, Embase, Healthstar, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Mental Measurements Yearbook citation databases, PEDE, CEA registry, HTA agencies. Study Selection. Economic evaluations of infliximab for adult or pediatric Crohn's disease and/or ulcerative colitis published from 1998 through 2019 in which drug price was varied in sensitivity analysis were included. Data Extraction. Study characteristics, main findings, and results of drug price sensitivity analyses were extracted. Studies were critically appraised. The cost-effective price of infliximab was determined based on the stated willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds for each jurisdiction. Data Synthesis. Infliximab price was examined in sensitivity analysis in 31 studies. Infliximab showed favorable cost-effectiveness at a price ranging from CAD $66 to $1,260 per vial, depending on jurisdiction. A total of 18 studies (58%) demonstrated cost-effectiveness ratios above the jurisdictional WTP threshold. Limitations. Drug prices were not always reported separately, WTP thresholds varied, and funding sources were not consistently reported. Conclusion. Despite the high cost of infliximab, few economic evaluations examined price variation, limiting the ability to infer the effects of biosimilar introduction. Alternative pricing strategies and access to treatment could be considered to enable IBD patients to maintain access to their current medications.

Highlights

In an effort to reduce public drug expenditures, Canadian and other jurisdictional drug plans have mandated the use of lower cost, but similarly effective, biosimilars in patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease or require a nonmedical switch for established patients. This switch has created concerns for patients and clinicians who want to maintain the ability to make treatment decisions and remain with the original biologic.It is customary for economic evaluations to assess the robustness of results to variations in high-cost items such as medications. In the absence of economic evaluations of biosimilars, examining biologic drug price in sensitivity analysis provides insight into the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar alternatives. A total of 31 economic evaluations of infliximab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease varied the infliximab price in sensitivity analysis.The infliximab price deemed to be cost-effective within each study ranged from CAD $66 to CAD $1,260 per 100-mg vial. A total of 18 studies (58%) demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio above the jurisdictional willingness-to-pay threshold. If policy decisions are based on price, then originator manufacturers could consider reducing the price or negotiating alternative pricing models to enable patients with inflammatory bowel disease to remain on their current medications.

Telemonitoring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease amid the COVID-19 pandemic—A cost-effectiveness analysis

Background and aim

COVID-19 pandemic burdens the healthcare systems, causes healthcare avoidance, and might worsen the outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. We aimed to estimate the impact of pandemic-related avoidance on outpatient IBD management, and the cost-effectiveness of adding telemonitoring during pandemic from the perspective of Hong Kong public healthcare provider.

Methods

The study was performed by a decision-analytic model to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost of care for IBD patients before and during the pandemic, and to compare the cost and QALYs of adding telemonitoring to standard care (SC-TM) versus standard care alone (SC) for IBD patients during the pandemic. The sources of model inputs included publications (retrieved from literature search) and public data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of base-case results.

Results

Standard care with pandemic-related avoidance (versus without avoidance) lost 0.0026 QALYs at higher cost (by USD43). The 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations found standard care with pandemic-related avoidance lost QALYs and incurred higher cost in 100% and 96.82% of the time, respectively. Compared with the SC group, the SC-TM group saved 0.0248 QALYs and reduced cost by USD799. Monte Carlo simulations showed the SC-TM group gained higher QALYs at lower cost in 100% of 10,000 simulations.

Conclusions

Standard care for IBD patients during pandemic with healthcare avoidance appears to worsen treatment outcomes at higher cost and lowered QALYs. The addition of telemonitoring to standard care seems to gain higher QALYs and reduce cost, and is therefore a potential cost-effective strategy for IBD management during the pandemic.

Thiopurine Monotherapy Is Effective in Maintenance of Mild-Moderate Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are complex, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) with debilitating complications. While severe IBD typically requires biologic agents, the optimal therapy for mild-moderate IBD is less clear.

AIMS

To assess the efficacy of thiopurine monotherapy for maintenance of mild-moderate IBD and clinical variables associated with treatment outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adults with mild-moderate IBD who were started on thiopurines without biologic therapy. The primary outcome was therapy failure, defined by disease progression based on clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic criteria. Clinical variables were extracted at time of thiopurine initiation. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the independent contribution of the clinical variables on treatment response.

RESULTS

From 230 CD patients, 64 (72%) were free of treatment failure with mean follow-up of 3.3 years. In our multivariable model, thiopurine failure was associated with concomitant systemic steroid administration (aHR 2.43, p = 0.001), whereas protective factors included concomitant oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy (aHR 0.54, p = 0.02) and non-fistulizing, non-stricturing disease (aHR 0.57, p = 0.047). From 173 UC patients, 50 (71%) were free from treatment failure with mean follow-up of 3.3 years. On multivariable analysis, concomitant oral steroids were associated with thiopurine failure (aHR 2.71, p = 0.001). Only 13 (4%) discontinued thiopurines from adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In mild-moderate uncomplicated IBD, thiopurine monotherapy was associated with longitudinal maintenance of remission and may represent a lower-cost, convenient, and effective alternative to biologics. Multiple clinical variables were predictive of treatment response.

Endoscopic Evaluation at 1 Month After Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease Predicts Future Postoperative Recurrence and Is Safe

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy remains the gold standard for evaluating postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. Timely therapy adjustment according to endoscopic findings can improve long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the characteristics, clinical values, and safety of the endoscopic evaluation at 1 month after surgery.

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with Crohn's disease undergoing ileocolic resection between January 2016 and November 2018 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The first postoperative ileocolonoscopy was performed at 4-5 weeks after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was postoperative recurrence within 12 months after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 84 ileocolonoscopies at 4-5 weeks, no endoscopic complication occurred. The main endoscopic findings at the first evaluation were anastomotic circumferential ulcers (10, 11.9%), anastomotic scattered ulcers (35, 41.7%), ulcers in the neoterminal ileum (16, 19.0%), edema in anastomosis (50, 59.5%), mild narrowing in anastomosis (7, 8.3%), and mild narrowing in neoterminal ileum (3, 3.6%). Anastomotic scattered ulcers were associated with future postoperative recurrence (OR, 2.532 (95% CI, 1.02-6.32), p = 0.046). Fecal calprotectin >150 ug/g on postoperative day 14 could predict anastomotic scattered ulcers (OR' 2.91 (95% CI, 1.31-7.47), p = 0.027). The modified Rutgeerts score was used to define endoscopic findings: i0, 37 (44.0%); i1, 4 (4.8%); i2a, 29 (34.5%); i2b, 11 (13.1%); i3, 0; i4, 3 (3.6%). Score ≥i2a were associated with future postoperative recurrence (OR, 3.17 (95% CI, 1.22-8.27), p = 0.018). No factor was associated with a Rutgeerts score of ≥i2a at the first endoscopic evaluation.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study with a small cohort of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic evaluation at 1 month after surgery in CD was safe. Anastomotic scattered ulcers occurred in nearly half of patients and were associated with future postoperative recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B760.LA EVALUACIÓN ENDOSCÓPICA A UN MES DESPUÉS DE LA RESECCIÓN ILEOCÓLICA PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN, PREDICE FUTURA RECURRENCIA POSOPERATORIA Y ES SEGURAANTECEDENTES:La endoscopia sigue siendo el estándar de oro para evaluar la recurrencia posoperatoria en la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). El ajuste oportuno en la terapia de acuerdo con los hallazgos endoscópicos, puede mejorar los resultados a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:Determinar las características, valores clínicos y seguridad de la evaluación endoscópica, al mes de la cirugía.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional prospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes con EC sometidos a resección ileocólica entre enero de 2016 y noviembre de 2018.INTERVENCIONES:La primera ileocolonoscopia posoperatoria se realizó a las 4-5 semanas posteriores a la cirugía.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la recurrencia posoperatoria dentro de los 12 meses posteriores a la cirugía. Se realizaron análisis univariados y multivariados para identificar factores de riesgo.RESULTADOS:Entre 84 ileocolonoscopias a las 4-5 semanas, no ocurrió ninguna complicación endoscópica. Los principales hallazgos endoscópicos en la primera evaluación, fueron úlceras anastomóticas circunferenciales (10, 11,9%), úlceras anastomóticas dispersas (35, 41,7%), úlceras en el íleon neo-terminal (16, 19,0%), edema en la anastomosis (50, 59,5%), estrechamiento leve en la anastomosis (7, 8,3%) y estrechamiento leve en el íleon neo-terminal (3, 3,6%). Las úlceras anastomóticas dispersas se asociaron con recurrencia posoperatoria futura (OR, 2,532 (95% CI, 1,02-6,32), p = 0,046). La calprotectina fecal en el post d 14 > 150 ug / g podría predecir úlceras anastomóticas dispersas (OR' 2,91 (95% CI, 1,31-7,47), p = 0,027). Se utilizó la puntuación de Rutgeerts modificada para definir los hallazgos endoscópicos: i0, 37 (44,0%); i1, 4 (4,8%); i2a, 29 (34,5%); i2b, 11 (13,1%); i3, 0; i4, 3 (3,6%). La puntuación ≥i2a se asoció con recurrencia posoperatoria futura (OR, 3,17 (95% CI, 1,22-8,27), p = 0,018). Ningún factor se asoció con ≥i2a en la primera endoscopia.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de un solo centro con una pequeña cohorte de pacientes.CONCLUSIONES:La evaluación endoscópica al mes de la cirugía en EC, fue segura. Se produjeron úlceras anastomóticas dispersas en casi la mitad de los pacientes y se asociaron con una futura recurrencia posoperatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B760. (Traducción - Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

The Management of the Hospitalized Ulcerative Colitis Patient, the Medical-Surgical Conundrum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this study we present the evidence based management for patients hospitalized for UC with a special focus on the synergic approach of the two key actors of the inflammatory bowel disease multidisciplinary team (IBD-MDT): gastroenterologist and surgeon.

RECENT FINDINGS

Focused treatment by a specialized IBD-MDT and early involvement of the colorectal surgeon in the management of hospitalized ulcerative colitis patients is advocated. The colectomy rate has not changed over the years. Moreover delayed surgery after admission is burden by increase complication and mortality. Thus, it is pivotal to identify the patients who are likely to undergo surgery, by mean of predictors of outcome, and to not prolong ineffective medical treatment. The perfect timing based on clinical close monitoring is crucial. Up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may require hospitalization. The aim of admission is to evaluate severity of the disease, exclude infections and establish proper treatment while monitoring the response. During admission, the patient has to be closely observed for the possible development of toxic megacolon or perforation, which should prompt emergency colectomy. Up to 30% of UC patients will fail to respond to initial intravenous corticosteroid. Non responder or partial responder to medical therapy should be evaluated for timely surgery or could be considered for rescue medical therapy.

Development of a Simple, Serum Biomarker-based Model Predictive of the Need for Early Biologic Therapy in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Early or first-line treatment with biologics, as opposed to conventional immunomodulators, is not always necessary to achieve remission in Crohn's disease [CD] and may not be cost-effective. This study aimed to develop a simple model to predict the need for early biologic therapy, in order to risk-stratify CD patients and guide initial treatment selection.

METHODS

A model-building study using supervised statistical learning methods was conducted using a retrospective cohort across two tertiary centres. All biologic-naïve CD patients who commenced an immunomodulator between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2016, were included. A predictive score was derived using Cox regression modelling of immunomodulator failure, and was internally validated using bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

Of 410 patients [median age 37 years, 47% male, median disease duration 4.7 years], 229 [56%] experienced immunomodulator failure [39 required surgery, 24 experienced a new stricture, 44 experienced a new fistula/abscess, 122 required biologic escalation] with a median time to failure of 16 months. Independent predictors of treatment failure included raised C-reactive protein [CRP], low albumin, complex disease behaviour, younger age, and baseline steroids. Highest CRP and lowest albumin measured within the 3 months preceding immunomodulator initiation outperformed baseline measurements. After model selection, only highest CRP and lowest albumin remained and the resultant Crohn's Immunomodulator CRP-Albumin [CICA] index demonstrated robust optimism-corrected discriminative performance at 12, 24, and 36 months (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 0.83, 0.81, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The derived CICA index based on simple, widely available markers is feasible, internally valid, and has a high utility in predicting immunomodulator failure. This requires external, prospective validation.

Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence in CD: Tailoring Treatment to Patient Profile

Crohn's disease (CD) is an immune-mediated condition characterized by the transmural inflammation of the gut tissue, associated with progressive bowel damage often leading to surgical intervention. As operative resection of the damaged segment is not curative, a majority of patients undergoing intestinal resections for complicated CD present disease recurrence within 3 years after the intervention. Postoperative recurrence can be defined as endoscopic, clinical, radiological or surgical. Endoscopic recurrence rates within 1 year exceed 60% and the severity, according to the Rutgeerts' score, is associated with worse prognosis and can predict clinical recurrence (in up to 1/3 of the patients). Most importantly, about 50% of patients will undergo a reoperation after 10 years of their first intestinal resection. Therefore, the prevention of postoperative recurrence in CD remains a challenge in clinical practice and should be properly managed. We aim to summarize the most recent data on the definition, risk factors, assessment and treatment of postoperative CD recurrence.

Strengthened monitoring and optimized management of Crohn's disease patients

In recent years, the treatment goal of Crohn's disease (CD) has shifted from clinical remission to mucosal healing. In this regard, CD management and monitoring are particularly important. Timely adjustment of treatment regimen according to clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers is helpful to monitor patients and achieve better clinical and endoscopic treatment results. However, there is not enough evidence to recommend an optimal treatment regimen that considers only inflammatory markers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been used to improve the treatment of thiopurine and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. Passive TDM is suitable for all drugs. In order to improve the clinical usefulness, the monitoring of anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs should be transformed from passive to active. The effectiveness of active TDM in optimizing non-anti-TNF biologic agents remains to be described. In addition, inflammatory markers can predict CD recurrence after surgery, and regular colonoscopy at 6-12 mo after surgery is also important. Early postoperative anti-TNF therapy should be considered in high-risk CD patients, but the optimal time for prophylactic administration of anti-TNF therapy is still controversial, and the role of non-anti-TNF biologic agents in prophylactic administration after surgery still needs to be studied. This paper mainly summarizes the monitoring of inflammatory markers, drug monitoring, and postoperative monitoring of patients, so as to optimize the management of CD patients and enable more patients to achieve the treatment goal, and emphasizes the importance of close monitoring of CD patients.

Systematic Review: Cost-effective Strategies of Optimizing Anti-tumor Necrosis and Immunomodulators in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Medication costs in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are now the principal driver of health care costs. Cost-effective strategies to optimize and rationalize treatment are therefore necessary.

METHODS

A systematic review until April 30, 2018, was performed to identify economic evaluations of strategies to optimize infliximab, adalimumab, and immunomodulators for the treatment of IBD in adults. A qualitative synthesis of the identified studies was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Adalimumab seems cost-effective compared with infliximab as maintenance therapy for moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). Infusion costs are a significant additional treatment cost with infliximab. However, other studies found biosimilar infliximab more cost-effective than alternative biologics in fistulizing and moderate-severe luminal CD-although the latter did not reach a willingness-to-pay threshold of <$50,000. In moderate-severe ulcerative colitis, infliximab seems more cost-effective than adalimumab. Multiple tailored approaches to treatment based on objective markers of disease activity or efficacy have been shown to be cost-effective in CD, including following secondary loss of response to anti-TNF therapy for postoperative recurrence and in escalating treatment. For immunomodulator treatment, both thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) testing before commencing thiopurines and thiopurine metabolite testing for dose optimization seem cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

In a win-win for patients and payers, several potential avenues to achieve cost-effectiveness-but also therapeutic optimization of anti-TNF therapies-were elucidated in this review with comparatively sparse data for immunomodulators. Optimizing immunomodulator and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy to achieve objective disease control seems to be cost-effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds in a number of clinical settings.