A shift from oral to intravenous iron supplementation therapy is observed over time in a large swiss cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Oral Sucrosomial Iron Is as Effective as Intravenous Ferric Carboxy-Maltose in Treating Anemia in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Anemia is a frequent complication of ulcerative colitis, and is frequently caused by iron deficiency. Oral iron supplementation displays high rates of gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, the formulation of sucrosomial iron (SI) has shown higher tolerability. We performed a prospective study to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of oral SI and intravenous ferric carboxy-maltose (FCM) in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission and mild-to-moderate anemia. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 60 mg/day for 8 weeks and then 30 mg/day for 4 weeks of oral SI or intravenous 1000 mg of FCM at baseline. Hemoglobin and serum levels of iron and ferritin were assessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks from baseline. Hemoglobin and serum iron increased in both groups after 4 weeks of therapy, and remained stable during follow up, without significant treatment or treatment-by-time interactions (p = 0.25 and p = 0.46 for hemoglobin, respectively; p = 0.25 and p = 0.26 for iron, respectively). Serum ferritin did not increase over time during SI supplementation, while it increased in patients treated with FCM (treatment effect, p = 0.0004; treatment-by-time interaction effect, p = 0.0002). Overall, this study showed that SI and FCM displayed similar effectiveness and tolerability for treatment of mild-to-moderate anemia in patients with ulcerative colitis under remission.

Follow-Up Ileocolonoscopy Is Underused in Crohn's Disease Patients after Ileocecal Resection despite Higher Total and Inpatient Health-Care Costs Compared to Controls

Background

Postoperative recurrence is frequently observed after ileocecal resection in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Since 2010, endoscopy within 1 year is considered the gold standard for its diagnosis. However, if and how frequent such endoscopies are performed in clinical practice remains unknown.

Methods

We analyzed 1-year follow-up data on CD patients who underwent ileocecal resection between 2012 and 2014 and compared them with hospitalized, non-resected CD controls. Data were extracted from the Helsana database. Helsana is one of the largest Swiss health insurance companies providing coverage for 1.2 million individuals.

Results

A total of 645 CD patients were identified with ≥1 hospitalization between 2012 and 2014 and a follow-up of 1 year. Of these, 79 (12.2%) underwent ileocecal resection. Although endoscopy rates increased over time and were higher in patients with resection versus controls (p = 0.029), in only 54.4% a 1-year follow-up ileocolonoscopy was performed. Postoperative prophylaxis with anti-tumor necrosis factor or azathioprine was prescribed in 63.3%. Female sex and age >60 years were independent predictors for not receiving prophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, p = 0.048, and OR 0.2, p = 0.022). Patients with resection had significantly lower numbers of rehospitalizations (1.2 vs. 1.8, p = 0.021), with resection being an independent negative predictor for number of rehospitalizations in a Poisson regression model (incident risk ratio 0.64, p = 0.029). However, disease-related surgery was more often the cause for rehospitalization after resection versus controls (47.6 vs. 22.1%, p = 0.015). Total and inpatient health-care costs were higher in these patients.

Conclusion

Endoscopies are underused after ileocecal resection. This contrasts current guidelines. Physicians should be aware of this underuse and perform follow-up examinations more often.

Current practice in the diagnosis and management of IBD-associated anaemia and iron deficiency in Germany: the German AnaemIBD Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Anaemia is a common complication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), frequently resulting from iron deficiency. IBD guidelines advocate intravenous iron administration although some patients respond to oral supplementation. This non-interventional study investigates the current status of anaemia management in German IBD patients.

METHODS

Baseline data on pre-study treatment for anaemia were retrospectively analysed in IBD patients with anaemia participating in a prospective trial of the efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose. Data were collected from 55 German gastroenterological centres up to August 2010. Subjects had received care at their centre for at least 12 months prior to baseline.

RESULTS

193 cases of IBD-associated anaemia (115 Crohn's disease, 77 ulcerative colitis) were analysed (mean age: 39 years (18-83), 79 (41%) males). Anaemia and iron status were usually assessed by haemoglobin (100%), serum ferritin (97%), and transferrin saturation (82%). In the previous 6 months, only 84 patients (43.5%) had been treated for anaemia: 47 (56%) with oral iron, 13 (15%) parenteral iron, 16 (19%) oral plus parenteral iron and 8 (10%) transfusions. No patients received erythropoietin stimulating agents.

CONCLUSION

Although intravenous iron supplementation is recommended in IBD patients, current German practice still relies on oral therapy, even in severe anaemia. The high incidence of severe anaemia in this cohort reflects inadequate iron replacement and status monitoring. While the proportion of IBD patients with inadequately treated anaemia/iron deficiency is unknown, greater awareness of existing guidelines for iron deficiency management in IBD patients appears necessary.

Iron treatment and inflammatory bowel disease: what happens in real practice?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), the most common extra-intestinal complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), negatively impacts quality of life. We audited the recent practice of anaemia treatment in an unselected IBD population.

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to adult IBD outpatients in a university hospital to assess the form and frequency of iron prescribed, duration of use, side effects, and completion of therapy. The efficacy of treatment was determined by the resolution of anaemia and change in haemoglobin from baseline.

RESULTS

Of 87 IBD patients (60 patients with Crohn's disease, 25 with ulcerative colitis, 2 with microscopic colitis), 85 received various dosing regimens of iron tablets; 15 patients also received IV iron. Side effects were reported in 43 (51%) patients, with no clear relationship to dose prescribed and 26 (32%) patients were unable to complete the intended course. Only 36 (42%) patients completed the course of oral iron without side effects and in these patients, haemoglobin normalised in about 30%. Their median haemoglobin change was 12.5 (5.3-23.5)g/l. The median duration of treatment in those without side effects was 4.5months, and in those with adverse effects was 2months. Only one adverse effect was reported for IV iron.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with oral iron results in failure to control anaemia in 2 out of 3 IBD patients, which is likely in part to be due to the side effects reported by over half of patients. Patients failing to tolerate or adequately respond to therapy should be offered alternative treatment.

The role of diet on intestinal microbiota metabolism: downstream impacts on host immune function and health, and therapeutic implications

Dietary impacts on health may be one of the oldest concepts in medicine; however, only in recent years have technical advances in mass spectroscopy, gnotobiology, and bacterial sequencing enabled our understanding of human physiology to progress to the point where we can begin to understand how individual dietary components can affect specific illnesses. This review explores the current understanding of the complex interplay between dietary factors and the host microbiome, concentrating on the downstream implications on host immune function and the pathogenesis of disease. We discuss the influence of the gut microbiome on body habitus and explore the primary and secondary effects of diet on enteric microbial community structure. We address the impact of consumption of non-digestible polysaccharides (prebiotics and fiber), choline, carnitine, iron, and fats on host health as mediated by the enteric microbiome. Disease processes emphasized include non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, IBD, and cardiovascular disease/atherosclerosis. The concepts presented in this review have important clinical implications, although more work needs to be done to develop fully and validate potential therapeutic approaches. Specific dietary interventions offer exciting potential for nontoxic, physiologic ways to alter enteric microbial structure and metabolism to benefit the natural history of many intestinal and systemic disorders.

Anaemia management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: routine practice across nine European countries

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anaemia and iron deficiency (ID) are common complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In patients undergoing iron therapy, intravenous iron supplementation is recommended in preference to oral therapy. This study evaluated routine practice in the management of IBD-associated anaemia and ID to verify implementation of international treatment guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gastroenterologists from nine European countries (n=344) were surveyed about their last five IBD patients treated for anaemia (n=1404). Collected information included tests performed at anaemia diagnosis, haemoglobin (Hb) levels and iron status parameters, the anaemia treatment given and, if applicable, the iron administration route.

RESULTS

Selection of diagnostic tests and treatment for IBD-associated anaemia varied considerably across Europe. Anaemia and iron status were mainly assessed by Hb (88%) and serum ferritin (75%). Transferrin saturation was only tested in 25% of patients. At diagnosis of anaemia, 56% presented with at least moderate anaemia (Hb<10 g/dl) and 15% with severe anaemia (Hb<8 g/dl). ID (ferritin<30 ng/ml) was detected in 76%. Almost all patients (92%) received iron supplementation; however, only 28% received intravenous iron and 67% oral iron. Management practice was similar in 2009 and 2011.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, most IBD patients received oral iron even though this administration route may aggravate the disease, and despite international guidelines recommending intravenous administration as the preferred route. The high frequency of ID suggests insufficient monitoring of iron status in IBD patients. There is a need to increase awareness and implementation of international guidelines on iron supplementation in patients with IBD.

Intravenous iron for the treatment of iron deficiency in IBD: the pendulum is swinging

Intravenous (IV) iron therapy has been a major asset in the management of refractory iron-deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other diseases. However, the cost-effectiveness of parenteral substitution as the first-line treatment of this condition in IBD has been questioned. A study published by Reinisch et al. in this issue of the journal fails to show non-inferiority of iron isomaltose 1,000, a novel high-dose IV preparation, compared to oral iron sulfate.