Trichomegaly Induced by Cetuximab: Case Series and Review the Literature

Clinical and imaging strategies for the assessment of the ocular side effects of systemic targeted anti-cancer therapies

Systemic targeted anti-cancer therapies selectively target cancerous cells whilst limiting systemic side effects. The eye however, is a particularly sensitive organ and the expanding use of the newer targeted chemotherapy agents has been associated with multiple ocular side effects. In this review we provide an update of the ocular side effects of the newer targeted chemotherapy agents along with suggested minimum, pragmatic, evidence-based strategies for effective screening or monitoring for potential ocular side effects. This framework is designed to guide oncologists, trial managers, protocol developers and regulatory authorities so that appropriate ophthalmic clinical examinations and non-invasive modern imaging can be requested and commissioned according to a patient's specific treatment.

[Ophthalmologic toxicities of novel anticancer therapies]

New anticancer strategies increasingly rely on targeted therapies, which maximize anticancer activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) mainly include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and targeted anticancer therapies (TATs) which inhibit signal transduction pathways. These new molecules are associated with a wide range of ocular adverse events (OAEs), of varying severity: from ocular surface irritation to irreversible vision loss. ICIs can trigger autoimmune responses in all eye tissues. ADCs mainly cause ocular surface toxicity, the most specific of which being microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs). TATs cause a wide range of OAEs, depending on their class. Oncologists and ophthalmologists will be increasingly confronted to these OAEs - some of which are still poorly characterized - as the number of prescribed NTAs increases. Close collaboration between specialists is essential for their early identification and management, which helps reduce visual and quality of life consequences for these patients. This review addresses the clinical characteristics of the main OAEs linked to MATs, the description of the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the key points of their management.

Ocular surface toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies

Cancer treatments have recently shifted from broad-spectrum cytotoxic therapies to more focused treatments, maximizing anticancerous activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) encompass a wide range of innovative molecules that include immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted anticancer therapies, comprising antibody drug conjugates and inhibitors of signal transduction. Some MATs are associated with ocular surface adverse events that can cause severe discomfort and even lead to loss of vision. While these complications remain rare, they are probably underreported. It is likely that both oncologists and ophthalmologists will come across MATs-associated ocular surface-adverse events in their practices, owing to the increasing number of patients being treated with MATs. Rapid identification of ocular surface-adverse events is crucial, as early intervention can manage these conditions to avoid vision loss and reduce negative impacts on quality of life. We discuss characteristics of ocular surface pathologies attributed to MATs, describe the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and outline the main lines of treatment.

Ocular side effects of oncological therapies: Review

With the advance of cancer therapy in recent years, the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in this disease has increased, which has meant an increase in the quality of life and survival of patients with tumor pathologies previously considered incurable or refractory to treatment. The number of drugs used has increased exponentially in number, and although the implicit toxicity is lower than that of conventional antineoplastic therapy, they lead to the appearance of new associated adverse effects that the ophthalmologist must recognize and manage.

Mechanism of Lethal Skin Toxicities Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Related Treatment Strategies

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are widely used to treat various types of cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer. Adverse reactions such as skin toxicity, interstitial lung disease, hepatotoxicity, ocular toxicity, hypomagnesemia, stomatitis, and diarrhea may occur during treatment. Because the EGFR signaling pathway is important for maintaining normal physiological skin function. Adverse skin reactions occurred in up to 90% of cancer patients treated with EGFR inhibitors, including common skin toxicities (such as papulopustular exanthemas, paronychia, hair changes) and rare fatal skin toxicities (e.g., Stevens–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis). This has led to the dose reduction or discontinuation of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Recently, progress has been made about research on the skin toxicity of EGFR inhibitors. Here, we summarize the mechanism of skin toxicity caused by EGFR inhibitors, measures to prevent severe fatal skin toxicity, and provide reference for medical staff how to give care and treatment after adverse skin reactions.

Eyelash trichomegaly: a systematic review of acquired and congenital aetiologies of lengthened lashes

Long eyelashes have been popularized and many commercially available products exist to achieve eyelash growth as a desired cosmetic effect. Eyelash trichomegaly may be induced by medications, procedures, or be related to medical conditions; however, the exact mechanisms that govern eyelash growth are not well elucidated. This study aims to identify and summarize aetiologies associated with eyelash trichomegaly. We report a systematic review of 148 clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and case reports describing all evidence-based potential aetiologies of eyelash trichomegaly obtained from the Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library through January 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as (i) human studies involving congenital and acquired diseases in which eyelash trichomegaly is a characteristic or (ii) assessment of trichomegaly as an adverse or desired effect of a medication or procedure. Exclusion criteria included: animal studies, articles not available in English, outcomes unrelated to eyelash trichomegaly, and secondary review articles. Pharmacologic agents associated with eyelash trichomegaly included prostaglandin analogues (15-keto fluprostenol isopropyl ester, bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost), epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab, erlotinib, and panitumumab), interferon-alpha, and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine). Surgical procedures of the eyelid, as well as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, HIV, ichthyosis vulgaris (IV), uveitis, and vernal keratoconjunctivitis were also associated with increased eyelash growth. Congenital disorders associated with lengthened eyelashes included Cantú syndrome, CHOPS syndrome, Coffin-Siris syndrome, congenital heart disease, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Costello syndrome, familial trichomegaly, Floating Harbor syndrome, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, Kabuki-Makeup syndrome, KBG syndrome, Oliver-McFarlane syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, and Smith-Magenis syndrome. While the most common cause of eyelash trichomegaly is topical bimatoprost use, better understanding of pathways implicated in eyelash trichomegaly may lead to the discovery of additional medications to stimulate eyelash growth and create avenues for future therapeutic interventions.

Ocular Toxicity of Targeted Anticancer Agents

The proliferation of targeted anticancer agents over the last two decades has revolutionized cancer treatment and improved survival in many previously refractory malignancies. However, many agents are associated with characteristic ophthalmic adverse effects. It is important that ophthalmologists recognize and maintain a high index of suspicion for these side effects in patients on targeted therapy. Most ophthalmic adverse effects can be treated with specific ocular therapy without discontinuation of cancer treatment, although it is important to be aware of the life-threatening and vision-threatening circumstances that would require therapy cessation in conjunction with the patient's oncologist. This review aims to summarize the ophthalmic adverse effects of targeted and hormonal anticancer agents and briefly describe their management.

Drug reactions affecting hair and nails

Drug-induced changes of hair and nails have been observed with a variety of different pharmaceutical agents, both topical and systemic. These compounds or their metabolites may interfere with hair cycling and texture, nail matrix, nail bed, nail folds, and microvasculature. Phototoxic reactions may also occur. Before initiating treatment, physicians and patients should be aware of possible adverse events to hair and nails and should be aware of the preventive measures, if available, as quality of life can be reduced, and adherence and compliance to treatment may be impaired.