Impact of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery on Pharmacokinetics of Administered Drugs: Implications and Perspectives

Pharmacokinetic changes post-bariatric surgery: A scoping review

Bariatric surgeries induce structural changes that can alter the absorption of drugs in patients already at risk of polypharmacy. This scoping review aimed to explore pharmacokinetic changes of orally administered drugs in patients post-bariatric surgery, and assess the quality and level of bias. Electronic databases were searched for articles relating to bariatric surgery and pharmacokinetics published between 1998 and 2019. Pre-post studies reporting on pharmacokinetic parameters were included, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk-of-bias. A total of 21 studies were included in this review, and changes in absorption were reported in all included studies across 29 drugs. In 11 studies, this change was reported as statistically significant (p<.05), while six reported a nonsignificant change. More drugs exhibited a shorter Tmax and higher Cmax after surgery than otherwise, however changes in AUC were variable. Four studies were assessed as having fair quality while the remainder of the included studies were of good quality and low risk-of-bias. Bariatric surgery alters the absorption of drugs and several mechanisms are implicated to be responsible. Short and long-term monitoring is recommended in patients post-surgery for clinical changes in response to medications. Future research with a higher number of participants and greater control of variables, such as concurrent medications, malabsorptive disorders, and body composition should be considered.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model on the Oral Drug Absorption in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Bariatric Patients: Amoxicillin Tablet and Suspension

The potential of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict oral amoxicillin bioavailability, by considering the physiological changes after "Roux-en-Y gastric bypass" (RYGB) surgery in bariatric patients, was evaluated. A middle-out approach for parameter estimations was undertaken using in vitro, in situ, and in vivo data. The observed versus predicted plasma concentrations and the model sensitivity of the simulated parameters of AUC_0-inf and C_max of amoxicillin (AMX) were used to confirm the reliability of the estimation. The model considers that a drug-transporter (Transp) in the initial segments of the normal intestine plays a significant role in the AMX absorption. A lower fraction absorbed (F_abs) was observed in RYGB patients (54.43% for suspension and 45.21% for tablets) compared to healthy subjects (77.48% capsule). Furthermore, the tablet formulation presented a lower dissolved fraction (F_d) and F_abs compared to the suspension formulation of AMX in RYGB patients (91.70% and 45.21% versus 99.92% and 54.43%, respectively). The AUC_0-inf and C_max were sensitive to changes in R_tintestine, Peff_AMX, and Transp for both healthy and RYGB models. Additionally, AUC_0-inf and C_max were also sensitive to changes in the t_lag parameter for tablet formulation in RYGB patients. The PBPK model showed a reduction in AMX bioavailability as a consequence of reduced intestinal length after RYGB surgery. Additionally, the difference in the predicted F_d and F_abs between suspension and tablet suggests that liquid formulations are preferable in postbariatric patients.

Reduced bioavailability of oral amoxicillin tablets compared to suspensions in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass bariatric subjects

AIMS

To evaluate the relative bioavailability of oral amoxicillin (AMX) tablets in comparison to AMX suspension in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass bariatric subjects.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was performed on the bioavailability of oral AMX tablets and suspension in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass subjects operated at least 3 months previously . Doses of 875 mg of the AMX tablet or 800 mg of the AMX suspension were given to all the subjects, allowing a washout of 7 days between the periods. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours after drug administration and the AMX levels were quantified by liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis, normalized to an 875 mg dose and the bioavailability of the AMX from the tablets was compared to that from the suspension formulation.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects aged 42.65 ± 7.21 years and with a body mass index of 29.88 ± 4.36 kg/m² were enrolled in the study. The maximum AMX plasma concentration of the tablets and the suspension (normalized to 875 mg) were 7.42 ± 2.99 mg/L and 8.73 ± 3.26 mg/L (90% confidence interval of 70.71-99.11), and the total area under the curve from time zero to infinity were 23.10 ± 7.41 mg.h/L and 27.59 ± 8.32 mg.h/L (90% confidence interval of 71.25-97.32), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The tablets presented a lower bioavailability than the suspension formulation and the total absorbed amount of AMX in these subjects was lower in comparison to the standard AMX absorption rates in nonbariatric subjects, regardless of the formulation.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery influenced pharmacokinetics of several drugs given as a cocktail with the highest impact observed for CYP1A2, CYP2C8 and CYP2E1 substrates

There is a lack of information about the changes in drug pharmacokinetics and cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism after bariatric surgery. Here, we investigated the effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery on pharmacokinetics of nine drugs given simultaneously which may reveal changes in the activities of the main CYPs. Eight obese subjects undergoing LRYGB received an oral cocktail containing nine drugs, substrates of various CYPs: melatonin (CYP1A2), nicotine (CYP2A6), bupropion (CYP2B6), repaglinide (CYP2C8), losartan (CYP2C9), omeprazole (CYP2C19/CYP3A4), dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), chlorzoxazone (CYP2E1) and midazolam (CYP3A). The 6-hours pharmacokinetic profiles in serum and urine of each drug or corresponding metabolite as well as their metabolic ratios were compared before surgery with those at a median 1 year later. LRYGB exerted variable effects on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The geometric mean AUC_0-6 (90% confidence interval) of melatonin, bupropion, repaglinide, chlorzoxazone and midazolam after LRYGB was 27 (19%-41%), 54 (43%-67%), 44 (29%-66%), 160 (129%-197%) and 74 (62%-90%) of the pre-surgery values, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of losartan, omeprazole and dextromethorphan did not change in response to surgery. Nicotine was not detected in serum, while geometric mean of AUC_0-6 of its metabolite, cotinine, increased by 1.7 times after surgery. There were 3.6- and 1.3-fold increases in the AUC ratios of 6-hydroxymelatonin/melatonin and hydroxybupropion/bupropion, respectively. The cocktail revealed multiple pharmacokinetic changes occurring after LRYGB with the greatest effects observed for CYP1A2, CYP2C8 and CYP2E1 substrates. Future studies should be focused on CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8 and CYP2B6 to clarify the changes in activities of these enzymes after LRYGB.