Dronedarone-Induced Digoxin Toxicity: New Drug, New Interactions

Drug Interactions Affecting Antiarrhythmic Drug Use

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) play an important role in the management of arrhythmias. Drug interactions involving AAD are common in clinical practice. As AADs have a narrow therapeutic window, both pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic interactions involving AAD can result in serious adverse drug reactions ranging from arrhythmia recurrence, failure of device-based therapy, and heart failure, to death. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions frequently involve the inhibition of key metabolic pathways, resulting in accumulation of a substrate drug. Additionally, over the past 2 decades, the P-gp (permeability glycoprotein) has been increasingly cited as a significant source of drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic drug interactions involving AADs commonly involve additive QT prolongation. Amiodarone, quinidine, and dofetilide are AADs with numerous and clinically significant drug interactions. Recent studies have also demonstrated increased morbidity and mortality with the use of digoxin and other AAD which interact with P-gp. QT prolongation is an important pharmacodynamic interaction involving mainly Vaughan-Williams class III AAD as many commonly used drug classes, such as macrolide antibiotics, fluoroquinolone antibiotics, antipsychotics, and antiemetics prolong the QT interval. Whenever possible, serious drug-drug interactions involving AAD should be avoided. If unavoidable, patients will require closer monitoring and the concomitant use of interacting agents should be minimized. Increasing awareness of drug interactions among clinicians will significantly improve patient safety for patients with arrhythmias.

Evaluating the Risk of Digitalis Intoxication Associated With Concomitant Use of Dronedarone and Digoxin Using Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Dronedarone may increase digoxin plasma levels through inhibition of P-glycoprotein. Using real-world data, we evaluated the risk of digitalis intoxication in concomitant users of dronedarone and digoxin compared digoxin-alone users.

METHODS

We used the Clinformatics DataMart, a US claims database, to identify adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) who concomitantly used dronedarone and digoxin and those who used digoxin alone between July 2009 and March 2016. Digitalis intoxication during follow-up until March 2016 was ascertained using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for digitalis intoxication in concomitant users versus users of digoxin alone were estimated, controlling for age, sex, cohort entry year, number of medical encounters for AF or AFL, history of congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, use of drugs interacting with digoxin, and digoxin dose.

FINDINGS

Overall, 524 concomitant users and 32,459 users of digoxin alone were identified, among which 3 and 301 events of digitalis intoxication occurred during follow-up, respectively. Incidence rates were 17.25 and 9.17 cases per 1000 person-years, respectively. The adjusted HR for digitalis intoxication in concomitant users versus users of digoxin alone was 1.56 (95% CI, 0.50-4.88; P = 0.45). When digitalis intoxication was defined by ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes accompanied by laboratory testing for digoxin/digitoxin or hospitalization within 30 days, no events occurred in the concomitant users and 40 events occurred in the users of digoxin alone (incidence rate of 1.22 cases per 1000 person-years).

IMPLICATIONS

Concomitant use of dronedarone and digoxin was uncommon in this study, and no significant increase in the risk of digitalis intoxication with concomitant use was found.

Digoxin-amiodarone Combination is Associated With Excess All-cause Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Combination use of digoxin and other medications might lead to worse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to investigate whether digoxin-amiodarone combination would lead to worse outcome than digoxin alone in patients with AF. Adult patients with AF and received digoxin treatment from random samples of 1,000,000 individuals covered by the National Health Insurance in Taiwan were included. Baseline characteristics including risk factors and medications were matched by propensity score (PS) in those with and without addition of amiodarone treatment. A total of 5,040 AF patients taking digoxin therapy was included. PS matching identified 1,473 patients receiving digoxin-amiodarone combination and 2,660 patients receiving digoxin with a median follow-up of 1,331 days. Digoxin-amiodarone combination was associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.640, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.470–1.829, P < 0.001). The risk of mortality increased regardless of duration of combination. Risk of sudden cardiac death was not increased in the combination group (HR: 1.304, 95% CI: 1.049–1.622, P = 0.017). Death due to non-arrhythmic cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disease, and other vascular disease were higher in the combination group than the digoxin group. In conclusion, in patients with AF, digoxin-amiodarone combination therapy is associated with excess mortality than digoxin alone.

Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions and Their Significance

Drug transporters are considered to be determinants of drug disposition and effects/toxicities by affecting the absorption, distribution, and excretion of drugs. Drug transporters are generally divided into solute carrier (SLC) family and ATP binding cassette (ABC) family. Widely studied ABC family transporters include P-glycoprotein (P-GP), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs). SLC family transporters related to drug transport mainly include organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), organic anion transporters (OATs), organic cation transporters (OCTs), organic cation/carnitine transporters (OCTNs), peptide transporters (PEPTs), and multidrug/toxin extrusions (MATEs). These transporters are often expressed in tissues related to drug disposition, such as the small intestine, liver, and kidney, implicating intestinal absorption of drugs, uptake of drugs into hepatocytes, and renal/bile excretion of drugs. Most of therapeutic drugs are their substrates or inhibitors. When they are comedicated, serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur due to alterations in intestinal absorption, hepatic uptake, or renal/bile secretion of drugs, leading to enhancement of their activities or toxicities or therapeutic failure. This chapter will illustrate transporter-mediated DDIs (including food drug interaction) in human and their clinical significances.

ABC Family Transporters

The transport of specific molecules across lipid membranes is an essential function of all living organisms. The processes are usually mediated by specific transporters. One of the largest transporter families is the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family. More than 40 ABC transporters have been identified in human, which are divided into 7 subfamilies (ABCA to ABCG) based on their gene structure, amino acid sequence, domain organization, and phylogenetic analysis. Of them, at least 11 ABC transporters including P-glycoprotein (P-GP/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs/ABCCs), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) are involved in multidrug resistance (MDR) development. These ABC transporters are expressed in various tissues such as the liver, intestine, kidney, and brain, playing important roles in absorption, distribution, and excretion of drugs. Some ABC transporters are also involved in diverse cellular processes such as maintenance of osmotic homeostasis, antigen processing, cell division, immunity, cholesterol, and lipid trafficking. Several human diseases such as cystic fibrosis, sitosterolemia, Tangier disease, intrahepatic cholestasis, and retinal degeneration are associated with mutations in corresponding transporters. This chapter will describe function and expression of several ABC transporters (such as P-GP, BCRP, and MRPs), their substrates and inhibitors, as well as their clinical significance.

Clinical Implications of P-Glycoprotein Modulation in Drug-Drug Interactions

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) occur commonly and may lead to severe adverse drug reactions if not handled appropriately. Considerable information to support clinical decision making regarding potential DDIs is available in the literature and through various systems providing electronic decision support for healthcare providers. The challenge for the prescribing physician lies in sorting out the evidence and identifying those drugs for which potential interactions are likely to become clinically manifest. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a drug transporting protein that is found in the plasma membranes in cells of barrier and elimination organs, and plays a role in drug absorption and excretion. Increasingly, P-gp has been acknowledged as an important player in potential DDIs and a growing body of information on the role of this transporter in DDIs has become available from research and from the drug approval process. This has led to a clear need for a comprehensive review of P-gp-mediated DDIs with a focus on highlighting the drugs that are likely to lead to clinically relevant DDIs. The objective of this review is to provide information for identifying and interpreting evidence of P-gp-mediated DDIs and to suggest a classification for individual drugs based on both in vitro and in vivo evidence (substrates, inhibitors and inducers). Further, various ways of handling potential DDIs in clinical practice are described and exemplified in relation to drugs interfering with P-gp.

Cardiovascular Ion Channel Inhibitor Drug-Drug Interactions with P-glycoprotein

P-glycoprotein (Pgp) is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter that plays a major role in cardiovascular drug disposition by effluxing a chemically and structurally diverse range of cardiovascular therapeutics. Unfortunately, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with the transporter have become a major roadblock to effective cardiovascular drug administration because they can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) or reduce the efficacy of drugs. Cardiovascular ion channel inhibitors are particularly susceptible to DDIs and ADRs with Pgp because they often have low therapeutic indexes and are commonly coadministered with other drugs that are also Pgp substrates. DDIs from cardiovascular ion channel inhibitors with the transporter occur because of inhibition or induction of the transporter and the transporter's tissue and cellular localization. Inhibiting Pgp can increase absorption and reduce excretion of drugs, leading to elevated drug plasma concentrations and drug toxicity. In contrast, inducing Pgp can have the opposite effect by reducing the drug plasma concentration and its efficacy. A number of in vitro and in vivo studies have already demonstrated DDIs from several cardiovascular ion channel inhibitors with human Pgp and its animal analogs, including verapamil, digoxin, and amiodarone. In this review, Pgp-mediated DDIs and their effects on pharmacokinetics for different categories of cardiovascular ion channel inhibitors are discussed. This information is essential for improving pharmacokinetic predictions of cardiovascular therapeutics, for safer cardiovascular drug administration and for mitigating ADRs emanating from Pgp.

2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an extremely common clinical problem with an important population morbidity and mortality burden. The management of AF is complex and fraught with many uncertain and contentious issues, which are being addressed by extensive ongoing basic and clinical research. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF Guidelines Committee produced an extensive set of evidence-based AF management guidelines in 2010 and updated them in the areas of anticoagulation and rate/rhythm control in 2012. In late 2013, the committee judged that sufficient new information regarding AF management had become available since 2012 to warrant an update to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF Guidelines. After extensive evaluation of the new evidence, the committee has updated the guidelines for: (1) stroke prevention principles; (2) anticoagulation of AF patients with chronic kidney disease; (3) detection of AF in patients with stroke; (4) investigation and management of subclinical AF; (5) left atrial appendage closure in stroke prevention; (6) emergency department management of AF; (7) periprocedural anticoagulation management; and (8) rate and rhythm control including catheter ablation. This report presents the details of the updated recommendations, along with their background and rationale. In addition, a complete set of presently applicable recommendations, those that have been updated and those that remain in force from previous guideline versions, is provided in the Supplementary Material.

Chronic Digoxin Toxicity Precipitated by Dronedarone

Objective: To report the case of a patient who presented with chronic symptoms attributable to dronedarone-induced digoxin toxicity. A review of the literature is also provided. Case Summary: This case report details a case of a 77-year-old male patient who presented to the hospital with multiple ambiguous symptoms that lasted several weeks. The patient was later hospitalized for symptoms of chronic digoxin toxicity, including prolonged nausea, diarrhea, weakness, and lack of appetite. The patient had a long history of digoxin use for control of his atrial fibrillation but experienced signs and symptoms of toxicity only after the addition of dronedarone. Discussion: Both the Naranjo and Drug Interaction Probability Scales indicated a “probable” relationship between the development of digoxin toxicity and dronedarone. Due to a p-glycoprotein-mediated interaction, dronedarone is able to decrease the renal clearance of digoxin, thus putting patients at risk for potentially fatal digoxin toxicity. Conclusion: This is the second case report detailing dronedarone-induced digoxin toxicity and the first to focus on chronic digoxin toxicity. The presentation, possible causes, and drug-drug interactions associated with digoxin toxicity are described. This report aims to increase clinicians’ awareness of this possible complication. It is recommended that digoxin be discontinued prior to initiating dronedarone. If concomitant therapy is absolutely necessary, the dose of digoxin should be halved prior to initiating dronedarone. Digoxin plasma levels should be monitored closely, with frequent patient evaluation for signs and symptoms of digoxin toxicity.

Benefit-risk assessment of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be achieved using pharmacological therapy. Amiodarone is the most efficacious anti-arrhythmic agent; however, its use is limited due to an unfavourable safety profile, including pro-arrhythmia, thyroid, liver, skin and pulmonary complications. Dronedarone, which is structurally similar to amiodarone, was developed to try and achieve a favourable balance of efficacy and risk. Dronedarone has been evaluated in several large clinical trials, which have shown reduced mortality and hospitalization rates in patients with non-permanent AF. In patients with permanent AF and/or heart failure, dronedarone has been shown to cause increased mortality and morbidity and should not be used in these groups. Compared with amiodarone, dronedarone has fewer toxic effects (thyroid, skin, pulmonary) and, although less efficacious, may be used as first-line therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with non-permanent AF. Clinicians must be vigilant in monitoring their patients to ensure they do not develop permanent AF or heart failure.

Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes with dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation or heart failure

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration to decrease the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated cardiovascular risk factors who are in sinus rhythm or will undergo cardioversion. There has been recent evidence to suggest that dronedarone may not have a favorable safety profile. We decided to evaluate all available evidence on the cardiovascular safety of this drug. A systematic search was made of the PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled trials from 1966 through 2011 comparing dronedarone to comparators in AF/heart failure. Intervention was dronedarone for AF for some studies and heart failure for others. Comparators included standard medical therapy and/or placebo and amiodarone for 1 study. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, embolic events, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure exacerbations, and hospitalization rates in the intervention versus comparator group at the end of ≥ 3 months of follow up with abstraction of data by 1 author. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in our analysis. Dronedarone use was associated with a trend toward worse all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations. It also showed numerically higher event rates for all other outcome events except acute coronary syndrome. Our pooled analysis showed increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations with use of dronedarone across a wide spectrum of populations. In conclusion, we recommend exercising caution using dronedarone, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Safety and efficacy of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation/flutter

Dronedarone is an amiodarone analog but differs structurally from amiodarone in that the iodine moiety was removed and a methane-sulfonyl group was added. These modifications reduced thyroid and other end-organ adverse effects and makes dronedarone less lipophilic, shortening its half-life. Dronedarone has been shown to prevent atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFl) recurrences in several multi-center trials. In addition to its rhythm control properties, dronedarone has rate control properties and slows the ventricular response during AF. Dronedarone is approved in Europe for rhythm and rate control indications. In patients with decompensated heart failure, dronedarone treatment increased mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. However, when dronedarone was used in elderly high risk AF/AFl patients excluding such high risk heart failure, cardiovascular hospitalizations were significantly reduced and the drug was approved in the USA for this indication in 2009 by the Food and Drug Administration. Updated guidelines suggest dronedarone as a front-line antiarrhythmic in many patients with AF/Fl but caution that the drug should not be used in patients with advanced heart failure. In addition, the recent results of the PALLAS trial suggest that dronedarone should not be used in the long-term treatment of patients with permanent AF.