Angioplasty Alone Versus Angioplasty and Stenting for Subclavian Artery Stenosis—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effects of percutaneous endovascular angioplasty for severe stenosis or occlusion of subclavian artery

To investigate the effect and safety of percutaneous endovascular angioplasty (PEA) with optional stenting for the treatment of severe stenosis or occlusion of subclavian artery, patients with severe stenosis ≥ 70% or occlusion of subclavian artery treated with PEA were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data were analyzed. A total of 222 patients were retrospectively enrolled, including 151 males (68.0%) and 71 females (32.0%) aged 48-86 (mean 63.9 ± 9.0) years. Forty-seven (21.2%) patients had comorbidities. Subclavian artery stenosis ≥ 70% was present in 201 (90.5%) patients and complete subclavian occlusion in 21 (9.5%) cases. Angioplasty was successfully performed in all (100%) patients. Balloon-expandable stents were used in 190 (85.6%) cases, and self-expandable stents in 20 (9.0%) cases. Only 12 (5.4%) cases were treated with balloon dilation only. Among 210 patients treated with stent angioplasty, 71 (33.8% or 71/210) cases underwent balloon pre-dilation, 139 (66.2% or 139/210) had direct deployment of balloon-expandable stents, and 2 (1.0% or 2/210) experienced balloon post-dilation. Distal embolization protection devices were used in 5 (2.3% or 5/222) cases. Periprocedural complications occurred in 3 (1.4%) patients, including aortic dissection in 2 (0.9%) cases and right middle cerebral artery embolism in 1 (0.5%). No hemorrhage occurred. Among 182 (82.0%) patients with 6-month follow-up, restenosis > 70% occurred in 1 (0.5%) patient, and among 68 (30.6%) patients with 12-month follow-up, restenosis > 70% took place in 11 (16.2%) patients. Percutaneous endovascular angioplasty can be safely and efficiently performed for the treatment of severe stenosis ≥ 70% or occlusion of subclavian artery.

A Case of Pontine Infarction due to Subclavian Steal Phenomenon Enhanced by an Arteriovenous Shunt for Hemodialysis

We present a case of pontine infarction caused by subclavian steal phenomenon (SSP) due to subclavian artery stenosis (SAS) and an arteriovenous shunt in the forearm in a 74-year-old man with hemodialysis and stenting for SAS with improvement of SSP. He developed dysarthria during dialysis. He was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with a pontine infarction. As the basilar artery appeared to be occluded on magnetic resonance angiography, an emergency diagnostic angiography was performed. Aortagram showed severe stenosis of the left subclavian artery. Right vertebral artery (VA) angiogram revealed retrograde arterial blood flow from the right VA to the left VA via the VA union, which suggested SSP. In addition, the steal was augmented by an ipsilateral hemodialysis arteriovenous shunt. Percutaneous subclavian artery stenting was performed 12 days later, and there was no recurrence of symptoms in the follow-up period. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report a patient with SSP who developed a pontine infarction due to SAS and an arteriovenous shunt during hemodialysis and who underwent subclavian artery stenting and had a good outcome.

Non-Coronary Atherosclerotic Arterial Disease: Where Are We Now?

Lower extremity peripheral artery and upper extremity artery disease are significant vascular conditions with distinct clinical presentations and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The lower extremity peripheral artery is associated with worse major adverse cardiovascular events compared with coronary artery disease, but often remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Upper extremity artery disease encompasses a range of clinical presentations resulting from atherosclerosis and other obstructive lesions in arteries such as the subclavian artery and brachiocephalic trunk. While atherosclerosis is a common cause, non-atherosclerotic factors can also influence distal lesions. This review aims to synthesize existing knowledge on both conditions, encompassing risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options. Improved awareness and early intervention can mitigate complications and enhance patient outcomes for lower extremity peripheral artery and upper extremity artery disease.

Clinical outcomes of a balloon-expandable stent for symptomatic obstructions of the subclavian or innominate arteries

Background: Upper-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) may present with a broad spectrum of signs and symptoms. If an endovascular treatment is planned, percutaneous angioplasty and stent placement may lead to a better patency compared to percutaneous angioplasty alone. We assessed the characteristics and clinical course of patients with upper-extremity PAD who received angioplasty and a balloon-expandable stent. Patients and methods: We analyzed data from consecutive patients treated with angioplasty and placement of a balloon-expandable BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System® (Bentley, Germany) at the Angiology Department (University Hospital Zurich) between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was re-intervention at the target lesion within 6 months from index angioplasty and during available follow-up. The study was approved by the local ethical commission. Results: A total of 27 patients were treated. The median age was 70 (Q1-Q3: 60-74) years and 59% were men. The subclavian artery (74%) represented the most frequently treated target lesion, followed by the innominate artery (26%). The mean improvement in blood pressure in the treated arm was 21 (95%CI 7 to 35) mmHg at 24 hours and 29 (95%CI 15 to 43) mmHg at 6 months. At 6 months, 2 (8%) patients required a target lesion re-intervention. During the remaining follow-up period up to 24 months, one of these two patients required additional intervention and a total of 3 (11%) patients died due to sepsis, cancer, and unknown causes, respectively. Conclusions: Percutaneous catheter-based treatment with a balloon-expandable stent for symptomatic upper extremity PAD appeared to be effective and safe.

[Treatment of atherosclerotic lesion of the first segment of subclavian artery]

Severe subclavian artery lesion is an important medical and social problem worsening the quality of life and leading to dire consequences. Vertebrobasilar insufficiency is the main syndrome of lesion of the first segment of subclavian artery. About 20% of all ischemic strokes occur in vertebrobasilar basin. At present, surgical treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe lesion of the 1st segment of subclavian artery is still debatable. Open surgery is optimal for occlusion of this vascular segment. Carotid-subclavian transposition is a preferable option with favorable in-hospital and long-term results. However, carotid-subclavian bypass is an equivalent alternative in case of difficult transposition following anatomical and topographic features of vascular architectonics. Endovascular treatment is preferable for isolated subclavian artery stenosis and should certainly include stenting.

Subclavian Artery Calcification: A Narrative Review

Subclavian artery calcification (SAC) affects 2% of the population and presents a serious risk of developing into subclavian steal syndrome (SSS). Risk factors for plaque formation of the subclavian artery include diabetes, hypertension, and smoking. While SAC generally presents as asymptomatic, symptoms in severe cases may include numbness, pain at rest, and ischemic gangrene. Patients with severe SSS are at high risk of developing neurological symptoms as a result of vertebrobasilar insufficiency affecting posterior cerebral perfusion. On physical examination, SSS is preliminarily diagnosed from bilateral inter-arm systolic blood pressure discrepancy (>10 mmHg), which can be further confirmed with vascular imaging. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a cost-effective and non-invasive baseline technique for visualizing luminal stenosis and quantifying peak systolic velocity (PSV). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides high-quality, fast, three-dimensional (3D) imaging at the cost of introducing nephrotoxic contrast agents. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is the safest 3D imaging modality, without the use of X-rays and contrast agents, that is useful in assessing plaque characteristics and degree of stenosis. DUS-assisted digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for grading the degree of stenosis in the subclavian artery and determining the distance between the puncture site and lesion, which can be carried out in a combined procedure with endovascular management strategies. The fundamental treatment options are surgical and endovascular intervention. Endovascular treatment options include percutaneous transluminal angiography (PTA) for recanalization of the stenosed vessel and permanent balloon stenting to prevent collapse after PTA. Overall, the benefits of endovascular management encompass faster recovery, lower stenosis recurrence rate, and lower incidence of complications, making it the treatment of choice in low-risk patients. Surgical interventions, although more complex, are considered gold-standard treatment options.

Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

The subclavian arteries are two major arteries of the upper chest, below the collar bone, which come from the arch of the aorta. Endovascular treatment for stenosis of the subclavian arteries includes angioplasty alone, and with stenting. There is insufficient evidence to guide the use of stents following angioplasty for subclavian artery stenosis. This is the second update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to determine whether stenting was more effective than angioplasty alone for stenosis of the subclavian artery.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and LILACS databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 2 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials of endovascular treatment of subclavian artery lesions that compared angioplasty alone and stent implantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently evaluated studies to assess eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. If there was no agreement, we asked a third review author to assess the study for inclusion. We planned to undertake data collection and analysis in accordance with recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and assess the certainty of the evidence using a GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

To date, we have not identified any completed or ongoing randomised controlled trials that compare percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for subclavian artery stenosis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to determine whether stenting is more effective than angioplasty alone for stenosis of the subclavian artery.

Finding the optimal access for proximal upper limb artery (PULA) interventions: Lessons learned from the PULA multicenter registry

OBJECTIVE

The multicenter proximal upper limb artery (PULA) Registry was created to study the optimal puncture sites for the interventions involving the subclavian, axillary, and innominate arteries.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the optimal vascular access for PULA interventions, despite the well-known technical complexity of these procedures.

METHODS

We performed the retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated for symptomatic steno-occlusive disease of the proximal upper limb arteries between January 2015 and December 2019 in three high-volume centers. Acute thrombotic occlusions were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-two patients were treated for significant stenosis and 108 for total occlusion. The baseline patient's characteristics were similar, except for the higher median age of the stenotic patients: 68.5 years (31.1; 90.0) versus 64 years (38.0; 86.0) p = 0.0015. Successful revascularization rate was higher in the stenotic group 93.75% (255/272) versus 86.11% (93/108) p = 0.0230, while the procedure length 27 min (8; 133) versus 46 min (7; 140) p = 0.0001 and fluoroscopy times 439 s (92; 2993) versus 864 s (86; 4176) p = 0.0001 were higher in the occlusion group. The main adverse event rate was similarly low. Dual access was used more often to treat occlusions (60.19% (65/108) vs. 11.40% (31/272) p = 0.0001) without significantly increasing the complication rate. The safest access was ultrasound-guided distal radial artery puncture, significantly better than conventional radial access with 0% (0/31) versus 13.6% (18/131) p = 0.0253 complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous revascularization of proximal upper limb arteries is a safe and effective. Dual access can be applied to increase treatment efficacy, without significantly compromising safety.

Focal intramural hematoma as a potential pitfall for iatrogenic aortic dissection during subclavian artery stenting: A case report

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic aortic dissection (IAD) is a rare but fatal complication of interventional treatment for the proximal supra-aortic large vessels. Several cases of IAD after endovascular treatment of subclavian artery have been reported. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of IAD is still unclear. Here we report a patient with IAD following a balloon expandable stent implanted into the left subclavian artery (LSA).

CASE SUMMARY

An 84-year-old man with a history of hypertension was admitted to the Neurology Department of our hospital complaining of dizziness and gait disturbance for more than 1 mo. Computed tomography angiography of the head and neck showed severe stenosis at the proximal LSA and the origin of the left vertebral artery. Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain revealed subacute infarctions in cerebellum, occipital lobe and medulla oblongata. He suffered a Stanford type B aortic dissection after the proximal LSA angioplasty with a balloon expandable stent. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed immediately with the chimney technique and he was discharged 20 d later. After exploring the pathogenesis with multimodal imaging analysis, an easily neglected focal intramural hematoma (IMH) in the aorta near the junction of the LSA was found to be the main cause of the IAD. The risk of IAD should be sufficiently evaluated according to the characteristics of aortic arch lesions before the proximal LSA angioplasty.

CONCLUSION

Focal aortic IMH is a potential risk factor for IAD during a seemingly simple stenting of the proximal LSA.

Endovascular therapy of subclavian artery occlusive disease involving the vertebral artery origin

Background: While the majority of subclavian artery (SA) lesions are localized in the proximal segment, the evidence in patients with medial SA disease involving the vertebral artery (VA) origin are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization of the SA at our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The majority of SA lesions (n = 163, 83 %) were located in the proximal segment, whereas 28 lesions (14 %) were located in the medial segment, and only 5 lesions (3 %) involved the distal segment. Procedural success was high for both stenosis (96 %) and occlusion (89 %) and did not differ depending on lesion location. Revascularization techniques in the medial segment included stenting of the SA only (13 patients), additional VA balloon-dilatation (6 patients), and bifurcation stenting of the SA and VA using T-stenting technique (9 patients). Outcome after a median of 12 months showed no significant differences in freedom from restenosis between proximal and medial lesions (90 % vs. 95 %; p = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular revascularization of SA disease with medial segments involving the VA origin required more complex techniques and showed long-term patency rates comparable to those in lesions located within the proximal SA.

Percutaneous Antegrade and Retrograde Endovascular approach to Symptomatic High-Grade Subclavian Artery Stenosis: Technique and Follow-Up

Background and Purpose:

Angioplasty and stenting of the subclavian artery have been reported with high technical and clinical success rates, low complication rates, and good midterm patency rates. Different antegrade or retrograde endovascular catheter-based approaches are used. Nowadays, endovascular therapy has taken over open surgical techniques in subclavian artery disease. The purpose of this study was to determine safety, efficacy, and midterm clinical and radiological outcome of the endovascular treatment with special focus on the different technical approaches in subclavian artery disease.

Materials and Methods:

Between 2014 and 2017, 11 patients (10 men, 1 woman) with symptomatic high-grade stenosis (90%–100%) of the subclavian artery were treated with endovascular treatment. Their mean age was 51.3 years (range, 32-61 years). Mean angiographic and clinical follow-up was 22.5 months (range, 5-44 months). Clinical follow-up was performed at hospital discharge and routine follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 12 months, and 6 monthly thereafter. In all 11 patients, a percutaneous approach was used successfully. In eight patients, the lesions were accessed retrogradely through a brachial artery puncture.

Results:

Acute success rate was 100%. There were no significant peri-procedure complications. At the latest clinical follow-up (mean of 22.5 months), all patients showed a good outcome with a restenosis rate of 18.2% including a patient with Takayasu arteritis.

Conclusion:

Percutaneous antegrade and retrograde stenting of high-grade subclavian artery stenosis is a viable less invasive alternative to open bypass surgery with good midterm clinical results and patency rates.

Invasive treatment in peripheral artery disease

Invasive treatment in peripheral artery disease (PAD) has evolved as a viable alternative to surgical treatment. However, beyond the common pathophysiological substrate, as far as treatment is concerned, each site of atherosclerotic disease (subclavian and vertebral arteries; carotid arteries; intracranial arterial tree; renal arteries; lower extremity arteries) features unique characteristics. Treatment options include medical treatment, endovascular management and/or surgery. Sound clinical evaluation is required as individual patient assessment often limits intervention options, while available data regarding benefits of invasive and surgical management are questioned by advances in medical treatment. In the present article, we aim to summarize existing evidence and guidance on the role of invasive procedures in PAD.

Subclavian Artery Disease: Diagnosis and Therapy

The diagnosis of brachiocephalic disease is often overlooked. Symptoms include arm claudication and vertebrobasilar insufficiency. In patients who have had the use of the internal mammary artery for coronary bypass surgery, the development of symptoms of myocardial ischemia should alert the clinician to the possibility of subclavian artery stenosis. Also, in patients who have had axillofemoral bypass, lower-extremity claudication may occur. Recognition involves physical examination and accurate noninvasive testing. Endovascular therapy has proven to be effective in alleviating symptoms in properly selected patients.

Drug coated balloon angioplasty for subclavian artery stenosis: A potential novel indication

Subclavian artery stenosis is associated with increased cardiovascular disease mortality. It remains an important treatable cause of upper extremity, brain and cardiac ischemia. Endovascular treatment with angioplasty and stenting has become the preferred modality of treatment. Surgical revascularization is reserved for difficult cases with unfavorable anatomy to endovascular approach. Here we describe a case of subclavian artery stenosis causing subclavian steal syndrome with unfavorable anatomy to stenting treated successfully with drug coated balloon angioplasty with maintenance of patency at 6months.

Simultaneous Kissing Stenting: A Valuable Technique for Reconstructing the Stenotic Initial Segment of the Right Subclavian Artery

Atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion often involves the subclavian artery. For lesions that are close to the orifice of the right subclavian artery, stenting of the right subclavian artery itself blocks the pathway from the innominate artery to the right carotid artery and causes problems in patients with multiple angiostenosis, especially involving the right carotid system. In this study, we report 2 cases using simultaneous kissing stenting (SKS) of the right subclavian artery and the right carotid artery to relieve right subclavian stenosis and maintain right carotid system patency. Standard stenting methods were used to perform SKS. Two self-expanding stents were implanted simultaneously into the initial segment of the right subclavian artery and the right carotid artery, forming a "Y" shape, with the overlap of the proximal segments in the innominate artery ≥5 mm. After SKS, the stenosed right subclavian artery was dilated, and the patency of the right carotid system was maintained. The symptoms of patients were relieved and the stents were intact at several months of follow-up. In conclusion, SKS of the right subclavian artery and the right carotid artery might be a safe and effective procedure when the stenotic or occlusive lesion in the initial segment of the right subclavian artery is close to the orifice, and lesions (or potential ones) exist in the right carotid system.

Multiterritory Atherosclerosis and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness as Cardiovascular Risk Predictors After Percutaneous Angioplasty of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To identify independent predictors of cardiovascular events among patients with subclavian artery stenosis.

METHODS

Two hundred eighteen consecutive patients with subclavian artery stenosis referred to angioplasty were examined for coexistent coronary, renal, or lower extremity artery stenosis of 50% or greater. Initial carotid intima-media thickness and internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis were assessed. Intima-media thickness was reassessed in 108 randomly chosen patients to evaluate the change over time. The incidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and symptomatic lesion progression was recorded.

RESULTS

The patients included 116 men and 102 women (mean age ± SD, 62.1 ± 8.4 years). Isolated subclavian artery stenosis and involvement of 1, 2, and 3 or 4 other territories with stenosis of 50% or greater were found in 46 (21.1%), 83 (38.1%), 55 (25.2%), and 34 (15.6%) patients, respectively. Internal carotid artery stenosis of 50% or greater (relative risk [RR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.70; P < .001) and initial intima-media thickness (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28; P = .005) were identified as independent markers of multiterritory atherosclerosis. The optimal intima-media thickness cutoff for atherosclerosis extent was 1.3 mm (sensitivity, 75.6%; specificity, 76.1%). During follow-up of 57 ± 35 months, cardiovascular death, MI, and ischemic stroke occurred in 29 patients (13.3%). Those patients had significantly higher intima-media thickness progression (+0.199 ± 0.57 versus +0.008 ± 0.26 mm; P = .039) and more widespread initial atherosclerosis (mean territories, 1.8 ± 1.1 versus 1.3 ± 1.1; P = .042). Independent predictors of cardiovascular death, MI, ischemic stroke, and lesion progression were coronary artery disease (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.58; P = .003) and intima-media thickness progression (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.46; P = .033; sensitivity, 75.0%; specificity, 61.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with symptomatic subclavian artery stenosis, baseline carotid intima-media thickness and ICA stenosis of 50% or greater are associated with multiterritory atherosclerosis, whereas intima-media thickness progression is associated with the risk of cardiovascular events.

Resolution of ischemic symptoms after percutaneous angioplasty for a symptomatic subclavian artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

A minor part of patients with subclavian or innominate artery occlusive disease (subclavian artery stenosis [SAS]) experience symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency, upper extremity exertional ischemia (UEEI), or cardiac ischemia owing to subclavian-coronary steal (SCS) in some instances. The study aimed to assess the impact of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of symptomatic SAS on symptom resolution and to determine factors related with SAS recurrence.

METHODS

Symptom resolution and incidence of restenosis (RS) were evaluated for up to 15 years in patients who had undergone successful PTA of SAS.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 232 consecutive subjects after successful PTA of SAS (61.9 ± 8.4 years old 53.4% men). The mean follow-up time was 101 ± 40 months (range, 5-188 months). One month after PTA, 85.4% of the study participants were free from dizziness, 94.4% from imbalance, 97.1% from visual disturbances, 97.8% from syncope, 98.7% from UEEI, and 100% from SCS. RS was found in 37 patients (15.9%) in long-term observation. UEEI, dizziness, imbalance, and SCS were significantly more frequent in patients with SAS recurrence, as compared with patients with patent artery (65.9% vs 3.1% [P < .001] 63.4% vs 19.4% [P < .001]; 26.8% vs 9.4% [P = .005]; and 100% vs 15.4% [P = .018], respectively). Smaller stent diameter (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96; P = .004), implantation of ≥2 stents for a lesion (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26; P = .003), concomitant stenosis in the carotid or vertebral artery (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = .036), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.31; P < .001), and high-density lipoprotein level (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P = .021) were associated independently with risk of RS, whereas recurrence of UEEI (relative risk, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.55-1.90; P < .001), dizziness (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.39; P < .001), limb paresthesia (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; P = .005), and angina in subjects after coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = .024) were associated with RS/SAS progression after PTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioplasty of SAS leads to symptom resolution in most patients. UEEI, dizziness, and angina recurrence are predictors of RS or SAS progression; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, smaller stent diameter, and number of implanted stents predict RS.

Ten-year experience in subclavian revascularisation. A parallel comparative observational study

Introduction

Subclavian stenosis has a prevalence of approximately 2% in the community, and 7% within a clinical population. It is closely linked with hypertension and smoking. There is a relative paucity of published data to inform clinicians on the optimal mode of treatment for subclavian artery stenosis.

Objectives

To compare clinical outcomes of subclavian bypass surgery with that of subclavian endovascular re-vascularisation. Endpoints were survival time, re-intervention-free survival, and symptom-free survival.

Method

In all, 21 subclavian interventions were performed from 2000 to 2010. We compared angioplasty vs angioplasty with stenting vs bypass.

Results

Technical success was 100% in all groups. Symptom-free survival, at 70 months, was 60% in the angioplasty group, 100% in the angioplasty and stenting group and 75% in the bypass group. Re-intervention rate was 40% in the angioplasty group, 0% in the angioplasty and stenting group and 25% in the bypass group. Median time for re-intervention was 9.5 months in angioplasty patients and 36 months in bypass patients ( p = 0.102). Target lesion revascularisation was 20.0% for angioplasty procedures, 16.67% for angioplasty and stenting and 25% for bypass procedures.

Conclusion

Angioplasty with stenting provides improved symptom-free survival and freedom from re-intervention in patients with symptomatic subclavian artery stenosis.

Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence to guide stent usage following angioplasty in subclavian artery stenosis. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to determine whether stenting is more effective than angioplasty alone for stenosis of the subclavian artery.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched February 2014) and CENTRAL (2014, Issue 1). There was no restriction on language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of endovascular treatment of subclavian artery lesions comparing angioplasty alone and stent implantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently evaluated studies to assess eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. If there was no agreement, the third author was asked to assess the study for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

To date we have not identified any completed or ongoing randomised controlled trials comparing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for subclavian artery stenosis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to determine whether stenting is more effective than angioplasty alone for stenosis of the subclavian artery.