Value of the Promontory Stimulation Test in Predicting Speech Perception After Cochlear Implantation

Electrical promontory stimulation test using a portable peripheral nerve stimulator with an ear canal electrode

OBJECTIVE

An intact cochlear nerve is necessary for successful cochlear implantation (CI). Although the promontory stimulation test (PST) using a promontory stimulator (PS) and a transtympanic needle electrode is invasive, it is still commonly used to verify cochlear nerve function. PSs are currently unavailable because they are no longer manufactured; however, considering that PST continues to be beneficial in certain situations, alternative equipment is needed. The PNS-7000® (PNS) was developed as a neurologic instrument for stimulating the peripheral nerves. This study investigated the usefulness of the ear canal stimulation test (ECST) using PNS with a silver ball ear canal electrode, which is a new noninvasive alternative technique to the PST.

METHODS

ECST was performed from November 2013 to December 2018 using PS and PNS for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The electrical threshold, most comfortable loudness level, uncomfortable loudness level, dynamic range, and gap detection were measured in the ECST. The results of these measured PNS items were compared with PS.

RESULTS

ECST was performed in 61 ears of 35 patients (age, 59.9 ± 20.1 years) using PS and PNS. The sound sensation was elicited in 51 (83.6%) and 52 (85.2%) ears with PS and PNS, respectively. All items excluding GAP were measured in 46 (75%) and 43 (70%) ears at 50 and 100 Hz, respectively. GAP was measured in 33 ears by the ascending and descending methods using PS and PNS. Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive linear correlation between the PS and PNS results in all measurements. No significant difference was found between the PS and PNS thresholds in all measured items.

CONCLUSIONS

PNS is a useful instrument for performing ECST as a new alternative to PS. ECST using a silver ball electrode is a less invasive and easier test than PST.

Neural activity of the auditory cortex predicts speech recognition of patients with asymmetric hearing loss after cochlear implantation

Patients with asymmetric hearing loss show an asymmetry of glucose metabolism of the primary auditory cortex (PAC). We investigated whether this asymmetry could serve as an objective predictor for speech recognition with CI. Nine patients underwent ¹⁸FDG PET prior to CI surgery. Average normalized ¹⁸FDG uptake of 25% of voxels with highest uptake was calculated for the PAC employing a probabilistic atlas and cerebellar cortex as reference. Differences in glucose metabolism of the PAC were assessed by an asymmetry index (AI-PAC). We tested the correlation between outcome of CI surgery (6 months post implantation), AI-PAC and clinical predictors. Pre-operative AI-PAC showed a positive correlation with speech recognition with CI (significant for sentences and numbers; trend for monosyllabic words). With a pre-operative AI-PAC ≥ 4.2%, patients reached good CI outcome in sentence recognition of 59–90% and number recognition of 90–100% and less favorable CI outcome in monosyllabic word recognition of 25–45%. Age at symptom onset was significantly associated with all measures of speech recognition, while deafness duration was only associated with sentence recognition. AI-PAC allows for a reliable and quantitative pre-operative prediction of early improvement in speech recognition after CI. ¹⁸FDG PET may be a valuable addition to the objective pre-operative assessment of CI candidates. Further studies in larger cohorts and with longer follow-up times are needed.

Prognostic factors in cochlear implantation in adults: Determining central process integrity

The purpose of this study is to examine various preoperative factors that can play a role in the auditory rehabilitation outcome of cochlear implant (CI) recipients. In order to determine the level of integrity of central processing preoperatively, special attention was given to residual hearing, duration of deafness, and cochlear nerve diameter as prognostic factors. A cohort of 232 (272 CI implantations) postlingually deafened adults was evaluated in this study. Hearing results at 1, 2 and up to 3 years postoperatively were compared with various preoperative factors: promontory stimulation testing, residual hearing, duration of deafness, and magnetic resonance imaging of the cochlear nerve. Postoperative hearing performance was measured based on the German Freiburg monosyllabic word test and the Oldenburg sentence test. Postoperative hearing performance showed a significant improvement in each consecutive year after implantation. Duration of deafness showed a negative correlation to word recognition and a positive correlation to increased signal-to-noise-ratio in sentence testing. A significant decline in hearing outcome was shown starting around the second decade of deafness corresponding to 66% of life spent in deafness. MR imaging of cochlear nerve diameter shows a positive correlation of larger nerve diameter to better speech understanding. Promontory stimulation testing did not show any prognostic value. In this retrospective review it could be shown that there is an intricate interaction in the preoperative variables: duration of deafness - as well as the ratio of life spent in deafness; residual hearing; and cochlear nerve diameter.

Outcomes after cochlear implant provision in children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia or aplasia

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia is found in up to a half of patients with unilateral or bilateral hearing loss. There is an ongoing discussion regarding the indication of cochlear implants for hearing rehabilitation in cases with radiologically-defined aplasia or hypoplasia of the cochlear nerve in those patients, especially in children. At present there is conflicting evidence whether the audiological outcomes of those children with a CI are comparable to those of children with a CI and a radiologically-normal cochlear nerve. The primary aim of this study was to assess the audiological abilities before and after CI provision in children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia or aplasia. Additionally, we aimed to determine if audiological outcomes differed in children with aplasia from those with hypoplasia. Such data should be helpful in determining if CI provision is appropriate for such children.

METHODS

This retrospective study presents 7 children who were diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia and received a CI. The pre- and postoperative audiological performance and the hearing and speech development of the children were examined.

RESULTS

4 children were unilateral CI users and 3 were bilateral CI users. Hearing reactions could be detected in all children. Already at first fitting, prompt responses and reactions to songs were observed. The aided thresholds in free field in children with hypoplasia were between 30 and 60 dB. Even in children with aplasia, the results in free field with CI averaged between 30 and 70 dB. Therefore the aided thresholds in children with hypoplasia and in children with aplasia of the CN are similar. It could be demonstrated that hearing reactions improve with the long term use of the implant. Improvement in general development could be observed in all children despite the very heterogeneous conditions and the accompanying handicaps.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the hypothesis that children with radiologically-defined CN hypoplasia or aplasia and detectable responses to electrical or acoustical stimuli can improve their sound detection thresholds and their awareness of sound when provided with a CI.

Utilization of Nerve Integrity Monitor for Promontory Stimulation Testing Prior to Cochlear Implant

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility of a nerve integrity monitor as a tool for promontory stimulation testing in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss considering cochlear implantation.

PATIENTS

Adult patients considered for cochlear implantation with no auditory response on audiometric testing INTERVENTION:: Promontory stimulation testing using the nerve integrity monitor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

By using a facial nerve stimulator and the nerve integrity monitor, transtympanic promontory stimulation testing was performed to assess auditory nerve function and determine candidacy for cochlear implantation. Patients indicated if they heard the stimulus.

RESULTS

Of the four patients completing the promontory stimulation tests, three patients heard the stimulus and one patient did not hear the stimulus. Of the three patients with a positive stimulation test, two patients have a history of progressive profound sensorineural hearing loss and one patient had a history of severe blunt temporal bone trauma. Two of these patients proceeded with cochlear implantation. The patient who had a negative promontory stimulation test has a history of neurofibromatosis type 2.

CONCLUSION

The nerve integrity monitor is a convenient tool that can be used in the clinic setting to perform promontory stimulation tests and aid in determining cochlear implant candidates, specifically in those patients who require verification of auditory nerve function. This tool is a feasible and reasonable method for promontory stimulation testing.

In Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation, Psychological Burden Affects Tinnitus and the Overall Outcome of Auditory Rehabilitation

Cochlear implantation (CI) is increasingly being used in the auditory rehabilitation of deaf patients. Here, we investigated whether the auditory rehabilitation can be influenced by the psychological burden caused by mental conditions. Our sample included 47 patients who underwent implantation. All patients were monitored before and 6 months after CI. Auditory performance was assessed using the Oldenburg Inventory (OI) and Freiburg monosyllable (FB MS) speech discrimination test. The health-related quality of life was measured with Nijmegen Cochlear implantation Questionnaire (NCIQ) whereas tinnitus-related distress was measured with the German version of Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ). We additionally assessed the general perceived quality of life, the perceived stress, coping abilities, anxiety levels and the depressive symptoms. Finally, a structured interview to detect mental conditions (CIDI) was performed before and after surgery. We found that CI led to an overall improvement in auditory performance as well as the anxiety and depression, quality of life, tinnitus distress and coping strategies. CIDI revealed that 81% of patients in our sample had affective, anxiety, and/or somatoform disorders before or after CI. The affective disorders included dysthymia and depression, while anxiety disorders included agoraphobias and unspecified phobias. We also diagnosed cases of somatoform pain disorders and unrecognizable figure somatoform disorders. We found a positive correlation between the auditory performance and the decrease of anxiety and depression, tinnitus-related distress and perceived stress. There was no association between the presence of a mental condition itself and the outcome of auditory rehabilitation. We conclude that the CI candidates exhibit high rates of psychological disorders, and there is a particularly strong association between somatoform disorders and tinnitus. The presence of mental disorders remained unaffected by CI but the degree of psychological burden decreased significantly post-CI. The implants benefitted patients in a number of psychosocial areas, improving the symptoms of depression and anxiety, tinnitus, and their quality of life and coping strategies. The prevalence of mental disorders in patients who are candidates for CI suggests the need for a comprehensive psychological and psychosomatic management of their treatment.

Promontory electrical stimulation to elicit vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs)

CONCLUSION

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) provoked electrically at the promontory provide a feasible method to record vestibular responses in awake patients.

OBJECTIVES

Electrically evoked VEMP testing has been performed by galvanic stimulation at the mastoid so far. The present study examined an electrical stimulation mode close to the otolith organs at the promontory.

METHODS

Fourteen cochlear implant candidates who were planned for clinical routine promontory stimulation testing (PST) to assess auditory nerve function underwent promontory VEMP testing. After testing the cochlear nerve function during PST promontory cervical VEMPs (p-c-VEMPs) and promontory ocular VEMPs (p-o-VEMPs) were recorded during subsequent transtympanic electrical stimulation at the promontory.

RESULTS

Promontory VEMP testing was well tolerated by the patients. Mean latencies for p-c-VEMPs were 10.30 ± 2.23 ms (p1) and 17.86 ± 3.83 ms (n1). Mean latencies for p-o-VEMPs were 7.64 ± 1.24 ms (n1) and 11.2 ± 1.81 ms (p1). The stimulation threshold level was measured at 0.15 ± 0.07 mA for p-c-VEMPs and at 0.19 ± 0.11 mA for p-o-VEMPs. The discomfort level was found to be at 0.78 ± 0.29 mA for p-c-VEMPs and at 0.69 ± 0.25 mA for p-oVEMPs. Mean p1-n1 amplitude in p-c-VEMPs was 124.78 ± 56.55 µV and p-o-VEMPs showed a mean n1-p1 amplitude of 30.94 ± 18.98 µV.

Evaluation of Temporal Difference Limen in Preoperative Non-Invasive Ear Canal Audiometry as a Predictive Factor for Speech Perception after Cochlear Implantation

The temporal difference limen (TDL) can be measured with noninvasive electrical ear canal stimulation. The objective of the study wa to determine the role of preoperative TDL measurements in predicting patients’ speech perception after cochlear implantation. We carried out a retrospective chart analysis of fifty-four cochlear implant (CI) patients with preoperative TDL and postoperative bisyllabic word recognition measurements in Helsinki University Central Hospital between March 1994 and March 2011. Our results show that there is no correlation between TDL and postoperative speech perception. However, patient’s advancing age correlates with longer TDL but not-directly with poorer speech perception. The results are in line with previous results concerning the lack of predictive value of preoperativ TDL measurements in CI patients.

Would an endosteal CI-electrode make sense? Comparison of the auditory nerve excitability from different stimulation sites using ESRT measurements and mathematical models

Regarding potential endosteal cochlear implant electrodes, the primary goal of this paper is to compare different intra- and extra-cochlear stimulation sites in terms of current strengths needed for stimulating the auditory nerve. Our study was performed during routine cochlear implantation using needle electrodes for electric stimulation and by visually recording electrically elicited stapedius reflexes (ESRT) as a measure for the stimulus transfer. Of course this rather simple setup only allows rough estimations, which, however, may provide further arguments whether or not to proceed with the concept of an endosteal electrode. In addition, a mathematical model is being developed. In a pilot study, intra-operative electric stimuli were applied via a needle electrode commonly used for the promontory stimulation test. Thus, stapedius reflex thresholds (ESRTs), electrically elicited via the needle from different points inside and outside the cochlea served as indicators for the suitability of different electrode positions towards the modiolus. Tests were performed on 11 CI-recipients. In addition, the extension of electrical fields from different stimulation sites is simulated in a mathematical cochlea model. In most patients ESRT measurements could be performed and evaluated. Thus an "endosteal" stimulation seems possible, although the current intensities must be higher than at intraluminal stimulation sites. Moreover, our model calculations confirm that the extension of electric fields is less favourable with increasing distance from the electrode to the ganglion nerve cells. In terms of hearing, the concept of an endosteal electrode should only be promoted, if its superiority for hearing preservation can be proven, e.g. in animal experiments. However, for other indications like the electric suppression of tinnitus, further research seems advisable.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a revision and/or expansion of current audiologic cochlear implant candidacy criteria is warranted.

DESIGN

The study design was a retrospective review of postoperative speech perception performance for 22 adult cochlear implant recipients who demonstrated preoperative Consonant Nucleus Consonant word recognition scores of 30% or higher in the best-aided condition. This criterion was chosen to exceed that specified by the North American clinical trial of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative best-aided monosyllabic word score for the 22 patients was 41% correct. The degree of postoperative benefit for the best postoperative condition (electric only or bimodal) ranged from 10 to 68 percentage points with a mean benefit of 27 percentage points for the electric-only condition and 40 percentage points for the bimodal condition. Statistical analyses revealed highly significant differences between preoperative-aided, implant-only, and bimodal performance on Consonant Nucleus Consonant monosyllabic word recognition performance. That is, both postoperative scores--electric only and bimodal--were significantly different from one another and from the preoperative best-aided performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggest that a large-scale reassessment of manufacturer and Medicare preoperative audiologic candidacy criteria for adults is warranted to allow more hearing-impaired individuals to take advantage of the benefits offered by cochlear implantation.