Flexible endoscopic clip-assisted Zenker’s diverticulotomy: the first case series (with videos). Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1199-1205. [PMID: 18401278 DOI: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e31816e2eee]

A History of Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Surgeons have been involved, since the beginning, in the development and evolution of endoscopy. They have been instrumental in developing new methods and have been actively involved in most of the therapeutic applications. The continued evolution of endoscopic technique is inevitable and will involve the integration of new technology with innovative thinking.

Endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum with Ligasure: simple, safe and effective

Background and study aims  Zenker's diverticulum may cause disabling symptoms, especially in the elderly. Treatment has changed in recent decades from open surgery to management with flexible endoscopy, resulting in lower morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to present the largest series, with the longest follow-up, of patients with Zenker's diverticulum receiving outpatient treatment with flexible endoscopy using a diverticuloscope and Ligasure (Covidien, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States), a device that allows tissue sealing and coagulation of vessels before cutting the septum between the diverticulum and esophagus. Patients and methods  We performed 79 diverticulotomies in 69 patients (65.2 % male, mean age 73.4 years). The mean diverticulum size was 2.8 cm. In three cases with a diverticulum ≤ 1.5 cm, the diverticuloscope could not be placed. Results  The technical success was 95.83 % and the clinical success 96.7 %: 84 % of the 56 patients followed for a mean of 34.6 months (24 - 64 months) had no dysphagia. The recurrence rate was 10.4 %, with a good response to a second diverticulotomy at 12 months (IQR: 11.5 - 17) in most cases. The most severe complications were two microperforations, resolved with conservative treatment, and one case of delayed bleeding endoscopically-controlled with a clip. Conclusions  Diverticulotomy of the esophageal-diverticular septum with Ligasure is an outpatient endoscopic technique that is simple, effective in the long term and very safe for the treatment of patients with Zenker's diverticulum. In symptomatic recurrences, a second procedure was equally safe and effective in most patients.

Flexible endosopic management of Zenker's diverticulum: characteristics and outcomes of 52 cases at a tertiary referral center

Zenker's diverticulum causes substantial morbidity among affected elderly patients. In the United States, rigid endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy is the mainstay of management and the flexible endoscopic technique is reserved for those not deemed candidates for rigid endoscopy due to an inability to extend the neck and/or medical comorbidities. Short- and long-term outcomes following flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy in the United States are limited. We reviewed the patient characteristics and outcomes of 58 consecutive flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomies performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between March 2006 and November 2013. There were 58 procedures performed on 52 unique patients. The median age was 77 years, and 48% of patients were female. More than one third of patients had either failed previous rigid therapy or were deemed inoperable by the referring surgeon. Size of the diverticulum ranged from 1 cm to 5 cm with a mean of 2.8 cm. Most procedures (67%) were performed under general anesthesia. Initial procedural success was achieved in all patients. Of the patients, 77% reported complete symptom resolution at mean follow-up time of 26 months. Of the procedures, 71% were not associated with any adverse event, but esophageal microperforation occurred during 11 procedures (19%). Of these, nine resolved with conservative management, one required an endoscopic stent, and one developed a neck abscess that required drainage. Our data show in a group of elderly patients with preexisting comorbidities flexible endoscopy therapy for Zenker's diverticulum is feasible. Initial symptomatic improvement was universal, and long-term response appears durable. The most common adverse event was esophageal microperforation, and the majority (82%) of these resolved with conservative management. Direct comparison with outcomes of rigid endoscopic or open surgical techniques has not been performed, but these data suggest that a randomized trial is warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of a flexible endoscopic technique.

Esophageal surgery in minimally invasive era

The widespread popularity of new surgical technologies such as laparoscopy, thoracoscopy and robotics has led many surgeons to treat esophageal diseases with these methods. The expected benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) mainly include reductions of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pain and better cosmetic results. All of these benefits could potentially be of great interest when dealing with the esophagus due to the potentially severe complications that can occur after conventional surgery. Moreover, robotic platforms are expected to reduce many of the difficulties encountered during advanced laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures such as anastomotic reconstructions, accurate lymphadenectomies, and vascular sutures. Almost all esophageal diseases are approachable in a minimally invasive way, including diverticula, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, achalasia, perforations and cancer. Nevertheless, while the limits of MIS for benign esophageal diseases are mainly technical issues and costs, oncologic outcomes remain the cornerstone of any procedure to cure malignancies, for which the long-term results are critical. Furthermore, many of the minimally invasive esophageal operations should be compared to pharmacologic interventions and advanced pure endoscopic procedures; such a comparison requires a difficult literature analysis and leads to some confounding results of clinical trials. This review aims to examine the evidence for the use of MIS in both malignancies and more common benign disease of the esophagus, with a particular emphasis on future developments and ongoing areas of research.

Pulsion Diverticulum of the Oesophagus: More than just an Out Pouch

Oesophageal diverticulum is divided into two types based on the aetiology: the pulsion and the traction diverticula. Pulsion diverticulum occurs due to increased intraluminal pressure. This can be of three types based on the location along the oesophagus: the Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), the mid-oesophageal diverticulum (MD) and the epiphrenic diverticulum (ED). A PubMed search was conducted for the words 'pulsion', 'diverticulum' and 'oesophagus' for all studies published from January 1980 to March 2013 in the English language. A total of 31 studies were identified, and out of which, five were not included in the review. The pulsion diverticulum of the oesophagus is an uncommon disorder. Its aetiology is related to the motility disorders of the oesophagus. Patients usually present with chest-related symptoms or oesophageal symptoms, which are related to the underlying motility disorder. Evaluation includes barium studies, gastrointestinal endoscopy, CT scan and oesophageal manometry. Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic and large diverticula, although the outcome in asymptomatic patients is unknown. The surgical options include diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy with an adequate myotomy. Most patients with ZD are now treated by using endoscopic techniques, although no randomised trial has shown its superiority over the open technique. Minimally invasive surgery has also been used for patients with MD and ED. Although isolated case series has shown good improvement in symptoms and reduction in mortality with minimally invasive techniques in patients with ED, its role in thoracic oesophageal diverticulum is debated.

Zenker's Diverticulum

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is an outpouching of tissue through the Killian triangle that is believed to be caused by dysfunction of the cricopharyngeal muscle. ZD is a relatively uncommon disorder occurring in the elderly. The predominant symptom of ZD is dysphagia, and the most serious consequence is pulmonary aspiration. Videofluoroscopy confirms the diagnosis. Therapy of symptomatic ZD has evolved from an open surgical approach to less invasive transoral endoscopic techniques. Transoral endoscopic therapy using rigid instruments is performed primarily by otorhinolaryngologists, whereas transoral therapy using flexible endoscopes is performed by surgical endoscopists and gastroenterologists. The common goal of all modalities is severing of the septum between the esophageal lumen and the diverticulum containing the cricopharyngeal muscle. Although flexible endoscopic therapy was described nearly 20 years ago, it has experienced a recent resurgence paralleling the advancements of therapeutic endoscopy in other areas, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection. Direct head-to-head comparisons of rigid and flexible endoscopic therapy are lacking, and each approach has variations in techniques as well as advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we review the pathophysiology and management of patients with ZD with an emphasis on flexible endoscopic therapy.

Flexible endoscopic and surgical management of Zenker's diverticulum

Zenker's diverticulum is an outpouching of the mucosa through the Killian's triangle. The etiology of Zenker's diverticulum is not well understood. It is thought to be due to the incoordination or incomplete relaxation of the cricopharyngeal muscle. Most patients are men who present with symptoms of dysphagia between the seventh and eighth decades of life. The diagnosis is made with a dynamic contrast swallowing study. Treatment options include open surgical diverticulectomy and diverticulopexy with myotomy or myotomy alone using flexible or rigid endoscopes. Rigid endoscopic treatment is currently the preferred initial choice for Zenker's diverticulum of any size. The flexible endoscopic technique is used when there is a high risk of general anesthesia, or neck extension is contraindicated. Some centers use flexible endoscopy as the initial treatment option. Due to a lack of prospective studies, the treatment choice should be tailored to the individual patient and local expertise.

Divertículo de Zenker: tratamento endoscópico versus cirúrgico

OBJETIVO: Revisar a evidência da segurança e efetividade dos tratamentos endoscópico e cirúrgico do divertículo de Zenker. MÉTODOS: pesquisa no MEDLINE, LILACS e SciELO por "Zenker's diverticulum or pharyngoesophageal diverticulum", e seleção de estudos para avaliação da qualidade e extração dos dados para uma metanálise. RESULTADOS: a pesquisa não localizou nenhum ensaio clínico randomizado. Encontramos cinco estudos comparativos não randomizados com grupo controle, com um total de 630 pacientes, 339 no braço endoscópico e 291 no cirúrgico. Os valores para segurança foram uma mortalidade de 0,29% e morbidade 7% para o tratamento endoscópico, e mortalidade 0,34% e morbidade 5% para o tratamento cirúrgico. O valor para efetividade foi 84% e 85%, respectivamente. O efeito das abordagens endoscópica e cirúrgica para o tratamento do divertículo de Zenker foi comparável, a odds ratio para morbidade foi 1,24 (0,56-2,74), e a odds ratio para o sucesso foi 0,66 (0,41-1,05). CONCLUSÃO: os estudos sobre o tratamento do divertículo de Zenker têm baixo nível de evidência e não são capazes de definir qual o melhor tratamento em termos de segurança e efetividade.

Flexible endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcome of patients undergoing flexible endoscopic therapy for symptomatic Zenker diverticulum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of 22 consecutive patients who underwent flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy using needle-knife electrocautery performed by a single endoscopist from March 2006 through January 2010.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients with symptomatic Zenker diverticulum, 13 were men and 9 were women (median age, 84.5 years). Moderate sedation was used in all but 3 (14%) of the patients. Postprocedural free air occurred in 6 patients (27%) and resolved uneventfully in all. Another patient developed a neck abscess 1 week after endoscopic treatment, which was surgically drained. All procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, although 8 patients (36%) required subsequent hospitalization. The mean (SD) length of stay in the hospital was 2.9 (1.64) days. All patients had initial symptomatic improvement, and 18 (82%) maintained improvement at a mean (SD) follow-up of 12.7 (9.2) months.

CONCLUSION

Flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy is an effective treatment of symptomatic Zenker diverticulum, with low recurrence rates and with the benefit of no general anesthesia and hospitalization in most cases. Esophageal perforation is the most common procedural complication.

Endoscopic Carbon Dioxide Laser Zenker's Diverticulotomy Revisited

Objectives:

We assessed the efficacy of endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy with the carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and Acuspot and compared it with the historical results of using a CO2 laser without Acuspot and electrocautery diverticulotomy.

Methods:

Between 1976 and 2005, a total of 229 endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomies in 189 patients were performed in our institution. Since 1995, micro-endoscopic diverticulotomy with the CO2 laser and Acuspot (MEDCO2A) has been performed in 61 cases. Between 1984 and 1995, micro-endoscopic diverticulotomy with the CO2 laser (MEDCO2) was performed in 113 cases. Before 1984, endoscopic diverticulotomy with electrocautery (EDE) was performed in 55 cases. All patients had radiologically proven Zenker's diverticula. We recorded preoperative and postoperative complaints of dysphagia, the frequency of recurrence in long-term follow-up, postoperative tube feeding, non-oral intake, days of admission, and complications.

Results:

After operation, dysphagia was absent in 84.6% of MEDCO2A cases, 78.4% of MEDCO2 cases, and 72.0% of EDE cases. Repeat surgery was required in 13.0% of MEDCO2A cases, 19.6% of MEDCO2 cases, and 24.3% of EDE cases. Five patients developed mediastinitis (2 MEDCO2 cases and 3 EDE cases); none died as a consequence. In 1 patient, squamous cell carcinoma was found in the diverticulum.

Conclusions:

The technological improvement of the CO2 laser with Acuspot has further increased the efficacy of its use over that of methods previously used in our institution. The results and complications rate are comparable to those reported for endoscopic stapler diverticulotomy in the literature.

Iatrogenic esophageal submucosal dissection after attempted diagnostic gastroscopy (with videos)

Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is generally a very safe procedure. We report the first case of iatrogenic esophageal submucosal dissection after an attempted diagnostic gastroscopy in a patient with a small previously undiagnosed Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). After EGD, she developed severe dysphagia with the inability to swallow solids, liquids, and even her own saliva. On barium swallow study, there was a column of contrast below the upper esophageal sphincter, and this was misdiagnosed as a large ZD by the radiologist. The resultant stricture was successfully managed with endoscopic balloon dilatation under fluoroscopy with wire-guided cannulation. The ZD was treated with flexible endoscopic clip-assisted diverticulotomy. Iatrogenic submucosal dissection is a unique complication of upper endoscopy. Endoscopists, otolaryngologists, radiologists, and cardiothoracic surgeons should be aware of this condition and prepare to manage it appropriately. If the patient is stable and the possibility of perforation is small, conservative and supportive care can be tried first. A surgical gastrostomy tube can be placed for enteral feeding. In patients with ZD, ZD recognition and gentle manipulation is strongly recommended during esophageal intubation.