Is patient-perceived severity of a geriatric condition related to better quality of care?

Potential Factors Associated with Healthcare Utilization for Balance Problems in Community-Dwelling Adults within the United States: A Narrative Review

Falls are the leading cause of mortality and chronic disability in elderly adults. There are effective fall prevention interventions available. But only a fraction of the individuals with balance/dizziness problems are seeking timely help from the healthcare system. Current literature confirms the underutilization of healthcare services for the management of balance problems in adults, especially older adults. This review article explores factors associated with healthcare utilization as guided by the Andersen Healthcare Utilization Model, a framework frequently used to explore the factors leading to the use of health services. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, and comorbidities have been identified as some of the potential predisposing factors; socioeconomic status, health insurance, and access to primary care are the enabling and disabling factors; and severity of balance problem, perceived illness, and its impact on daily activities are the factors affecting need for care associated with healthcare utilization for balance or dizziness problems. Knowledge about these barriers can help direct efforts towards improved screening of vulnerable individuals, better access to care, and education regarding effective fall prevention interventions for those who are at risk for underutilization. This can aid in timely identification and management of balance problems, thereby reducing the incidence of falls.

Falling Down on the Job: Evaluation and Treatment of Fall Risk Among Older Adults With Upper Extremity Fragility Fractures

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend fall risk assessment and intervention for older adults who sustain a fall-related injury to prevent future injury and mobility decline.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe how often Medicare beneficiaries with upper extremity fracture receive evaluation and treatment for fall risk.

DESIGN

Observational cohort.

METHODS

Participants were fee-for-service beneficiaries age 66 to 99 treated as outpatients for proximal humerus or distal radius/ulna ("wrist") fragility fractures. -Participants were studied using Carrier and Outpatient Hospital files. The proportion of patients evaluated or treated for fall risk up to 6 months after proximal humerus or wrist fracture from 2007-2009 was examined based on evaluation, treatment, and diagnosis codes. Time to evaluation and number of treatment sessions were calculated. Logistic regression was used to analyze patient characteristics that predicted receiving evaluation or treatment. Narrow (gait training) and broad (gait training or therapeutic exercise) definitions of service were used.

RESULTS

There were 309,947 beneficiaries who sustained proximal humerus (32%) or wrist fracture (68%); 10.7% received evaluation or treatment for fall risk or gait issues (humerus: 14.2%; wrist: 9.0%). Using the broader definition, the percentage increased to 18.5% (humerus: 23.4%; wrist: 16.3%). Factors associated with higher likelihood of services after fracture were: evaluation or treatment for falls or gait prior to fracture, more comorbidities, prior nursing home stay, older age, humerus fracture (vs wrist), female sex, and white race.

LIMITATIONS

Claims analysis may underestimate physician and physical therapist fall assessments, but it is not likely to qualitatively change the results.

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion of older adults with upper extremity fracture received fall risk assessment and treatment. Providers and health systems must advance efforts to provide timely evidence-based management of fall risk in this population.

When comorbidity, aging, and complexity of primary care meet: development and validation of the Geriatric CompleXity of Care Index

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate the Geriatric CompleXity of Care Index (GXI), a comorbidity index of medical, geriatric, and psychosocial conditions that addresses disease severity and intensity of ambulatory care for older adults with chronic conditions.

DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT phase: variable selection and rating by clinician panel. VALIDATION phase: medical record review and secondary data analysis.

SETTING

Assessing the Care of Vulnerable Elders-2 study.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred forty-four older (≥75) individuals receiving ambulatory care.

MEASURES

DEVELOPMENT

32 conditions categorized according to severity, resulting in 117 GXI variables. A panel of clinicians rated each GXI variable with respect to the added difficulty of providing primary care for an individual with that condition.

VALIDATION

Modified versions of previously validated comorbidity measures (simple count, Charlson, Medicare Hierarchical Condition Category), longitudinal clinical outcomes (functional decline, survival), intensity of ambulatory care (primary, specialty care visits, polypharmacy, number of eligible quality indicators (NQI)) over 1 year of care.

RESULTS

The most-morbid individuals (according to quintiles of GXI) had more visits (7.0 vs 3.7 primary care, 6.2 vs 2.4 specialist), polypharmacy (14.3% vs 0% had ≥14 medications), and greater NQI (33 vs 25) than the least-morbid individuals. Of the four comorbidity measures, the GXI was the strongest predictor of primary care visits, polypharmacy, and NQI (P < .001, controlling for age, sex, function-based vulnerability).

CONCLUSION

Older adults with complex care needs, as measured by the GXI, have healthcare needs above what previously employed comorbidity measures captured. Healthcare systems could use the GXI to identify the most complex elderly adults and appropriately reimburse primary providers caring for older adults with the most complex care needs for providing additional visits and coordination of care.