Total lesion glycolysis as the best 18F-FDG PET/CT parameter in differentiating intermediate–high risk adrenal incidentaloma

Update in the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a diverse group of neoplasms that can occur in various areas throughout the body. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) most often arise in the gastrointestinal tract, termed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Although GEP-NETs are still uncommon, their incidence and prevalence have been steadily increasing over the past decades. The primary treatment for GEP-NETs is surgery, which offers the best chance for a cure. However, because GEP-NETs are often slow-growing and do not cause symptoms until they have spread widely, curative surgery is not always an option. Significant advances have been made in systemic and locoregional treatment options in recent years, including peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy with α and β emitters, somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and targeted molecular therapies.

The Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Characterizing Adrenal Tumors

CONTEXT

Imaging plays an important role in the characterization of adrenal tumors, but findings might be inconclusive. The clinical question is whether 18F fluodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is of diagnostic value in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was aimed at the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal tumors discovered either as adrenal incidentaloma or during staging or follow-up of oncologic patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to select articles between 2000 and 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies describing the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in adult patients with an adrenal tumor. Exclusion criteria were 10 or fewer participants, insufficient data on histopathology, clinical follow-up, or PET results. After screening of title and abstract by 2 independent reviewers, 79 studies were retrieved, of which 17 studies met the selection criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction using a protocol and quality assessment according to QUADAS-2 was performed independently by at least 2 authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A bivariate random-effects model was applied using R (version 3.6.2.). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying malignant adrenal tumors was 87.3% (95% CI, 82.5%-90.9%) and 84.7% (95% CI, 79.3%-88.9%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 9.20 (95% CI, 5.27-16.08; P < .01). Major sources of heterogeneity (I2, 57.1% [95% CI, 27.5%-74.6%]) were in population characteristics, reference standard, and interpretation criteria of imaging results.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG PET/CT had good diagnostic accuracy for characterization of adrenal tumors. The literature, however, is limited, in particular regarding adrenal incidentalomas. Large prospective studies in well-defined patient populations with application of validated cutoff values are needed.

Focal Nasopharyngeal Activity Detected on [18F]FDG PET/CT: Clinical Implications and Comparison of Metabolic Parameters for Prediction of Malignancy

Purpose

We aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical significance of incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake on [18F]FDG PET/CT and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of various metabolic parameters to differentiate between benign and malignant nasopharyngeal lesions.

Methods

A total of 63 consecutive patients with incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake on [18F]FDG PET/CT and subsequent nasopharyngeal biopsy were retrospectively enrolled. In addition, baseline pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET/CT images of 59 patients with newly diagnosed pathologically proven nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), nasopharynx-to-palatine tonsil ratio (NPR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the nasopharyngeal lesions were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the metabolic parameters.

Results

Incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake in two patients (3.2%, 2/63) was pathologically confirmed to be NPC. All the metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, NPR, MTV, and TLG) demonstrated significantly greater values in patients with NPC compared with patients with benign or physiological nasopharyngeal uptake (p < 0.001). Among the metabolic parameters, NPR demonstrated the greatest area under the curve of 0.992 (p < 0.05), with a sensitivity of 96.7% and a specificity of 93.4% when a cut-off of 1.1 was used. Similar results were seen in nasopharyngeal lesions without morphological abnormality.

Conclusion

NPC is an infrequent but important cause of incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake on [18F]FDG PET/CT. Metabolic parameters were shown to be useful to differentiate between benign and malignant nasopharyngeal lesions, and NPR showed the best diagnostic performance.

Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of adrenal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the role of the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F fluodeoxyglucose PET (¹⁸F-FDG PET) or PET/CT for characterization of adrenal lesions through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database, from the earliest available date of indexing through 30 April 2017, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for characterization of adrenal lesions. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 29 studies (2421 patients), the pooled sensitivity for ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT was 0.91 [95% CI (0.88-0.94)] with heterogeneity (χ² = 141.8, p = 0.00) and a pooled specificity of 0.91 [95% CI (0.87-0.93)] with heterogeneity (χ² = 113.7, p = 0.00). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 9.9 [95% CI (7.1-13.7)] and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.09 [95% CI (0.07-0.13)]. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 105 [95% CI (63-176)]. In metaregression analysis, study design, publication year, study location (western vs others), interpretation criteria of PET or PET/CT images, quantification of PET or PET/CT [SUV_max (maximum standardized uptake value) vs SUV (standardized uptake value) ratio], patient group, and analysis method (patient-based vs lesion-based) were the sources of the study heterogeneity. However, in multivariate metaregression, no definite variable was the source of the study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the characterization of adrenal masses. At present, the literature regarding the use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of adrenal masses remains still limited; thus, further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT characterization of adrenal masses. Advances in knowledge: ¹⁸F- FDG PET or PET/CT showed good sensitivity and specificity for the characterization of adrenal masses and could provide additional information for that purpose.

Texture analysis of FDG PET/CT for differentiating between FDG-avid benign and metastatic adrenal tumors: efficacy of combining SUV and texture parameters

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the SUV-related and texture parameters individually and in combination for differentiating between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid benign and metastatic adrenal tumors with PET/CT.

METHODS

Thirteen benign adrenal tumors (BATs) and 22 metastatic adrenal tumors (MATs) with a metabolic tumor volume (MTV) > 10.0 cm³ and SUV ≥ 2.5 were included. SUVmax, MTV, total lesion glycolysis, and four textural parameters [entropy, homogeneity, intensity variability (IV), and size-zone variability] were obtained. These parameters were compared between BATs and MATs using Mann-Whitney U test, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) values derived from the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The diagnostic value of combining SUV and texture parameters was examined using a scoring system.

RESULTS

MATs showed significantly higher SUV_max (p = 0.004), entropy (p = 0.013), IV (p = 0.006), and lower homogeneity (p = 0.019) than BATs. The accuracies for diagnosing MATs were 82.9, 82.9, 85.7, and 71.4% for SUV_max, entropy, IV, and homogeneity, respectively. No significant differences in AUC were found among these parameters (p > 0.05 each). When each parameter was scored as 0 (negative for malignancy) and 1 (positive for malignancy) according to each threshold criterion and the four parameter summed scores 0, 1, and 2 were defined as benignity and 3 and 4 as malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity and accuracy to predict MATs were 100% (22/22), 84.6% (11/13), and 94.3% (33/35), respectively, with 0.97 of the AUC.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of SUV_max and texture parameters has a potential to significantly increase the diagnostic performance to differentiate between large FDG-avid BATs and MATs.

Current generation time-of-flight (18)F-FDG PET/CT provides higher SUVs for normal adrenal glands, while maintaining an accurate characterization of benign and malignant glands

OBJECTIVE

Modern PET/CT scanners have significantly improved detectors and fast time-of-flight (TOF) performance and this may improve clinical performance. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of a current generation TOF PET/CT scanner on standardized uptake values (SUV), lesion-background contrast and characterization of the adrenal glands in patients with suspected lung cancer, in comparison with literature data and commonly used SUV cut-off levels.

METHODS

We included 149 adrenal glands from 88 patients with suspected lung cancer, who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT. We measured the SUVmax in the adrenal gland and compared this with liver SUVmean to calculate the adrenal-to-liver ratio (AL ratio). Results were compared with literature derived with older scanners, with SUVmax values of 1.0 and 1.8 for normal glands [1, 2]. Final diagnosis was based on histological proof or follow-up imaging. We proposed cut-off values for optimal separation of benign from malignant glands.

RESULTS

In 127 benign and 22 malignant adrenal glands, SUVmax values were 2.3 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD) and 7.8 ± 3.2 respectively (p < 0.01). Corresponding AL ratios were 1.0 ± 0.3 and 3.5 ± 1.4 respectively (p < 0.01). With a SUVmax cut-off value of 3.7, 96% sensitivity and 96% specificity was reached. An AL ratio cut-off value of 1.8 resulted in 91% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The ability of both SUVmax and AL ratio to separate benign from malignant glands was similar (AUC 0.989 vs. 0.993, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with literature based on the previous generation of PET scanners, current generation TOF (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging provides higher SUVs for benign adrenal glands, while it maintains a highly accurate distinction between benign and malignant glands. Clinical implementation of current generation TOF PET/CT requires not only the use of higher cut-off levels but also visual adaptation by PET readers.

Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity and Quantitative Indices Between (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and (111)In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT in Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Preliminary Report

PURPOSE

In-pentetreotide has been used for neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Recently, (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET has been used with the advantage of high image quality. In this study, we compared quantitative indices between (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT and (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.

METHODS

Thirteen patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively recruited. Patients underwent (111)In-pentetreotide scans with SPECT/CT and (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT before treatment. The number and location of lesions were analyzed on both imaging techniques to compare lesion detectability. Additionally, the maximal uptake count of each lesion and mean uptake count of the lungs were measured on both imagings, and target-to-normal lung ratios (TNR) were calculated as quantitative indices.

RESULTS

Among 13 patients, 10 exhibited lesions with increased uptake on (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT and/or (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Scans with SPECT/CT detected 19 lesions, all of which were also detected on PET/CT. Moreover, 16 additional lesions were detected on PET/CT (6 in the liver, 9 in the pancreas and 1 in the spleen). PET/CT exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity than SPECT/CT (100 % vs. 54 %, P < 0.001). TNR was significantly higher on PET/CT than on SPECT/CT (99.9 ± 84.3 vs. 71.1 ± 114.9, P < 0.001) in spite of a significant correlation (r = 0.692, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT has a higher diagnostic sensitivity than (111)In-pentetreotide scans with SPECT/CT. The TNR on PET/CT is higher than that of SPECT/CT, which also suggests the higher sensitivity of PET/CT. (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT should be used carefully if it is used instead of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.