Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer

Diagnostic Value of FDG PET/CT in Surveillance after Curative Resection of Breast Cancer

With increasing incidence of breast cancer and improvement in treatment, the concern about surveillance management also has increased. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of routine surveillance FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. The diagnostic performance of surveillance PET/CT was analyzed regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy was defined as the ability to differentiate recurrence and no-disease correctly and the proportion of true results, either true positive or true negative, in the population. Findings from pathologic examination; other imaging modalities such as CT, MRI and bone scan; or clinical follow-up were used as the reference standard. In this study of 1681 consecutive patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery, surveillance fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance in the detection of clinically unexpected recurrent breast cancer or other malignancy, with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98.5%, positive predictive value of 70.5%, negative predictive value of 100% and accuracy of 98.5%. In conclusion, surveillance fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance in the detection of clinically unexpected recurrent breast cancer after curative surgery.

Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage includes 3 posttherapy ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans per patient and per tumor type. Any additional follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans will be reimbursed at the discretion of a local Medicare administrator, if deemed medically necessary. This study aimed to investigate common clinical indications for performing a fourth or additional follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans that could affect the management of patients. Methods: This was a retrospective institutional review of 433 oncology patients (203 men; mean age, 55 y), including a total of 1,659 fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans after completion of primary treatment. Twelve indications for performing a fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scan were determined, and the impact of each of the 12 indications on patients' management was evaluated. Results: The primary tumors were breast cancer (92 patients, 426 scans), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (77 patients, 208 scans), Hodgkin disease (41 patients, 182 scans), colorectal cancer (70 patients, 286 scans), melanoma (69 patients, 271 scans), and lung cancer (84 patients, 286 scans). The indications were categorized in 4 groups: PET/CT for diagnosis of tumor recurrence (303/1,659, 18.3%), PET/CT before starting therapy for tumor recurrence (64/1,659, 3.9%), PET/CT to assess therapy response for tumor recurrence (507/1,659, 30.6%), and follow-up PET/CT after completion of treatment for tumor recurrence (785/1,659, 47.3%). Overall, fourth and subsequent follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans resulted in change in management in 31.6% of the scans (356 of 1,128) when the scans were obtained for medical necessities (indications 1-11), and in 5.6% of the scans (30/531) when the scans were obtained without any medical necessity (indication 12). Conclusion: The fourth and subsequent PET/CT scans obtained after completion of primary treatment led to a change in management in 31.6% of the scans when acquired for appropriate clinical reasons. Performing follow-up PET/CT without appropriate medical reason had a low impact on patients' management and should be avoided.