Interplay between right ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Role of Multimodality Imaging

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases, with a generally unfavorable long-term prognosis. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a useful therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic heart failure, currently recommended by all available guidelines, with outstanding benefits, especially in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Still, in spite of clear indications based on identifying a dyssynchronous pattern on the electrocardiogram (ECG,) a great proportion of patients are non-responders. The idea that multimodality cardiac imaging can play a role in refining the selection criteria and the implant technique and help with subsequent system optimization is promising. In this regard, predictors of CRT response, such as apical rocking and septal flash have been identified. Promising new data come from studies using cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear imaging for showcasing myocardial dyssynchrony. Still, to date, no single imaging predictor has been included in the guidelines, probably due to lack of validation in large, multicenter cohorts. This review provides an up-to-date synthesis of the latest evidence of CRT use in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and highlights the potential additional value of multimodality imaging for improving CRT response in this population. By incorporating all these findings into our clinical practice, we can aim toward obtaining a higher proportion of responders and improve the success rate of CRT.

Equilibrium radionuclide angiography compared with tissue doppler imaging for detection of right ventricular dyssynchrony and prediction of acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare tissue doppler imaging (TDI) and equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) for detection of right ventricular (RV) dyssynchrony and prediction of the acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

METHODS

This study was approved by the local ethics committee of Huai'an First People's Hospital. Patient consent was not provided due to the use of completely anonymous images from which the individual could not be identified in this study. Thirty-three patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent both TDI and ERNA before and within 48 hour after CRT implantation. RV dyssynchrony was measured with TDI using the difference in time to peak systolic velocity between the RV free wall and ventricular septum (RV-T). With ERNA, the standard of RV mean phase angle and RV phase standard deviation (RVmPA% and RVPSD%) were assessed.

RESULTS

Moderate positive correlations were observed among baseline RVmPA%, RVPSD% and RV-T (r = 0.689 and 0.716, P < .001). Twenty patients (61%) with a reduction of at least 15% in LV end-systolic volume were categorized as acute responders after CRT. Responders showed significant reduction in RVmPA% and RVPSD% after CRT (53.60 ± 4.15% to 43.95 ± 6.88% and 14.00 ± 2.41% to 10.40 ± 1.67%, P < .05), whereas RV-T remained unchanged (50.10 ± 10.28 ms to 49.25 ± 13.64ms, NS). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the cut-off value of RV-T was 48.5ms, yielding 65% sensitivity and 77% specificity to predict acute respond to CRT. The cut-off value of RVmPA% was 49.5%, yielding 85% sensitivity and 85% specificity and the cut-off value of RVPSD% was 11.5%, yielding 85% sensitivity and 92% specificity.

CONCLUSION

ERNA might be an appropriate alternative to TDI for assessment of RV dyssynchrony. Either RVmPA% or RVPSD% was highly predictive for acute response to CRT.