Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the staging, restaging, monitoring of response to therapy and surveillance of uterine leiomyosarcomas

New imaging modalities to distinguish rare uterine mesenchymal cancers from benign uterine lesions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterine sarcomas are rare and are often challenging to differentiate on imaging from benign mimics, such as leiomyoma. As functional MRI techniques have improved and new adjuncts, such as machine learning and texture analysis, are now being investigated, it is helpful to be aware of the current literature on imaging features that may sometimes allow for preoperative distinction.

RECENT FINDINGS

MRI, with both conventional and functional imaging, is the modality of choice for evaluating uterine mesenchymal tumors, especially in differentiating uterine leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma through validated diagnostic algorithms. MRI is sometimes helpful in differentiating high-grade stromal sarcoma from low-grade stromal sarcoma or differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma from endometrial carcinoma. However, imaging remains nonspecific for evaluating rarer neoplasms, such as uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor or perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, primarily because of the small number and power of relevant studies.

SUMMARY

Through advances in MRI techniques and novel investigational imaging adjuncts, such as machine learning and texture analysis, imaging differentiation of malignant from benign uterine mesenchymal tumors has improved and could help reduce morbidity relating to misdiagnosis or diagnostic delays.

Italian consensus conference on management of uterine sarcomas on behalf of S.I.G.O. (Societa' italiana di Ginecologia E Ostetricia)

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcomas are very rare tumours with different histotypes, molecular features and clinical outcomes; therefore, it is difficult to carry out prospective clinical trials, and this often results in heterogeneous management of patients in the clinical practice.

AIM

We planned to set up an Italian consensus conference on these diseases in order to provide recommendations on treatments and quality of care in our country.

RESULTS

Early-stage uterine sarcomas are managed by hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy according to menopausal status and histology; lymphadenectomy is not indicated in patients without bulky nodes, and morcellation must be avoided. The postoperative management is represented by observation, even though chemotherapy can be considered in some high-risk patients. In early-stage low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth, hormonal adjuvant treatment can be offered based on hormone receptor expression. In selected cases, external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy can be considered to increase local control only. Patients with advanced disease involving the abdomen can be offered primary chemotherapy (or hormonal therapy in the case of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcoma without sarcomatous overgrowth), even if potentially resectable in the absence of residual disease in order to test the chemosensitivity (or hormonosensitivity); debulking surgery can be considered in patients with clinical and radiological response. Chemotherapy is based on anthracyclines ± ifosfamide or dacarbazine. Palliative radiotherapy can be offered for symptom control, and stereotactic radiotherapy can be used for up to five isolated metastatic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of uterine sarcoma should be centralised at referral centres and managed in a multidisciplinary setting.

How to differentiate uterine leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma with imaging

Uterine leiomyomas, the most frequent benign myomatous tumors of the uterus, often cannot be distinguished from malignant uterine leiomyosarcomas using clinical criteria. Furthermore, imaging differentiation between both entities is frequently challenging due to their potential overlapping features. Because a suspected leiomyoma is often managed conservatively or with minimally invasive treatments, the misdiagnosis of leiomyosarcoma for a benign leiomyoma could potentially result in significant treatment delays, therefore increasing morbidity and mortality. In this review, we provide an overview of the differences between leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma, mainly focusing on imaging characteristics, but also briefly touching upon their demographic, histopathological and clinical differences. The main indications and limitations of available cross-sectional imaging techniques are discussed, including ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. A particular emphasis is placed on the review of specific MRI features that may allow distinction between leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas according to the most recent evidence in the literature. The potential contribution of texture analysis is also discussed. In order to help guide-imaging diagnosis, we provide an MRI-based diagnostic algorithm which takes into account morphological and functional features, both individually and in combination, in an attempt to optimize radiologic differentiation of leiomyomas from leiomyosarcomas.