2
|
Gemmell AJ, Brown CM, Ray S, Small A. Quantitative uptake in 99m Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC somatostatin receptor imaging - the effect of long-acting release somatostatin analogue therapy. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:944-952. [PMID: 37578312 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Withdrawal of long-acting release somatostatin analogue (LAR-SSA) treatment before somatostatin receptor imaging is based on empirical reasoning that it may block uptake at receptor sites. This study aims to quantify differences in uptake of 99m Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC between patients receiving LAR-SSA and those who were not. METHODS Quantification of 177 patients (55 on LAR-SSA) imaged with 99m Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC was performed, with analysis of pathological tissue and organs with physiological uptake using thresholded volumes of interest. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) and tumour/background (T/B) ratios were calculated and compared between the two patient groups. RESULTS SUVs were significantly lower for physiological organ uptake for patients on LAR-SSA (e.g. spleen: SUV max 13.3 ± 5.9 versus 33.9 ± 9.0, P < 0.001); there was no significant difference for sites of pathological uptake (e.g. nodal metastases: SUV max 19.2 ± 13.0 versus 17.4 ± 11.5, P = 0.552) apart from bone metastases (SUV max 14.1 ± 13.5 versus 7.7 ± 8.0, P = 0.017) where it was significantly higher. CONCLUSION LAR-SSA has an effect only on physiological organ uptake of 99m Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC, reducing uptake. It has no significant effect on pathological uptake for most sites of primary and metastatic disease. This should be taken into account if making quantitative measurements, calculating T/B ratios or assigning Krenning Scores. There is the potential for improved dosimetric results in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy by maintaining patients on LAR-SSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair J Gemmell
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gartnavel General Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
- Department of Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
- School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Colin M Brown
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gartnavel General Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
- Department of Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
| | - Surajit Ray
- School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alexander Small
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gartnavel General Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
- Department of Clinical Physics & Bioengineering, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu HF, Li Z, Chen K, Liu MQ, Ye Z, Chen XM, Zhang Y, Yu XJ, Xu XW, Ji SR. Multimodality imaging differentiation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and solid pseudopapillary tumors with a nomogram model: A large single-center study. Front Surg 2022; 9:970178. [PMID: 36277293 PMCID: PMC9583874 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.970178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are two of the most common pancreatic neoplasms with different treatment procedures. However, the broad heterogeneity of pNETs and SPTs in clinical manifestations and radiological features often confuse the presurgical discrimination in clinical practice, and the clinical and molecular differentiation of the two tumors remains elusive to date. We presume that a large and comprehensive study into the multimodality features of pNETs and SPTs is necessary for precise clinical management. Methods We collected and analyzed the clinicopathological information and multimodality features of nonfunctional pNET and SPT patients, for a total of 631 cases from 2006 to 2021. Univariate analysis of imaging features, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and nuclear medicine imaging, and clinical characteristics was performed, and CT features and clinical information were integrated to establish a nomogram model. Results We recruited 354 nonfunctional pNET and 277 SPT patients in our cohort. Regarding demographic information, pNET patients had a lower female percentage (55.4% vs. 72.9%), smaller tumor size (2.8 vs. 4.8 cm), and older age (53.4 vs. 35.3 years). In CT imaging and EUS, pNETs tended to appear as solid and homogenous lesions with strong enhancement intensity. Multifocal lesions, duct dilation, and lymph node (LN) enlargement were more likely to be observed in pNETs, while calcification was more common in SPT lesions. On positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, pNETs exhibited significant sensitivity to somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), with positive rates of 81.4% and 95% on 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, respectively, while SPTs were all negative on SRS. Multivariate analysis identifies tumor size, age, enhancement intensity, calcification, and LN enlargement as statistically significant variables. Conclusions Compared to SPT patients, pNET patients exhibit an older age and smaller tumor size. CT manifestations of strong intensity, LN enlargement, and no calcification could indicate a higher possibility of pNET. Meanwhile, the similarity in the immunohistochemical profile indicates that the two tumors could potentially develop from the same origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Feng Hu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Li
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ke Chen
- Department of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng-Qi Liu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zeng Ye
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue-min Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Xian-Jun Yu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Correspondence: Shun-Rong Ji Xian-Jun Yu Xiao-Wu Xu
| | - Xiao-Wu Xu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Correspondence: Shun-Rong Ji Xian-Jun Yu Xiao-Wu Xu
| | - Shun-Rong Ji
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China,Correspondence: Shun-Rong Ji Xian-Jun Yu Xiao-Wu Xu
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garcia-Torralba E, Spada F, Lim KHJ, Jacobs T, Barriuso J, Mansoor W, McNamara MG, Hubner RA, Manoharan P, Fazio N, Valle JW, Lamarca A. Knowns and unknowns of bone metastases in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 94:102168. [PMID: 33730627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to develop an evidence-based summary of current knowledge of bone metastases (BMs) in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), inform diagnosis and treatment and standardise management between institutions. METHODS PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and meeting proceedings were searched for eligible studies reporting data on patients with BMs and NENs of any grade of differentiation and site; poorly-differentiated large/small cell lung cancer were excluded. Data were extracted and analysed using STATA v.12. Meta-analysis of proportions for calculation of estimated pooled prevalence of BM and calculation of weighted pooled frequency and weighted pooled mean for other variables of interest was performed . RESULTS A total of 149 studies met the eligibility criteria. Pooled prevalence of BMs was 18.4% (95% CI 15.4-21.5). BMs were mainly metachronous with initial diagnosis of NEN (61.2%) and predominantly osteoblastic; around 61% were multifocal, with a predisposition in axial skeleton. PET/CT seemed to provide (together with MRI) the highest sensitivity and specificity for BM detection. Almost half of patients (46.4%) reported BM-related symptoms: pain (66%) and skeletal-related events (SREs, fracture/spinal cord compression) (26.2%; weightedweighted mean time-to-SRE 9.9 months). Management of BMs was multimodal [bisphosphonates and bone-modifying agents (45.2%), external beam radiotherapy (34.9%), surgery (14.8%)] and supported by little evidence. Overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis of BMs was long [weighted mean 50.9 months (95% CI 40.0-61.9)]. Patients with BMs had shorter OS [48.8 months (95% CI 37.9-59.6)] compared to patients without BMs [87.4 months (95% CI 74.9-100.0); p = 0.001]. Poor performance status and BM-related symptoms were also associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS BMs in patients with NENs remain underdiagnosed and undertreated. Recommendations for management of BMs derived from current knowledge are provided. Prospective studies to inform management are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmeralda Garcia-Torralba
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Francesca Spada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Kok Haw Jonathan Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Jacobs
- Medical Library, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Barriuso
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Was Mansoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mairéad G McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A Hubner
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Prakash Manoharan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan W Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|