Does Tc-99m ECD ictal brain SPECT have incremental value in localization of epileptogenic zone and predicting postoperative seizure freedom in cases with discordant video electroencephalogram and MRI findings?

SPECT postprocessing for epileptogenic focus localization: SISCOM versus ISAS

OBJECTIVE

Ictal SPECT can be used as an estimate for the epileptogenic zone in people with focal epilepsy. Subtraction of ictal and interictal SPECT scans reveals the area with significant ictal hyperperfusion. Some methods use a control database to also correct for physiological variance. This control database is ideally scanner specific, but it is not trivial to obtain such a database because of ethical issues. In this study, we used a publicly available control database to compare ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by SPM (ISAS) with the most commonly used subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI (SISCOM).

METHODS

Ictal and interictal SPECTs of 26 patients (age range: 7-50 years, 15 adults, 11 children) with focal drug resistant epilepsy in workup for epilepsy surgery were retrospectively analyzed using both SISCOM and ISAS. The control database for ISAS was obtained from the ISAS website. Two groups of blinded reviewers determined the location of ictal hyperperfusion in all datasets. Results were compared between subtraction algorithms and with the resected area (if available) or the suspected epileptogenic zone. The number of significant clusters and the locations of maximum hyperperfusion were compared between algorithms.

RESULTS

The location of ISAS and SISCOM hyperperfusion was the same in 14 patients (54%). ISAS localized in 6 patients where SISCOM did not. Compared to the resected area or suspected epileptogenic zone, SISCOM correctly localized in 55%, while ISAS did in 65% (not significantly different). ISAS shows significantly less clusters than SISCOM. The maximum hyperperfusion was in the reviewer's location in 65% for ISAS and 38% for SISCOM.

SIGNIFICANCE

ISAS using a publicly available control database gives comparable or better results than SISCOM. ISAS results are easier to interpret than SISCOM results. We show that ISAS is a reliable alternative for SISCOM, which could easily be implemented in epilepsy surgery clinics.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

We explored the effectiveness of ISAS as an alternative to the widely used SISCOM for assessing SPECT scans in epilepsy surgery candidates. Utilizing a publicly available control database, we compared the two methods in 26 patients. The results indicate that ISAS might offer increased accuracy and interpretability, making it a promising option, especially for centers without access to a specific control dataset.

The Legacy of the TTASAAN Report-Premature Conclusions and Forgotten Promises: A Review of Policy and Practice Part I

Brain perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans were initially developed in 1970's. A key radiopharmaceutical, hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO), was originally approved in 1988, but was unstable. As a result, the quality of SPECT images varied greatly based on technique until 1993, when a method of stabilizing HMPAO was developed. In addition, most SPECT perfusion studies pre-1996 were performed on single-head gamma cameras. In 1996, the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (TTASAAN) issued a report regarding the use of SPECT in the evaluation of neurological disorders. Although the TTASAAN report was published in January 1996, it was approved for publication in October 1994. Consequently, the reported brain SPECT studies relied upon to derive the conclusions of the TTASAAN report largely pre-date the introduction of stabilized HMPAO. While only 12% of the studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the TTASAAN report utilized stable tracers and multi-head cameras, 69 subsequent studies with more than 23,000 subjects describe the utility of perfusion SPECT scans in the evaluation of TBI. Similarly, dementia SPECT imaging has improved. Modern SPECT utilizing multi-headed gamma cameras and quantitative analysis has a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 89% for the diagnosis of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease-comparable to fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Advances also have occurred in seizure neuroimaging. Lastly, developments in SPECT imaging of neurotoxicity and neuropsychiatric disorders have been striking. At the 25-year anniversary of the publication of the TTASAAN report, it is time to re-examine the utility of perfusion SPECT brain imaging. Herein, we review studies cited by the TTASAAN report vs. current brain SPECT imaging research literature for the major indications addressed in the report, as well as for emerging indications. In Part II, we elaborate technical aspects of SPECT neuroimaging and discuss scan interpretation for the clinician.

Comparative contribution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in pre-operative localization for epilepsy surgery: A prospective blinded study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value and accuracy of ictal SPECT and inter-ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the site for surgery in persons with drug resistant epilepsy.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study. Patients expected to undergo epilepsy surgery were enrolled consecutively and the localization results from different imaging modalities were discussed in an epilepsy surgery meet. Odds ratio of good outcome (Engel I) were calculated in patients who underwent surgery in concordance with MEG and SPECT findings. Post-surgical seizure freedom lasting at least 36 months or more was considered the gold standard for determining the diagnostic output of SPECT and MEG.

RESULTS

MEG and SPECT were performed in 101 and 57 patients respectively. In 45 patients SPECT could not be done due to delay in injection or technical factors. The accuracy of MEG and SPECT in localizing the epileptogenic zone was found to be 74.26 % and 78.57 % respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for Engel I surgical outcome was reported as 2.43 and 5.0 for MEG and SPECT respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for MEG in whom SPECT was non-informative was found to be 6.57 [95 % CI 1.1, 39.24], although it was not significantly associated with good surgical outcome. MEG was useful in indicating sites for SEEG implantation.

CONCLUSION

SPECT was found to be non-informative for most patients, but reported better diagnostic output than MEG. MEG may be a useful alternative for patients in whom SPECT cannot be done or was non-localizing.