Patient arm position during quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography acquisition can affect image quality and quantitative accuracy: a phantom study

Evaluation of quantitative accuracy among different scatter corrections for quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging

Although scatter correction improves SPECT image contrast and thus image quality, the effects of quantitation accuracy under various conditions remain unclear. The present study aimed to empirically define the conditions for the optimal scatter correction of quantitative bone SPECT/CT images. Scatter correction was performed by applying dual and triple energy windows (DEW and TEW) with different sub-energy window widths, and effective scatter source estimation (ESSE) to CT-based scatter correction. Scattered radiation was corrected on images acquired using a triple line source (TLSP) phantom and an uniform cylinder phantom. The TLSP consisted of a line source containing 74.0 MBq of 99mTc in the middle, and a background component containing air, water or a K2HPO4 solution with a density equivalent to that of bone. The sum of all pixels in air, water and the K2HPO4 solution was measured on SPECT images. Scatter fraction (SF) and normalized mean square error (NMSE) based on counts from the air background as a reference were then calculated to assess quantitative errors due to scatter correction. The uniform cylinder phantom contained the same K2HPO4 solution and 222.0 MBq of 99mTc. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated from the count profile of this phantom to assess the uniformity of SPECT images across scatter correction under various conditions. Both SF and NMSE in SPECT images of phantoms containing water in the background were lower at a TEW sub-window of 3% (TEW3%), than in other scatter corrections, whereas those in K2HPO4 were lower at a DEW sub-window of 20% (DEW20%). Larger DEW and smaller TEW sub-energy windows allowed more effective correction. The CV of the uniform cylinder phantom, DEW20%, was inferior to all other tested scatter corrections. The quantitative accuracy of bone SPECT images substantially differed according to the method of scatter correction. The optimal scatter correction for quantitative bone SPECT was DEW20% (k = 1), but at the cost of slightly decreased image uniformity.

Impact of patient body habitus on image quality and quantitative value in bone SPECT/CT

OBJECTIVE

The first edition of guidelines for standardization of bone single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging was published in 2017, and the optimization and standardization are widely promoted. To the purpose, clarification of the factors related to image quality and quantitative values and their influence are required. The present study aimed to clarify and optimize the influence of patient body habitus on image quality and quantitative values in bone SPECT/CT.

METHODS

National Electrical Manufacturers Association body phantom (S-size) and custom-made large body phantoms (M-size and L-size) that simulate the abdomens of Japanese patients weighing 60, 80, and 100 kg, were used. Each phantom was filled with ^99mTc-solutions of 108  and 18 kBq/mL for the hot spheres and background, respectively. Dynamic SPECT acquisition was performed for 6000 s (150 s /rotation × 40 rotation). The data were divided into six projection data and reconstructed each acquisition time (150, 300, 450, 600, 750, 900 s, and single projection 6000 s). Image quality was evaluated for contrast (Q_{H, 17 mm}), background noise (N_{B, 17 mm}), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_{max, 17 mm}), and visual assessment for a 17 mm hot sphere.

RESULTS

Image quality in the 300 s acquisition showed that values of Q_{H, 17 mm}, CNR, and SUV_{max, 17 mm} decreased (-16.7%, -11.8%, and -11.3%) for M-size and (-28.2%, -30.1%, and -21.7%) for L-size compared with S-size, respectively. No significant difference was observed in N_{B, 17 mm} values. M-size and L-size required 1.2 and 2.3 times longer acquisition, to achieve same CNR as S-size. In visual assessment, 17 mm hot sphere could not be detected only in the L-size. When the Japanese bone SPECT guidelines criteria were applied in 600 s, the sphere could be detected between all phantoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient body habitus significantly affects image quality and decreases the quantitative value in bone SPECT/CT. For the optimization, extend acquisition time according to the patient body habitus is effective for image quality. And for the standardization, it is important to achieve imaging conditions that meet the Japanese bone SPECT guidelines criteria to ensure adequate detectability.