Optimization of cross-calibration factor for quantitative bone SPECT without attenuation and scatter correction in the lumbar spine: head-to-head comparison with attenuation and scatter correction

Detectability of cold tumors by xSPECT bone technology compared with hot tumors: a supine phantom study

Detecting cold as well as hot tumors is vital for interpreting bone tumors on single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images. This study aimed to visually and quantitatively demonstrate the detectability of cold tumors using xSPECT technology compared with that of hot tumors in the phantom study. Five tumors of different sizes and normal bone contained a mixture of 99mTc and K2HPO4 in a spine phantom. We acquired SPECT data using an xSPECT protocol and transverse images were reconstructed using xSPECT Bone (xB) and xSPECT Quant (xQ). Mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) in volumes of interest (VOI) were calculated. Recovery coefficients (RCs) for each tumor site were calculated with reference to radioactive concentrations. The SUVmeans of the whole vertebral body for hot tumor bone image in cortical bone phantom reconstructed by with xB and xQ were 5.77 and 4.86 respectively. The SUVmean of xB was similar to the true value. The SUVmeans for xB and xQ reconstructed images of cold tumors were both approximately 0.16. The RC of the cold tumor on xQ images increased as the tumor diameter decreased, whereas that of xB remained almost constant regardless of the tumor diameter. In conclusion, the quantitative accuracy of detecting hot and cold tumors was higher in the xB image than in the xQ image. Moreover, the visual detectability of cold tumors was also excellent in xB images.

Comparison of the detectability of hot lesions on bone SPECT using six state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter phantom study to optimize reconstruction parameters

Single-photon emission computed tomography with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT/CT) systems have diversified due to the remarkable developments made by each manufacturer. This study aimed to optimize the reconstruction parameters of six state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems and compare their image quality of bone SPECT. SPECT images were acquired on SPECT/CT systems, including Symbia Intevo, Discovery NM/CT 670, Discovery NM/CT 870 CZT, Brightview XCT, and VERITON-CT. SIM² bone phantom with tough lung phantoms on both sides of the spinal inserts that simulate the thorax was used for image quality assessment. SPECT images were obtained at individual workstations using an ordered subset expectation maximization method with three-dimensional resolution recovery, as well as CT attenuation and scatter correction, subset 2, iteration 12-84, and a full width at half maximum 10-mm Gaussian smooth filter. An automatic image analysis software dedicated to SIM² bone phantom was used to assess the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), relative recovery coefficient, percentage of coefficient of variance, contrast, and detectability. The optimal parameters for each system were defined with superior detectability of spherical lesions and noise characteristics, as well as the highest CNR. All systems exhibited better image quality indexes using the optimal parameters than using the manufacturer's recommended parameters. The detectability of all systems was in agreement while using the optimal parameters. Detectability agreement can be achieved by optimizing the reconstruction parameters for different reconstruction algorithms, which can further improve the image quality. Therefore, future research should focus on optimal reconstruction parameters for SPECT alone.

Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom

Background

SwiftScan single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a recently released scanning technique with data acquired when the detector is stationary and when it moves from one view to the next. The influence of scan time for using SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the effect of the scan time for SwiftScan SPECT on the image quality and quantification of bone SPECT compared to step and shoot mode (SSM) using ^99mTc-filled anthropomorphic phantom (SIM² bone phantom).

Materials and methods

Phantom SPECT/computed tomography (CT) images were acquired using Discovery NM/CT 860 (GE Healthcare) with a low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator. We used the fixed parameters (subsets 10 and iterations 5) for reconstruction. The coefficient of variation (CV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), full width at half maximum (FWHM), and quantitative value of SwiftScan SPECT and SSM were compared at various acquisition times (5, 7, 17, and 32 min).

Results

In the short-time scan (< 7 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were better than those of SSM, whereas in the longtime scan (> 17 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were similar to those of SSM. The FWHMs for SwiftScan SPECT (13.6–14.8 mm) and SSM (13.5–14.4 mm) were similar. The mean absolute errors of quantitative values at 5, 7, 17, and 32 min were 38.8, 38.4, 48.8, and 48.1, respectively, for SwiftScan SPECT and 41.8, 40.8%, 47.2, and 49.8, respectively, for SSM.

Conclusions

SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT provides improved image quality in the short-time scan with quantification similar to or better than SSM. Therefore, in clinical settings, using SwiftScan SPECT instead of the SSM scan protocol in the short-time scan might provide higher-quality diagnostic images than SSM. Our results could provide vital information on the use of SwiftScan SPECT.

Evaluation of quantitative accuracy among different scatter corrections for quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging

Although scatter correction improves SPECT image contrast and thus image quality, the effects of quantitation accuracy under various conditions remain unclear. The present study aimed to empirically define the conditions for the optimal scatter correction of quantitative bone SPECT/CT images. Scatter correction was performed by applying dual and triple energy windows (DEW and TEW) with different sub-energy window widths, and effective scatter source estimation (ESSE) to CT-based scatter correction. Scattered radiation was corrected on images acquired using a triple line source (TLSP) phantom and an uniform cylinder phantom. The TLSP consisted of a line source containing 74.0 MBq of 99mTc in the middle, and a background component containing air, water or a K2HPO4 solution with a density equivalent to that of bone. The sum of all pixels in air, water and the K2HPO4 solution was measured on SPECT images. Scatter fraction (SF) and normalized mean square error (NMSE) based on counts from the air background as a reference were then calculated to assess quantitative errors due to scatter correction. The uniform cylinder phantom contained the same K2HPO4 solution and 222.0 MBq of 99mTc. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated from the count profile of this phantom to assess the uniformity of SPECT images across scatter correction under various conditions. Both SF and NMSE in SPECT images of phantoms containing water in the background were lower at a TEW sub-window of 3% (TEW3%), than in other scatter corrections, whereas those in K2HPO4 were lower at a DEW sub-window of 20% (DEW20%). Larger DEW and smaller TEW sub-energy windows allowed more effective correction. The CV of the uniform cylinder phantom, DEW20%, was inferior to all other tested scatter corrections. The quantitative accuracy of bone SPECT images substantially differed according to the method of scatter correction. The optimal scatter correction for quantitative bone SPECT was DEW20% (k = 1), but at the cost of slightly decreased image uniformity.