Prospective evaluation of CECT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in detection of hepatic metastases

PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis on 18F-FDG

Approximately 25% of those who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) as their illness advances. Despite major improvements in both diagnostic and treatment methods, the prognosis for patients with CRLM is still poor, with low survival rates. Accurate employment of imaging methods is critical in identifying the most effective treatment approach for CRLM. Different imaging modalities are used to evaluate CRLM, including positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Among the PET radiotracers, fluoro-18-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG), a glucose analog, is commonly used as the primary radiotracer in assessment of CRLM. As the importance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT continues to grow in assessment of CRLM, developing a comprehensive understanding of this subject becomes imperative for healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines. The primary aim of this article is to offer a simplified and comprehensive explanation of PET/CT in the evaluation of CRLM, with a deliberate effort to minimize the use of technical nuclear medicine terminology. This approach intends to provide various healthcare professionals and researchers with a thorough understanding of the subject matter.

The Role of 68Ga FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Liver Metastases in Different Types of Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We compared the diagnostic accuracies of 68Ga FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting liver metastases (LMs) in patients with different cancer types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 63 patients with liver lesions who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT between May 2020 and May 2022. Patients with histopathologically confirmed primary diagnoses, data that could be accessed retrospectively, liver lesions confirmed by biopsy over at least 3-6 months of follow-up (via ultrasonography, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, PET/CT, or laboratory tests) were included. Patients with secondary malignancies or primary liver malignancies, and/or who could not be followed-up, were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 63 total patients, 34 (54%) were female, and the mean age was 61 (30-92) years. There were 582 LMs in 51 patients and 35 benign liver lesions in 20 (12 patients had only benign and 8 both benign and malignant lesions). Of the 582 LMs, 472 (81.1%) evidenced 18F-FDG uptake and 572 (98.2%) 68Ga-FAPI uptake. The diagnostic accuracies of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 98% and 82%, respectively (p < 0.001; McNemar test). When the LMs were compared, the maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was significantly higher on 18F-FDG PET/CT than 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT (median: 6.0 vs. 5.4; p = 0.016). However, the LM-to-background ratio (TBR) was significantly higher on 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT than 18F-FDG PET/CT (median: 4.1 vs. 2.1; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

68Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected more LMs than did 18F-FDG PET/CT, and TBR was significantly higher on 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT than 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Is Prone Position [18F]FDG PET/CT Useful in Reducing Respiratory Motion Artifacts in Evaluating Hepatic Lesions?

Prone position is useful in reducing respiratory motion artifacts in lung nodules on 2-Deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). However, whether prone position PET/CT is useful in evaluating hepatic lesions is unknown. Thirty-five hepatic lesions from 20 consecutive patients were evaluated. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of both standard supine position PET/CT and additional prone position PET/CT were evaluated. No significant difference in SUVmax (4.41 ± 2.0 vs. 4.23 ± 1.83; p = 0.240) and MTV (5.83 ± 6.69 vs. 5.95 ± 6.24; p = 0.672) was observed between supine position PET/CT and prone position PET/CT. However, SUVmax changes in prone position PET/CT varied compared with those in supine position PET/CT (median, -4%; range: -30-71%). Prone position PET/CT was helpful when [18F]FDG uptake of the hepatic lesions was located outside the liver on supine position PET/CT (n = 4, SUVmax change: median 15%; range: 7-71%) and there was more severe blurring on supine position PET/CT (n = 6, SUVmax change: median 11%; range: -3-32%). Unlike in lung nodules, prone position PET/CT is not always useful in evaluating hepatic lesions, but it may be helpful in individual cases such as hepatic dome lesions.

Can PET/CT detect recurrence in post-operative colorectal carcinoma patients with elevated CEA level?

Background

PET is considered to be the most sensitive and specific modality for the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. This study is to assess the role of F18-FDG PET/CT in post-operative assessment in a patient with colorectal cancer with elevated CEA level to rule out local recurrence and/or metastasis and hence guiding the clinician to the proper management strategy.

Results

This study was performed on 45 patients who underwent surgical resection of the colon and/or rectal cancer; they were referred for PET/CT assessment at least 3 months after surgical resection. F18-FDG PET/CT sensitivity and specificity in detecting the recurrence and/or metastasis were 96.9 % and 83.3%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 94.2% while the negative predictive value was 90%.

Conclusion

For post-operative detection of loco-regional recurrence and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated CEA level, 18F-FDG PET/CT can be considered as an efficient diagnostic imaging tool due to its high sensitivity and specificity which extensively affect further management.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Liver Lesion-Initial Characterization

Incidental liver masses are commonly identified on imaging performed for other indications. Since the prevalence of benign focal liver lesions in adults is high, even in patients with primary malignancy, accurate characterization of incidentally detected lesions is of paramount clinical importance. This document reviews utilization of various imaging modalities for characterization of incidentally detected liver lesions, discussed in the context of several clinical scenarios. For each clinical scenario, a summary of current evidence supporting the use of a given diagnostic modality is reported. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Molecular Imaging and Therapy of Liver Tumors

Liver cancer is one of the top leading causes of mortality worldwide. Conventional imaging using contrast enhanced CT and MRI are currently the mainstay of oncologic imaging of the liver for the diagnosis and management of cancer. In the past two decades, especially since the advent of hybrid imaging in the form of PET/CT and SPECT/CT, molecular imaging has been increasingly utilized for oncologic imaging and the variety of radionuclide probes for imaging liver cancers have been expanding. Beyond the usual workhorse of FDG as an oncologic tracer, there is a growing body of evidence showing that radiolabeled choline tracers, C-11 acetate and other new novel tracers may have increasing roles to play for the imaging of liver tumors. On the therapy front, there have also been advances in recent times in terms of targeted therapies for both primary and secondary liver malignancies, particularly with transarterial radioembolization. The concept of theranostics can be applied to transarterial radioembolization by utilizing a pretreatment planning scan, such as Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy, coupled with post treatment imaging. Radiation dose planning by personalized dosimetric calculations to the liver tumors is also being advocated. This article explores the general trends in the field of nuclear medicine for the imaging and treatment of liver cancer above and beyond routine diagnosis and management.

FDG-PET/CT imaging findings of hepatic tumors and tumor-like lesions based on molecular background

The usefulness of whole-body 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is established for assessment of disease staging, detection of early disease recurrence, therapeutic evaluation, and predicting prognosis in various malignancies; and for evaluating the spread of inflammation. However, the role of FDG-PET/CT for the liver is limited because CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide an accurate diagnosis of most tumors. In addition, in other potentially useful roles there are several pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG uptake in PET/CT imaging. Accurate evaluation demands knowledge of the FDG uptake of each lesion, including potential negative and positive uptakes, and requires an understanding of the underlying background of the molecular mechanisms. The degree of FDG uptake is dependent on cellular metabolic rate and the expression of glucose transporter, hexokinase, and glucose-6-phosphatase, which in turn are closely affected by biological characteristics such as pathological category (e.g., adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell cancer, transitional cell cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, sarcoma, lymphoma), tumor differentiation, histological behavior (e.g., solid, cystic, mucinous), and intratumoral alterations (e.g., necrosis, degeneration, hemorrhage). Correlation with the CT and MRI findings, which also precisely depict the pathological findings, is important to avoid misdiagnosis.

Selection and clinical significance of individualized treatment for metastatic liver cancer

The liver is one of the most common target organs for metastasis of malignant tumors, with a metastasis rate of 11.1%. Approximately 40% of patients with malignant tumors will develop liver metastasis. Metastatic liver cancer not only exhibits individualized difference in the origin of primary tumor, tumor gene, and biological behavior, but also varies in the stage of progression, anatomic characteristics, organ function, and complications. In view of the different sources and pathways of metastatic tumors, the treatment of metastatic liver cancer involves two aspects: primary tumor and liver metastasis. How to choose surgery, local ablation, chemotherapy, molecular targeted drugs, endocrine therapy, biological and immune therapy, and radiotherapy as well as the treatment opportunity rationally is the key to the treatment of metastatic liver cancer. Advanced imaging techniques are used to determine the size, number, location, and blood supply of metastatic liver cancer, so as to provide an objective basis for making an accurate individualized treatment plan for metastatic liver cancer. At present, any single therapy for metastatic liver cancer has its own indications. If a metastatic liver tumor cannot be resected radically , the use of a single therapy is difficult to cure or control the progression of the tumor. In this case, it is necessary to combine two or more than two kinds of treatment methods to achieve the synergistic effect. According to the specific condition of patients with metastatic liver cancer, the individual characteristics of the patients should be analyzed by experienced clinicians to formulate an individualized treatment plan in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine, so as to make the patients benefit most from the plan, improve the quality of life, and prolong the survival time.

Surgical treatment of liver tumors - own experience and literature review

Despite advances, the treatment of focal liver lesions is still challenging. It requires the experience of a surgeon, improvement of existing and the development of new techniques. The aim of this article is to present a literature review and summarize our experience in liver surgery. Twenty-one patients with various liver tumors were treated in 2015 at the Department of Surgical Oncology of Bialystok Center for Oncology. Mostly patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma. Nine anatomical, 6 non-anatomical resections and 6 radiofrequency ablations were performed. Among 9 resections, 6 bisegmentectomies, resection of the 4b segment, and left-side and right-side hemihepatectomy were performed. Resections were associated only with minor postoperative complications. No perioperative mortality was noted. Preliminary outcomes of resections and radiofrequency ablations of liver lesions even in a low volume surgical center are promising and are associated with a relatively low rate of complications.

FDG PET/CT in the liver: lesions mimicking malignancies

PURPOSE

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is invaluable in managing liver lesions, in particular in the evaluation of suspected liver metastases. It is both sensitive and specific in detecting liver metastases from a wide range of primary cancers, and may change clinical management, most commonly by detecting additional lesions and decreasing the number of futile surgeries. However, some benign lesions may also show increased metabolic activity which can lead to false positive PET findings. We describe some of these lesions and their imaging characteristics that may help in differentiating them from malignant metastases.

METHODS

e reviewed all whole body FDG PET/CT studies performed over a 5-year period in our institution, and identified those with focal liver lesions showing increased FDG uptake for which histological results were available.

RESULTS

majority of lesions showing increased metabolic activity were due to malignant disease, such as metastases or primary liver tumours. However, we also found increased FDG uptake in non-neoplastic lesions such as Cryptococcosis, abscesses, and secondary inflammation from cholecystitis. Increased metabolic activity was also seen in some benign neoplasms such as hepatic adenomas and hemangioendotheliomas.

CONCLUSION

DG PET/CT is currently the most sensitive non-invasive imaging modality for the detection of hepatic metastases, particularly from the gastrointestinal tract. False positive results are rare, and have been described mainly in abscesses. However, other lesions can also show increased metabolic activity, and failure to differentiate these from metastases may result in inappropriate treatment.

The impact of PET/CT on the management of hepatic and extra hepatic metastases from gastrointestinal cancers

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detection and management of hepatic and extrahepatic metastases from gastrointestinal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2008 and July 2010, patients histopathologically diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer and showing suspected metastasis on CT screening were subsequently evaluated with PET/CT. All patients were subgrouped according to histopathological origin and localization of the primary tumor. Localization of gastrointestinal cancers was further specified as lower gastrointestinal system (GIS), upper GIS, or hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB). Both accuracy and impact of CT and PET/CT on patient management were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen patients diagnosed histopathologically with gastrointestinal cancers were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy-nine patients had adenocarcinoma and 34 patients other gastrointestinal tumors. Forty-one patients were in the upper GIS group, 30 patients in the HPB group, and 42 patients in the lower GIS group. Evaluation the diagnostic performance of PET/CT for suspected metastasis according to histopathological origin of the tumor, revealed that the sensitivity of PET/CT - although statistically not different - was higher in adenocarcinomas than in non-adenocarcinomas (90% (95% CI, 0.78-0.96) vs. 71.4% (95% CI, 0.45-0.88), P=0.86). The specificity was not significantly different (85.7% (95% CI, 0.70-0.93) vs. 85% (95% CI, 0.63-0.94), P=1.00). In the overall patient group; CT was significantly more sensitive than PET/CT for detection of hepatic metastases (94.7% vs. 78.9%, P=0.042), whereas PET/CT was significantly more specific than CT (48% vs. 98.7%, P<0.001). In subgroup analysis, sensitivity was not significantly different (P>0.05) but specificity was significantly higher in PET/CT than CT (P<0.05). The specificity of PET/CT was highest in upper GIS (100%) and HPB (100%) subgroups. In the overall patient group; for detection of extrahepatic metastasis, the sensitivity of CT (75%) and PET/CT (87.5%) showed no significant difference (P=0.437). However, PET/CT was significantly more specific than CT (88.7% vs. 70.4%, P=0.007). In subgroup analysis, no significant difference was found between CT and PET/CT either in sensitivity or in specificity (P>0.05). The specificity of PET/CT was highest in the lower GIS subgroup (93%). The management of 45 patients (39.8%) was revised after PET/CT evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT has a higher specificity than CT in detecting suspected hepatic and extrahepatic metastases of gastrointestinal cancers, and has an impact of nearly 40% on changing patient management strategies.

18F-FDG PET/CT Findings in Portal Vein Thrombosis and Liver Metastases

(18)F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable noninvasive tool in oncologic imaging, and its application in the diagnosis of liver metastases has been very convincing. Both the sensitivity and the specificity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT are high for detecting liver metastases from various tumors including colorectal, breast, and lung. Such liver metastases are typically (18)F-FDG-avid. We present atypical (18)F-FDG PET findings in a lung cancer patient with known liver metastases and PVT.

Multidetector computed tomography follow-up of hypoattenuating small liver lesions in patients with rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To study the behavior of hypoattenuating liver lesions, deemed too small to characterize at baseline scanning with multidetector computed tomography (CT), in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective review of locally advanced rectal cancer patients from a radiation oncology therapy database was conducted. Patients who presented before neoadjuvant chemoradiation without metastases at baseline CT and with follow-up scans for at least 1 year after therapy were evaluated. CT studies were reviewed for the presence and change in size of hypoattenuating liver lesions (<15 mm) at baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 616 consecutive patients from the radiotherapy database were reviewed. Of these, 70 patients with a total of 163 hepatic lesions met the selection criteria. The mean patient age was 62.4 years (range, 26-85 years). All patients subsequently underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The mean time of radiographic imaging from baseline CT to most recent surveillance CT was 3.3 years (range, 1.1-7.4 years). Two radiologists independently reviewed the CTs. The lesions were stable in 56 of 70 (80.0%, 95% confidence interval: 69%, 89%) patients. Of 163 lesions, 148 (90.8%) were stable, 8 (4.9%) regressed, and 7 (4.3%) progressed in size. No significant difference in results was found for patients stratified according to T-stage (P = 0.41) and N-stage (P > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

In patients with rectal cancer, majority of small hypoattenuating liver lesions remain stable and are treated as benign lesions, at multidetector CT follow-up of more than a year. Nevertheless, hepatic lesion stability during systemic therapy should still be interpreted with caution and closely followed for at least 1 year after completion of therapy.

Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue®-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis

PURPOSES

This study is aimed at evaluating diagnostic value of focal liver lesions (FLLs) with SonoVue(®)-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register were searched for English language articles published from January 2000 to May 2011. Histopathologic analysis and/or close clinical and imaging follow-up (except CECT or CEMRI) for at least 6 months were used as golden reference. Sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted to test heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In 21 included studies, for the SonoVue(®)-enhanced ultrasound studies, sensitivity was 88% (95% CI 87-90), specificity was 81% (95% CI 79-84), and 38.62 (95% CI 13.64-109.35) for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR); for the CECT studies, sensitivity was 90% (95% CI 88-92), specificity was 77% (95% CI 71-82), and 30.84 (95% CI 11.11-85.61) for DOR; for the CEMRI studies, sensitivity was 86% (95% CI 83-88), specificity was 81% (95% CI 76-85), and 27.63 (95% CI 11.28-67.70) for DOR.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison, SonoVue(®)-enhanced ultrasound had high pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity. SROC analysis showed the diagnostic value of FLLs with SonoVue(®)-enhanced ultrasound has no significant difference compared with CECT and CEMRI. SonoVue(®)-enhanced ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific in the characterization of FLLs to support an effective diagnostic method.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) was determined in patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) in a meta-analysis. Meta-Disc version 1.4 was used to describe and calculate sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). In the 25 included studies, the pooled estimate of CEUS studies for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 87% (95% CI 85-88), 89% (95% CI 87-91) and 78.84 (95% CI 29.40-211.40), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 86% (95% CI 84-88), 82% (95% CI 77-86) and 26.34 (95% CI 8.32-83.39), respectively, for the CECT studies. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 85% (95% CI 82-88), 87% (95% CI 83-91) and 48.37 (95% CI 15.87-147.45), respectively, for the CEMRI studies. SROC analysis indicated that the diagnostic value of CEUS for FLLs is not significantly different from that of CECT and CEMRI.