The clinical value of incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid foci detected on positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Breast Cancer Subtype Prediction Model Employing Artificial Neural Network and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography

Introduction

Although positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a common tool for measuring breast cancer (BC), subtypes are not automatically classified by it. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to use an artificial neural network (ANN) to evaluate the clinical subtypes of BC based on the value of the tumor marker.

Materials and Methods

In our nuclear medical facility, 122 BC patients (training and testing) had 18F-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT to identify the various subtypes of the disease. 18F-FDG-18 injections were administered to the patients before the scanning process. We carried out the scan according to protocol. Based on the tumor marker value, the ANN's output layer uses the Softmax function with cross-entropy loss to detect different subtypes of BC.

Results

With an accuracy of 95.77%, the result illustrates the ANN model for K-fold cross-validation. The mean values of specificity and sensitivity were 0.955 and 0.958, respectively. The area under the curve on average was 0.985.

Conclusion

Subtypes of BC may be categorized using the suggested approach. The PET/CT may be updated to diagnose BC subtypes using the appropriate tumor maker value when the suggested model is clinically implemented.

Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area

OBJECTIVES

Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape.

METHODS

In 60 patients with at least 1 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer or adenoma, a serial 3 min dynamic whole-body PET/computed tomography imaging was performed four times around 60 min after the administration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to create a conventional (early) image by summation. Delayed imaging was performed separately at 110 min after FDG administration. High focal uptake lesions in the colorectal area were visually assessed as "changed" or "unchanged" on serial dynamic imaging and early-delayed imaging, based on the alteration in uptake shape over time. These criteria on the images were used to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake.

RESULTS

In this study, 334 lesions with high focal FDG uptake were observed. Among 73 histologically proven pathological FDG uptakes, no change was observed in 69 on serial dynamic imaging and 72 on early-delayed imaging (sensitivity of 95 vs. 99%, respectively; ns). In contrast, out of 261 physiological FDG uptakes, a change in uptake shape was seen in 159 on dynamic PET imaging and 66 on early-delayed imaging (specificity of 61 vs. 25%, respectively; p < 0.01). High and similar negative predictive values for identifying pathological uptake were obtained by both methods (98 vs 99%, respectively). Thus, the overall accuracy for differentiating pathological from physiological FDG uptake based on change in uptake shape tended to be higher on serial dynamic imaging (68%) than on early-delayed imaging (41%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic whole-body FDG imaging enables differentiation of pathological uptake from physiological uptake based on the serial changes in uptake shape in the colorectal area. It may provide greater diagnostic value than early-delayed PET imaging. Thus, this technique holds a promise for minimizing the need for delayed imaging.

Clinical relevance of incidental focal breast uptake on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography studies: an experience in a high-load center of Spain

AIM

We aimed to determine the frequency and clinical significance of breast incidental uptake (BIU) detected through fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in a single, high-load center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed a total of 13 763 PET/CT studies performed from January 2017 to January 2020. After excluding 3148 scans, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and maximum diameter (cm) of each BIU were measured. Clinical management, ultrasound/mammography and pathology reports were analyzed.

RESULTS

We found BIU in 27 scans of 26 patients (0.3% of the studies). Mean age was 62.2 years and 88.5% were women; 84.6% underwent PET/CT for oncological indications. Ultrasound/mammography was consequently performed in 23 patients (88.5%), and histological correlations were available for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 4 and 5. Finally, lesions were benign in 14 patients (60.9%; two of them with low/intermediate risk of malignancy) and malignant in nine patients (39.1%). The remaining three patients had no ultrasound/mammography reports. Mean SUVmax of benign and malignant lesions were 2.6 ± 1.4 and 5.8 ± 3.5, respectively (P = 0.002). Considering a SUVmax cut-off value of 4.0, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign vs. malignant lesions were 67 and 93%, respectively. Benign lesions were smaller than malignant in CT (maximum diameter:1.3 ± 0.5 cm vs. 2.0 ± 1.0 cm, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although BIU detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT is infrequently found, the risk of malignancy remains very high (39.1%). Both SUVmax and maximum diameter were greater in malignant than in benign lesions. An exhaustive study with ultrasound/mammography and selective histopathological correlation is mandatory after BIU findings, even in small lesions.

Clinical impact of pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT staging of primary ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women

INTRODUCTION

To assess the clinical impact of preoperative fludeoxyglucose (FDG) with positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) in women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer with focus on consequences of added findings (AFs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

FDG-PET/CT was implemented as a standard imaging modality for women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer at our institution in 2008. After full implementation, all preoperative scans were reviewed and AFs were evaluated from January 2011 to December 2012. Decisions regarding further examination made at the first multidisciplinary team conference were recorded. Subsequent procedures were tracked via medical records, and the impact of AFs on additional examinations, delay, and change in treatment plans was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-four (21.1%) of 209 women presented with AFs. Further examination was performed in 35/44 (79.5%). Malignancy was identified in 15/35 (42.9%), revealing metastases from ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in 11, a synchronous primary cancer in 3, and recurrence of a previous cancer in 1 woman. The ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer metastases were localized in the lungs, uterus, colon, vagina, and breasts. The remaining 20 AFs revealed 2 benign lesions and 1 pre-malignant lesion, whereas no abnormality was found in 17. Further examination of AFs resulted in a significant time delay until treatment start of median 4 days (range 1-83 days, P < 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Further examinations of AFs by FDG-PET/CT delayed time to start of treatment by median 4 days in women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in a contemporary institution with fast-track access to additional diagnostics. The clinical implications of this must be balanced against the gain of detecting unrecognized malignancy in 15 of 209 women (7.2%).

Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to explore the role of the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database, from the earliest available date of indexing through April 30, 2018, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 8 studies (1451 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18 FDG PET/CT was 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.90) without heterogeneity (χ² = 10.84, p = 0.37) and a pooled specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.89) with heterogeneity (χ² = 130.1, p = 0.00). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.2 (95% CI 3.6-7.4) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.22). The pooled DOR was 32 (95% CI 20-51).

CONCLUSION

F-18 FDG PET/CT demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake. At present, the literature regarding the use of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake remains still limited; thus, further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake.

Incidental Findings on FDG PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer

Objective

18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging is common in head and neck cancer and often identifies incidental findings that necessitate additional patient evaluations. Our goal was to assess the frequency and nature of these incidental imaging findings on FDG-PET/CT.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary medical center.

Subjects and Methods

All patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone FDG-PET/CT imaging between January 2014 and June 2015 at our institution were evaluated for incidental findings.

Results

A total of 293 patients met criteria; more than one-third (n = 103) had at least 1 finding unrelated to their head and neck cancer, for a total of 134 incidental findings. Incidental findings within the head and neck (33.5% of all) excluding the thyroid were most common: 35% incidental findings were concerning for malignancy; of these, 25.5% were malignant with further workup. Recommendations were given by the head and neck radiologist on 72 (53.7%) findings: 74.5% of potentially malignant findings and 42.5% of benign findings had recommendations for follow-up. Significantly more patients with findings described as malignant were given recommendations for follow-up ( P = .0004).

Conclusion

Incidental findings on FDG-PET/CT are present in more than one-third of patients with head and neck cancer. More than one-third of incidental findings were concerning for malignancy. This study illustrates how the incidental findings discovered on FDG PET/CT frequently necessitate additional evaluations unrelated to the index head and neck cancer. The impact of these additional assessments on the cost and quality of health care warrants future evaluation.

Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The relevance of incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake is debatable. All patients who were referred for colonoscopy because of incidental colonic focal FDG uptake were included in this retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 PET/CT imaging characteristics were reviewed by a nuclear physician who was blinded to endoscopic and histopathological findings to determine the location of FDG uptake sites and to measure the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Endoscopic findings were categorized as malignant lesions (ML), high-risk polyps (HRP), low-risk polyps (LRP) or other non-neoplastic lesions (NNL).

RESULTS

 Seventy patients with 84 foci of FDG uptake were included. The proportions of true-positive (lesions found at colonoscopy at the same location) and false-positive (no lesion at colonoscopy) PET/CT findings were 65.5 % (n = 55) and 34.5 % (n = 29). Median SUVmax values did not differ between true-positive and false-positive findings ( P  = 0.27). Median MV30 values differed significantly between true-positive (5.5 cm ³ , [3.3 - 10.9 cm ³ ]) and false-positive (9.7 cm ³ , [5.2 - 40.8 cm ³ ]) findings ( P  = 0.015). Among the 55 true-positive FDG uptake sites, there were 14 (25.5 %) malignant lesions, 30 (54.5 %) HRP, 4 (7.3 %) LRP, and 7 (12.7 %) NNL. Median MV30 values differed significantly between advanced neoplasia (5.0 cm ³ , [2.9 - 9.7 cm ³ ]) and other endoscopic findings (9.4 cm ³ , [5.2 - 39.8 cm ³ ]) ( P  = 0.001); the AUROC was 0.71. By per-colonic segment analysis, the distribution of true-positive, false-negative, false-positive, and true-negative FDG PET/CT findings was as follows: 21.5 %, 14.2 %, 11.5 %, and 52.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Our study demonstrates that follow-up complete colonoscopy is mandatory in all patients with incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake.

The incidence of thyroid cancer in focal hypermetabolic thyroid lesions: an 18F-FDG PET/CT study in more than 6000 patients

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of incidental thyroid abnormalities discovered in fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) (FDG PET/CT) studies remains controversial. The aim of this large retrospective study was to (a) determine the prevalence of focal F-FDG thyroid uptake on whole-body F-FDG PET/CT studies carried out for nonthyroid cancers and (b) to test whether intense focal F-FDG thyroid uptake is associated with malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 11 921 F-FDG PET/CT studies in 6216 patients carried out at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014 were analyzed. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of these patients. Eight hundred and forty-five/6216 (13.6%) patients had a thyroid incidentaloma on the basis of the clinical F-FDG PET/CT report. One hundred and sixty/845 (18.9%) of these underwent ultrasound and 98 (61.3%) of these underwent a fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Twenty-six of these 98 (26.5%) patients underwent thyroidectomy. Thyroid lesion and background standardized uptake value (SUVs) for each patient were measured upon review of the F-FDG PET/CT study. We measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), thyroid to background TL/TBG, thyroid to bloodpool TL/BP and thyroid to liver TL/L ratios in benign and malignant lesions. Receiver operating curves were calculated to determine optimal cut-off values between malignant and benign lesions.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of the 98 patients who underwent FNA biopsy or thyroidectomy had malignant disease (21.4%). Malignant lesions had significantly higher thyroid lesion SUVmax, TL/TBG, TL/BP, and TL/L than benign nodules. The receiver operating curves derived cut-off ratio TL/TBG of more than 2.0 differentiated benign from malignant lesions best with a specificity and sensitivity of 0.76 and 0.88, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of malignancy in biopsied focal hypermetabolic thyroid lesions is 21.4%. Lesions on F-FDG PET/CT studies, with a ratio TL/TBG more than 2.0, warrant further work-up with ultrasound and FNA to exclude malignancy.

Incidental head and neck findings on 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

The overlapping risk factors for lung and head and neck cancer present a definite risk of synchronous malignant pathology. This is the first study to specifically review incidental positron emission tomography computed tomography findings in the head and neck region in lung carcinoma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all lung cancer patients who underwent positron emission tomography computed tomography imaging over a five-year period (January 2008 - December 2012), identified from the Liverpool thoracic multidisciplinary team database.

RESULTS

Six hundred and nine patients underwent positron emission tomography computed tomography imaging over this period. In 76 (12.5 per cent) scans, incidental regions of avid 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose uptake were reported in the head and neck region. In the 28 patients who were fully investigated, there were 4 incidental findings of malignancy.

CONCLUSION

In lung cancer patients undergoing investigative positron emission tomography computed tomography scanning, a significant number will also present with areas of clinically significant 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose uptake in the head and neck region. Of these, at least 5 per cent may have an undiagnosed malignancy.

Multicentre study of 18F-FDG-PET/CT prostate incidental uptake

AIM

The purpose of our study was to establish the prevalence and pathological nature of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) prostate incidental uptake (PIU) among patients studied for non-prostate-malignant purposes in three nuclear medicine centres.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 20,422 scans performed on male patients; all patients underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT for purposes not related to prostate disease.

RESULTS

Among 20,422 patients PIU was identified for 280 (1.4 %) with an average age of 70 ± 10.7 years. Sixty-three of the 280 patients with PIU (22.5 %) underwent PSA dosage and biopsy to determine the nature of the incidental uptake. Thirty-five of the 63 (55.5 %) PIU were malignant whereas 28/63 (44.5 %) were benign. The average value of PSA for patients with benign PIU was 3.7 ± 2.8 ng/ml whereas it was 7.8 ± 8.2 ng/ml in patients with malignant PIU; this difference was statistically significant. For malignant lesions, the average lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio was 2.9 ± 2.5 and the average lesion-to-blood-pool SUVmax ratio was 3.7 ± 2.5. For benign lesions, the average lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio was 2.5 ± 1.7 and the average lesion-to-blood-pool SUVmax ratio was 3.5 ± 2.4; there was no statistically significant difference between lesion-to-liver and lesion-to-blood-pool SUVmax ratios for benign and malignant lesions.

CONCLUSION

Because PIU values are indicative of malignancy for a substantial percentage of patients, further investigation is required.

Subdiaphragmatic gallstone mimicking hepatic malignancy on FDG PET/CT

A 70-year-old man underwent an FDG PET/CT for a possible primary liver malignancy or metastasis found on an abdominal MRI obtained as part of a workup for intermittent abdominal pain. The MRI showed an enhancing lesion at the dome of the right lobe of the liver. The lesion was FDG avid with a discrete central calcification. In conjunction with the patient's history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy 1 year prior, the findings were consistent with inflammation around a migrated subdiaphragmatic gallstone. One month after the scan, a CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of this lesion revealed chronic inflammatory cells with no evidence of malignancy.

Incidental uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the prostate gland. Systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and risk of malignancy

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data on the prevalence and risk of malignancy of prostatic incidental uptake (PIU) detected by fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT).

PATIENTS, MATERIAL, METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of studies published up to February 2014 was performed. Pooled prevalence and malignancy risk of PIU were calculated on a per patient-based analysis including 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Furthermore, we assessed some parameters as potential predictors of malignant PIU.

RESULTS

Six studies including 47925 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT were selected. Pooled prevalence of PIU was 1.8% (95%CI: 1.3-2.3%). Overall, 444 patients with PIU were further evaluated and 121 underwent biopsy. The pooled risk of malignancy in patients with PIU further evaluated or verified by biopsy were 17% (95%CI: 12-23%) and 62% (95%CI: 54-71%), respectively. A higher mean age was observed in the group of malignant PIUs compared to benign PIUs. There was a trend towards a higher mean SUV(max) in the group of malignant PIUs but without a statistically significant difference compared to benign PIUs. Peripheric site of PIU but not presence or absence of calcification was a predictor of malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

PIU is observed in about 1.8% of 18F-FDG PET/CT scans performed in male patients carrying a significant risk of malignancy. Therefore, whenever a PIU is detected further investigation is warranted to exclude malignancy, in particular when PIU is located in the peripheric site of prostate gland.

Prevalence and malignancy risk of focal colorectal incidental uptake detected by (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT: a meta-analysis

Background

The aim of the study was to meta-analyze published data about prevalence and malignancy risk of focal colorectal incidentalomas (FCIs) detected by Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT).

Methods

A comprehensive computer literature search of studies published through July 31^st 2012 regarding FCIs detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT was performed. Pooled prevalence of patients with FCIs and risk of malignant or premalignant FCIs after colonoscopy or histopathology verification were calculated. Furthermore, separate calculations for geographic areas were performed. Finally, average standardized uptake values (SUV) in malignant, premalignant and benign FCIs were reported.

Results

Thirty-two studies comprising 89,061 patients evaluated by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT were included. The pooled prevalence of FCIs detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.6–4.7%). Overall, 1,044 FCIs detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT underwent colonoscopy or histopathology evaluation. Pooled risk of malignant or premalignant lesions was 68% (95% CI: 60–75%). Risk of malignant and premalignant FCIs in Asia-Oceania was lower compared to that of Europe and America. A significant overlap in average SUV was found between malignant, premalignant and benign FCIs.

Conclusions

FCIs are observed in a not negligible number of patients who undergo ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT studies with a high risk of malignant or premalignant lesions. SUV is not reliable as a tool to differentiate between malignant, premalignant and benign FCIs. Further investigation is warranted whenever FCIs are detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT.

The Proportion of Malignancy in Incidental Thyroid Lesions on 18-FDG PET Study

Objective

To evaluate through a systematic review and meta-analysis the malignancy rates of thyroid incidentalomas identified in adults by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, computed tomography (18-FDG PET-CT) imaging studies.

Data Sources

The literature search was conducted using OVID Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Pubmed, and reference list review (inception to April 2013) by 2 independent review authors.

Review Methods

Studies with adults undergoing 18-FDG PET scan identifying a thyroid incidentaloma with definitive histological or cytological results reported were included.

Results

Thirty-one studies with a total of 197,296 PET studies and 3659 focal thyroid incidentalomas were identified with 1341 having definitive cytopathology or histopathology. The pooled proportion of malignancy was calculated as 19.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3%-24.7%) with 15.4% (95% CI, 11.4%-20.0%) of the total cases being papillary thyroid cancer. Distant metastases represented 1.1% (95% CI, 0.6%-1.8%) of the total cases.

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the incidence of malignancy is high in thyroid incidentalomas identified through 18-FDG PET imaging studies. Thyroid incidentalomas identified through 18-FDG PET require thorough investigation.

Frequency and clinical implications of incidental new primary cancers detected on true whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of additional primary malignancies in patients undergoing staging/restaging with PET/computed tomography (CT) and to determine the frequency with which these unsuspected findings change clinical management.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 556 patients who had undergone a total of 804 PET/CTs for staging/restaging. Lesions that were at an atypical location for a metastasis from the primary malignancy (indication for the study) and had a maximum standardized uptake value greater than 2.5 were considered suspicious. Suspicious lesions were followed up by a combination of clinical examination, biopsy, and additional and/or follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

Forty-three (7.7%) patients had lesions that were suspicious for a newly discovered primary malignancy that was different from the known/suspected malignancy (indication for study). Eight (1.4% of 556) of these patients had biopsy confirmation of an additional synchronous or metachronous primary malignancy. However, these suspicious lesions changed the clinical management for 18 (3.2% of 556) patients. Patients with early-stage disease (stages 1 and 2) based on the malignancy for which the study was conducted were three times more likely to have these suspicious lesions biopsied, evaluated by clinical examination or by additional immediate imaging than were patients with advanced-stage disease (stages 3 and 4); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.08).

CONCLUSION

Unsuspected additional primary malignancies are rarely identified in patients undergoing staging/restaging with PET/CT but have the potential to significantly impact clinical management.

Value of true whole-body FDG-PET/CT scanning protocol in oncology: optimization of its use based on primary diagnosis

BACKGROUND

No standardized field of view (FOV) currently exists for whole-body (WB) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Limited WB PET/CT FOV can exclude portions of the head, upper, and lower extremities, because there is little perceived clinical benefit to be gained from imaging these areas.

PURPOSE

To determine how often utilizing WB PET/CT changes the clinical stage and management compared to each of the limited WB FOVs used for PET/CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 556 oncologic patients (804 PET/CT studies) who underwent staging or restaging PET/CT between November 2010 and November 2011. Abnormal hypermetabolic areas that were suspicious for malignancy in areas that are outside of some of the limited fields of view including in the brain, scalp, and calvarium (above the orbital ridge), in the proximal upper extremity (distal to the humeral neck), distal upper extremity (beyond the elbow), proximal lower extremity (distal to the lesser trochanter), and distal lower extremity (beyond the knees) were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 8.5% (47/556) of patients had abnormal findings outside the most limited FOV (skull base to upper thighs) used in PET/CT. More patients had abnormal hypermetabolic lesions in the lower extremity (5.9%) than in the upper extremity (2.3%). Similarly, more patients had abnormal lesions in the proximal (6.5%) compared to the distal (1.4%) upper and lower extremities. The stage was only changed in one patient (0.2%), however new lesions noted in the brain changed management in six patients (1.1%). Melanoma, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, sarcomas and stage IV lung, breast, prostate, bladder, testicular, and renal cancer were more likely to have findings outside the most limited FOV (skull base to upper thighs).

CONCLUSION

WB FOV detects additional sites of disease compared to the limited WB FOV, and although these lesions rarely change stage, some of these lesions may change clinical management.

[Effectivity and clinical impact of (18)F-FDG-PET in the diagnosis of unsuspected second primary tumors]

OBJECTIVE

This study has aimed to determine the capacity and clinical impact of the (18)F-FDG-PET to detect previously unsuspected second primary tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 1984 consecutive scans performed between March 2004 and March 2005, identifying those studies that had reported the presence of hypermetabolic lesions, that had not been previously suspected or detected and that could be suggestive of second primary tumors. Diagnosis was made histopathologically or by clinical and radiological follow-up for a period exceeding one year.

RESULTS

62 findings suggestive of second primary tumors were detected in 58 patients (3.1%). The reasons for the study for this group of patients were diverse, the most common being the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. A total of 43.5% of lesions were not followed-up. We confirmed the existence of 35 lesions, either by pathology study (21 lesions, 13 second primary tumors, the incidence in our population was 0.65%) or clinical and radiological follow-up (14 lesions, none of which corresponded to second primary tumors). The total clinical impact was the discovery of unexpected 14 lesions in 12 patients.

CONCLUSION

The presence of second primary tumors on (18)F-FDG-PET is relatively common. These lesions should be monitored clinically for accurate diagnosis. In a high percentage, they correspond to unexpected second primary tumors in an early stage and therefore amenable to curative treatment or for which tumor treatment planning may be modified.

Analysis of incidental focal hypermetabolic uptake in the breast as detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

With the widespread use of PET/CT, incidental hypermetabolic foci unrelated to the known malignancy have been described with increasing frequency.

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and clinical significance of incidental focal hypermetabolic uptake in the breast as detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT, and to explore factors differentiating benign and malignant breast uptake.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2005 to June 2010, a total of 51,971 whole-body FDG PET/CT examinations were performed in our clinic. After excluding 7254 sets of PET/CT data from patients known to have breast cancer, we retrospectively identified patients showing incidental focal hypermetabolic activity in the breast. Of 44,717 PET/CT examinations conducted on 32,988 patients, we identified 131 patients with no previous known or suspected benign and malignant breast disease. The etiology, mean SUV(max), and diameter of breast lesions were assessed. We also compared the presentation of the lesions on CT, mammography, and ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Of the 131 patients, 60 were histologically diagnosed with breast lesions, including 32 with malignant and 28 with benign lesions. An additional 11 patients were followed-up for more than 2 years and were clinically considered to have benign lesions. The remaining 60 patients who had neither histologic confirmation nor followed-up for more than 2 years were excluded. Therefore, 71 patients were finally included. The mean SUV(max) of 39 benign lesions and 32 malignant lesions were 2.02 ± 1.52 and 3.71 ± 3.83, respectively (P = 0.0001). At a cut-off value of 2.3, the rate of malignancy and specificity of the mean SUVmax for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions were 61.3%, 76.3, respectively. The CT data from PET/CT revealed that the mean diameters of benign and malignant lesions were 1.19 ± 0.97 cm and 2.26 ± 1.96 cm, respectively (P = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the breast as detected by PET/CT was indicative of malignancy in 45% of patients. Both mean SUV(max) and diameter were greater for malignant than benign lesions.

Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature

AIM

The aims of the present study were: (i) to evaluate the focal incidental colorectal uptake of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) and to correlate it with colonoscopy and histological findings; (ii) to evaluate the relationship between the presence/absence of neoplastic disease and clinical data and the anatomical site of [(18)F]FDG uptake; and (iii) to compare our results with those reported for incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG in the literature and those obtained from various screening programmes for colorectal cancer.

METHOD

The database of 6000 patients referred for [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) to our centre was retrospectively reviewed for incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG. Patients with focal uptake were selected and the aetiology of PET findings was verified with a subsequent colonoscopy and histopathological analysis when available.

RESULTS

Incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG was seen in 144 (2.4%) patients, of whom 64 (1.1%) had focal uptake; 48 out of these 64 patients underwent colonoscopy, which showed malignant tumours in 12 (25%), premalignant lesions in 19 (40%), non-neoplastic lesions in six (12%) and lesions not confirmed by colonoscopy in 11 (23%). Our data agreed with previously published data. Statistical analysis did not show any significant relationship between the presence/absence of neoplastic disease and patient sex or age, type of primary disease and anatomical site of [(18)F]FDG uptake. Comparing our data with various screening programmes, a significant difference was found only with series in which colonoscopy was performed in patients at high risk for colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Focal incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG is observed in about 1% of PET/CT studies and carries a high risk of neoplastic disease. A PET-CT report should suggest colonoscopy when abnormal findings are reported.

Acute portal vein thrombosis: an important mimic of malignancy on FDG PET/CT

The authors report a case of portal vein thrombosis, with no underlying malignant cause identified, which was initially detected by fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG PET/CT) and subsequently confirmed by both contrast enhanced CT and MRI. The multimodality imaging findings are outlined, the potential clinical implications discussed and note made of the possible FDG PET/CT mimics of this disorder.

Incidental pelvic lesions in the oncology patient

The identification of an incidental (i.e. unexpected and asymptomatic) lesion can create a dilemma for the clinician and radiologist. The incidental abnormality may represent metastatic disease, a second primary malignancy or a benign lesion. The diagnosis and management of such incidental findings will depend in part on the clinical setting, the pathology and stage of underlying primary malignancy and the imaging features of the incidental abnormality. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of incidental pelvic lesions in the oncology patient.

Incidental Focal (18)F-FDG Uptake in the Prostate: Clinical Significance and Differential Diagnostic Criteria

PURPOSE

The extent and intensity of (18)F-FDG uptake in prostate cancer patients are known to be variable, and the clinical significance of focal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake that is incidentally found on positron emission tomography (PET) has not been established. We investigated the clinical significance of incidental focal prostate uptake of (18)F-FDG on PET/computed tomography (CT) and analyzed differential findings on PET/CT between malignant and benign uptake.

METHODS

A total of 14,854 whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans (4,806 that were conducted during cancer screening and 10,048 that were conducted to evaluate suspected or alleged cancer outside of the prostate) were retrospectively reviewed to determine the presence, location, multiplicity and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of focal prostate uptake and combined calcification. The final diagnosis determined by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and biopsy was compared with PET findings.

RESULTS

Incidental focal prostate uptake was observed in 148 of 14,854 scans (1.0 %). Sixty-seven of these 148 subjects who had diagnostic confirmation were selected for further analysis. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in nine of 67 subjects (13.4%). The remaining 58 subjects had no malignancy in the prostate based on normal serum PSA level (n = 53), or elevated serum PSA level with a negative biopsy result (n = 5). While 84.6% (11/13) of malignant uptake was peripherally located in the prostate glands, 60.2% (50/83) of benign uptake was centrally located (p < 0.05). The positive predictive value of peripheral focal uptake for malignancy was 25%. The SUVmax, multiplicity and combined calcification were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although incidental focal (18)F-FDG uptake in the prostate is not common, the incidence of cancer with focal uptake is not low. Therefore, these findings deserve further evaluation. The location of the focal prostate uptake may help with the selection of high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Clinical relevance of incidental finding of focal uptakes in the colon during 18F-FDG PET/CT studies in oncology patients without known colorectal carcinoma and evaluation of the impact on management

AIMS

To assess the significance and the impact of focal FDG uptake in the colon in oncology patients without known colorectal carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken on 2,220 (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies carried out consecutively in the Nuclear Medicine Department in our hospital from 2 December 2008 to 31 May 2010. Inclusion criteria were patients with abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake in colorectal area that could not be explained (or not previously known) by their clinical histories. Patients previously diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma were excluded. A total of 86 patients (57 male, average age 63.4, range 46-85) were finally included. Colonoscopy with biopsy was established as a reference test. The impact of these findings on the diagnostic-therapeutic management in these patients was evaluated.

RESULTS

A colonoscopy was performed in 54 of the 86 patients, this examination not having been done up-to-date in the remaining 32 patients. Biopsy was obtained in 43 lesions of the 54 patient in whom a colonoscopy was performed. Colon disease was detected in 49 of these 54 patients, obtaining 54 FDG incidental foci which corresponded to 10 previously unsuspected primary colorectal carcinoma, 3 metastases, 27 adenomatous polyps with different degrees of dysplasia and 14 inflammatory processes. In the remaining 5 patients, the colonoscopy was normal. PET/CT modified the diagnostic and treatment management in most of the patients (49/54, that is 91%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the need to determine the cause of abnormal (18)F-FDG colorectal uptakes in the PET/CT studies by using colonoscopy and biopsy. This approach allows for the detection and early treatment of malignant and premalignant lesions.

Physiology and pathophysiology of incidental findings detected on FDG-PET scintigraphy

A routine feature of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is whole-body acquisition that results in many unexpected findings identified outside of the primary region of abnormality. Furthermore, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is a marker of glycolysis and does not specifically accumulate in malignancy. Understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of normal FDG distribution and common incidental findings is therefore essential to the physician interpreting whole-body FDG-PET/CT studies. Whereas many incidental findings are benign and of limited clinical significance, others represent uncommon manifestations of the primary malignancy, second malignancies, or various clinically significant pathologic processes. Patients with a single malignancy are at greater risk of developing synchronous or metachronous second malignancies, possibly related to exposure to shared carcinogenic agents or presence of prooncogenic mutations. The decision of how to pursue an intervention on the basis of an incidental finding is generally left to clinical judgment.