Validation for performing 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET studies on the same day

Differentiation between Treatment-Induced Necrosis and Recurrent Tumors in Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparison among 11C-Methionine-PET, FDG-PET, MR Permeability Imaging, and MRI-ADC-Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In patients with metastatic brain tumors after gamma knife radiosurgery, the superiority of PET using ¹¹C-methionine for differentiating radiation necrosis and recurrent tumors has been accepted. To evaluate the feasibility of MR permeability imaging, it was compared with PET using ¹¹C-methionine, FDG-PET, and DWI for differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study analyzed 18 lesions from 15 patients with metastatic brain tumors who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Ten lesions were identified as recurrent tumors by an operation. In MR permeability imaging, the transfer constant between intra- and extravascular extracellular spaces (/minute), extravascular extracellular space, the transfer constant from the extravascular extracellular space to plasma (/minute), the initial area under the signal intensity-time curve, contrast-enhancement ratio, bolus arrival time (seconds), maximum slope of increase (millimole/second), and fractional plasma volume were calculated. ADC was also acquired. On both PET using ¹¹C-methionine and FDG-PET, the ratio of the maximum standard uptake value of the lesion divided by the maximum standard uptake value of the symmetric site in the contralateral cerebral hemisphere was measured (¹¹C-methionine ratio and FDG ratio, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors was the best for the ¹¹C-methionine ratio (0.90) followed by the contrast-enhancement ratio (0.81), maximum slope of increase (millimole/second) (0.80), the initial area under the signal intensity-time curve (0.78), fractional plasma volume (0.76), bolus arrival time (seconds) (0.76), the transfer constant between intra- and extravascular extracellular spaces (/minute) (0.74), extravascular extracellular space (0.68), minimum ADC (0.60), the transfer constant from the extravascular extracellular space to plasma (/minute) (0.55), and the FDG-ratio (0.53). A significant difference in the ¹¹C-methionine ratio (P < .01), contrast-enhancement ratio (P < .01), maximum slope of increase (millimole/second) (P < .05), and the initial area under the signal intensity-time curve (P < .05) was evident between radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that PET using ¹¹C-methionine may be superior to MR permeability imaging, ADC, and FDG-PET for differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors after gamma knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors.

Dynamic contrast enhanced CT aiding gross tumor volume delineation of liver tumors: an interobserver variability study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the application of perfusion CT for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for radiotherapy of intrahepatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

15 radiotherapy patients with confirmed liver tumors underwent contrast enhanced 4D-CT (Philips Brilliance Big-bore) as well as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) CT (GE 750HD). Perfusion maps were generated with CT perfusion v5 from GE. Five observers delineated GTVs of all intrahepatic foci on the 4D-CT, time-averaged DCE-CT and perfusion CT for every patient. STAPLE consensus contours were generated. Dice's coefficients were compared between GTVs generated by observers on each image set and the corresponding consensus GTVs. Comparisons were also performed with patients stratified by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastatic tumors, and by tumor volume.

RESULTS

Overall, mean Dice's coefficients were 0.81±0.14, 0.84±0.10, and 0.81±0.14 for 4D-CT, DCECT and perfusion. DCE-CT performed significantly better than 4D-CT and perfusion (p=0.005 and p=0.01 respectively). For patients with HCC, DCE-CT reduced interobserver variability significantly compared to 4D-CT (Dice's coefficients 0.87 vs. 0.84, p<0.05). For patients with metastatic disease time-averaged DCE-CT images decreased variability compared to 4D-CT (Dice's coefficient 0.81 vs. 0.76, p<0.05), especially true for tumors<100cc. The smaller tumors results are important to be included here.

CONCLUSIONS

DCE-CT imaging of liver perfusion reduced interobserver variability in GTV delineation for both HCC and metastatic liver tumors.